On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Michael Lauer wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> > Well, I'm not sure how much breakage would be, but it's certainly not up
> > to James alone: Gtk+ 1.4 is sure to break code anyway. As PyGTK is still
> > young, I think there is still hope to fix thos
Michael Lauer writes:
> > On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> > Well, I'm not sure how much breakage would be, but it's certainly not up
> > to James alone: Gtk+ 1.4 is sure to break code anyway. As PyGTK is still
> > young, I think there is still hope to fix those things...
>
Moshe Zadka writes:
> Well, I'm not sure how much breakage would be, but it's certainly not up
> to James alone: Gtk+ 1.4 is sure to break code anyway. As PyGTK is still
> young, I think there is still hope to fix those things...
Frankly, I have no idea how real Gtk+ 1.4 is. I've seen refe
On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Michael Lauer wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
I wrote that, not Fred. Please try to attribute correctly
> > Well, I'm not sure how much breakage would be, but it's certainly not up
> > to James alone: Gtk+ 1.4 is sure to break code anyway. As PyGTK
Wow - It's now getting really far from my original question...
(by the way, really no one with experience with both the QT/KDE
and the GDK/GNOME bindings to compare and comment ?), however:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> Well, I'm not sure how much breakage would be, but it's
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> Moshe Zadka writes:
> > As long as you're breaking things anyway, let me suggest one change:
> > have the "Gtk" prefix stripped from the classes' names (GtkText -> Text,
> > etc) and recommend that Gtk is imported via
> [...]
>
> I think (but
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, James Henstridge wrote:
> You can currently do:
> import gtk
> gtk.GtkText()
That's what I do, currently . However, I feel to be saying the same
thing twice, which bothers me on a moral level.
> I am more in favour of keeping the Gtk prefix, as this seems to be common
>
