On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Jon Nelson wrote:
> as bad karma as it might be to reply to one's self, I could supplement
> my supplied patch with the anti-show, the 'hide', if requested.
Yes, you might be deallocated if you do that:
http://www.bedope.com/stories/0116.html
I haven't been doing much pygt
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Aaron Optimizer Digulla wrote:
> I, for example, cannot use gnome but I use pygtk. Therefore,
> I depend on an independend pygtk package (a .tar.gz to be precise).
> The reason for this is: I'm developing in a tight/secure environment
> and I must restrict myself to the small
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, James Henstridge wrote:
> > This presumes I'm using a gnome-based system, which I'm not. I've heard
> > three people complaining that Glade can't open /dev/dsp. This is insane.
>
> Well, it would be gnome that is using esound, so I thought that was a
> fairly valid asumption
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, James Henstridge wrote:
> If you don't have esound installed on your system when compiling
> gnome, it won't use it. If it was installed and you don't want gnome
> to use it, start the control center and go to the sound properties
> capplet and uncheck the "enable sound serv
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Niklas Saers Mailinglistaccount wrote:
> > Actually, I was seriously considering making a null library (that
> > has all the right calls but no code). Call it "equiet" and ln -s it
> > to the esound locations.:)
>
> Ok, so bottom line is that this is something which should b
On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Arkaitz wrote:
> I suspect this are caused by GNOME starting esd as you suggested. Does
> anyone know how to disable the sound support in GNOME?
Actually, I was seriously considering making a null library (that has all
the right calls but no code). Call it "equiet" and ln -s
This is a stupid gnome dependency on ethe esound libraries. Which is dumb
really. I don't want my GUI builders making noise. Ever. I have now, in
order to get it to work at all, recompiled my version of glade and
gnome-python to be gtk+ only.
I will be changing my tutorial to give info on the gtk
I recompiled all the gnome libraries today...in order. (see
http://www.baypiggies.org/10mintig.html for what I was recommending)
Recompiled libglade, glade, gnome-python.
Tried a gtk example:
$ python glade.py
*** You should really think about switching over to libglade
Segmentation fault
bash-
On Sat, 29 Apr 2000, Clint Hepner wrote:
> Hi, I just subscribed to this list. I saw in the archives
> that someone may have ported the GTK tutorial from www.gtk.org
> to Python, but I haven't been able to track it down anywhere.
There's links from my page on this:
http://www.baypiggies.org/10m
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Michael Lauer wrote:
> * * * HAPPY BIRTHDAY JAMES! * * *
>
> And many thanks for the great amount
> of work you do for the open source community!
Wow, I hadn't known (just caught up with Advogato). James, please don't
let the Lego Mindstorms distract you from too much for t
On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, Michael Lauer wrote:
> While we're at the subject - since the BeOS Gtk port
> seems to be evolving and Python already runs on
> BeOS - anyone which is involved in porting pygtk to
> BeOS ?
No, but it would be interesting. I'm currently working on a MacOS Gtk+
port. I'm still
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Moshe Zadka wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Michael Lauer wrote:
>
> > Hmm - I thought that especially the hand crafted stuff
> > do the most work in hiding the naturally not object oriented
> > nature of the native GTK language - C.
One wonders what you think that the first
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, Baruch Even wrote:
> I've installed it before from a redhat RPM, I now tried to reinstall it
> (gnome-python/pygtk) from the original package, as far as I can see
> glade has gnome support and so does libglade (how can I verify it for
> sure? they came from rpms).
You can be
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Baruch Even wrote:
> I want to use Glade to develop the UI of my app and intend to write
> the app in python and ofcourse write it Gnomishly.
Cool!
> I found that pyGlade doesn't support Gnome objects, I would like to
> know if there is a version/patch that adds support to
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Hassan Aurag wrote:
> For example, what's wrong with the following:
You're using the MDI interface, the lamest interface known to mankind.
:)
Seriously, I don't know what the problem is, but I want to register my
disparagement of this human interface abomination.
--
_De
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Michael Coddington wrote:
> I'm trying to pick up Python and GNOME development at the same time.
> Obviously PyGnome is the way to go. However, in attempting to try out
> some simple apps, I keep getting:
>
> Unknown widget class "GnomeApp'
The code looks right -- it must
On 15 Nov 1999, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Does Mailman allow normal, non-web-based subscription to its lists?
> To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes. It just doesn't advertise it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a body of subscribe works fine.
--
_Deirdre * http://www.linux
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, James Henstridge wrote:
> If you have a reference to the toplevel, you can just call its destroy()
> method. This will remove it from screen and destroy it. Any references
> to the widget you still have will still be valid, as GtkWidgets are
> reference counted objects. Of
1) I'm having difficulty figuring out what to do in a button callback
so that the parent dialog is deleted (note, I don't want to *quit*,
just delete that one window). I know which window it is, so I'm not
worried about knowing that.
2) I'm using libglade and have set it up so that my wi
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Eron Lloyd wrote:
> program I personally think will be highly beneficial, both to me and the
> open-source community - a GUI frontend to the Zope (www.zope.org)
> publishing system. I'm building a product in Zope, and besides wanting
> to learn it's internals, need a tool such
On 1 Nov 1999, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Deirdre Saoirse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > <#include rant on C code not being able to have abstract \
> > non-instantiable classes>
>
> But we're using Python, aren't we? :-)
Yes, but the C underlayme
On 1 Nov 1999, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Is there an explanation why this trivial program doesn't work?
>
> #!/usr/bin/python
>
> import gtk
>
> w = gtk.GtkWindow()
> vbox = gtk.GtkVBox()
> vbox.add(gtk.GtkRuler()) # Error here!
Educated guess after doing lots of C
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, James Henstridge wrote:
> The GnomeApp is a composite widget, which already has something packed
> inside it (hence the warning). You should use the set_contents method of
> the GnomeApp instead to set what apears between the menubar and statusbar.
> This is just one of the
I'm still something of a neophyte to Gtk programming and it's a different
GUI paradigm than I'm used to. I've done a fair amount of Gtk proramming
in C lately (grr), but there's still a lot of holes.
So, here's a snippet:
self.win = GnomeApp('bidmeister_base', 'BidMeister')
self.win.set_wmcl
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can anybody else reproduce this bug? Any pointers or suggestions to
> eliminate it? Any help would be greatly appreciated as this has largely
> killed the project for the time being.
I can verify that it does not happen on a LinuxPPC (PowerPC) machi
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Kim Friesen wrote:
> I am attempting to learn python and I was wondering if anyone is using
> libglade/Glade to create their UI.
I found glade to be THE least intuitive GUI builder I'd ever seen. Mind
you, I've used bunches on several platforms and it, imho, sucks.
> Is it
On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, J.W. Bizzaro wrote:
> Deirdre Saoirse wrote:
> >
> > I'm having to write something that will also run on Windows. I probably
> > need some windows-using python people (who knit!) to make that part work
> > OK. But how would you suggest doing
On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> I wouldn't. ;-)
Neither would I, however most of my prospective coders are indeed on
Windows.
> Seriously, I don't know enough about how Python finds things on
> Windows to say; what happens / is supposed to happen if the "script"
> the user
But I thought of this later.
I'm having to write something that will also run on Windows. I probably
need some windows-using python people (who knit!) to make that part work
OK. But how would you suggest doing it on Windows?
On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
>
&
> Deirdre Saoirse writes:
> > /usr/local/lib/app-name wouldn't be a *bad* place.
> >
> > OTOH, I can make a case for /usr/local/bin/app-name too. At least the
> > modules for starting a given app should be there.
>
> But not a good one. Modules ar
On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, J.W. Bizzaro wrote:
> Unless someone might want to import gui.py or any other part of Anaconda, the
> source should go elsewhere. Where? Maybe /opt or /lib ?
/opt isn't standardised across the unixes.
/usr/local/lib/app-name wouldn't be a *bad* place.
OTOH, I can make a c
Or if they're using a different language, the word widths would be
different for the text in their language. :)
A good rule of thumb is to allow 30% extra width from a normal width font
in English. This is speaking as a Mac programmer who's had to deal with
multi-language support and is not based
I spent some time this evening writing the Ten Minute Total Idiot's Guide
to Using Gnome/Gtk+ & Glade with Python
And boy is my left pinky tired after all that capitalization!
http://www.baypiggies.org/10mintig.html
--
_Deirdre * http://www.linuxcabal.net * http://www.deirdre.net
"Mar
On Fri, 5 Nov 1999, James Henstridge wrote:
> Someone did some work on a python code generator for glade. I posted a
> message about it to this list a while back. Here is the contents of that
> message:
There's also one I put up today that is linked from www.baypiggies.org. I
haven't looked at
Actually, I'm working on my Total Idiot's Guide. Please hold. It should be
up shortly. :)
--
_Deirdre * http://www.linuxcabal.net * http://www.deirdre.net
"Mars has been a tough target" -- Peter G. Neumann, Risks Digest Moderator
"That's because the Martians keep shooting things down." --
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Hassan Aurag wrote:
> I just wanted to know if there are any plans to make a python mode for
> glade, that would create a source directory instead of the present
> runtime thing.
I much prefer the libglade approach. Since Jim wrote both, likely that's
the way it'll go.
> I
36 matches
Mail list logo
