>> I'm trying to get the 3.3 and 3.4 branches so I can check my libraries
>> compatibility with older versions, but I do not see those branches as being
>> available:
>>
>> How can I get those?
>>
>>
>
>
> 3.3 and 3.4 existed before the migration from GitHub, so we don't have the
> branches.
>
On 12 April 2017 at 03:10, Mariatta Wijaya <mariatta.wij...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Back to the original issue with reviewing the PR
> https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/851
>
> Other than not being able to review the diff, is there any other problem?
> Can the PR be revie
his discussion to
>> the python-committers list rather than core-mentorship.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/10/2017 12:54 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So th
> On Mar 10, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Is the mention bot helpful? (Our config is at
> https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/.mention-bot and the docs are
> at https://github.com/facebook/mention-bot)
On 11 March 2017 at 00:32, Donald Stufft
>> On 11/22/2016 08:16 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
>> > On Nov 22, 2016, at 11:06, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
>> >> The configure file on the default and 3.6 branches have been generated
>> >> with autoconf 2.70 once again. This is annoying when you have to
>> >> maintain patches to
On 24 June 2016 at 09:29, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 24.06.2016 11:14, Larry Hastings wrote:
>> Heads up! This is a courtesy reminder from your friendly 3.4 and 3.5 release
>> manager. Here's a list of all the changes since 3.5.2rc1 that are currently
>> going into 3.5.2 final:
> What and when to deprecate
> ==
>
> * The number of releases before an API is removed is decided
> on a case-by-case basis depending on widely used the API is
depending on [how] widely used
> * In general it's better to be conservative, and if the API is
>
On 29 January 2016 at 21:59, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> On 29.01.16 21:56, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Serhiy Storchaka
>> wrote:
>>> Some deprecation can be documentation-only.
>>
>> Do you have examples where this has been
On 3 September 2015 at 10:03, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> I did a merge head with Victor's change in 2.7 before pushing my change.
> Can someone confirm if I did it right? If anything was wrong, how to correct
> it?
It looks like you did it right. If I compare the merge result
, and a post-push hook on the repository
to trigger the build. It's actually possible to configure a bitbucket
POST hook to trigger a buildbot build, but we haven't yet integrated
that into the buildbot master.
Regards,
Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment
cycle.
I had asked the PSF for a StartSSL certificate when the previous
certificate expired, and the PSF was not able to provide one. After
waiting several weeks for the PSF to provide the certificate, Kurt then
kindly went to Verisign.
Kind regards,
Martin
in early 2015.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
, by targeting them to
http://hg.python.org/buildbot/empty/
once, and triggering a rebuild.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
?
Typically we do one last release before shutting the last bugfix branch
down, but that's Georg's call since 3.3.5 was released so recently.
Given that, I propose 3.3 goes into security fix mode immediately.
+1
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
Am 17.03.14 16:58, schrieb Jesus Cea:
On 17/03/14 15:16, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
However, I would advise against doing so now, and delay the addition
of the 3.4 branch until 3.3 is retired from bug fixing, and then
repurpose all 3.3 configuration for 3.4. Otherwise, some slaves might
run out
Am 27.01.14 21:24, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
As a sidenote, why is Larry green on this page?
Because he used the keyword LGTM.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
/a
which really ought to fill out the in_reply_to field (with Message_2687)
If anybody wants to investigate: the source of this is at
http://hg.python.org/tracker/rietveld
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
).
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
of sitting idle, they actually start working
on bugs, and contributing to finishing the release.
With a DVCS, there is of course an alternative, where one could start
working on new features while the trunk is in feature-freeze.
Regards,
Martin
___
python
necessarily follow
that banning someone is a better response.
I think it is. Based on past experience, it would be temporarily anyway,
and it may buy us a year or so of mental peace.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers
role (meaning that
it makes no difference whether you are logged in or not).
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
*think* we have a hook on the master that prevents
further pushes to the branch.
Also, can anybody think of anything in the devguide that needs to
be updated?
Not the devguide. If anywhere, in PEP 101.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
, and 24h
is not at all unrealistic.
That, or some text explaining what to expect, would be good to have.
It's easy enough: the tag is likely to occur 24h before the scheduled release.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers
://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/tech/SshAndMitM
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
of
incoming links to various pages. These need to be preserved as much
as feasible (possibly using redirects).
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
for this kind of behavior: I still think he fits the
description in
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q52kFL8zVoMfeature=gv
I think he is poisenous to the Python project. If you haven't
seen the video, please watch it all.
Regards,
Martin
___
python
and them somebody
fixing them is something that could work.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
decision (that I'm
aware of) is that 2.7 should be supported indefinitely, which is
not infinitely.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
control; he should just stick to committing where
he is supposed to (just as everybody else). Key managers are currently
Georg Brandl, Antoine Pitrou, and Brett Cannon. I keep forgetting whether
there is an email alias for them.
Regards,
Martin
in mind, they actually do demonstrate
a real interest in free software.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
On 02.07.2012 00:48, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I'll report if we found something that can be considered a
permanent solution.
Antoine managed to reduce the memory usage of Mercurial quite
drastically. Not sure which contributed most, but
a) hg was upgraded to 2.2
b) a patch was applied to hgweb
!
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
We (primarily Antoine) just migrated hg.python.org to OSU/OSL.
Everything should continue to work as it did before, except that the
IP address of the machine has now changed.
If there are any issues, please let us know.
Regards,
Martin
___
python
found something that can be considered a
permanent solution.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
have put EungJun Yi into
Misc/ACKS (for doing the research), and asked him for a contributor
form.
If we are to require a signed agreement from smaller changes too, the
devguide should be updated.
Will do!
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing
at the moment would
gain a desirable reduction of workload if Daniel could push changes himself).
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
as if these people had
individually submitted a contributor form.
Regards,
Martin
On 01.05.2012 17:32, Pat Campbell wrote:
Hi Maria:
Thank-you for submitting your CLA.
Pat
2012/4/30 Maria Lysek maria.ly...@allegro.pl
mailto:maria.ly...@allegro.pl
Hello,
__ __
I am pleased to send you CLA
of the forms, thanks to them being listed in
Roundup, and thanks to Pat (Campbell) keeping track of all forms that
we receive. So we (the committers) are now in a position to actually
verify that we have a contrib form received before deciding whether or
not to commit a patch.
Regards,
Martin
I noticed that I don't have that fancy python logo next to my name
on the bug tracker, indicating that I am a committer. Is that
fixable? My user account is krisvale.
Done!
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
Am 24.02.2012 17:49, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
Hi Ned and Martin,
2.7.3rc1 and 3.2.3rc1 are tagged in the repo ready for binaries.
1b605fb13977c887a9554a9896b8 16081986 python-2.7.3rc1-pdb.zip
53439ec0110345225f5f0951f00bc387 17220674 python-2.7.3rc1.amd64-pdb.zip
until the final
release, and any changes are only merged afterwards.
This is a mess.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
than that. If the hg and svn changes are in the same
order, and have the same commit messages (as they should), you can look
at the log of the hg branch to find out what the youngest change is that
has been copied; all changes that are more recent then still have to be
applied.
Regards,
Martin
(which
is not a new requirement), so after synching, NEWS should be identical
in svn and hg.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
you or me.
It would be better, IMO, if there was a single developer who would
migrate changes to svn, or to have some semi-automatic procedure for
that.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http
Martin, Ned: I would say it's not mandatory for the beta release to have
binaries, but you might want to test out your toolchains against the new
process too.
Indeed. I'd prefer if the release clone is public somewhere, so that I
can point my local clones to it.
Regards,
Martin
to svn (i.e. multiple projects in one repository) is
so uncommon that the Mercurial people are likely to ignore problems
arising out of it.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman
the full history). So it
might have been possible to deal with it, had it been noticed.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
the Englishmen failed to accept that import
:-( The best the dictionaries come up with (besides to specify)
is to state more precisely, to render more precisely.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http
I added a boolean flag to the bug tracker indicating what user accounts
belong to committers. Please check that the flag is set in Your Details,
Is Committer. If it's not, please let me know.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python
; the repository is read-only (IIUC)
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Am 24.02.2011 02:39, schrieb Brett Cannon:
Not sure if Martin is the only person who can fix this, but it would be
nice to have those URLs working.
I have added a redirect for 3.2.x. I haven't added one for 3.2.0, since
we currently don't have any redirects for X.Y.0, only for X.Y.
Regards
to your current setup, except
that
a) changes flow into the other direction, and
b) there is no server communication to move patches across branches
(whereas in subversion, you commit to the server, then svnmerge
from the server).
Regards,
Martin
keeps track of what patches have been
transplanted, but I doubt it.
In any case, this discussion reiterates my point that this
project (Mercurial migration) really needs a project lead,
who then will also pronounce on usage policies. Otherwise,
it's doomed to fail.
Regards,
Martin
into this to your taste.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
(no report if no pending merges), either to python-dev
or to the original committer (it might be also possible to determine
the original pusher, and send mail to him instead).
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http
it is now with svnmerge (since
you first have to transplant, and then merge back the transplanted
patch, which should come out as a no-op - but the merge must be
recorded).
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
compatibility, and another version
that fixes it in the right way. I think I regularly contributes
two or three such changes to every feature release of Python.
I think a few other committers have also written such changes over
time.
Regards,
Martin
___
python
and subscribe to the committers list, and give any
instructions you deem necessary.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
:
Python-2.7.tgz 32059
Python-2.7.tar.bz2 24986
python-2.7.msi577240
In November, the numbers were
Python-2.7.tgz 24535
Python-2.7.tar.bz2 20797
python-2.7.msi 569328
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers
to Mercurial in the middle of release candidates. I expect the initial
release using Mercurial to just not work, plus I plan to need several
days to make the release. Doing so under the time pressure of a release
candidate is not something I look forward to.
Regards,
Martin
Am 05.12.2010 20:40, schrieb Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven:
-On [20101205 20:23], Martin v. Löwis (mar...@v.loewis.de) wrote:
For those of us involved in the release process, every single file is a
big problem, indeed. Seriously.
Correct me if wrong, but isn't rolling up a tgz, tbz2, or txz
will happen next year.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
We don't gain anything by not implementing automation.
I certainly gain something: spare time where I can work on other stuff
than fulfilling infrastructure wishes of people.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers
for bug fixes. Releases will be
made by Benjamin regularly.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
with the slave admin and ask him to
clean the buildbot before anything can proceed.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
a single buildbot, it might be best to create a branch,
and then manually trigger a build of that branch on the build slaves
that interest you.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman
Am 27.08.2010 15:28, schrieb Jesse Noller:
Can someone with the power make sure Ask (asksol) has dev-level privs
on the tracker?
Benjamin took care of that.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http
branches (dead: =2.4, 3.0, security-only: 2.5, 2.6, bug fixes only:
2.7, 3.1, new features: 3k)
Unless somebody disagrees, please have him sent me his SSH key, and
apply for python-committers.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python
the external-common.bat
for OpenSSL 1.0.0a. This is now fixed.
There is a related problem - apparently, OpenSSL now fails to build on
AMD64. I look into this later today.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http
area, and it
currently retries.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Am 31.07.2010 13:50, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
Le samedi 31 juillet 2010 à 11:23 +0200, Martin v. Löwis a écrit :
Also, the Windows 3.x buildbot shows failures compiling _ssl and
_hashopenssl
(for logs, see e.g. http://bit.ly/aSAnhh). I'd like to know if this is
specific to that machine (I've
He has been contributing to Python via the tracker, c.l.p, python-dev
and python-ideas for years and has recently requested commit
privileges in order to work on IDLE. I think we should give them to
him :)
Has he actually contributed code to Python in all this time?
Regards,
Martin
on everybody, it better be widely agreed (i.e. the people
being forced to do things should, in principle, agree that these
are good things).
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
were not in place when we made the switch.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Antoine patched the 4 most important branches. Do we you have other active
branches?
Define active. The 2.5 maintenance branch will have further releases
made from it.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
Barry Warsaw wrote:
On May 11, 2010, at 09:20 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Barry Warsaw wrote:
Who remembers the Great Renaming? :)
Wasn't it the /Grand/ Renaming?
See Guido's link! (btw, what a great blog :).
While studying this history, I ran into
http://www.rmi.net/~lutz/errata-book
will also switch to Mercurial, so the point of
using svnmerge and blocking changes becomes irrelevant for that reason,
also.
So in short: in less than two months.
Regards,
Martin
(*) there still might be bug fixes applied to the 2.7 maintenance branch
which also apply to the 3.x branch. I would expect
it's clearly out of scope for
2.6.5, IMO.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
What about 3.1.3, Benjamin?. I guess it is too late for 3.1.2,
since the rc is out. I saw your message asking for stopping commits
the 6th march, but I haven't seen another message opening the gates
again...
As Martin pointed out, I don't think this patch is acceptable for a
bug fix release
them, as the
only person who can push to the frozen branch.
FWIW, it would be possible to freeze a branch also in subversion, today.
As for pulling from committer branches: that would require that
committers host their branches somewhere.
Regards,
Martin
Barry Warsaw wrote:
Martin, do you magic! :)
I have uploaded the files, and added the signatures. I have not changed
the content file; the relevant data are
3b47876d4dc3ab064926345eb76a61d2 15422464 python-2.6.5rc2.amd64.msi
e6b561ccf166aec5de4daa37a465e1c1 14886912 python-2.6.5rc2.msi
I'll
, and nobody willing to do them - everybody just wants them to be done.
So people who want the Mercurial switch to happen now really need to
step forward and volunteer to work on it, or else it won't happen for
another year.
Regards,
Martin
___
python
The hold-up will ultimately be the EOL extension and the updated docs
now that Dirkjan has a patch for sys.mercurial.
Is that patch published somewhere? I'd like to take a look.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers
a contributor agreement.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
That seems to argue for doing rc2 on Sunday the 18th. If I tag the
release some time Saturday, you could have the binaries by Sunday
right?
Correct.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http
It seems logging is broken in 2.6.3. Should we release
2.6.4 quickly?
http://bugs.python.org/issue7052
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
.
The final 2.6.3 release mistakenly identifies its svn tag as 263rc1.
It still actually is the final release, as can be seen when looking
at sys.version_info.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http
Yes, but what I experienced is much worse - I was actually getting the
2.6.2 version of python26.dll due to shadowing, instead of the 2.6.3
version.
Ah. Did you get a message [TARGETDIR] exists. Are you sure you want to
overwrite existing files?
Regards,
Martin
database, for that matter.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Apr 16, 2009, at 12:34 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I've merged this into release26-maint in r71639. But in order to update
Python2.6.2 binary, I think Martin's help is needed. Could you?
I won't be re-releasing 2.6.2. We should make a 2.6.3 release instead.
Agreed
this was incorrect.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
s...@pobox.com wrote:
Martin My own personal experience tells me git and bzr are much worse
Martin than subversion (each in different respects).
Perhaps you could relay these shortcomings to Brett or edit them into the
PEP directly.
As I said: I refrain from commenting at this point
a complete specification right
from the start, or else discussion will revolve around the open issues,
with no conclusion. So I'd rather have the PEP suggest that we switch
to bzr (say), so that I can vote that down, instead of giving options
in its final form.
Regards,
Martin
don't accept word-of-mouth as
a proof. My own personal experience tells me git and bzr are much
worse than subversion (each in different respects).
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org
and line endings) definitely
belongs into the list of issues that need to be resolved, and I
think it should be show-stopper if it isn't adequately resolved
(i.e. it needs to be at least as good as CVS and subversion).
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers
dumbencode, though.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
sources). It doesn't cost anything to continue to run svn.
(perhaps if all the other projects except for stackless left svn,
I would ask you to volunteer some admin time into its operation).
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python
unused?
Worse than that: it is broken. It can't stay up for more than 30
seconds, before some watchdog mechanism reboots it - too short for
me to find out what the problem is.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
Anyone who feels like biting his head off, go for it.
I think as a starting point, I'll revoke his access to the tracker
(although I guess he'll create a new account in response).
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo