On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 22:22:05 -0400
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:36:03 +0200, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:19:45 -0400
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
Besides, hg status is meant to show
Hi Senthil,
+if source_address: self.source_address = source_address
Could you try to follow PEP 8?
(I know PEP 8 is not always followed in old code, but there's no reason
not to follow it in code that we add to the stdlib)
+SMTP.__init__(self, host, port, local_hostname =
Am 29.07.2011 11:26, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
So I'm curious, why is this move better than adding noindexes, or just
trusting users to understand the difference between test.support.unlink() and
os.unlink()? If I currently search for 'unlink', os.unlink comes up first,
which is good, and that
Am 27.07.2011 19:44, schrieb Terry Reedy:
On 7/27/2011 9:24 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Docstrings are sufficient for own our purposes.
import test.support as t
help(t.rmtree)
Help on function rmtree in module test.support:
rmtree(path)
Well, what are you waiting for... just add the
Am 27.07.2011 19:47, schrieb Terry Reedy:
On 7/27/2011 1:27 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
Perhaps what we could do is move the documentation for test.support to
the devguide, and then vet the test suite so that unlink and friends
are always called as 'support.unlink', etc.
I like
Hi,
sorry for nitpicking, but...
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 05:58, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
...
For those implementing PEP \302 importer objects:
the '\' should be removed, right?
Cheers,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Hi Sandro,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 05:58, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
For those implementing PEP \302 importer objects:
the '\' should be removed, right?
No. Philip used backslashes to prevent the HTML conversion to transform
each and every instance of “PEP \d+” to a link, which
On 7/29/2011 6:54 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:47:07 -0400
Terry Reedytjre...@udel.edu wrote:
And test.support *is* for internal use.
No, the stuff in there is *not* for internal use within the module but
for external use is possiby every test module.
I meant internal
On 7/29/2011 7:27 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:02:32 -0400
Terry Reedytjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 7/29/2011 5:32 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:51:18 -0400
Barry Warsawba...@python.org wrote:
The solution then is to rename test.support to
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 06:30:40 +0300, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
This mail can appear as if advocating the transfer of Lib/test into Tests/,
but this is not my intention here. Honest :-) I'm just trying to understand
the history and rationale behind this structure in the CPython
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:25:27 -0400
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
I'm sorry, can you be more precise. The effect of what?
Your proposal to remove the current formatted documentation of
test.support instead of completing it and force all developers to only
have reference to the
Hello Antoine,
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 08:46:00AM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
(I know PEP 8 is not always followed in old code, but there's no reason
not to follow it in code that we add to the stdlib)
Thanks for pointing out. I somehow overlooked it. I shall refactor
that lib.
Unless
2011/7/29 Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net:
Am 30.07.2011 01:20, schrieb benjamin.peterson:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/84c3be27b4c7
changeset: 71614:84c3be27b4c7
parent: 71611:a6afd26caa8a
user: Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org
date: Fri Jul 29 18:19:43 2011
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 14:57, Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 05:58, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
For those implementing PEP \302 importer objects:
the '\' should be removed, right?
No. Philip used backslashes to prevent the HTML conversion to
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Jul 30, 2011, at 01:02 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
If test.support is truly and only an internal implementation detail, then it
should adhere to Pythonic convention for such things, and be renamed
test._support. Then you
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
2011/7/29 Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net:
Shouldn't there be a matching Doc change somewhere?
Somewhere is the question!
While None/NotImplemented/Ellipsis are all documented as singletons,
the behaviour of calling
On Jul 31, 2011, at 01:23 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
It sounds to me like you're really objecting to the devguide living in
a separate clone. This doesn't bode well for the prospects of ever
splitting the stdlib out from the CPython interpreter core...
Actually, no. I'm objecting to moving
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Jul 31, 2011, at 01:23 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
It sounds to me like you're really objecting to the devguide living in
a separate clone. This doesn't bode well for the prospects of ever
splitting the stdlib out from the
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
Wasn't this change only in 3.3 where __nonzero__ doesn't exist? So when PyPy
eventually supports Python 3 they will have to update to support __bool__ on
None but this test won't exercise that for them. IOW I think the guard
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
And on that note... was there any particular reason for leaving
NotImplemented out for this change?
Never mind, just noticed the subsequest checkin.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane,
On 07/30/11 17:00, benjamin.peterson wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/402f94edf11b
changeset: 71637:402f94edf11b
branch: 2.7
user:Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org
date:Sat Jul 30 09:59:12 2011 -0500
summary:
note Ellipsis syntax
files:
On 07/30/11 17:03, benjamin.peterson wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/4a07b772f0e0
changeset: 71639:4a07b772f0e0
user:Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org
date:Sat Jul 30 10:03:09 2011 -0500
summary:
we can call singleton types now
files:
2011/7/30 Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net:
On 07/30/11 17:00, benjamin.peterson wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/402f94edf11b
changeset: 71637:402f94edf11b
branch: 2.7
user: Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org
date: Sat Jul 30 09:59:12 2011 -0500
summary:
note
Hi,
On 29/07/2011 15.35, eric.araujo wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1521d9837d16
changeset: 71569:1521d9837d16
user:Éric Araujomer...@netwok.org
date:Thu Jul 28 23:35:29 2011 +0200
summary:
Modernize modulefinder module and tests a bit.
The tests don’t use an
Hi,
On 30/07/2011 5.58, senthil.kumaran wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/26839edf3cc1
changeset: 71617:26839edf3cc1
parent: 71613:018e14a46454
user:Senthil Kumaransent...@uthcode.com
date:Sat Jul 30 10:56:50 2011 +0800
summary:
Fix closes Issue11281 -
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
why would you use Ellipsis outside of slices?
I could imagine someone wanting to use it as part of a
function API. For example,
print(a, b, c, ...)
would have been a nice way to tell print() not to put
a newline on the end.
--
Greg
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:11:08PM +0300, Ezio Melotti wrote:
-.. class:: SMTP(host='', port=0, local_hostname=None[, timeout])
+.. class:: SMTP(host='', port=0, local_hostname=None[, timeout],
source_address=None)
The [, timeout] now looks weird there, and it would be better to
convert it
27 matches
Mail list logo
