+- Richard Oudkerk was given push privileges on Apr 29 2012 by Antoine Pitrou
+ on recommendation by Charles-François Natali and Jesse Noller, for various
+ contributions to multiprocessing (and original authorship of
+ multiprocessing's predecessor, the processing package).
Could one of
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2012/4/29 Jim J. Jewett jimjjew...@gmail.com:
In http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/119134.html
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
I see PEP 418 gives time.clock_info() two boolean fields named
is_monotonic and is_adjusted. I think the is_ is unnecessary
Issue http://bugs.python.org/issue13183 raises the point that the step
command of pdb is broken. This issue is 6 months old. A patch and test
case have been proposed. The 'Lifecycle of a Patch' at
http://docs.python.org/devguide/patch.html says
quote
If your patch has not received any notice from
On 29.04.2012 03:04, victor.stinner wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/bd195749c0a2
changeset: 76599:bd195749c0a2
user:Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com
date:Sun Apr 29 03:01:20 2012 +0200
summary:
Issue #14428: Use the new time.perf_counter() and
On 29Apr2012 21:31, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
| 2012/4/29 Jim J. Jewett jimjjew...@gmail.com:
| In http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/119134.html
| Benjamin Peterson wrote:
|
| I see PEP 418 gives time.clock_info() two boolean fields named
| is_monotonic
On 30Apr2012 09:26, Mark Shannon m...@hotpy.org wrote:
| monotonic is an adjective,
Yes.
| whereas adjusted is (part of) a verb.
No. It is an adjective.
| I think
| both should be adjectives. Does adjusted mean that it has been
| adjusted, that it can be adjusted or it will be adjusted?
Hi,
It's not very obvious that printing this page
http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ actually prints only
the form. Can you rather offer a downloadable image/pdf.
As an aside, on Chromium, it appears on 2 separate pages, when there's
enough space on the first.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:37:25PM +0200, ezio.melotti wrote:
range of Unicode whitespace characters.
-\S Matches any non-whitespace character; equiv. to [^ \t\n\r\f\v].
+\S Matches any non-whitespace character; equivalent to [^\s].
Is this correct? While I
IT would be good if the author of one of the pdb add-ons such as (I
believe) pdb2 could comment on this bug.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Xavier de Gaye xdeg...@gmail.com wrote:
Issue http://bugs.python.org/issue13183 raises the point that the step
command of pdb is broken. This issue is 6
On Apr 30, 2012, at 08:42 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
IT would be good if the author of one of the pdb add-ons such as (I
believe) pdb2 could comment on this bug.
Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one of
the pdb add-ons or borging the best of their bits into
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 08:42 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
IT would be good if the author of one of the pdb add-ons such as (I
believe) pdb2 could comment on this bug.
Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:09:02PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one of
the pdb add-ons or borging the best of their bits into the stdlib?
Irrespective of this - Issue13183 seems to be an easy to verify bug in
3.2 and 3.3. I
Senthil, if you can shepherd this patch to completion that would be great!
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Senthil Kumaran sent...@uthcode.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:09:02PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one
of
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
Irrespective of this - Issue13183 seems to be an easy to verify bug in
3.2 and 3.3. I think, it would most visible if you were to use a full
screen debugger and you will notice that the return call indicator has
jumped to the next
On 30.04.2012 18:09, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 08:42 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
IT would be good if the author of one of the pdb add-ons such as (I
believe) pdb2 could comment on this bug.
Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one of
the pdb
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:35 AM, raymond.hettinger
python-check...@python.org wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b3aeaef6c315
changeset: 76675:b3aeaef6c315
user: Raymond Hettinger pyt...@rcn.com
date: Mon Apr 30 14:14:28 2012 -0700
summary:
Handle a possible race
16 matches
Mail list logo