Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] devguide: Record Richard Oudkerk.

2012-04-30 Thread Eric V. Smith
+- Richard Oudkerk was given push privileges on Apr 29 2012 by Antoine Pitrou + on recommendation by Charles-François Natali and Jesse Noller, for various + contributions to multiprocessing (and original authorship of + multiprocessing's predecessor, the processing package). Could one of

Re: [Python-Dev] time.clock_info() field names

2012-04-30 Thread Mark Shannon
Benjamin Peterson wrote: 2012/4/29 Jim J. Jewett jimjjew...@gmail.com: In http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/119134.html Benjamin Peterson wrote: I see PEP 418 gives time.clock_info() two boolean fields named is_monotonic and is_adjusted. I think the is_ is unnecessary

[Python-Dev] The step command of pdb is broken

2012-04-30 Thread Xavier de Gaye
Issue http://bugs.python.org/issue13183 raises the point that the step command of pdb is broken. This issue is 6 months old. A patch and test case have been proposed. The 'Lifecycle of a Patch' at http://docs.python.org/devguide/patch.html says quote If your patch has not received any notice from

Re: [Python-Dev] cpython: Issue #14428: Use the new time.perf_counter() and time.process_time() functions

2012-04-30 Thread Georg Brandl
On 29.04.2012 03:04, victor.stinner wrote: http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/bd195749c0a2 changeset: 76599:bd195749c0a2 user:Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com date:Sun Apr 29 03:01:20 2012 +0200 summary: Issue #14428: Use the new time.perf_counter() and

Re: [Python-Dev] time.clock_info() field names

2012-04-30 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 29Apr2012 21:31, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote: | 2012/4/29 Jim J. Jewett jimjjew...@gmail.com: | In http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/119134.html | Benjamin Peterson wrote: | | I see PEP 418 gives time.clock_info() two boolean fields named | is_monotonic

Re: [Python-Dev] time.clock_info() field names

2012-04-30 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 30Apr2012 09:26, Mark Shannon m...@hotpy.org wrote: | monotonic is an adjective, Yes. | whereas adjusted is (part of) a verb. No. It is an adjective. | I think | both should be adjectives. Does adjusted mean that it has been | adjusted, that it can be adjusted or it will be adjusted?

[Python-Dev] suggestion regarding the contributor agreement form

2012-04-30 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
Hi, It's not very obvious that printing this page http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ actually prints only the form. Can you rather offer a downloadable image/pdf. As an aside, on Chromium, it appears on 2 separate pages, when there's enough space on the first.

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (3.2): #14236: fix docs for \S.

2012-04-30 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:37:25PM +0200, ezio.melotti wrote: range of Unicode whitespace characters. -\S Matches any non-whitespace character; equiv. to [^ \t\n\r\f\v]. +\S Matches any non-whitespace character; equivalent to [^\s]. Is this correct? While I

Re: [Python-Dev] The step command of pdb is broken

2012-04-30 Thread Guido van Rossum
IT would be good if the author of one of the pdb add-ons such as (I believe) pdb2 could comment on this bug. On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Xavier de Gaye xdeg...@gmail.com wrote: Issue http://bugs.python.org/issue13183 raises the point that the step command of pdb is broken. This issue is 6

Re: [Python-Dev] The step command of pdb is broken

2012-04-30 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Apr 30, 2012, at 08:42 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: IT would be good if the author of one of the pdb add-ons such as (I believe) pdb2 could comment on this bug. Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one of the pdb add-ons or borging the best of their bits into

Re: [Python-Dev] The step command of pdb is broken

2012-04-30 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote: On Apr 30, 2012, at 08:42 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: IT would be good if the author of one of the pdb add-ons such as (I believe) pdb2 could comment on this bug. Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to

Re: [Python-Dev] The step command of pdb is broken

2012-04-30 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:09:02PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one of the pdb add-ons or borging the best of their bits into the stdlib? Irrespective of this - Issue13183 seems to be an easy to verify bug in 3.2 and 3.3. I

Re: [Python-Dev] The step command of pdb is broken

2012-04-30 Thread Guido van Rossum
Senthil, if you can shepherd this patch to completion that would be great! On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Senthil Kumaran sent...@uthcode.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:09:02PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one of

Re: [Python-Dev] The step command of pdb is broken

2012-04-30 Thread Xavier de Gaye
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Senthil Kumaran wrote: Irrespective of this - Issue13183 seems to be an easy to verify bug in 3.2 and 3.3. I think, it would most visible if you were to use a full screen debugger and you will notice that the return call indicator has jumped to the next

Re: [Python-Dev] The step command of pdb is broken

2012-04-30 Thread Martin v. Löwis
On 30.04.2012 18:09, Barry Warsaw wrote: On Apr 30, 2012, at 08:42 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: IT would be good if the author of one of the pdb add-ons such as (I believe) pdb2 could comment on this bug. Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one of the pdb

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Handle a possible race condition

2012-04-30 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:35 AM, raymond.hettinger python-check...@python.org wrote: http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b3aeaef6c315 changeset:   76675:b3aeaef6c315 user:        Raymond Hettinger pyt...@rcn.com date:        Mon Apr 30 14:14:28 2012 -0700 summary:  Handle a possible race