-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On behalf of the Python development team, I'm happy to announce
the release of Python 3.3.5, release candidate 2.
Python 3.3.5 includes a fix for a regression in zipimport in 3.3.4
(see http://bugs.python.org/issue20621) and a few other bugs.
Python
Hi,
I would like to know if the cherry-picking rule still applies for
Python 3.4 final? Can I open an issue if I want to see a changeset in
the final version? I'm asking for a typo in tracemalloc documentation:
http://bugs.python.org/issue20814
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a9058b772807
On 03/03/2014 03:01 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if the cherry-picking rule still applies for
Python 3.4 final? Can I open an issue if I want to see a changeset in
the final version?
Sadly, yes.
//arry/
___
Python-Dev mailing
2014-03-03 13:13 GMT+01:00 Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org:
I would like to know if the cherry-picking rule still applies for
Python 3.4 final? Can I open an issue if I want to see a changeset in
the final version?
Sadly, yes.
Ok, I created:
http://bugs.python.org/issue20843
Why do you
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
AFACT, in that message Victor was only talking about allowing Unicode
filenames.
...
Finally, in most places Python 2.7 *does* handle Unicode filenames just
fine.
I'm a bit confused. In this example:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
AFACT, in that message Victor was only talking about allowing Unicode
filenames.
...
Finally, in most places Python 2.7 *does* handle Unicode
On 3/3/2014 7:13 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
On 03/03/2014 03:01 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if the cherry-picking rule still applies for
Python 3.4 final? Can I open an issue if I want to see a changeset in
the final version?
Sadly, yes.
Doc changes appear online
Am 03.03.2014 19:31, schrieb Terry Reedy:
On 3/3/2014 7:13 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
On 03/03/2014 03:01 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if the cherry-picking rule still applies for
Python 3.4 final? Can I open an issue if I want to see a changeset in
the final version?
On 03/03/2014 05:05 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
2014-03-03 13:13 GMT+01:00 Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org:
I would like to know if the cherry-picking rule still applies for
Python 3.4 final? Can I open an issue if I want to see a changeset in
the final version?
Sadly, yes.
Ok, I created:
On 4 Mar 2014 07:32, Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org wrote:
On 03/03/2014 05:05 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
2014-03-03 13:13 GMT+01:00 Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org:
I would like to know if the cherry-picking rule still applies for
Python 3.4 final? Can I open an issue if I want to see
On 03/03/2014 21:38, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 4 Mar 2014 07:32, Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org
mailto:la...@hastings.org wrote:
On 03/03/2014 05:05 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
2014-03-03 13:13 GMT+01:00 Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org
mailto:la...@hastings.org:
I would like to know
On Mar 03, 2014, at 10:36 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
Will this impact on the decision http://bugs.python.org/issue20846 ?
Issue 20808 is my own pet cherry pick for 3.4.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Will this impact on the decision http://bugs.python.org/issue20846 ?
This issue has been closed as wontfix. It has no patch and must be reported
to pip, not python.
Victor
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On 4 Mar 2014 08:40, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 03/03/2014 21:38, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 4 Mar 2014 07:32, Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org
mailto:la...@hastings.org wrote:
On 03/03/2014 05:05 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
2014-03-03 13:13 GMT+01:00 Larry
In article
cadisq7ftyqu9+rglck54gmtwktccak97pvafdjszq9njqfu...@mail.gmail.com,
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 Mar 2014 08:40, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Will this impact on the decision http://bugs.python.org/issue20846 ?
No. I never claimed pip was bug free
On 4 Mar 2014 09:49, Ned Deily n...@acm.org wrote:
In article
cadisq7ftyqu9+rglck54gmtwktccak97pvafdjszq9njqfu...@mail.gmail.com,
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 Mar 2014 08:40, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Will this impact on the decision
On 03/03/2014 01:38 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Related question - have you decided yet whether or not to do an rc3?
I ask, as I believe it would be good to give the folks like Mike Bayer
and Armin Ronacher (who picked up test coverage gaps in rc2 via the
Alembic and Flask test suites
On 4 March 2014 13:35, Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org wrote:
On 03/03/2014 01:38 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Related question - have you decided yet whether or not to do an rc3?
I ask, as I believe it would be good to give the folks like Mike Bayer and
Armin Ronacher (who picked up test
On 03/03/2014 07:58 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
All of our development guides for testing against trunk are designed
around running from a Mercurial checkout - it would *really* be whole
lot easier for everyone else that is trying to test the release if you
could just do a push from your release
On 4 March 2014 14:20, Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org wrote:
On 03/03/2014 07:58 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
All of our development guides for testing against trunk are designed
around running from a Mercurial checkout - it would *really* be whole
lot easier for everyone else that is trying to
On 03/03/2014 10:23 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
But at the moment you're making it
*hard* for people to test the release,
How? How is testing against a tarball fundamentally different from
testing against an hg-cloned repository?
I'm really not buying this.
//arry/
On 4 March 2014 16:50, Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org wrote:
On 03/03/2014 10:23 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
But at the moment you're making it
*hard* for people to test the release,
How? How is testing against a tarball fundamentally different from testing
against an hg-cloned
22 matches
Mail list logo
