January 4, 2021 12:55 PM, redrad...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have found very nice attempt of JIT for CPython
> https://github.com/tonybaloney/Pyjion
>
> It is working under .NET Runtime, but if it is possible in this project I
> believe it is possible in
> CPython as well
>
I suggest that you fork
December 10, 2020 4:18 PM, redrad...@gmail.com wrote:
> I do not want to make type-checker a part of CPython, I just what options
> that will allow to run
> python with first some type-checker ...
> For example, you would be able to set default python module for type-checking
> and if there is n
< 100:
raise IndexError('list index out of range')
else:
my_list[99]
No thanks. Modifying the builtin list type for circular indexing is an "over
my dead body" situation.
--Edwin
On 11/26/2020 3:20 AM, Mathew M. Noel via Python-ideas wrote:
>
> Circular inde
t of range" errors can often be indicators
of a bug elsewhere, and this would cause those bugs to silently pass.
--Edwin
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://m
ingle exe file is
easier at all levels than distributing a complete install of Python.
--Edwin
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman
That would satisfy my concerns.
October 15, 2020 2:12 PM, "Ram Rachum" mailto:r...@rachum.com?to=%22Ram%20Rachum%22%20)> wrote:
Your use case is valid, there are times in which I'd like a strong reference to
be kept. But there are also lots of times I want it to not be kept. Then I
would offer t
Usually when I use lru_cache I don't want items to randomly disappearing from
the cache. Just because a key isn't referenced anywhere else doesn't mean that
I want it to automatically disappear. That is the whole point. Take this
example:
@lru_cache
def expensive_function(a,b,c):
return a**b**
not think
your idea is a good one.
Please stop being so dismissive of others' comments. It does not endear you to
them.
--Edwin
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-l
27;t see
> what you're complaining at.
>
> ChrisA
I don't either. This could be incredibly useful for simple string extraction.
Obviously, there are situations where regex is a much better option, but why
object to a simple option for simple problems?
--Edwin
_
ou need is an IDE feature that creates and merges
a pull request. Just think how easy that would make it for Python to be
everything to everyone.
--Edwin
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-idea
What about code that depends on __file__ to add installation dependent import
paths to sys.path? I have written code like that myself, and I've seen it
elsewhere too.
--Edwin
On 8/20/2020 9:06 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
> I really like pathlib.
>
> But for a while is was
On 8/7/2020 10:47 PM, Ricky Teachey wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:25 PM Edwin Zimmerman <mailto:ed...@211mainstreet.net>> wrote:
>
> On 8/7/2020 8:28 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> > I don't think anyone has the appetite for a Python 4 any
> > time
n for
proposing major breaking changes. Python 3 works quite well, I think.
Non-breaking, incremental changes suite me much better that large breaking
ones. I have better things to do with my time than complete software rewrites
of all the software projects I work on.
--Edwin
___
secure.
That said, I agree with the idea of giving users an easier way to control what
pickle does. I think that any such modifications
should continue to make clear that pickle has not magically become "safe".
--Edwin
___
Python-ideas m
I would have interest in it.
--Edwin
I'm no security expert, but we've got a big pile of serialization code that is
kind of like JSON-pickly, but it will only deserialize known objects. it's a
bit of pain to declare what you want to work with, but it seems safer.
On 7/11/2020 11:17 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> On 12/07/20 1:01 pm, Edwin Zimmerman wrote:
>> As I see it, the unsafe callables (eval, exec, os.system, etc) are generally
>> functions, and safe ones(int, list, dict) are generally classes, though
>> there certainly would be
incremental step towards better security.
--Edwin
On 7/11/2020 8:45 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> On 12/07/20 8:54 am, Wes Turner wrote:
>> Would it be feasible to just NOP callables when safe=True?
>
> This would break pickle, because calling constructors is
> the way many objects are unpic
was a MemoryError
traceback.
Even with all the improvements pickle has seen, I think it would be unwise to
imply (via pickle module names or flags) that pickle is "safe".
--Edwin
On 7/11/2020 1:31 PM, Wes Turner wrote:
> Would this accomplish something like:
>
> pickle.lo
ussions on
racism. I haven't seen an comments yet that agreed with the OP that PEP 8
authors wrote anything racist. If fact, I suspect the authors would vehemently
deny such an accusation. Please, can we just drop this discussion?
--Edwin
___
way everyone
could have it their way.
--Edwin
On 6/16/2020 6:51 AM, Stéfane Fermigier wrote:
> It has also been discussed that some people can't rely on anything outside
> the standard packages, due to the constraints of their company or
On 6/9/2020 9:21 PM, Jonathan Goble wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020, 8:47 PM Edwin Zimmerman <mailto:ed...@211mainstreet.net>> wrote:
>
> Wouldn't this break backwards compatibility with everything the whole way
> back to 3.0? I fear a future with where I have
Wouldn't this break backwards compatibility with everything the whole way back
to 3.0? I fear a future with where I have to run a 2to3 type tool on
third-party dependencies just to get them to work with my 3.7 code base.
--Edwin
On 6/9/2020 8:06 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> In Python
On 5/25/2020 8:29 AM, redrad...@gmail.com wrote:
> Edwin Zimmerman wrote:
>> On Monday, May 25, 2020 redrad...@gmail.com [mailto:redrad...@gmail.com]
>> wrote
>>> Edwin Zimmerman wrote:
>>> On 5/25/2020 5:56 AM, redrad...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Monday, May 25, 2020 redrad...@gmail.com [mailto:redrad...@gmail.com] wrote
> Edwin Zimmerman wrote:
> > On 5/25/2020 5:56 AM, redrad...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Edwin Zimmerman wrote:
> > Sub-interpreters are a work in progress. The API is not anywhere near
>
On 5/25/2020 5:56 AM, redrad...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Edwin Zimmerman wrote:
> Only if your workload is CPU bound. Python optimizes IO bound workload
> performance by
> releasing the GIL while doing IO. Green threads generally do not offer this
> option.
>
> Real thre
io` ... But we can to
> change underling `api` from `sync io` to `async io` !!
> User will notice nothing, but performance will be increased mush more !!
Only if your workload is CPU bound. Python optimizes IO bound workload
performance by releasing the GIL while doing IO. Green threads genera
e on
this email (Result: "I'd like to suggest allowing unicode as an alternative to
'dash'"). There might be other screen readers that work better, but I agree
that this would increase inaccessibility.
--Edwin
___
Python-idea
l already.
What if I want to use a font in my editor that doesn't support →? Does that
mean that I won't be able to edit some random bit of code I download?
--Edwin
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an
en as >= in Python). And maybe other
> > national or domain specific mathematical symbols. Imagine confusion when
> > >=, ≥, ⩾ and ⊃ are occurred in the same program.
> >
Hey, we don't have to stop there. There are lots of Unicode characters Python
could accept to make it
??
It wouldn't. No matter how slick of a Unicode operator insertion setup you
have, it still is quicker and easier to type ->. I fail to understand how
suggesting that all new python programmers use a slower, more complex entry
method can be perceived as m
On April 28, 2020 9:38 AM Soni L. wrote:
> On 2020-04-28 7:50 a.m., Edwin Zimmerman wrote:
> > On 4/27/2020 11:47 PM, Soni L. wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > tbh my particular case doesn't make a ton of practical sense. I have
> > > config files and there may be
On 4/27/2020 11:47 PM, Soni L. wrote:
[snip]
> tbh my particular case doesn't make a ton of practical sense. I have config
> files and there may be errors opening or deserializing them, and I have a
> system to manage configs and overrides. which means you can have multiple
> config files, and y
I doubt that you will find many people on this list who are willing to do your
homework for you. It will be very hard to convince most of the people on this
list if the only reason you can give is "I think this would look great". Great
ideas are based on real needs, not on flights of fancy.
O
33 matches
Mail list logo
