On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 05:01:48 -0400
Wes Turner wrote:
>
> Can't remember where I thought I read that libuv + CPython asyncio is
> actually faster than node + libuv.
"faster" is pretty much meaningless without specifics. libuv + asyncio
will certainly be fast if you're mostly transferring
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020, 1:33 PM David Mertz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:59 PM wrote:
>
>> Recently I have been thinking about why `JavaScript` with it's horrible
>> type system and lots of edge cases has supported so many platform and is
>> very fast ...
>> First answer is simple, because
I remember some years ago I compiled Python 3.4 on Kobo, using an ARM
virtual machine with qemu. Since the space on Kobo was little, I removed
the standard library.
But Python did not work. I had to include some stdlib modules too, like
encodings/ascii.py, because I was not able to even print an
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 11:52 AM wrote:
> CPython is portable but due to integrated standard library (builtin
> functionality) it is hard to evolve it,
How so? The stdlib is just a collection of packages we happen to ship with
Python. Think of it as if we ship blessed packages from PyPI with
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020, 2:57 PM wrote:
> I know, I know that PyPy is fast as V8 but PyPy implement the whole
> library inside and it is not easy to embed it somewhere
>
I have no idea what you mean by that. PyPy doesn't need its standard
library to run. Just like in CPython, those are just a
I know, I know that PyPy is fast as V8 but PyPy implement the whole library
inside and it is not easy to embed it somewhere
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
My main point is that it would be nice to have just very fast execute engine
and all library as integration layer
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
CPython is portable but due to integrated standard library (builtin
functionality) it is hard to evolve it, for examle to add JIT, anyway it is
just my thoughts
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 2:59 AM wrote:
>
> Recently I have been thinking about why `JavaScript` with it's horrible type
> system and lots of edge cases has supported so many platform and is very fast
> ...
>
> First answer is simple, because big companies such as Google, Facebook and so
> on
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:59 PM wrote:
> Recently I have been thinking about why `JavaScript` with it's horrible
> type system and lots of edge cases has supported so many platform and is
> very fast ...
> First answer is simple, because big companies such as Google, Facebook and
> so on evolve
On 16/07/2020 17:59, redrad...@gmail.com wrote:
Recently I have been thinking about why `JavaScript` with it's horrible type
system and lots of edge cases has supported so many platform and is very fast
...
First answer is simple, because big companies such as Google, Facebook and so
on
CPython is already very portable thanks to it being implemented in C.
I don't see, though, how a lack of stdlib for JavaScript makes it fast?
Unless you're saying the Python core team should drop the stdlib so it has
more time to focus on the CPython interpreter itself?
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at
12 matches
Mail list logo
