Dear fellow Pythonistas,
We're pleased to announce that Kiwi PyCon 2013's Call for Proposals is now open!
This year the conference will be held Saturday 06 and Sunday 07
September in Auckland, New Zealand. Friday 05 September will see
tutorials and workshops run during the day - a Kiwi PyCon
On Fri, 10 May 2013 05:03:10 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
There is no sensible use-case for creating a file OBJECT unless it
initially wraps an open file pointer.
So far the only counter-examples given aren't counter-examples ...
Well, sure, if you discount operations like create this file
On 10 May 2013 03:37, Thanatos xiao yanxiaopei...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey !
Now! I have written a python script . I want to call a golang script in
python script.
Who can give me some advices?
thanks!
Check out the subprocess module. You can use it to call other programs from
python and get
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
In article mailman.1523.1368160434.3114.python-l...@python.org,
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
The first hard disk I ever worked with stored 20MB in the space of a
5.25 slot (plus its associated ISA controller card).
On Wednesday, 1 May 2013 13:15:28 UTC+1, Jens Thoms Toerring wrote:
Alex Norton ayjayn1...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks... ill take a look at the Qt event handling
It's rather simple: instead of the program running through a
sequence of steps, the program normally is basically doing
On Fri, 10 May 2013 01:50:09 -0400, Roy Smith wrote:
In article 518c7f05$0$29997$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com,
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
there is no way to create a C file descriptor in a closed state. Such a
thing does not exist. If you have a file
Jussi Piitulainen於 2013年5月9日星期四UTC+8下午7時30分05秒寫道：
8 Dihedral writes:
This is just the handy style for a non-critical loop.
In a critical loop, the number of the total operation counts
does matter in the execution speed.
Do you use speed often?
There is another
On Fri, 10 May 2013 06:22:31 +, Dan Sommers wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2013 05:03:10 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
There is no sensible use-case for creating a file OBJECT unless it
initially wraps an open file pointer.
So far the only counter-examples given aren't counter-examples ...
On 2013-05-10 12:00, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
But either way, that's fine. You've found an object where it does make
sense to have an explicit make it go method: first one entity has
permission to construct the object, but not to open the underlying file.
Another entity has permission to open the
On May 10, 2013, at 12:55 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
In article mailman.1523.1368160434.3114.python-l...@python.org,
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
The first hard disk I ever worked with stored 20MB in the space of a
5.25 slot (plus its associated ISA controller card).
On 2013-05-09, Dave Angel da...@davea.name wrote:
On 05/09/2013 05:22 PM, rlelis wrote:
On Thursday, May 9, 2013 7:19:38 PM UTC+1, Dave Angel wrote:
Yes it's a list of string. I don't get the NameError: name 'file_content' is
not defined in my code.
That's because you have the 3 lines
On May 10, 2013, at 7:49 AM, William Ray Wing wrote:
On May 10, 2013, at 12:55 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
In article mailman.1523.1368160434.3114.python-l...@python.org,
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
The first hard disk I ever worked with stored 20MB in the space of a
In article 518cc239$0$29997$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com,
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
int fd = 37;
I've just created a file descriptor. There is not enough information
given to know if it corresponds to an open file or not.
No, you haven't
In article mailman.1527.1368188358.3114.python-l...@python.org,
Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd be curious to see in-the-wild instances of the anti-pattern that
you are talking about, then. I think everyone agrees that entirely
unmotivated enable methods should be avoided, but
On 10 May 2013 15:01, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
In article mailman.1527.1368188358.3114.python-l...@python.org,
Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd be curious to see in-the-wild instances of the anti-pattern that
you are talking about, then. I think everyone agrees that
In article mailman.1530.1368196163.3114.python-l...@python.org,
Oscar Benjamin oscar.j.benja...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not just because of exceptions. In C++ virtual method calls in a
constructor for a class A will always call the methods of class A even
if the object being constructed is
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
I suppose, if I had a class like this, I would write a factory function
which called the constructor and post-construction initializer. And
then I would make the constructor protected.
That sounds like a reasonable plan, with
In article mailman.1531.1368197225.3114.python-l...@python.org,
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
I suppose, if I had a class like this, I would write a factory function
which called the constructor and post-construction
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
In article mailman.1531.1368197225.3114.python-l...@python.org,
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
I suppose, if I had a class like this, I would write a
On 8 mai, 15:19, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
Apropos to any of the myriad unicode threads that have been going on
recently:
http://xkcd.com/1209/
--
This reflects a lack of understanding of Unicode.
jmf
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:06 AM, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 mai, 15:19, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
Apropos to any of the myriad unicode threads that have been going on
recently:
http://xkcd.com/1209/
--
This reflects a lack of understanding of Unicode.
By the
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Fábio Santos fabiosantos...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 May 2013 05:19, dabaichi valben...@outlook.com wrote:
And hereis the output file:
That's not the output file. That is just an HTML fragment to put on your
page. A full HTML file will need more things, which
On 5/10/2013 11:06 AM, jmfauth wrote:
On 8 mai, 15:19, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
Apropos to any of the myriad unicode threads that have been going on
recently:
http://xkcd.com/1209/
--
This reflects a lack of understanding of Unicode.
jmf
And this reflects a lack of a sense of
In article mailman.1532.1368198547.3114.python-l...@python.org,
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Each language has its own set of best practices. Trying to write C++
code using Python patterns is as bad as trying to write Python code
using C++ patterns.
Agreed, in generality. But
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Ned Batchelder n...@nedbatchelder.com wrote:
On 5/10/2013 11:06 AM, jmfauth wrote:
On 8 mai, 15:19, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
Apropos to any of the myriad unicode threads that have been going on
recently:
http://xkcd.com/1209/
--
This
On 2013-05-10 15:01, Roy Smith wrote:
In article mailman.1527.1368188358.3114.python-l...@python.org,
Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd be curious to see in-the-wild instances of the anti-pattern that
you are talking about, then. I think everyone agrees that entirely
unmotivated
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
In article mailman.1532.1368198547.3114.python-l...@python.org,
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed, in generality. But what is actually gained by hiding data from
yourself?
You're not hiding it from yourself.
On May 10, 8:32 pm, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Ned Batchelder n...@nedbatchelder.com
wrote:
On 5/10/2013 11:06 AM, jmfauth wrote:
On 8 mai, 15:19, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
Apropos to any of the myriad unicode threads that have been
On 10/05/2013 17:07, rusi wrote:
On May 10, 8:32 pm, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Ned Batchelder n...@nedbatchelder.com wrote:
On 5/10/2013 11:06 AM, jmfauth wrote:
On 8 mai, 15:19, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
Apropos to any of the myriad
On 05/10/2013 09:07 AM, rusi wrote:
On May 10, 8:32 pm, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Ned Batchelder n...@nedbatchelder.com wrote:
On 5/10/2013 11:06 AM, jmfauth wrote:
On 8 mai, 15:19, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
Apropos to any of the myriad
On Thu, 09 May 2013 05:23:59 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
There is no sensible use-case for creating a file without opening it.
What would be the point? Any subsequent calls to just about any method
will fail. Since you have to open the file after creating the file object
anyway, why make
10.05.13 15:19, Robert Kern написав(ла):
I'd be curious to see in-the-wild instances of the anti-pattern that you
are talking about, then.
Many (if not most) GUI frameworks use this pattern.
button = Button(text)
button.setForegroundColor(...)
button.setBackgoundColor(...)
On 2013-05-10 16:44, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
10.05.13 15:19, Robert Kern написав(ла):
I'd be curious to see in-the-wild instances of the anti-pattern that you
are talking about, then.
Many (if not most) GUI frameworks use this pattern.
button = Button(text)
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com wrote:
10.05.13 15:19, Robert Kern написав(ла):
I'd be curious to see in-the-wild instances of the anti-pattern that you
are talking about, then.
Many (if not most) GUI frameworks use this pattern.
button =
In article pan.2013.05.10.16.59.31.512...@nowhere.com,
Nobody nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
However: there are situations where it is useful to be able to separate
the simple task of creating an object from more invasive actions such as
system calls. Particularly in multi-threaded or real-time
WHY DID PROPHET MUHAMMAD MARRY AISHA THE YOUNG GIRL?
This is an important book talks about a common issue misunderstood but
misused by lots of thinkers and orientalists. It is “Why did Prophet
Muhammad marry Aisha the young girl?” The author shows the reason
behind their discussion. They want to
Now! I have written a python script . I want to call a golang script in
python script.
Who can give me some advices?
See http://gopy.qur.me/extensions/examples.html and
http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=333589
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 10May2013 09:22, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
| In article 518cc239$0$29997$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com,
| Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
| int fd = 37;
|
| I've just created a file descriptor. There is not enough information
| given to know if
There is no sensible use-case for creating a file OBJECT unless it
initially wraps an open file pointer.
So far the only counter-examples given aren't counter-examples ...
Well, sure, if you discount operations like create this file and
queries like could I delete this file if I wanted to?
| No, I've created a file descriptor, which is, by definition, an integer.
| It has nothing to do with C. This is all defined by the POSIX
| interface. For example, the getdtablesize(2) man page says:
|
| The entries in the descriptor table are numbered with small integers
| starting at 0.
Am 10.05.2013 15:22 schrieb Roy Smith:
That's correct. But, as described above, the system makes certain
guarantees which allow me to reason about the existence or non-existence
os such entries.
Nevertheless, your 37 is not a FD yet.
Let's take your program:
#include unistd.h
#include
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
if (PyLong_CheckExact(item) || (PyLong_Check(item)
item-ob_type-tp_as_number-nb_index ==
PyLong_Type.tp_as_number-nb_index))
--
nosy: +serhiy.storchaka
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Martin v. Löwis added the comment:
a) Is Windows Server 2003 is really meant to be spported?
Yes
b) Are UNCs expected to behave differently on Server 2003?
No.
c) Can UNCs be disabled on a particular machine?
I may misunderstand can: yes, it is possible, but no, it is not desirable.
New submission from Ethan Furman:
PEP-0435 has been approved!
Now for lots of code review.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation, Library (Lib), Tests
files: ref435.py
hgrepos: 189
messages: 188812
nosy: barry, docs@python, eli.bendersky, stoneleaf
priority: normal
Nick Coghlan added the comment:
For anyone else reading the issue and wondering about Ezio's question above -
this issue was actually spun out from issue 7475, which covers the long saga of
getting these codecs fully restored in the new world order of Python 3 :)
--
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
stage: - patch review
type: - enhancement
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17947
___
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
Can you upload the patch as a diff against the CPython repo?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17947
___
Ethan Furman added the comment:
Here it is (I hope ;) .
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30192/pep-435.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17947
___
New submission from Jesús Vidal Panalés:
This bug was found using Mercurial. All the information it's on this bug link
http://bz.selenic.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3905
The bug was introduced on 2.7.3, previous versions works fine.
--
components: Windows
messages: 188816
nosy: jesusvpct
Xavier de Gaye added the comment:
For the reson why read() must still check for EWOULDBLOCK even though
after select() has reported a file descriptor ready for reading, see
the BUGS section of select linux man page, which says:
Under Linux, select() may report a socket file descriptor as
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
TBH I would *love* for there to be a standardized way to extend the
command line options! If it existed I would help myself. As it is,
that's way to complicated. (Then again, most customizations to the
default test runner are too complicated IMO. :-)
+1.
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Hello Jesus, this report is far too vague to make anything about it. You should
try to diagnose the issue further, here are some ideas:
- check whether it happens with another server than IIS
- try if you can reproduce without Mercurial being involved (simply
Kristján Valur Jónsson added the comment:
So, any objections? It is pretty straighforward. Btw, the searching for
Py_NONE seems to be a rudiment of some older version, there is no place where a
Py_NONE is put in there.
Also, what is the policy for 2.7? Are performance bugs proper bugs?
Xavier de Gaye added the comment:
Deciding what's best to do at this point without breaking existent
code is not easy, that is why I think that on python = 3.3 we
should fix *asynchat* in order to take EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK into
account and leave asyncore's recv() alone.
IMHO for all python
mirabilos added the comment:
Hi again,
sorry for being a bit late in following up to this.
Here are the results for the two runs you requested; these were done on the
same machine, intermixed (the first one cache-clean, the second and third run
subsequently (so that the third run is
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Py_None is what PyWeakref_GET_OBJECT() returns when the object is dead.
(same as calling () on a weakref, really)
The patch looks straightforward to me. 2.7 doesn't receive performance fixes,
though, except for large regressions. Also, we've had enough
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +pitrou
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9687
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
See also issue9687.
--
nosy: +serhiy.storchaka
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17926
___
___
Kristján Valur Jónsson added the comment:
Right, I misread the code.
Since the remove_subclass() function is called when a subclass dies, I don't
think it is necessary to clear out weak references in add_subclass(). They are
there merely to break the reference cycle.
Btw, the 'patch diff'
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Should be fixed in issue17926. AFAICT the issue doesn't exist on 3.x.
--
resolution: - duplicate
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
superseder: - PowerLinux dbm failure in 2.7
versions: -Python 3.1, Python 3.2
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Right, I misread the code.
Since the remove_subclass() function is called when a subclass dies,
I don't think it is necessary to clear out weak references in
add_subclass(). They are there merely to break the reference cycle.
Agreed.
--
Anselm Kruis added the comment:
Hi,
I was faced with a very similar problem also caused by an invalid file
descriptor.
My solution is to set an invalid parameter handler, that does nothing. This
effectively disables Dr. Watson. Perhaps this is a suitable solution for other
users too. And it
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Which supports your suspicion that the optimised case may not be needed
at all.
So we can just skip the assert when __m68k__ is defined?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Could you please repeat the tests with a larger data (1MB or more)?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17237
___
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
So what about more compact Struct object? This is not only memory issue (a
Struct object can require several times larger memory than size of processed
data), but performance issue (time of creating such object is proportional to
it's size).
Here is a
Changes by Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file30191/ref435.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17947
___
Christian Heimes added the comment:
AP has started to review my patch. I'm not yet sure how we should handle
constants and functions when the platform doesn't provide them. For example
Windows doesn't have any S_IS*() function like macros and doesn't provide a
S_IFBLK constant.
We have three
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
I don't see docs in the patch, but perhaps that should be a separate patch to
keep reviewing easier.
Also, Ethan, number the patch files in some way (like pep-435.1.patch,
pep-435.N.patch) as they go through rounds of reviews.
--
assignee: docs@python
A.M. Kuchling added the comment:
This seems to be fixed now. I downloaded python-3.3.1-docs-pdf-letter.tar.bz2
and ran pdfinfo on using.pdf:
Title: Python Setup and Usage
Subject:
Keywords:
Author: Guido van Rossum, Fred L. Drake, Jr., editor
Creator:
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
A question that came up while reviewing the new enum code: module or
module_name for this extra argument? The former is shorter, but the latter is
more correct in a way.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Guido van Rossum added the comment:
Module, please. The class attribute is also called __module__ after all.
On Friday, May 10, 2013, Eli Bendersky wrote:
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
A question that came up while reviewing the new enum code: module or
module_name for this extra
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
OK, I sent another batch of reviews through the code review system - Ethan you
should've gotten an email about it.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17947
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Guido van Rossum rep...@bugs.python.orgwrote:
Guido van Rossum added the comment:
Module, please. The class attribute is also called __module__ after all.
Makes sense. Thanks.
--
Eli Bendersky added the comment:
Regarding module vs. module_name for the extra param in the functional API,
Guido rightly points out in issue 17941 that __module__ is the class attribute,
so module is a consistent choice.
--
___
Python tracker
Meador Inge added the comment:
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
So what about more compact Struct object?
I already implemented the count optimization as a part of my patch for
implementing
PEP 3188 in issue3132. I need to rebaseline the patch. It has gotten
stale. Hopefully
there is
Changes by Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +alex
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17947
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Ethan Furman added the comment:
Incorporated comments.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30195/pep-0435_2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17947
___
Changes by Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us:
--
hgrepos: -189
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17947
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +zach.ware
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17947
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Jonathan Wakely added the comment:
Insisting on including Python.h first is just broken.
GNU libc's /usr/include/features.h will override it anyway when _GNU_SOURCE is
defined:
# undef _POSIX_C_SOURCE
# define _POSIX_C_SOURCE200809L
# undef _XOPEN_SOURCE
# define _XOPEN_SOURCE 700
So
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset d331e14cae42 by Guido van Rossum in branch 'default':
#17927: Keep frame from referencing cell-ified arguments.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d331e14cae42
--
nosy: +python-dev
___
Python tracker
Guido van Rossum added the comment:
Ok, the deed is done. Thanks for your review, Benjamin! I've reassigned it to
you so you can fix up the test if you want to.
What would you think of a backport to 3.3?
--
assignee: gvanrossum - benjamin.peterson
resolution: - fixed
Zachary Ware added the comment:
Thanks for your response, Martin.
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Zach: Temporarily committing changes to test specific buildbot issues
is fine
I suppose it would also be beneficial to get some output from the other bots
which are *not* failing, to have something to
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30197/test_zipfile_2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17944
___
New submission from Martijn Pieters:
Rev 83684 (http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/5885c02120f0) managed to move the
`attrgetter()` `versionadded` and `versionchanged` notes down to the
`itemgetter()` documentation instead, by moving the `itemgetter()` signature
*up* above these lines.
Now the
mirabilos added the comment:
Antoine: precisely.
Serhiy: sure. The times are now in msec per loop.
I did three subsequent runs, so the second and
third tuple are cache-warm.
Without assert: (89,88), (87,87), (89,86)
Without block : (79,78), (78,78), (79,78)
And in a second run:
Without
Martijn Pieters added the comment:
The 2.7 patch shifted the `itemgetter()` signature to above the `attrgetter()`
change and new notes.
New patch to fix that in issue #17949: http://bugs.python.org/issue17949
--
nosy: +mjpieters
___
Python tracker
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 9c93a631e95a by Ezio Melotti in branch '2.7':
#17949: fix merge glitch in itemgetter signature. Patch by Martijn Pieters.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/9c93a631e95a
--
nosy: +python-dev
___
Python
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
Fixed, thanks for the report and the patch!
--
assignee: docs@python - ezio.melotti
nosy: +ezio.melotti
resolution: - fixed
stage: - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
type: - enhancement
___
Python tracker
Charles-François Natali added the comment:
I'm attaching a proof of concept code for a ScheduledExecutor
interface, and a ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor implementation
(unfortunately I can't upload it as a mercurial diff for now).
Here's what the API looks like:
from concurrent.futures import
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
Here's a patch. Do you think it should be added under the string signature
too? It will make linking easier, but it might be more confusing for users.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +chris.jerdonek, ezio.melotti
stage: needs patch - patch review
type:
Martin Morrison added the comment:
Our usage of Python would certainly benefit from the backport.
We are embedding Python 3.3 in a system with requirements that lead us to
disable the gc in most cases, so cycles are an obvious problem for us. Cycles
created inadvertently, such as this, are
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
The issue17807 patch has now been committed and should solve this issue. I
would like to encourage anyone to test this change, as it is quite a
significant departure from the previous semantics:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-May/126102.html
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
type: - enhancement
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17907
___
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
Raymond, since this has been merged to default too in e163c13b941c, can the
issue be closed or is there something else left to do?
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
components: +Library (Lib)
nosy: +ezio.melotti
stage: - patch review
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17923
___
Ethan Furman added the comment:
More adjustments due to review.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30202/pep-0435_3.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17947
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +bethard
stage: - needs patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17940
___
Bob Ippolito added the comment:
The patch that I wrote for simplejson is here (it differs a bit from serhiy's
patch):
https://github.com/simplejson/simplejson/commit/35816bfe2d0ddeb5ddcc68239683cbb35b7e3ff2
I discovered another bug along the way in the pure-Python scanstring, int(s,
16) will
James O'Cull added the comment:
We have more information on this bug here. It's SSL v2 related when pushing to
IIS.
http://stackoverflow.com/a/16486104/97964
Here's a paste from the StackOverflow answer:
I found a few ways of dealing with this issue:
To fix this server-side
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
