Christoph Zwerschke wrote:
> Now as I'm thinking about it, wouldn't it be nice to have the cartesian
> products on Python sets? Maybe also a method that returns the power set
> of a set (the set of all subsets), or the set of all subsets with a
> given length.
For defining powersets it might suf
Bryan Olson wrote:
> There's no such thing; you'd have to define it first. Are duplicates
> significant? Order?
That's all trivial isn't it? A string is a set of pairs (i,c) where i
is an integer number, the index, with 0<=ihttp://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Christoph Zwerschke wrote:
>
> > Sometimes I was missing such a feature.
> > What I expect as the result is the "cartesian product" of the strings.
>
> I've been thinking of it as well. I'd like it for lists too:
>
> >> range(3)**2
> [(0,0), (0,1), (0,2), (1,0), (1,1), (1,2)
Tim Peters wrote:
> [Kay Schluehr]
> > I concur and I wonder why CAS like e.g. Maple that represent floating
> > point numbers using two integers [1] are neither awkward to use nor
> > inefficient.
>
> My guess is that it's because you never timed the difference in
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:48:26 +, Steve Holden wrote:
>
> > Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >> On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 04:25:01 +, Bengt Richter wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:16:22 +0100, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gerhard_H=E4ring?=
> >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>[...
Bengt Richter wrote:
> On 19 Jan 2006 01:19:06 -0800, "Kay Schluehr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I want to manipulate a deeply nested list in a generic way at a
> >determined place. Given a sequence of constant objects a1, a2, ..., aN
> >and a va
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2006-01-19, Kay Schluehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Does anybody have advice? I am looking for any tricks, features I can
> >> disable, etc so I can get the python core to be a small as possible (<100k
> >> would be goo
Derek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking to port Python to an embedded platform (an ARM7 device with
> fairly limited memory, capable of running an RTOS, but not an OS, such as
> Linux). I came across DePython from a few years ago, but it seems to have
> died a death.
>
> Does anybody have advice? I am
Peter Otten wrote:
> Kay Schluehr wrote:
>
> > I want to manipulate a deeply nested list in a generic way at a
> > determined place. Given a sequence of constant objects a1, a2, ..., aN
> > and a variable x. Now construct a list from them recursively:
> >
Steve Holden wrote:
> > If Mr. interpreter is as slick as he is why doesn't he convert the
> > float by himself? This is at most a warning caused by possible rounding
> > errors of float.
> >
> Indeed, as the documentation says: """This serves as an explicit
> reminder of the details of the conver
I wonder why this expression works:
>>> decimal.Decimal("5.5")**1024
Decimal("1.353299876254915295189966576E+758")
but this one causes an error
5.5**1024
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in ?
OverflowError: (34, 'Result too large')
Another quirk is the follwoing:
>>> deci
Paul Boddie wrote:
> Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> > Fuzzyman wrote:
> > > web.py has the great advantage that (allegedly) you can migrate apps
> > > from CGI to FastCGI, mod_python, WSGI.
> >
> > This isn't an advantage of web.py over other frameworks. You can do the
> > same thing with Django, becaus
I want to manipulate a deeply nested list in a generic way at a
determined place. Given a sequence of constant objects a1, a2, ..., aN
and a variable x. Now construct a list from them recursively:
L = [a1, [a2, [[aN, [x]]...]]
The value of x is the only one to be changed. With each value of x
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> Fuzzyman wrote:
> > web.py has the great advantage that (allegedly) you can migrate apps
> > from CGI to FastCGI, mod_python, WSGI.
>
> This isn't an advantage of web.py over other frameworks. You can do the
> same thing with Django, because it has a WSGI backend; people
I'd be interested in what people think about bundling one of the
diverse Python webframeworks with the Python distribution which will be
"just there" as like Tcl/Tk+Tkinter for GUI-programming. Its not that I
don't trust people to make qualified decisions on their own or that I
actually believe in
Max M wrote:
> First of they would need to make Python a strategic platform for
> corporations, so that it was used practically everywhere on Windows.
>
> Then it would have the powerbase to change the lanuage and make an
> incompatible version that they could control.
>
> As far as I can see C##
Luis M. González wrote:
> Is it good to have Python running on Java and .NET?
> Sure, why not?
At least for Jython we already know from the Jython homepage that it is
the great hope of the Java platform to survive in future and far
beyond. With a comparable fate dotNET and Microsoft survive till
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> While preparing a Python411 podcast about classes and OOP, my mind
> wondered far afield. I found myself constructing an extended metaphor
> or analogy between the way programs are organized and certain
> philosophical ideas. So, going where my better angels dare not, her
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:00:51 -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
>
>
> >> The other way I thought of is to create a separate class that consists
> >> of the variables and to use the
> >>
> >> from import *
> >>
> >> in all of the files (namespaces) where it is needed.
> >
> > Except
D H wrote:
> Kay Schluehr wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >>I am trying to learn GUI programming in Python, but have to confess I
> >>am finding it difficult.
> >
> >
> > Don't do it if you can prevent it.
>
> What kind o
Mike Meyer wrote:
> Ok, I've given it the interface I want, and made it less of an
> attractive nuisance.
>
> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/try_python/ is now ready for people to
> play with. There's no tutorial information on it yet, that's the next
> thing to do. However, I won't be able to work
gsteff wrote:
> So I'm wondering, what is
> innovative about Python, either in its design or implementation? Or is
> its magic really just in combining many useful features of prior
> languages in an unusually pleasant way?
>
> Greg
The latter.
http://www.python-in-business.org/ep2005/download.
Alex Martelli wrote:
> > I don't see why your typeclass illustration does not apply to ABCs as
>
> Because in a class, A or B or not, this code WOULD mean mutual recursion
> (and it can't be checked whether recursion terminates, in general). In
> a typeclass, it means something very different --
Tolga wrote:
> As far as I know, Perl is known as "there are many ways to do
> something" and Python is known as "there is only one way". Could you
> please explain this? How is this possible and is it *really* a good
> concept?
Do you know about the existence of god, just or scientific truth? Of
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
> > Hrm. I don't recall anything about typeclasses, so my suspicion is that
> > you were writing something lengthy and above my head. Can you write
> > something reasonably short about it? (I'm asking partly for your
> > benefit, be
Gabriel Zachmann wrote:
> I understand the Wikipedia article on Polymorphism
> ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymorphism_%28computer_science%29 )
> that it doesn't make sense to talk about polymorphism in a fully dynamically
> typed language -- does the Python community agree?
Maybe you should a
In almost any case I install a Python package via distutils some
directories in the package tree are left behind e.g. the docs,
licenses, tests etc. I wonder if there is some rationale behind this?
Should it be left to the "creative freedom" of the user to copy the
docs whereever she wants or is th
Harald Armin Massa wrote:
> Dr. Armin Rigo has some mathematical proof, that High Level Languages
> like esp. Python are able to be faster than low level code like
> Fortran, C or assembly.
>
> I am not wise enough to understand that proof.
>
> Maybe I understood those papers totally wrong and he
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am trying to learn GUI programming in Python, but have to confess I
> am finding it difficult.
Don't do it if you can prevent it.
GUI - toolkits are very complex beasts and at least to me a source of
pain far more as a joy. Python cannot help you making them
signific
Steve R. Hastings wrote:
> It should be possible to define operators using punctuation,
> alphanumerics, or both:
>
> ]+[
> ]add[
> ]outer*[
Seems like you look for advanced source-code editors.Some ideas are
around for quite a while e.g. here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentional_programming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Steve Holden wrote:
> > Perhaps now the answer top your question is more obvious: there is by no
> > means universal agreement on what an "ordered dictionary" should do.
> > Given the ease with which Python allows you to implement your chosen
> > functionality it would b
Bengt Richter wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:27:22 +0100, Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> >> if you restructure the list somewhat
> >> d = (
> >> ('pid', ('Employee ID', 'int')),
> >> ('name', ('Employee name', 'varchar')),
> >>
Ron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm attempting to develop a plugin framework for an application that I'm
> working on. I wish to develop something in which all plugins exist in a
> directory tree. The framework need only be given the root of the tree. The
> framework then uses os.path.walk to search al
A.M. Kuchling wrote:
> On 22 Nov 2005 01:41:44 -0800,
> Kay Schluehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anyone actually use this site? While the Vaults offered a nice
> > place and a nice interface the Cheese Shop has the appeal of a code
> > slum.
>
&g
Christoph Zwerschke wrote:
> That would be also biased (in favour of Python) by the fact that
> probably very little people would look for and use the package in the
> cheese shop if they were looking for ordered dicts.
Does anyone actually use this site? While the Vaults offered a nice
place and
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> huh? if you want a list, use a list.
>
> d = [('a', {...}), ('b', {})]
If one wants uniform access to a nested data structure like this one
usually starts writing a wrapper class. I do not think the requirement
is anyhow deeper than a standard wrapper around such a
Steven Bethard wrote:
> Pierre Barbier de Reuille wrote:
> > Proposal
> >
> >
> > First, I think it would be best to have a syntax to represent symbols.
> > Adding some special char before the name is probably a good way to
> > achieve that : $open, $close, ... are $ymbols.
>
> How about
pcmanlin wrote:
> because i have a problem that python's oo feature is so great, but
> maybe when the project become larger, python's no-declaration cannot
> mapping the design to practice?
>
> I am not sure about it.
As far cartoon-ware ( UML ) is concerned note that it is NOT Pythons
non-declara
Stefan Arentz wrote:
> Stuart Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm already using it for a ton of things - I want to try and get broader
> > acceptance in the organisation for it to be made and 'officially supported
> > product'.
>
> IMO that is what you need to communicate: 'already using
Probably some of you know the amazing demo application for wxPython.
When you open the Listbook demo in the
Core Windows/Contols folder, replace there wx.LB_DEFAULT by wx.LB_RIGHT
and resize the main window the listbox on the right side moves into the
area of colored panel. This is a surprise to sa
Robin Becker wrote:
> Kay Schluehr wrote:
> > Robin Becker wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I thought that methods were always overridable.
> >>In this case the lookup on the
> >>class changes the behaviour of the one and only property.
> >
> >
Robin Becker wrote:
> I thought that methods were always overridable.
> In this case the lookup on the
> class changes the behaviour of the one and only property.
How can something be made overridable that is actually overridable? I
didn't know how to better express the broken polymorphism of Pyt
Robin Becker wrote:
> Is there a way to override a data property in the instance? Do I need to
> create
> another class with the property changed?
> --
> Robin Becker
It is possible to decorate a method in a way that it seems like
property() respects overridden methods. The decorator cares
polymo
The Eternal Squire wrote:
> My main question regarding this is: even if I am successful, would the
> results be rejected out of hand by y'all as not meeting the Zen of
> Python?
Have you ever asked a Zen master about Zen?
Kay
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
George Sakkis wrote:
> "Ron Adam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to implement simple svg style colored complex objects in
> > tkinter and want to be able to inherit default values from other
> > previously defined objects.
> >
> > I want to something roughly similar to ...
> >
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I got a problem deleting objects, which are placed in a hirarchy
>
> Asume we have the following code:
>
> class parent:
>
> MyChilds = [] # this list is filled with childs
>
> def AddC
Alex Martelli wrote:
> try it (and read the Timbot's article included in Python's sources, and the
> sources themselves)...
Just a reading advise. The translated PyPy source
pypy/objectspace/listsort.py might be more accessible than the
corresponding C code.
Kay
--
http://mail.python.org/mail
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> James Stroud wrote:
> > There needs to be an email filter that, when a thread is begun by a specific
> > user . . . it cans every
> > message in that thread.
>
> The tried-and-true solution is both simple and civil, "Don't feed the
> trolls."
>
>
> Raymond
People like ve
Steve Holden wrote:
> could ildg wrote:
> > Python is wonderful except that it has no real private and protected
> > properties and methods.
> > Every py object has dict so that you can easily find what fields and
> > methods an obj has,
> > this is very convenient, but because of this, py is very
Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if this was previously discussed but it's something I miss in
> Python. I get around this using isinstance() but it would be cleaner
> to have separate functions with the same name but different argument
> types. I think the idea gets quite close to the Lisp/
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Slashdot there is a discussion about the future C#3.0:
> > http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/05/09/18/0545217.shtml?tid=109&tid=8
> >
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/vcsharp/future/
>
> "The extensions enable construction of composi
Laszlo Zsolt Nagy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Do you know how to implement a really efficient self reordering list in
> Python? (List with a maximum length. When an item is processed, it
> becomes the first element in the list.) I would like to use this for
> caching of rendered images.
I wonder why you d
PyPK wrote:
> If I have a list say
>
> lst = [1,1,1,1,3,5,1,1,1,1,7,7,7]
> I want to group the list so that it returns groups such as
> [(0,3),4,5,(6,9),(10,12)]. which defines the regions which are similar.
>
> Thanks,
Hi,
I got a solution without iterators and without comparing adjecent
elemen
Steve Holden wrote:
> Kay Schluehr wrote:
> > Mike Meyer wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Yes, but the function "sorted" is more useful than a list method
> >>"sorted" in a duck typing language.
> >
> >
> > I don't see what this
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> 1) The existing tool is inadequate for the task at hand and OO subclassing
> is overrated/overhyped to fix this problem. Even when you override
> base classes with your own stuff, you're still stuck with the larger
> *architecture* of the original design. You real
Terry Reedy wrote:
> "Kay Schluehr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On the other hand there exists no sorted() method for tuples or lists
> > like join() for strings but it is implemented as a function in Python24
> >
Mike Meyer wrote:
> Yes, but the function "sorted" is more useful than a list method
> "sorted" in a duck typing language.
I don't see what this has to do with "duck typing"? sorted() is simply
a generic function accepting different types. I'm not aware that
sorted() requires a specific interface
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Let's say I define a list of pairs as follows:
> >>l = [('d', 3), ('a', 2), ('b', 1)]
>
> Can anyone explain why this does not work?
> >>h = {}.update(l)
>
> and instead I have to go:
> >>h = {}
> >>h.update(l)
> to initialize a dictionary with the given list of pairs?
>
David Duerrenmatt wrote:
> Is there a way to use old pyd files (Python 1.5.2) with a newer version
> of Python without recompiling them?
>
> Because the source code is not available anymore, I'm wondering whether
> it's possible or not to change few bytes with a hex editor (version
> number?). I'd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dude - this business is so confusing that you actually have to *think*
> about it!
> but python is all about simplicity.
> with python, when I program - I don't think *about* it - I think it. or
> something - don't make me think about it.
>
> so how about a "reyield" or
Terry Reedy wrote:
> "Kay Schluehr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > No, as I explained it is not a ternary operator and it can't easily be
> > implemented using a Python function efficiently because Python does not
> &g
Terry Hancock wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 September 2005 05:29 am, Kay Schluehr wrote:
> > Instead of pushing statements into expressions one can try to do it the
> > other way round and model expressions with the functionality of
> > statements.
>
> > Alternativ
One of the main reasons Pythons anonymous function lambda is considered
to be "broken" is Pythons disability to put statements into expressions
and support full functionality. Many attempts to improve lambdas syntax
had also been attempts to break the expression/statement distinction in
one or the
This should help:
http://epydoc.sourceforge.net/fields.html
Kay
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
> Kay Schluehr wrote:
> > Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
> >
> >> > x = [ yield r for r in iterable ]
> >>
> >> Which is quite different from
> >>
> >> x = (yield) in iterable
> >>
> >> which
Bengt Richter wrote:
> range(9)[4:-!0:-1] == range(5)
> >True
> Interesting, but wouldn't that last line be
> >>> range(9)[4:-!0:-1] == range(5)[::-1]
Ups. Yes of course.
> >Life can be simpler with unbound limits.
> Hm, is "!0" a di-graph symbol for infinity?
> What if we get full unicode
Bengt Richter wrote:
> How about interpreting seq[i] as an abbreviation of seq[i%len(seq)] ?
> That would give a consitent interpretation of seq[-1] and no errors
> for any value ;-)
Cool, indexing becomes cyclic by default ;)
But maybe it's better to define it explicitely:
seq[!i] = seq[i%
Bengt Richter wrote:
> How about interpreting seq[i] as an abbreviation of seq[i%len(seq)] ?
> That would give a consitent interpretation of seq[-1] and no errors
> for any value ;-)
Cool, indexing becomes cyclic by default ;)
But maybe it's better to define it explicitely:
seq[!i] = seq[i%
Sybren Stuvel wrote:
> > -Get rid of extra variables by shifting them inline (e.g.:
> > a=1;b=2;c=a+b --> c=1+2)
>
> This is already excess functionality IMO.
I don't think that Rex talked about his programming style but about
three and only three refactoring methods survived in BRM from ~30
Fow
Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
> > x = [ yield r for r in iterable ]
>
> Which is quite different from
>
> x = (yield) in iterable
>
> which is currently (PEP 342) equivalent to
>
> _ = (yield)
> x = _ in iterable
>
> So, no further tinkering with yield, I'm afraid.
>
> Reinhold
Is the statement
Bryan Olson wrote:
> Steven Bethard wrote:
> > Well, I couldn't find where the general semantics of a negative stride
> > index are defined, but for sequences at least[1]:
> >
> > "The slice of s from i to j with step k is defined as the sequence of
> > items with index x = i + n*k such that 0
Steven Bethard wrote:
> "The slice of s from i to j with step k is defined as the sequence of
> items with index x = i + n*k such that 0 <= n < (j-i)/k."
>
> This seems to contradict list behavior though.
> range(10)[9:-1:-2] == []
No, both is correct. But we don't have to interpret the seco
Simon Brunning wrote:
> On 8/15/05, Rocco Moretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Which lead me to the question - what's the difference between a library
> > and a framework?
>
> If you call its code, it's a library. If it calls yours, it's a framework.
Pretty!
I don't think it is an oversimplific
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:19:19 +0100
> phil hunt wrote:
>
> > According to Wikipedia, the Liskov substitution principle is:
> >
> > Let q(x) be a property provable about objects x of type T. Then
> > q(y) should be true for objects y of type S where S is a subtype of T
EP wrote:
> But sometimes a rugged individual can be even more rugged and more individual
> if said individual has the support of friends by which to vet ideas and, by
> absorbing counterpoint, to develop one's own thoughts even further.
>
>
> And it is kind of nice when you have two teams drill
Hi Bastard,
one of the main reasons PyPy gets funded by the EU was the promise to
port Python to embedded systems ( but not necessarily very memory
restricted ones ). The project seems to be in a state where the team
tries to get rid of the CPython runtime alltogether and reaching some
autonomy. T
Bengt Richter wrote:
> It occurs to me that we have the PEP process for core python, but no PEP
> process
> for the python app/lib environment. What about starting a PEEP process
> (Python Environment Enhancement Proposals) modeled on PEPs, where those
> motivated
> to formalize their pet projec
Paul Rubin schrieb:
> Having a good FFI is certainly an important feature but Python
> programs should first and foremost be Python programs.
Python was originally created as an extension language for C. In some
sense it is an abstraction layer for C libs.
> Compare the
> situation with Java or
Nicolas Fleury schrieb:
> Kay Schluehr wrote:
> > def makeClass(cls_name, **kw):
> > return type(cls_name,(), kw)
> >
> >>>>MyObject = makeClass("MyObject",a=8)
> >>>>MyObject
>
> As said to Bengt, a place is needed to write
Nicolas Fleury wrote:
> It is necessary to maintain a
> dictionary of types (to avoid redundacy) and simple things like:
>
> def makeType(someArgument):
> class MyObject:
> someArgument = someArgument
> return MyObject
>
> are not allowed.
def makeClass(cls_name, **kw):
ret
Use the strip() method.
Example:
>>> "\t abc\n".strip()
"abc"
Variants are lstrip() and rstrip().
Regards,
Kay
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
> Kay Schluehr wrote:
> > Eric Pederson wrote:
> >
> >>Raise your hand if you think the best technology wins!
> >
> >
> > Who is interested in such a matter? Is this a forum dedicated to some
> > programming language or a pop
Eric Pederson wrote:
> Raise your hand if you think the best technology wins!
Who is interested in such a matter? Is this a forum dedicated to some
programming language or a popularity contest?
If Python dies in a few years / looses attention but the Python Zen
survives in another language I have
Paul Rubin wrote:
> Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It didn't say what they left PHP, Perl and Python for (if you are to
> > even believe their findings).
> >
> > PHP has been losing programmers in droves... to Ruby on Rails, but I'm
> > not sure how that is bad news for scripting-langu
John Roth wrote:
> Another thing that stands out: the explicit versus dynamic typing debate
> has moved on from program correctness (which is a wash) to
> other areas that explicit (or derived) type information can be used
> for. I see this in PyFit: the languages where explicit type information
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've heard 2 people complain that word 'global' is confusing.
>
> Perhaps 'modulescope' or 'module' would be better?
>
> Am I the first peope to have thought of this and suggested it?
>
> Is this a candidate for Python 3000 yet?
>
> Chris
Maybe a solution would be best t
No good news for scripting-language fans:
http://www.phpmag.net/itr/news/psecom,id,23284,nodeid,113.html
Regards
Kay
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
> > In practise any Python GUI is going to contain code from otyher
> > languages since if it was coded all the way down in python it would
> > be too slow.
>
> Oh, I could imagine that a MFC-like wrapper around win32gui, or another
> one around Xlib wouldn't be slower t
Paolino wrote:
> The second point also shows my perplexities about functions namespace:
>
> def function():
>function.foo='something'
>
> a=function.foo
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>File "", line 1, in ?
> AttributeError: 'function' object has no attribute 'foo'
>
> How should I
Cliff Wells wrote:
> > My objection with wrappers around wrappers around wrappers is that I
> > have no hope ever watching the ground. If some error occurs, which
> > layer has to be addressed? Which developing group is reponsible? My own
> > or that of team A, team B, team C ... ? The baroque con
Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Sunday 31 July 2005 01:02, phil hunt wrote:
>
> > You mightn't have, but I suspect more Python programers who've
> > written GUI apps have used Tkinter than any of the other APIs.
> >
> > Not that I'm a particular fan of it, it's just I like
> > standardisation, because then y
Some indications:
>>> for i in range(5):
... x = lambda x:x
... y = lambda y:y
... print x,y,x at 0x00EE83F0> at 0x00EE8FB0>
True True
at 0x00EE8AB0> at 0x00EE83F0>
False False
at 0x00EE8FB0> at 0x00EE8AB0>
False False
at 0x00EE83F0> at 0x00EE8FB0>
True True
at 0x00EE8AB0> at
Dark Cowherd wrote:
> -Quote - Phillip J. Eby from dirtsimple.org
> Python as a community is plagued by massive amounts of
> wheel-reinvention. The infamous web framework proliferation problem is
> just the most egregious example.
>
> Why is Python "blessed" with so much reinvention? Because it's
Paul Rubin wrote:
> "Kay Schluehr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Examples:
> >f = ( || x>=0 then f(x) || True then f(-x) from (x,) )
> >g = ( || x< 0 then self._a <-x || self._a <- 0 from (x,))
>
> Is this an actual language? It lo
Mike Meyer schrieb:
> I know, lambda bashing (and defending) in the group is one of the most
> popular ways to avoid writing code. However, while staring at some Oz
> code, I noticed a feature that would seem to make both groups happy -
> if we can figure out how to avoid the ugly syntax.
>
> This
Tim Roberts schrieb:
> Scott David Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >What kind of shenanigans must a parser go through to translate:
> > <
> >
> >this is the comparison of two functions, but it looks like a left-
> >shift on a function until the second with is encountered. Then
> >yo
Jan Danielsson wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>I have written a simple whiteboard application. In my application, I
> want to be able to set draw attributes. This part works. I have a
> dictionary object which contains stuff like:
> self.attr['Pen.Color'] = ...
> self.attr['Pen.Thickness'] = ...
>
>
Andreas Kostyrka schrieb:
> (These are the people look for Pearl and Pyhton programmers ;) )
Or Phyton :)
Kay
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> hi
> i bassically need it cuz i am appyling to colleges this year and
> i know this kind of stuff really helps.
> besides since i am learning python i thought i might get some credit
> for it as well.
> its bassically for a mention in my resume/bio-data/appliccation
>
Ron Adam wrote:
> Kay Schluehr wrote:
>
>
> > Hi Ron,
> >
> > I really don't want to discourage you in doing your own CAS but the
> > stuff I'm working on is already a bit more advanced than my
> > mono-operational multiplicative algebra
501 - 600 of 725 matches
Mail list logo
