Op 26-11-13 22:42, Tim Delaney schreef:
On 27 November 2013 03:57, Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be
mailto:antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
So I can now ask my questions in dutch and expect others to try and
understand me instead of me asking them in english? Or can I
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
However that second sentence doesn't make much sense to me. Modern
languages contain a subset that is called the standard language. This
is the subset that is generally taught. Especially to those for whom
the
Op 27-11-13 09:19, Chris Angelico schreef:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
However that second sentence doesn't make much sense to me. Modern
languages contain a subset that is called the standard language. This
is the subset that is
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Op 27-11-13 09:19, Chris Angelico schreef:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
However that second sentence doesn't make much sense to me. Modern
languages contain
Op 27-11-13 09:36, Chris Angelico schreef:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
Op 27-11-13 09:19, Chris Angelico schreef:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
However that second sentence doesn't
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:41:54 AM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On 11/26/13 8:26 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
Classic Rick Rant
And will you be here to explain to time-travelling Shakespeare why we
are all of us speaking English completely wrong (to his ears)?
And to my (Indian!!)
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 3:02:54 PM UTC+5:30, rusi wrote:
[Last line cut-off by mistake!]
It is my impression that the arguments that happen in/around
programming languages are more-heat-less-light than in typical
art/science because artistic questions masquerade as
Steven D'Aprano writes:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:24:16 -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
Although i would strongly prefer for him to choose ubiquitous
definitions *over* regional definitions when posting to internet
forums, i would have happily ignored this thread had it not been
for Stevens
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:18:11 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:26:48 -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
[...]
A new home-run record!
What is this home-run of which you speak? Houses don't generally run.
Surely you're not using a regional idiom outside of your
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:47 PM, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:18:11 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:26:48 -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
[...]
A new home-run record!
What is this home-run of which you speak? Houses don't
On 27/11/2013 06:48, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:26:48 -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
Even if you are correct that the OP is using a regional variation of
English, you fail to realize that this regional redefinition of the
English word: doubts to mean what the *majority* of
On 27/11/2013 08:16, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 26-11-13 22:42, Tim Delaney schreef:
On 27 November 2013 03:57, Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be
mailto:antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
So I can now ask my questions in dutch and expect others to try and
understand me
On 11/26/13 11:24 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:11:54 PM UTC-6, Ned Batchelder wrote:
Rick, through all the verbiage, I've lost track of what you are
advocating. The OP asks a question and uses the word doubt in a way
that is unusual to you and many other, though not
rusi rustompm...@gmail.com writes:
Propositionally: All languages are equal -- Turing complete
As an aside, not all languages are Turing complete. For example Charity
is a language with the property that programs are guaranteed to
terminate.
On 2013-11-27 08:31, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 27-11-13 09:19, Chris Angelico schreef:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Antoon Pardon
antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
However that second sentence doesn't make much sense to me. Modern
languages contain a subset that is called the standard
On 2013-11-27 08:16, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 26-11-13 22:42, Tim Delaney schreef:
On 27 November 2013 03:57, Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be
mailto:antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
So I can now ask my questions in dutch and expect others to try and
understand me
On Wednesday 27 November 2013 07:44:18 rusi did opine:
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:41:54 AM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder
wrote:
On 11/26/13 8:26 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
Classic Rick Rant
And will you be here to explain to time-travelling Shakespeare why we
are all of us speaking
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 6:27:52 PM UTC+5:30, Robert Kern wrote:
On 2013-11-27 08:16, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 26-11-13 22:42, Tim Delaney schreef:
On 27 November 2013 03:57, Antoon Pardon wrote:
So I can now ask my questions in dutch and expect others to try and
On 27/11/2013 08:31, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 27-11-13 09:19, Chris Angelico schreef:
[...]
Do you mean standard British English, standard American English,
standard Australian English, or some other?
Does that significantly matter or are you just looking for details
you can use to disagree?
On 2013-11-27 13:29, rusi wrote:
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 6:27:52 PM UTC+5:30, Robert Kern wrote:
On 2013-11-27 08:16, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 26-11-13 22:42, Tim Delaney schreef:
On 27 November 2013 03:57, Antoon Pardon wrote:
So I can now ask my questions in dutch and expect
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Paul Rudin paul.nos...@rudin.co.uk wrote:
rusi rustompm...@gmail.com writes:
Propositionally: All languages are equal -- Turing complete
As an aside, not all languages are Turing complete. For example Charity
is a language with the property that programs are
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:39:37 PM UTC+5:30, Larry wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Paul Rudin wrote:
rusi writes:
Propositionally: All languages are equal -- Turing complete
As an aside, not all languages are Turing complete. For example Charity
is a language with the
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:09:37 -0500, Larry Martell wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Paul Rudin paul.nos...@rudin.co.uk
wrote:
rusi rustompm...@gmail.com writes:
Propositionally: All languages are equal -- Turing complete
As an aside, not all languages are Turing complete. For example
On 11/27/13 8:18 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 27 November 2013 07:44:18 rusi did opine:
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:41:54 AM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder
wrote:
On 11/26/13 8:26 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
Classic Rick Rant
And will you be here to explain to time-travelling
On 2013-11-27 01:32, rusi wrote:
And will you be here to explain to time-travelling Shakespeare
why we are all of us speaking English completely wrong (to his
ears)?
And to my (Indian!!) ears when Tim says 'plank in the eye' where
King James says 'beam' it does not cut it.
Well, would
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:55:12 PM UTC+5:30, Tim Chase wrote:
On 2013-11-27 01:32, rusi wrote:
And will you be here to explain to time-travelling Shakespeare
why we are all of us speaking English completely wrong (to his
ears)?
And to my (Indian!!) ears when Tim says 'plank
On 27/11/2013 7:12 PM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
However that there is no perfect solution doesn't imply
we can't expect some effort from those with english as a mother
tongue to search for ways in which to express themselves that are
more likely to be understood by those who had to learn english
as
In article l764gb$5k5$1...@dont-email.me, alex23 wuwe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 27/11/2013 7:12 PM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
However that there is no perfect solution doesn't imply
we can't expect some effort from those with english as a mother
tongue to search for ways in which to express
On 2013-11-27 20:08, Roy Smith wrote:
How do you expect people to know they're using a local idiom?
Look it up in Urban Dictionary and Bob's your uncle.
I thought that's how one could tell if it was an *inappropriate*
idiom. As a matter of fact, I'm surprised that Bob's your uncle
doesn't
On 11/25/13 10:33 PM, Rick Johnson wrote: On Monday, November 25, 2013 2:10:04
PM UTC-6, Ned Batchelder wrote:
Let's please avoid veering off into rants about language
and philosophy now.
Hello Ned. I respect the fact that you want to keep threads
on-topic, and i greatly appreciate the
In article mailman.3219.1385452076.18130.python-l...@python.org,
Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
So I think we may expect more effort from the writer in trying to be
understandable than from the readers in trying to understand. And
that includes idiom use.
We live in an
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
We live in an international world (otherwise we wouldn't need that
annoying unicode stuff). When you say, effort to be understandable,
what you're really saying is, everybody should be just like me.
Unfortunately, that's not
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 01:52:11 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
We live in an international world (otherwise we wouldn't need that
annoying unicode stuff). When you say, effort to be understandable,
what you're really saying is,
Op 26-11-13 15:37, Roy Smith schreef:
In article mailman.3219.1385452076.18130.python-l...@python.org,
Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be wrote:
So I think we may expect more effort from the writer in trying to be
understandable than from the readers in trying to understand. And
On Tuesday 26 November 2013 10:49:07 Alister did opine:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 01:52:11 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
We live in an international world (otherwise we wouldn't need that
annoying unicode stuff). When you say,
On 27 November 2013 03:57, Antoon Pardon antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.bewrote:
So I can now ask my questions in dutch and expect others to try and
understand me instead of me asking them in english? Or can I use
literal translations of dutch idioms even if I suspect that such
a literal
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:52:11 AM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Roy Smith [...] wrote:
We live in an international world (otherwise we wouldn't
need that annoying unicode stuff). When you say,
effort to be understandable, what you're really saying
On 11/26/13 8:26 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:52:11 AM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Roy Smith [...] wrote:
We live in an international world (otherwise we wouldn't
need that annoying unicode stuff). When you say,
effort to be
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:26:48 -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
Even if you are correct that the OP is using a regional variation of
English, you fail to realize that this regional redefinition of the
English word: doubts to mean what the *majority* of English speaking
world understands as
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:24:16 -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
Although i would strongly prefer for him to choose ubiquitous
definitions *over* regional definitions when posting to internet forums,
i would have happily ignored this thread had it not been for Stevens
emotional plea of:
As this
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
I completely sniglim with what you are saying. I'd go further and state
that, without exception, your argument is the most vumtigious I've ever
seen, and if there were any justice in the world, people would follow you
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:24:16 -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
Pop Quiz
Your driving your car down the
On 2013-11-23, Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 01:55:44 +, Denis McMahon wrote:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:22:29 +0530, Bharath Kummar wrote:
Could you PLEASE provide me with the codes (codes only for the asked
queries) ?
The codes are:
On 2013-11-23, Dave Angel da...@davea.name wrote:
Try posting in text, as some of us see nothing in your message. This
is a text newsgroup, not html.
Also make a subject line that summarizes your issue, not the urgency.
An exclamation mark is a yellow flag, and three should definitly route
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:25:57 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2013-11-23, Dave Angel da...@davea.name wrote:
Try posting in text, as some of us see nothing in your message. This is
a text newsgroup, not html.
Also make a subject line that summarizes your issue, not the urgency.
An
On Saturday, November 23, 2013 7:38:47 PM UTC-6, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Where do you, an American,
What the hell makes you believe I'm an American? Because i
speak fluent English? Because i embrace capitalism? Because
i wish to be free of tyranny? Well, if that's all it takes
to be an American,
Op 23-11-13 03:18, Steven D'Aprano schreef:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 01:55:44 +, Denis McMahon wrote:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:22:29 +0530, Bharath Kummar wrote:
Could you PLEASE provide me with the codes (codes only for the asked
queries) ?
The codes are:
1)
I'm not an expert on Indian English, but I understand that in that
dialect it is grammatically correct to say the codes, just as in UK and
US English it is grammatically correct to say the programs.
In other words, in UK/US English, code in the sense of programming code
is an uncountable
On Monday, November 25, 2013 2:32:12 PM UTC-5, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Saturday, November 23, 2013 7:38:47 PM UTC-6, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Where do you, an American,
What the hell makes you believe I'm an American? Because i
speak fluent English? Because i embrace capitalism? Because
i
On 11/25/2013 11:53 AM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 23-11-13 03:18, Steven D'Aprano schreef:
As this is an international forum, it behoves us all to make allowances
for slight difference in dialect.
I don't see how that follows. I would say on the contrary. This being
an international forum
Ned Batchelder wrote:
Let's please avoid veering off into rants about language
and philosophy now.
Philosophy is totally on topic for this group:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2gJamguN04
--
Greg
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Gregory Ewing
greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nzwrote:
Ned Batchelder wrote:
Let's please avoid veering off into rants about language
and philosophy now.
Philosophy is totally on topic for this group:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2gJamguN04
A classic! I
On Monday, November 25, 2013 2:10:04 PM UTC-6, Ned Batchelder wrote:
Let's please avoid veering off into rants about language
and philosophy now.
Hello Ned. I respect the fact that you want to keep threads
on-topic, and i greatly appreciate the humbleness of your
request.
However, i feel as
Op 25-11-13 21:00, Ethan Furman schreef:
On 11/25/2013 11:53 AM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 23-11-13 03:18, Steven D'Aprano schreef:
As this is an international forum, it behoves us all to make allowances
for slight difference in dialect.
I don't see how that follows. I would say on the
Op 25-11-13 21:05, Joel Goldstick schreef:
I'm not an expert on Indian English, but I understand that in that
dialect it is grammatically correct to say the codes, just as in UK and
US English it is grammatically correct to say the programs.
In other words, in UK/US English, code in the sense
On Saturday 2013 November 23 23:32, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
This list needs stronger moderation
Rule #1: The ML should not disseminate any message which contains an
unquoted please.
--
Yonder nor sorghum stenches shut ladle gulls stopper torque wet
strainers.
--
On Nov 23, 2013, at 1:42 AM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
I'm not an expert on Indian English, but I understand that in that
dialect it is grammatically correct to say the codes, just as in
On 23/11/2013 02:18, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
In other words, in UK/US English,
UK English? Clearly you've never been to Newcastle upon Tyne or Glasgow :)
--
Python is the second best programming language in the world.
But the best has yet to be invented. Christian Tismer
Mark Lawrence
--
On 2013-11-23 10:44, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 23:42:44 -0700, Ian Kelly
ian.g.ke...@gmail.com declaimed the following:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wlfr...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Rice is the plural of rouse
Not according to the
By the same logic
the plural of spouse is spice and most men that have had more
than one wife will tell you that, whilst it may be the
expectation, it ain't necessarily so ;-)
On 23/11/2013 16:44, Dennis Lee Bieber
wrote:
On
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Tim Chase
python.l...@tim.thechases.com wrote:
Mice/Mouse Rice/*Rouse
Wordplay is one of my worst vouse. ;-)
Yeah, some people can come up with bad puns in a trouse.
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 23/11/2013 17:35, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Tim Chase
python.l...@tim.thechases.com wrote:
Mice/Mouse Rice/*Rouse
Wordplay is one of my worst vouse. ;-)
Yeah, some people can come up with bad puns in a trouse.
ChrisA
Well! That wasn't very nouse!
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 02:18:03 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 01:55:44 +, Denis McMahon wrote:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:22:29 +0530, Bharath Kummar wrote:
Could you PLEASE provide me with the codes (codes only for the asked
queries) ?
The codes are:
1)
On Friday, November 22, 2013 8:18:03 PM UTC-6, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[snip] I look forward to the day that rice is the plural of ri
Yes and i look forward to the day when thread hijacking perpetrated under the
guise of exploring linguistic minutia perpetrated under the guise of vanity
is
On Friday, November 22, 2013 8:18:03 PM UTC-6, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
As this is an international forum, it behoves us all to make allowances
for slight difference in dialect.
I don't thank so. What purpose does that serve?
If we allow people to speak INCORRECT English under the
guise of
On 2013-11-23 15:06, Rick Johnson wrote:
I don't thank so. What purpose does that serve?
If we allow people to speak INCORRECT English under the
guise of political correctness then no one will benefit.
I don't thank so?
talk about the plank in your own eye...
-tkc
--
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Rick Johnson
rantingrickjohn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, November 22, 2013 8:18:03 PM UTC-6, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
As this is an international forum, it behoves us all to make allowances
for slight difference in dialect.
I don't thank so. What purpose
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wlfr...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Rice is the plural of rouse
And spice is the plural of spouse. :-)
--
Greg
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Ian Kelly wrote:
I wouldn't necessarily even consider it an Indian thing, as I've known
Americans to use the same phrase.
In my experience it seems to be a scientific community
vs. computer science community thing. I often hear Fortran
people talk about a code where we would say a library
or a
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 15:06:42 -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Friday, November 22, 2013 8:18:03 PM UTC-6, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
As this is an international forum, it behoves us all to make allowances
for slight difference in dialect.
I don't thank so. What purpose does that serve?
If we
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
Thank you for the lesson in the virtues of bluntness, and why politeness
and political correctness is a vice. Never let it be said that I'm not
willing to learn from you Rick, so keeping everything you
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Devin Jeanpierre
jeanpierr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
Thank you for the lesson in the virtues of bluntness, and why politeness
and political correctness is a vice. Never let
Hello Sir/Mam,
Could you please help me with my current research ? Am implementing the
concept in python language.
My doubts are :
1) Is it possible to Retrieve the address of a variable in python ?
2) Is it possible to Delete the Address of the Variable and create a new
dynamic address inside
In article mailman.3038.1385125611.18130.python-l...@python.org,
Bharath Kummar bathubharat...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you please help me with my current research ? Am implementing the
concept in python language.
My doubts are :
[Note to readers of American/British English; Indian English
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:22:29 +0530, Bharath Kummar wrote:
1) Is it possible to Retrieve the address of a variable in python ?
No. Variables in Python are not at fixed addresses, like in Pascal or C,
they are names in a namespace.
You can read this post for some more information about the
On Friday, November 22, 2013 6:22:29 PM UTC+5:30, Bharath Kummar wrote:
Hello Sir/Mam,
Could you please help me with my current research ? Am implementing the
concept in python language.
My doubts are :
1) Is it possible to Retrieve the address of a variable in python ?
2) Is it
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:13 AM, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
2) del will delete objects -- like free in C
Except that like above, thinking in C will cause more problems than it
solves
No, del will only delete name bindings. Whether the bound object is
also deleted depends on whether
On 2013-11-22, Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:22:29 +0530, Bharath Kummar wrote:
1) Is it possible to Retrieve the address of a variable in python ?
No. Variables in Python are not at fixed addresses, like in Pascal or C,
they are names
On Friday, November 22, 2013 9:13:50 AM UTC-5, rusi wrote:
On Friday, November 22, 2013 6:22:29 PM UTC+5:30, Bharath Kummar wrote:
Hello Sir/Mam,
Could you please help me with my current research ? Am implementing the
concept in python language.
My doubts are :
1) Is it possible to
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:22:29 +0530, Bharath Kummar wrote:
Could you please help me with my current research ? Am implementing the
concept in python language.
My doubts are :
1) Is it possible to Retrieve the address of a variable in python ?
2) Is it possible to Delete the Address of the
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 01:55:44 +, Denis McMahon wrote:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:22:29 +0530, Bharath Kummar wrote:
Could you PLEASE provide me with the codes (codes only for the asked
queries) ?
The codes are:
1) 7373a28109a7c4473a475b2137aa92d5
2) f2fae9a4ad5ded75e4d8ac34b90d5c9c
3)
Try posting in text, as some of us see nothing in your message. This
is a text newsgroup, not html.
Also make a subject line that summarizes your issue, not the urgency.
--
DaveA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
I'm not an expert on Indian English, but I understand that in that
dialect it is grammatically correct to say the codes, just as in UK and
US English it is grammatically correct to say the programs.
I
83 matches
Mail list logo
