Le 28/05/2014 13:31, Sameer Rathoud a écrit :
I was searching for spyder, but didn't got any helpful installable.
What problem did you encounter while trying to install spyder ?
Spyder is oriented towards scientific applications, but can be used as a
general python IDE. I use it for GUI devel
On 02/06/2014 11:43, Tim Golden wrote:
On 02/06/2014 10:15, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
What is the Latin for "resident unicode expert go home"?
Google Translate says:
Eusebius, et revertatur in domum perito resident.
ChrisA
Try:
Perite d
On 02/06/2014 10:15, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>
>> What is the Latin for "resident unicode expert go home"?
>
> Google Translate says:
>
> Eusebius, et revertatur in domum perito resident.
>
> ChrisA
>
Try:
Perite domestice unicodicis: vad
Chris Angelico gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Mark Lawrence
yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > What is the Latin for "resident unicode expert go home"?
>
> Google Translate says:
>
> Eusebius, et revertatur in domum perito resident.
>
> ChrisA
>
Oh, the joys of Google Tran
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
> What is the Latin for "resident unicode expert go home"?
Google Translate says:
Eusebius, et revertatur in domum perito resident.
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 02/06/2014 09:15, Tim Golden wrote:
On 02/06/2014 08:28, Wolfgang Maier wrote:
gmail.com> writes:
Amen.
Ite missa est.
Oh, why all the lamenting about python's unicode support, when your latin is
so superbe ! Elegant solution to all your problems :)
After all, if you can't use Lati
On 02/06/2014 08:28, Wolfgang Maier wrote:
> gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> Amen.
>> Ite missa est.
>>
>
> Oh, why all the lamenting about python's unicode support, when your latin is
> so superbe ! Elegant solution to all your problems :)
After all, if you can't use Latin-1 for Latin, what can yo
gmail.com> writes:
>
> Amen.
> Ite missa est.
>
Oh, why all the lamenting about python's unicode support, when your latin is
so superbe ! Elegant solution to all your problems :)
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 16:04:18 UTC+2, Rustom Mody a écrit :
> On Friday, May 30, 2014 7:24:10 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>
> > Rustom Mody wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > >> > 3. Search unopened files (grep) for a string or re.
>
> > >
>
> > > How do you do this with emacs?
>
> > > I fi
Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 18:38:04 UTC+2, Mark Lawrence a écrit :
> On 30/05/2014 17:15, Rustom Mody wrote:
>
> > On Friday, May 30, 2014 8:36:54 PM UTC+5:30, wxjm...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> > It is now about time that we stop taking ASCII seriously!!
>
> >
>
>
>
> This can't happen in the
Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 18:15:09 UTC+2, Rustom Mody a écrit :
> On Friday, May 30, 2014 8:36:54 PM UTC+5:30, wxjm...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > Out of curiosity.
>
> > Are you the Rusi Mody attempting to dive in Xe(La)TeX?
>
>
>
> Yeah :-)
>
>
>
> As my blog posts labelled unicode will in
Le mercredi 28 mai 2014 14:55:35 UTC+2, Chris Angelico a écrit :
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Greg Schroeder wrote:
>
> >> > Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
>
> >
>
> > Anything that writes text is fine.
>
> >
Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 19:30:27 UTC+2, Rustom Mody a écrit :
> On Friday, May 30, 2014 10:47:33 PM UTC+5:30, wxjm...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > =
>
>
>
> > Ok, thanks for the answer.
>
>
>
> > "xetex does not quite work whereas pdflatex works smoothly"
>
>
>
> > ?
>
>
>
> Problem
Le dimanche 1 juin 2014 03:48:07 UTC+2, Rustom Mody a écrit :
> On Friday, May 30, 2014 10:37:00 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
>
>
>
> > You are talking about the infrastructure needed for writing unicode apps.
>
> > The language need not have non-ASCII lexemes for that
>
>
>
> > I am talk
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 18:31:09 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> the better solution is to permit the full Unicode alphabet in
>> identifiers...
>
> I'm not entirely sure about that. Full Unicode support in identifiers
> such as URLs doesn't c
On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 18:31:09 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> the better solution is to permit the full Unicode alphabet in
> identifiers...
I'm not entirely sure about that. Full Unicode support in identifiers
such as URLs doesn't create a brand new vulnerability, but it does
increase it from a
On Sunday, June 1, 2014 2:01:09 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> > As a Finnish-speaker, I hope that patch doesn't become default behavior.
> > Too many times, we have been victimized by the German conventions. A
> > Finnish-speaker would
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> As a Finnish-speaker, I hope that patch doesn't become default behavior.
> Too many times, we have been victimized by the German conventions. A
> Finnish-speaker would much rather see
>
>Järvenpää => Jarvenpaa
>Öllölä => Ollola
>K
Rustom Mody :
> On Friday, May 30, 2014 10:37:00 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
>> Think for example of a German wanting to write "Gödel"
>> According to some conventions (s)he can write Goedel
>
> [...]
>
> | if there is an german Umlaut in the section title like 'ä' this
> | becomes just 'a' in
On Friday, May 30, 2014 10:37:00 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> You are talking about the infrastructure needed for writing unicode apps.
> The language need not have non-ASCII lexemes for that
> I am talking about something quite different.
> Think for example of a German wanting to write "Gö
On Fri, 30 May 2014 13:53:06 +0100, Rustom Mody
wrote:
On Thursday, May 29, 2014 10:14:35 PM UTC+5:30, Paul Rudin wrote:
Terry Reedy writes:
> 3. Search unopened files (grep) for a string or re.
Emacs.
How do you do this with emacs?
I find a menagerie of greppish commands -- rgrep, lgre
On Friday, May 30, 2014 10:47:33 PM UTC+5:30, wxjm...@gmail.com wrote:
> =
> Ok, thanks for the answer.
> "xetex does not quite work whereas pdflatex works smoothly"
> ?
Problem is a combination of
1. I am a somewhat clueless noob
2. xetex is emerging technology therefore changing fast
On 30/05/2014 18:07, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Friday, May 30, 2014 10:08:04 PM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 30/05/2014 17:15, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Friday, May 30, 2014 8:36:54 PM UTC+5:30, jmf wrote:
It is now about time that we stop taking ASCII seriously!!
This can't happen in the Pytho
On Friday, May 30, 2014 10:08:04 PM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 30/05/2014 17:15, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > On Friday, May 30, 2014 8:36:54 PM UTC+5:30, jmf wrote:
> > It is now about time that we stop taking ASCII seriously!!
> This can't happen in the Python world until there is a sensible
On Friday, May 30, 2014 10:07:21 PM UTC+5:30, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 5/30/2014 12:15 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
>
> > And for those who dont know xetex, its is really xɘtex – a pictorial
> > anagram if written as XƎTEX
>
> I believe you mean 'pictorial palindrome', which it is!
>
Heh! Getting wooz
On 30/05/2014 17:15, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Friday, May 30, 2014 8:36:54 PM UTC+5:30, wxjm...@gmail.com wrote:
It is now about time that we stop taking ASCII seriously!!
This can't happen in the Python world until there is a sensible approach
to unicode. Ah, but wait a minute, the ball was s
On 5/30/2014 12:15 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
And for those who dont know xetex, its is really xɘtex – a pictorial
anagram if written as XƎTEX
I believe you mean 'pictorial palindrome', which it is!
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Friday, May 30, 2014 8:36:54 PM UTC+5:30, wxjm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Out of curiosity.
> Are you the Rusi Mody attempting to dive in Xe(La)TeX?
Yeah :-)
As my blog posts labelled unicode will indicate I am a fan of using
unicode in program source:
http://blog.languager.org/search/label/Unicod
On 5/30/2014 9:54 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Rustom Mody :
3. Search unopened files (grep) for a string or re.
How do you do this with emacs?
I find a menagerie of greppish commands -- rgrep, lgrep, grep-find etc
To grep for a pattern in the directory of the active buffer:
M-x grep
On Friday, May 30, 2014 7:24:10 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Rustom Mody wrote:
>
>
> >> > 3. Search unopened files (grep) for a string or re.
> >
> > How do you do this with emacs?
> > I find a menagerie of greppish commands -- rgrep, lgrep, grep-find etc
>
>
>
> To grep for a pattern
Rustom Mody :
>> > 3. Search unopened files (grep) for a string or re.
>
> How do you do this with emacs?
> I find a menagerie of greppish commands -- rgrep, lgrep, grep-find etc
To grep for a pattern in the directory of the active buffer:
M-x grep
Run grep (like this): grep -nH -e
Compl
On Thursday, May 29, 2014 10:14:35 PM UTC+5:30, Paul Rudin wrote:
> Terry Reedy writes:
> > 3. Search unopened files (grep) for a string or re.
> Emacs.
How do you do this with emacs?
I find a menagerie of greppish commands -- rgrep, lgrep, grep-find etc
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listin
On Thu, 29 May 2014 15:11:31 -0500, Mark H Harris wrote:
> On 5/29/14 11:44 AM, Paul Rudin wrote:
>> Terry Reedy writes:
>>> I am curious how many of the editors people have been recommending
>>> have all of the following Idle features, that I use constantly.
>>>
>>> 1. Run code in the editor wit
On 2014-05-30 07:21:52 +, Andrea D'Amore said:
It aims at providing a beautiful interface,
Side note: the text editing is still green.
--
Andrea
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2014-05-29 22:40:36 +, Travis Griggs said:
I use either vim or textwrangler for simple one file scripts.
Since you're on OS X have a look at Exedore, it's paid but very cheap.
It aims at providing a beautiful interface, I fetched the free trial a
couple days ago and the job so far is
> On May 28, 2014, at 3:43, Sameer Rathoud wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am new to python.
>
> I am currently using python 3.3
>
> With python I got IDLE, but I am not very comfortable with this.
>
> Please suggest, if we have any free ide for
Terry Reedy writes:
> I am curious how many of the editors people have been recommending
> have all of the following Idle features, that I use constantly.
You can satisfy such wonderings with a search for the answers to such
questions, which is how I got these answers.
> 1. Run [Python] code in
On 5/29/2014 12:51 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
I am curious how many of the editors people have been recommending have all
of the following Idle features, that I use constantly.
Regarding SciTE:
1. Run code in the editor with a single keypre
On 29/05/2014 21:11, Mark H Harris wrote:
The OP is looking for an "IDE-like" interactive environment, because he
is "uncomfortable" with IDLE. IDLE is THE choice, however ---precisely
because IDLE is clean, elegant, and most importantly "simple". It is
simple to understand, and it is even simpl
On 5/29/14 11:44 AM, Paul Rudin wrote:
Terry Reedy writes:
I am curious how many of the editors people have been recommending have all of
the following Idle features, that I use constantly.
1. Run code in the editor with a single keypress.
2. Display output and traceback in a window that lets
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> I am curious how many of the editors people have been recommending have all
> of the following Idle features, that I use constantly.
Regarding SciTE:
> 1. Run code in the editor with a single keypress.
Yes, although for most of what I like t
Terry Reedy writes:
> On 5/29/2014 5:41 AM, Wolfgang Maier wrote:
>> On 28.05.2014 12:43, Sameer Rathoud wrote:
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> I am new to python.
>>>
>>> I am currently using python 3.3
>>>
>>> With python I got IDLE, but I am not very comfortable with this.
>
> What bothers you the
On 5/29/2014 5:41 AM, Wolfgang Maier wrote:
On 28.05.2014 12:43, Sameer Rathoud wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am new to python.
I am currently using python 3.3
With python I got IDLE, but I am not very comfortable with this.
What bothers you the most.
Seems like not too many other people on th
On 28.05.2014 12:43, Sameer Rathoud wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am new to python.
I am currently using python 3.3
With python I got IDLE, but I am not very comfortable with this.
Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
Seems like not too many other people on this list
Duncan Booth wrote:
> Sameer Rathoud wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 5:16:41 PM UTC+5:30, Greg Schroeder wrote:
>>> > > Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Anything that writes
Sameer Rathoud wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 5:16:41 PM UTC+5:30, Greg Schroeder wrote:
>> > > Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
>>
>>
>>
>> Anything that writes text is fine.
>>
>> I recommend the s
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Rhodri James wrote:
> On Wed, 28 May 2014 14:04:55 +0100, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>
>> My IDE is to have three GUI windows open:
>>
>> * A web browser for searching the Internet. Any browser will do, but I
>> prefer Firefox.
>>
>> * A tabbed editor. I prefer kate
Greg Schroeder writes:
> Any gripes against vim with some tweaks?
None from me; Vim is a fine programming (and programmable) editor.
It is free software, like Python. This is vital for any tool in which
one expects to sink an amount of effort. It means no party has
privileged access to change i
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 22:55 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Greg Schroeder wrote:
> >> > Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
> >
> > Anything that writes text is fine.
> > I recommend the standard text e
On Wed, 28 May 2014 14:04:55 +0100, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
My IDE is to have three GUI windows open:
* A web browser for searching the Internet. Any browser will do, but I
prefer Firefox.
* A tabbed editor. I prefer kate (KDE 3 version, not KDE 4), but geany is
also good. At a pinch gedit w
Sameer Rathoud writes:
> I am new to python.
> I am currently using python 3.3
Welcome! You're off to a good start, using Python 3 :-)
> With python I got IDLE, but I am not very comfortable with this.
> Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
What
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 4:13:29 PM UTC+5:30, Sameer Rathoud wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I am new to python.
> I am currently using python 3.3
> With python I got IDLE, but I am not very comfortable with this.
> Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
>> On 05/28/2014 01:43 PM, Sameer Rathoud wrote:
>>
>>> Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
>>
> But first time I am trying python. I was trying some UI with python. I
> have installed wingide. But i didn't liked it because
h this.
> >
> > Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
>
> There are a lot of IDEs for Python.
>
> One classic is WingIDE. Available for free is a "101" edition. Runs on
> all major operating systems. Implemented itself in Python.
>
> With python I got IDLE, but I am not very comfortable with this.
>
> Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
There are a lot of IDEs for Python.
One classic is WingIDE. Available for free is a "101" edition. Runs on
all major operating systems. Im
On 28/05/2014 14:01, Sameer Rathoud wrote:
I've had to snip umpteen lines that gg has added so *please* use the
mailing list https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list or
read and action this https://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython to
prevent us seeing double line spacing and
On 5/28/14 5:43 AM, Sameer Rathoud wrote:
I am currently using python 3.3
With python I got IDLE, but I am not very comfortable with this.
Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
I tend to agree with Chris & Steven on this... a good gnu/linux desktop
is the best
On May 28, 2014, at 6:43 AM, Sameer Rathoud wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am new to python.
>
> I am currently using python 3.3
>
> With python I got IDLE, but I am not very comfortable with this.
>
> Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python
t; >>
>
> >>> Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> I think major IDEs in the place have their Python integration.
>
> >>
>
> >> Did you make
On Wed, 28 May 2014 03:43:29 -0700, Sameer Rathoud wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am new to python.
>
> I am currently using python 3.3
>
> With python I got IDLE, but I am not very comfortable with this.
>
> Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python d
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 6:26:46 PM UTC+5:30, Sameer Rathoud wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 5:16:41 PM UTC+5:30, Greg Schroeder wrote:
>
> > > > Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> &
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 5:16:41 PM UTC+5:30, Greg Schroeder wrote:
> > > Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
>
>
>
> Anything that writes text is fine.
>
> I recommend the standard text editor for your OS (Notepad if you use
&g
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Greg Schroeder wrote:
>> > Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
>
> Anything that writes text is fine.
> I recommend the standard text editor for your OS (Notepad if you use
> Windows, Textedit on Mac, whatever
> > Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
Anything that writes text is fine.
I recommend the standard text editor for your OS (Notepad if you use
Windows, Textedit on Mac, whatever is on your GNU/Linux distro by
default) unless you know exactly what you don't
On 28/05/2014 12:31, Sameer Rathoud wrote:
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 4:21:22 PM UTC+5:30, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
On 05/28/2014 01:43 PM, Sameer Rathoud wrote:
Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
I think major IDEs in the place have their Python
uggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
> >
> >
> >
> > I think major IDEs in the place have their Python integration.
> >
> > Did you make some search and tried each one?
> >
> >
> >
> > With just the informatio
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Sameer Rathoud
wrote:
> for C++ and C# development I prefer visual studio and for C++ try outs even
> codeblock is ok
>
> For Java I use eclipse.
>
> But first time I am trying python. I was trying some UI with python. I have
> installed wingide. But i didn't li
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 4:21:22 PM UTC+5:30, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> On 05/28/2014 01:43 PM, Sameer Rathoud wrote:
>
> > Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
>
>
>
> I think major IDEs in the place have their Python integration
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Sameer Rathoud
wrote:
> I am currently using python 3.3
>
> With python I got IDLE, but I am not very comfortable with this.
>
> Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
You don't really need an IDE, generally. A good
On 05/28/2014 01:43 PM, Sameer Rathoud wrote:
Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
I think major IDEs in the place have their Python integration.
Did you make some search and tried each one?
With just the information you provided, every existing IDE is OK.
- What
On Wed, 28 May 2014 03:43:29 -0700, Sameer Rathoud wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am new to python.
>
> I am currently using python 3.3
>
> With python I got IDLE, but I am not very comfortable with this.
>
> Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python devel
Sameer Rathoud :
> Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
emacs
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
IPython for interactive testing.
Aptana or PyDev + eclipse as IDE
-邮件原件-
发件人: Python-list
[mailto:python-list-bounces+scrappedprince.li=gmail@python.org] 代表
Sameer Rathoud
发送时间: 2014年5月28日 18:43
收件人: python-list@python.org
主题: IDE for python
Hello everyone,
I am new to python.
I
Hello everyone,
I am new to python.
I am currently using python 3.3
With python I got IDLE, but I am not very comfortable with this.
Please suggest, if we have any free ide for python development.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
The latest Zeus IDE Version 3.97o is now available:
http://www.zeusedit.com/python.html
This latest Zeus release adds improved Python debugger support.
Other Pyhon language features include syntax highlighting, code
completion, smart indenting, class browsing and code folding.
Zeus is also
Jonathan Hartley writes:
> I'd like to offer the group the anecdote of the great Resolver IDE
> migration.
[…]
It's great to see something refreshing and new — data beyond a single
person's subjective experience! — come out of a topic that looked like
it was just going to re-hash the same tired
On Nov 16, 1:05 am, Jonathan Hartley wrote:
> Then, after about a year, a curious thing happened. One by one, in
> entirely independent decisions, almost all developers decided to
> migrate to either Emacs or Vi.*
>
> Each person decided that the fancy features of their IDE wasn't as
> useful to t
sturlamolden schrieb:
On 15 Nov, 18:09, Peng Yu wrote:
There had been some discussion on IDE. But I'm not sure what pros and
cons of each choice. Current, I'm using vim and ctags.
Could somebody give some advices on choosing the best IDE for me?
There is a plug-in to develop (amd debug) Pyth
On 16 Nov, 10:05, Jonathan Hartley wrote:
> As far as I can make out, TextPad has only two features, syntax
> highlighting and the ability to define a 'make' command, and a regex
> that is used to extract filenames and line-numbers from the resulting
> output of that make command. These are, it t
On Nov 16, 5:09 am, sturlamolden wrote:
> On 15 Nov, 18:09, Peng Yu wrote:
>
> > There had been some discussion on IDE. But I'm not sure what pros and
> > cons of each choice. Current, I'm using vim and ctags.
>
> > Could somebody give some advices on choosing the best IDE for me?
>
> There is a
On 15 Nov, 18:09, Peng Yu wrote:
> There had been some discussion on IDE. But I'm not sure what pros and
> cons of each choice. Current, I'm using vim and ctags.
>
> Could somebody give some advices on choosing the best IDE for me?
There is a plug-in to develop (amd debug) Python using MS Visual
Peng Yu schrieb:
On Nov 15, 11:15 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
Peng Yu schrieb:
There had been some discussion on IDE. But I'm not sure what pros and
cons of each choice. Current, I'm using vim and ctags.
Could somebody give some advices on choosing the best IDE for me?
http://groups.google.
On Nov 15, 11:15 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
> Peng Yu schrieb:
>
> > There had been some discussion on IDE. But I'm not sure what pros and
> > cons of each choice. Current, I'm using vim and ctags.
>
> > Could somebody give some advices on choosing the best IDE for me?
>
> >http://groups.google
Peng Yu schrieb:
There had been some discussion on IDE. But I'm not sure what pros and
cons of each choice. Current, I'm using vim and ctags.
Could somebody give some advices on choosing the best IDE for me?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/4b3300d10285ae2b/e
There had been some discussion on IDE. But I'm not sure what pros and
cons of each choice. Current, I'm using vim and ctags.
Could somebody give some advices on choosing the best IDE for me?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/4b3300d10285ae2b/e934bd5b9f2d0f8c?lnk
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
> Threader Slash wrote:
>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>>> From: J Sisson
>>> To: Nobody
>>> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:18:03 -0500
>>> Subject: Re: IDE for python similar to visua
Threader Slash wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: J Sisson
To: Nobody
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:18:03 -0500
Subject: Re: IDE for python similar to visual basic
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Nobody wrote:
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 05:27:59 -0700, r wrote
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: J Sisson
> To: Nobody
> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:18:03 -0500
> Subject: Re: IDE for python similar to visual basic
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Nobody wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 05:27:59 -0700,
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Nobody wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 05:27:59 -0700, r wrote:
>
> > Sounds like "somebody" failed to get input
> > from their users at design time. Or "somebody" has the inability to
> > relate to their end users.
>
> You're assuming that there is some "right" an
> You can also try Eclipse + PyDev. It's not the same as Visual Studio, and I
> am not sure about the GUI builder, but I think it's what you want.
I really like Eclipse + Pydev. It is not a GUI builder at all but it
has a nice debugger, code completion and that kind of thing. And its
free!
B
In article ,
Nobody wrote:
>On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:56:17 +, Albert van der Horst wrote:
>>
>> In view of the above this is not quite the correct way to put it.
>>
>> What I resent is that it leads to a non-professional attitude
>> of the graphical part. Programming is over, lets now kludge
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 05:27:59 -0700, r wrote:
>> I'm saying that the user understands their workflow and environment better
>> than the application's programmers. The user should be able to decide
>> which menu items are shown and where, which buttons are shown and where,
>> etc. The code doesn't n
On 8/30/09 1:48 PM, r wrote:
Hello qwe rty,
I remember my first days with GUI programming and thinking to myself;
how on earth can i write GUI code without a MS style GUI builder? Not
to long after that i was coding up some pretty spectacular GUI's from
nothing more than source code and loving
r wrote:
> On Sep 11, 7:08 am, Nobody wrote:
> (snip)
>> I'm saying that the user understands their workflow and environment better
>> than the application's programmers. The user should be able to decide
>> which menu items are shown and where, which buttons are shown and where,
>> etc. The code
>
>
> The interface really should be configurable by the user according to their
> needs. The code doesn't need to *know* the position or dimensions of
> a widget, or its label or colour or spacing, let alone dictate them.
>
Perhaps...but the user needs a framework in order to understand the
funct
On Sep 11, 7:08 am, Nobody wrote:
(snip)
> I'm saying that the user understands their workflow and environment better
> than the application's programmers. The user should be able to decide
> which menu items are shown and where, which buttons are shown and where,
> etc. The code doesn't need to k
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 18:04:40 -0700, r wrote:
>> >It also allows the GUI to be edited by without requiring any programming
>> >knowledge. This eliminates the need for the GUI designer to be familiar
>> >with the programming language used (or any programming language), and
>> >allows customisation b
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:56:17 +, Albert van der Horst wrote:
>>The main advantage of a GUI builder is that it helps prevent you from
>>hard-coding the GUI into the program. You could get the same effect by
>>coding a UIL/XRC/etc file manually, but a GUI builder tends to force it.
>
> A GUI bui
On Sep 7, 6:56 pm, Albert van der Horst
wrote:
> In article ,
>
> Nobody wrote:
> >On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:48:24 -0700, r wrote:
>
> >> I think a point and click GUI builder (although some may disagree) is
> >> actually detrimental to your programming skills. The ability to
> >> visualize the GUI
In article ,
Nobody wrote:
>On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:48:24 -0700, r wrote:
>
>> I think a point and click GUI builder (although some may disagree) is
>> actually detrimental to your programming skills. The ability to
>> visualize the GUI only from the source code as you read it, is as
>> important
1 - 100 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
