Another page with up to date IronPython information:
http://www.gotdotnet.com/workspaces/workspace.aspx?id=ad7acff7-ab1e-4bcb-99c0-57ac5a3a9742
Cameron Laird wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, spiffo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> .
> .
>
On 10/4/05, Cameron Laird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Python IS "a dot net language" http://ironpython.com/ >.
. that is the site it was born at;
but microsoft has actively adopted it here:
IronPython 0.9.2 (9/22/2005)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=2C
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, spiffo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.
.
.
>I am a corporate developer, working for a single company. Got a new project
>coming up and wondering if I should stay with Python for this new, fairly
>la
> It has many similarities, but also some fundamental differences,
> considered "almost" a static python
lol, if that is your definition of 'almost' then your statement is
correct
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> that Boo isn't enough like Python to
> be a kind of Python - not necessarily a criticism, though, but an
> observation.
This is correct. I completely agree with you and I'm not saying that
boo is python.
Again, I just said that it could be considered "almost" a static python
implementation for .
Luis M. Gonzalez wrote:
> So, we can safely say that Boo is "almost" a static python
> implementation. Wether you like or not, is another problem, but please,
> do not insist with your reiterative anti-boo ranting.
I can't comment on Boo beyond the documentation's description of the
language, but
If you read again my comment, I said "almost" an static version of
Python for .NET.
That means that it's not a Python implementation, but another language.
It takes a lot from python though, and it is aknowledeged by its
creator in the first paragraph of its homepage.
And if you still feel the nee
Istvan Albert wrote:
> Disclaimer: this is not a flame against Boo.
>
> It just boggles my mind that a language that describes itself as
> "python inspired syntax" keeps being touted as:
>
>
>>Luis M. Gonzalez wrote:
>>Boo (which could be considered almost an static version of Python for .NET)
>
Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen wrote:
> While Microsoft and other big software vendors might have a roadmap
> that ties you very tightly in with their budget, and also changes that
> roadmap from time to time which breaks your current software, a lot of
> open source projects have no roadmap at all.
>
> T
Disclaimer: this is not a flame against Boo.
It just boggles my mind that a language that describes itself as
"python inspired syntax" keeps being touted as:
> Luis M. Gonzalez wrote:
> Boo (which could be considered almost an static version of Python for .NET)
Boo is *nothing* like a static ve
Luis M. Gonzalez wrote:
> If not Ironpython, Boo (which could be considered almost an static
> version of Python for .NET) would be a great choice.
You could also use Python for .Net
(http://www.zope.org/Members/Brian/PythonNet).
--
Benji York
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-l
> Boa Constructor, Iron Python etc... it seems all these projects get started,
> but never finished.
I don't know Boa (never liked it, never used it), but you could try
PythonCard: much higher level, easier and more productive. As for
Ironpython seems to be moving full steam towards a stable relea
On 10/3/05, spiffo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am a corporate developer, working for a single company. Got a new project
> coming up and wondering if I should stay with Python for this new, fairly
> large project, are jump back on the 'safe' M$ bandwagon using a dot net
> language? Cross platfo
Ok, when re-reading my post it seems that I'm saying that Python has no
roadmap. That was not my intent. I meant projects other than Python,
even though the problems I got with 2.4.2 is real, I suspect there's
something in Komodo that is the problem since I can run all my python
programs with 2.4.2
While Microsoft and other big software vendors might have a roadmap
that ties you very tightly in with their budget, and also changes that
roadmap from time to time which breaks your current software, a lot of
open source projects have no roadmap at all.
This means that a .x.y.2 upgrade might very
spiffo wrote:
> The Main Issue in a nutshell
>
> I am a corporate developer, working for a single company. Got a new project
> coming up and wondering if I should stay with Python for this new, fairly
> large project, are jump back on the 'safe' M$ bandwagon using a dot net
> language?
Hehe ...
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 09:01:37 -0500, spiffo wrote:
> The Main Issue in a nutshell
>
> I am a corporate developer, working for a single company. Got a new project
> coming up and wondering if I should stay with Python for this new, fairly
> large project, are jump back on the 'safe' M$ bandwagon us
Perhaps with the time saved by using Python instead of C# or some such,
you could help to improve adodbapi.py, ensuring support for the next
version of MS SQLServer, although that might be of little help in the
short term. Just a thought.
Also, have a gander at http://www.object-craft.com.au/proje
spiffo wrote:
> Ok, I LOVE python, so that is not the issue, but, I am getting very worried
> about it's growth. I recently re-visted the web looking at alot of projects
> I assumed would be up and running by now from over a year ago, such as Boa
> Constructor, Iron Python etc... it seems all these
The Main Issue in a nutshell
I am a corporate developer, working for a single company. Got a new project
coming up and wondering if I should stay with Python for this new, fairly
large project, are jump back on the 'safe' M$ bandwagon using a dot net
language? Cross platform is NOT an issue, but C
20 matches
Mail list logo
