On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Jorgen Grahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OP: keep in mind that your users do not see any gain from you using
> 2.5. All they see is something that makes your software harder to
> install. At some point you can dismiss them as living in the Stone Age,
> but the
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:49:25 -0700 (PDT), George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Apr 18, 2:08 pm, Joseph Turian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How widely adopted is python 2.5?
>>
>> We are doing some development, and have a choice to make:
>> a) Use all the 2.5 features we want.
>> b) Maint
On Apr 21, 12:59 pm, Lou Pecora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Apr 21, 9:28 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
>
> > > Why is this newsgroup different from all other newsgroups?
>
> > Different is a verbally atomic relation.
>
>
In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Apr 21, 9:28 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
> >
> >
> > Why is this newsgroup different from all other newsgroups?
>
> Different is a verbally atomic relation.
It's a Passover question.
--
-- Lou Pecora
--
http://mail.py
On Apr 21, 9:28 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Joseph Turian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> >Basically, we're planning on releasing it as open-source, and don't
> >want to alienate a large percentage of potential users.
>
> Datapoint: my company still u
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Joseph Turian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Basically, we're planning on releasing it as open-source, and don't
>want to alienate a large percentage of potential users.
Datapoint: my company still uses 2.3 and *might* upgrade to 2.4 and
later this year. Basically,
On Apr 19, 1:08 am, Joseph Turian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How widely adopted is python 2.5?
>
> We are doing some development, and have a choice to make:
> a) Use all the 2.5 features we want.
> b) Maintain backwards compatability with 2.4.
>
There is another choice: Develop with future in mi
At 12:16 PM -0700 4/18/08, Joseph Turian wrote:
>Basically, we're planning on releasing it as open-source, and don't
>want to alienate a large percentage of potential users.
>--
>http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
A few seconds after reading this, I read the announcement for pyspr
Joseph Turian wrote:
> Basically, we're planning on releasing it as open-source, and don't
> want to alienate a large percentage of potential users.
Then develop for 2.5 with an eye on what is to come this year in 2.6 with
regard to already planned
deprecations.
- Paddy.
--
http://mail.python.o
On Apr 18, 2:16 pm, Joseph Turian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically, we're planning on releasing it as open-source, and don't
> want to alienate a large percentage of potential users.
99% is a big percent. My 1% doesn't like something.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Apr 19, 3:16 am, Joseph Turian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically, we're planning on releasing it as open-source, and don't
> want to alienate a large percentage of potential users.
How about Java users? Jython was recently at 2.2 (still is for all I
know). I'm pleased they've got that fa
On Apr 18, 2:08 pm, Joseph Turian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How widely adopted is python 2.5?
>
> We are doing some development, and have a choice to make:
> a) Use all the 2.5 features we want.
> b) Maintain backwards compatability with 2.4.
>
> So I guess the question is, does anyone have a se
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas Bellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > For what it's worth, Fedora 8 has Python 2.5, RHEL 5 ships with
> > Python 2.4, and RHEL 4 has Python 2.3. Suse and Debian, I don't
> > know.
>
> The current Debian "stable" branch (4.0r3, "etch", released
Thomas Bellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For what it's worth, Fedora 8 has Python 2.5, RHEL 5 ships with
> Python 2.4, and RHEL 4 has Python 2.3. Suse and Debian, I don't
> know.
The current Debian "stable" branch (4.0r3, "etch", released
2008-02-17) has the 'python' package installing Python
Joseph Turian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How widely adopted is python 2.5?
Impossible to answer in general, because there's no way of finding
out.
> So I guess the question is, does anyone have a sense of what percent
> of python users don't have 2.5?
You might be able to get a more useful a
Debian Etch (stable) has Python 2.4
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Bellman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
To:
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: Python 2.5 adoption
> John Nagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>
John Nagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Desktop or server?
> If server, check what the major Linux distros, like Fedora
> Core, are shipping with.
For server, you should probably rather look at distros like
RHEL/CentOS, Suse and Debian Stable.
For what it's worth, Fedora 8 has Python 2
On Apr 18, 2:08 pm, Joseph Turian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How widely adopted is python 2.5?
>
> We are doing some development, and have a choice to make:
> a) Use all the 2.5 features we want.
> b) Maintain backwards compatability with 2.4.
>
> So I guess the question is, does anyone have a se
Basically, we're planning on releasing it as open-source, and don't
want to alienate a large percentage of potential users.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Joseph Turian wrote:
> How widely adopted is python 2.5?
>
> We are doing some development, and have a choice to make:
> a) Use all the 2.5 features we want.
> b) Maintain backwards compatability with 2.4.
>
> So I guess the question is, does anyone have a sense of what percent
> of python users
On Apr 18, 1:08 pm, Joseph Turian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How widely adopted is python 2.5?
>
> We are doing some development, and have a choice to make:
> a) Use all the 2.5 features we want.
> b) Maintain backwards compatability with 2.4.
>
> So I guess the question is, does anyone have a se
How widely adopted is python 2.5?
We are doing some development, and have a choice to make:
a) Use all the 2.5 features we want.
b) Maintain backwards compatability with 2.4.
So I guess the question is, does anyone have a sense of what percent
of python users don't have 2.5?
Thanks,
Joseph
--
22 matches
Mail list logo
