.
so obviously I need to install some version of boost libs or
Boost.Python etc etc. Gave up :(
-luddite-ly yrs-
Robin Becker
The aur repository, no ?
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-exiv2/
Vincent
that would work (if I had thought hard about it), but not for a pip instal
On 19Aug2020 08:53, Chris Green wrote:
>I have quite a lot of things installed with pip, however I've never
>had this problem with dependencies before. Adding to the fun is that
>my system has still got Python 2 as the default Python so I have to
>run pip3 explicitly to get P
Le 19/08/20 à 10:15, Robin Becker a écrit :
> On 18/08/2020 20:05, Vincent Vande Vyvre wrote:
> .
>>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Two solutions:
>> 1. Install exiv2-dev and py3exiv2 with pip
>> $ sudo apt-get install libexiv2-dev
>> $ sudo pip3 install py3exiv2
>>
>> 2. Install my ppa
>>
#x27;gcc' failed with exit status 1
>
> so obviously I need to install some version of boost libs or Boost.Python
> etc etc. Gave up :(
> -luddite-ly yrs-
OP here, yes, that's exactly where I got to as well! :-)
I've used Vincent's PPA before so I took that route and it worked
flawlessly, my code is now working again in 20.04 running Python 3.
--
Chris Green
·
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
rying to get it to work on Python 3 as I have just upgraded to
> > Ubuntu 20.04 and on that Python 3 is now the default version of Python.
> >
> > I seem to be descending into a horrible morass of dependencies (or
> > failed dependencies) when I try to install pyexiv2 (pr
On 18/08/2020 20:05, Vincent Vande Vyvre wrote:
.
Hi,
Two solutions:
1. Install exiv2-dev and py3exiv2 with pip
$ sudo apt-get install libexiv2-dev
$ sudo pip3 install py3exiv2
2. Install my ppa
$ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:vincent-vandevyvre/vvv
$ sudo apt-ge
> > I am trying to get it to work on Python 3 as I have just upgraded to
> > Ubuntu 20.04 and on that Python 3 is now the default version of Python.
> >
> > I seem to be descending into a horrible morass of dependencies (or
> > failed dependencies) when I try to install
Le 18/08/20 à 19:22, Chris Green a écrit :
> I have a fairly simple Python program that I wrote a while ago in
> Python 2 that transfers images from my camera to a date ordered
> directory hierarchy on my computer.
>
> I am trying to get it to work on Python 3 as I have just upgra
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 3:36 AM Chris Green wrote:
>
> I have a fairly simple Python program that I wrote a while ago in
> Python 2 that transfers images from my camera to a date ordered
> directory hierarchy on my computer.
>
> I am trying to get it to work on Python 3 as I hav
I have a fairly simple Python program that I wrote a while ago in
Python 2 that transfers images from my camera to a date ordered
directory hierarchy on my computer.
I am trying to get it to work on Python 3 as I have just upgraded to
Ubuntu 20.04 and on that Python 3 is now the default version
`pathlib` trims trailing slashes by default, but certain packages require
trailing slashes. In particular, `cx_Freeze.bdist_msi` option "directories" is
used to build the package directory structure of a program and requires
trailing slashes.
Does anyone think it would be a good idea to add a f
On Sunday, March 26, 2017 at 7:55:09 PM UTC+5:30, Νίκος Βέργος wrote:
> Τη Κυριακή, 26 Μαρτίου 2017 - 5:19:27 μ.μ. UTC+3, ο χρήστης Ian έγραψε:
>
> > You need to change the placeholders back. The poster who told you to
> > replace them was misinformed.
>
> okey altered them back to
>
> cur.execu
On 29/01/20 6:27 pm, Peng Yu wrote:
Suppose that I use this to read from stdin. But `line` contains
decoded data in python 3. In python 2, it contains the original data.
What is the best way to get the original data in python 3?
Read from stdin.buffer, which is a stream of bytes.
--
Greg
Suppose that I use this to read from stdin. But `line` contains
decoded data in python 3. In python 2, it contains the original data.
What is the best way to get the original data in python 3? Thanks.
```
for line in sys.stdin:
...
```
--
Regards,
Peng
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman
2
3 torsocks python3 ./3usenet.py
4
5 10 lines
6
7 some random garbage ... x lines cant be empty
8
9
tenth line starting at 14
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
2
3
4
5 10 lines
6
7 some random garbage ... x lines cant be empty
8
9
tenth line starting at 14
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 10/12/19 8:40 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 12/9/2019 6:21 AM, jezka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have got a problem.
Is this homework?
Same question - that way we know that our task is to help you learn to
code in Python, cf a problem with Python itself...
Similarly, you may like to know th
On 12/9/2019 6:21 AM, jezka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have got a problem.
Is this homework?
I wrote a code for prefix to infix. It works, but I need improve it
so on input there will be only necessary parentheses.
Define 'necessary'; give multiple input/output examples.
Put them in a test f
Hi, I have got a problem.
I wrote a code for prefix to infix. It works, but I need improve it
so on input there will be only necessary parentheses. Can u help me?
Here is the code:
import re
a = input()
class Calculator:
def __init__ (self):
self.stack = []
def push (self, p):
Hello Pythonistas,
Earlier this year a number of Tahoe-LAFS
<https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs> community members began an effort
to port Tahoe-LAFS from Python 2 to Python 3. Around five people are
currently involved in a part-time capacity. We wish to accelerate the
effort to en
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 4:38 AM Spencer Graves
wrote:
>
>Is anyone interested in contacting these companies -- or the
> companies from which they buy cybersecurity insurance -- and inviting
> them to provide paid staff to maintain 2.7 and to offer further offer
> consulting services to hel
On 2019-09-14 08:10:50 -0500, Spencer Graves wrote:
> As I'm thinking about it, the companies that provide cybersecurity
> insurance could be the best points of leverage for this, because they think
> about these kinds of things all the time. Insurance companies for decades
I wouldn't set my
On 2019-09-14 07:30, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 14 September 2019 04:37:14 Larry Martell wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:37 PM Skip Montanaro
wrote:
https://www.techrepublic.com/google-amp/article/jpmorgans-athena-has
-35-million-lines-of-python-code-and-wont-be-updated-to-python-3
s-35-million-lines-of-python-code-and-wont-be-updated-to-python-3-in
> >>-time/
> >>
> >> I doubt this is unusual, and presume JP Morgan is big enough to
> >> handle the change of status, either by managing security releases
> >> in-house or relying on th
On 9/14/2019 4:37 AM, Larry Martell wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:37 PM Skip Montanaro
wrote:
https://www.techrepublic.com/google-amp/article/jpmorgans-athena-has-35-million-lines-of-python-code-and-wont-be-updated-to-python-3-in-time/
I doubt this is unusual, and presume JP Morgan is big
On Saturday 14 September 2019 04:37:14 Larry Martell wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:37 PM Skip Montanaro
>
>
> wrote:
> > https://www.techrepublic.com/google-amp/article/jpmorgans-athena-has
> >-35-million-lines-of-python-code-and-wont-be-updated-to-python-3-in-t
>
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 3:39 AM Larry Martell wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:37 PM Skip Montanaro
> wrote:
>
> > >
> > https://www.techrepublic.com/google-amp/article/jpmorgans-athena-has-35-million-lines-of-python-code-and-wont-be-updated-to-python-3-in-ti
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:37 PM Skip Montanaro
wrote:
> >
> https://www.techrepublic.com/google-amp/article/jpmorgans-athena-has-35-million-lines-of-python-code-and-wont-be-updated-to-python-3-in-time/
>
> I doubt this is unusual, and presume JP Morgan is big enough to handle
"35 million lines of python code" it is insane.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:39 PM Skip Montanaro
wrote:
> >
> https://www.techrepublic.com/google-amp/article/jpmorgans-athena-has-35-million-lines-of-python-code-and-wont-be-updated-to-python-3-in-time/
>
> I doubt this i
> https://www.techrepublic.com/google-amp/article/jpmorgans-athena-has-35-million-lines-of-python-code-and-wont-be-updated-to-python-3-in-time/
I doubt this is unusual, and presume JP Morgan is big enough to handle
the change of status, either by managing security releases in-house or
relying
https://www.techrepublic.com/google-amp/article/jpmorgans-athena-has-35-million-lines-of-python-code-and-wont-be-updated-to-python-3-in-time/
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 16/07/19 10:08 PM, אורי wrote:
Hi,
1. When we use super() in Python 3, we don't pass it the first argument
(self). Why?
What happens if the first argument is not self?
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super().__init__(*args, **kwargs)
I think it would make more sense t
[Rearranged and snipped so this makes any kind of sense]
On 16/07/2019 16:43, אורי wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 3:13 PM Rhodri James wrote:
On 16/07/2019 11:08, אורי wrote:
2. I want to override a function called build_suite in an inherited
class.
The function receives an argument "test_l
lot of the answers to your questions are at least implied
> in the Fine Manual
> (https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#super), but it's not
> very clear and written more for precision than comprehension. Here's my
> attempt at explaining :-)
>
> On 16/07/2019 1
אורי wrote:
Hi,
1. When we use super() in Python 3, we don't pass it the first argument
(self). Why?
Actually the first argument to super() isn't self, it's the class that
we want the superclass of. The *second* argument is self. In the
normal course of using super() ins
Hi,
1. When we use super() in Python 3, we don't pass it the first argument
(self). Why?
What happens if the first argument is not self?
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super().__init__(*args, **kwargs)
I think it would make more sense to use something like
self.super().__init__(
Sayth Renshaw at 2019/2/3 UTC+8 AM9:52:50 wrote:
> Or perhaps use a 3rd party library like
> https://github.com/mikeckennedy/python-switch
Thank you for this link. It's a good general implementation.
--Jach
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2019-02-26 20:06, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to create a python 3 script that takes a list of AWS instance
IDs. It then prints out some information about the instances and then
terminates them.
I am very new to python, so still working through some basic issues.
This is the
Hi all,
I'm trying to create a python 3 script that takes a list of AWS instance
IDs. It then prints out some information about the instances and then
terminates them.
I am very new to python, so still working through some basic issues.
This is the error I get when I run the s
The migration was from 2.7 to 2.7 and 3.x, rather than 3.x only.
I think it worth reading for anyone interested in the subject.
https://zato.io/blog/posts/python-3-migration-success-story.html
60,000 lines of Python and Cython, 130 external dependencies (but only
10 not already 3.x ready) took
Am 05.02.19 um 02:20 schrieb DL Neil:
So, even with the French making their dates into sentences, not a single
one uses ordinals!
- did the computer people in all these languages/cultures decide that
the more numeric approach was better/easier/...
(ie simpler/less-complex)
:)
For the two lan
) in [0,4,5,6,7,8,9] or (day / 10) == 1:
return 'th'
return {1: 'st', 2: 'nd', 3: 'rd'}[day % 10]
In Python 3, 11/10 == 1.1, not 1.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 6:47:49 PM UTC-6, Sayth Renshaw wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to convert a switch statement from C into Python. (why?
> practising).
>
> This is the C code.
>
> printf("Dated this %d", day);
> switch (day) {
> case 1: case 21: case 31:
> printf("st"
On 4/02/19 9:25 PM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Am 04.02.19 um 09:18 schrieb Christian Gollwitzer:
I think English is quite "unique" with writing out the ending of the
ordinals attached to arabic numerals.
Of course, there is a Wikipedia page about it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ord
Am 04.02.19 um 09:18 schrieb Christian Gollwitzer:
I think English is quite "unique" with writing out the ending of the
ordinals attached to arabic numerals.
Of course, there is a Wikipedia page about it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordinal_indicator
So I was wrong and the abbrevi
Am 04.02.19 um 04:11 schrieb DL Neil: > On 4/02/19 10:00 AM, Christian
Gollwitzer wrote:
Am 03.02.19 um 09:32 schrieb DL Neil:
Now back to ordinal dates - the "st", "th", etc suffixes only work in
English. You'd need another list (but no great coding complexity) to
cope with a second, third, ..
Christian,
On 4/02/19 10:00 AM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Am 03.02.19 um 09:32 schrieb DL Neil:
Now back to ordinal dates - the "st", "th", etc suffixes only work in
English. You'd need another list (but no great coding complexity) to
cope with a second, third, ... language!
Only for some
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:53 AM Avi Gross wrote:
> It is very bad form to have ambiguous compressed formats. Even if you include
> a slash or minus sign or period or the delimiter of your choice, I sometimes
> see this:
>
> 01/02/2020
>
> And I wonder if it is meant to be January 2nd or February
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:08 AM Chris Angelico wrote:
> If you need to attach some *other* time zone (which should be rare -
> ONLY do this if you absolutely cannot translate to UTC)
BTW, there are some legit reasons for keeping something in a different
timezone. If you're representing an instant
Comment at end:
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Bob van der Poel
Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2019 4:01 PM
To: DL Neil
Cc: Python
Subject: Re: Implement C's Switch in Python 3
I'm surprised that no one has yet addressed the year 1 problem.
Hopefully w
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 2:15 PM Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 8:02 AM Bob van der Poel wrote:
> >
> > I'm surprised that no one has yet addressed the year 1 problem.
> Hopefully we're doing numeric, not alpha sorts on the stuff before the 1st
> '-'. And, the compact versions
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 8:02 AM Bob van der Poel wrote:
>
> I'm surprised that no one has yet addressed the year 1 problem. Hopefully
> we're doing numeric, not alpha sorts on the stuff before the 1st '-'. And,
> the compact versions will really screw up :).
>
Compact versions? You mean non-
Am 03.02.19 um 09:32 schrieb DL Neil:
Now back to ordinal dates - the "st", "th", etc suffixes only work in
English. You'd need another list (but no great coding complexity) to
cope with a second, third, ... language!
Only for some languages. In other languages there can be, for example,
case
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:35 AM DL Neil wrote:
>
> On 3/02/19 10:16 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >> There's normal and there's normal - like it's tomato or tomato?
> > I dunno. I'm the kind of normal that likes tomatoes (not to be
> > confused with tomatoes). Does that help?
>
> If you like tomatoes
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 1:35 PM DL Neil
wrote:
> On 3/02/19 10:16 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 8:09 PM DL Neil
> wrote:
> >> On 3/02/19 9:45 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >>> Which is why I always write dates in sorted format, usually eschewing
> >>> delimiters:
> >>> //CJA
On 3/02/19 10:16 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 8:09 PM DL Neil wrote:
On 3/02/19 9:45 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
Which is why I always write dates in sorted format, usually eschewing
delimiters:
//CJA 20160511: Is this still happening? I don't remember seeing it in
three part
The discussion strictly sets a limit of 31 for the largest number of days in
a month and asks for suffixes used to make ordinal numbers like 31st.
But in reality, you can go to 99th and beyond for other purposes albeit the
pattern for making 101 and on seems to repeat.
The last algorithm I wrote
"Sayth Renshaw" wrote in message
news:73a1c64c-7fb1-4fc8-98a2-b6939e82a...@googlegroups.com...
chooseFrom = { day : nthSuffix(day) for day in range(1,32)}
chooseFrom
{1: '1st', 2: '2nd', 3: '3rd', 4: '4th', 5: '5th', 6: '6th', 7: '7th', 8:
'8th', 9: '9th', 10: '10th', 11: '11th', 12: '12th',
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 8:09 PM DL Neil wrote:
>
> On 3/02/19 9:45 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > Which is why I always write dates in sorted format, usually eschewing
> > delimiters:
> >
> > //CJA 20160511: Is this still happening? I don't remember seeing it in
> > three parts of forever.
>
> Sure
Chris,
On 3/02/19 9:45 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 7:40 PM DL Neil wrote:
This would normally see us coding "2019-02-03". The arrangement of
larger to ever more precise time-units is very useful in databases and
applications such as file-names, because it sequences logical
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 7:40 PM DL Neil wrote:
> This would normally see us coding "2019-02-03". The arrangement of
> larger to ever more precise time-units is very useful in databases and
> applications such as file-names, because it sequences logically.
>
> However, that is not the way 'normal pe
When a client demanded his way on this issue, the action we took was, as
below, to create a list (called ordinal) and to use the dd (day) value
as an index.
[ nthSuffix(day) for day in range(1,32)]
['1st', '2nd', '3rd', '4th', '5th', '6th', '7th', '8th', '9th', '10th',
'11th', '12th', '13th'
Chris Angelico schrieb am 03.02.19 um 02:23:
> Of course, you can also precompute this:
>
> day_ordinal = mapper(
> [1, 21, 31], "st",
> [2, 22], "nd",
> [3, 23], "rd",
> )
> def f(x): return day_ordinal.get(x, "th")
… in which case I would also 'precompute' the ".get" and
fix(day) for day in range(1,32)}
> >>> chooseFrom
> {1: '1st', 2: '2nd', 3: '3rd', 4: '4th', 5: '5th', 6: '6th', 7: '7th', 8:
> '8th', 9: '9th', 10: '10th', 11: '11th', 12:
7;, 8:
'8th', 9: '9th', 10: '10th', 11: '11th', 12: '12th', 13: '13th', 14: '14th',
15: '15th', 16: '16th', 17: '17th', 18: '18th', 19: '19th', 20: '20th', 21:
'21st
t; 13rd
> 14th
> 15th
> 16th
> 17th
> 18th
> 19th
> 20th
> 21st
> 22nd
> 23rd
> 24th
> 25th
> 26th
> 27th
> 28th
> 29th
> 30th
> 31st
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Python-list On
> Behalf Of Sayth Renshaw
> Sent: Saturday
On 2019-02-03 02:51, Avi Gross wrote:
I may be missing something, but the focus seems to be only on the rightmost
digit. You can get that with
I had the same thought, but came across a problem. "11st", "12nd", "13rd"?
[snip]
Output:
for day in range(1, 32):
print( nthSuffix(day))
7th
18th
19th
20th
21st
22nd
23rd
24th
25th
26th
27th
28th
29th
30th
31st
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Sayth Renshaw
Sent: Saturday, February 2, 2019 8:53 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Implement C's Switch in Python 3
> >I am trying to conver
Cameron wrote:
> Skip has commented on lists being unhashable. We can elaborate on that
> if you like.
>
> However, even if you went to tuples (which would let you construct the
> dict you lay out above), there is another problem.
>
> You're looking up "x" in the dict. But the keys of the dict are
> >I am trying to convert a switch statement from C into Python. (why?
> >practising).
> >
> >This is the C code.
> >
> >printf("Dated this %d", day);
> > switch (day) {
> >case 1: case 21: case 31:
> >printf("st"); break;
> >case 2: case 22:
> >printf("nd"); break;
> >
On 02Feb2019 16:47, Sayth Renshaw wrote:
I am trying to convert a switch statement from C into Python. (why?
practising).
This is the C code.
printf("Dated this %d", day);
switch (day) {
case 1: case 21: case 31:
printf("st"); break;
case 2: case 22:
printf("nd"); break;
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 11:51 AM Sayth Renshaw wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am trying to convert a switch statement from C into Python. (why?
> practising).
>
> This is the C code.
>
> printf("Dated this %d", day);
> switch (day) {
> case 1: case 21: case 31:
> printf("st"); break;
> case
>
> I have an unhashable type list.
>
Try replacing the list with a tuple. Also, read up on immutable v mutable
types and dictionary keys for a bit of background on why a list won't work.
Skip
>
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi
I am trying to convert a switch statement from C into Python. (why? practising).
This is the C code.
printf("Dated this %d", day);
switch (day) {
case 1: case 21: case 31:
printf("st"); break;
case 2: case 22:
printf("nd"); break;
case 3: case 23:
printf
On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 18:44, Hemant Mehta
wrote:
>
> Dear Team,
>
> I am unable to install python 3 in my computer.
> Kindly find my system configuration details & error details occured at
the time of installation.
Unable to find the system configuration details & erro
Dear Team,
I am unable to install python 3 in my computer.
Kindly find my system configuration details & error details occured at the time
of installation.
Please do the needful on priority.
Regards,
Hemant Mehta
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
After chickening out a couple of times over the past few years, about eight
months ago we migrated our small code base from 2.7.14 to 3.6.5. Some notes:
On 2.7 we spent a couple of years coding with 3.x in mind, using import from
__future__ and coding to Python 3 standards wherever possible
On 2019-01-22 19:20, Grant Edwards wrote:
> > For anyone who has moved a substantial bunch of Python 2 to Python
> > 3, can you please reply with your experience?
>
> If you used bytes (or raw binary strings) at all (e.g. for doing
> things like network or serial protocols
Robin Becker writes:
> On 22/01/2019 19:00, Schachner, Joseph wrote:
> ..
>> For anyone who has moved a substantial bunch of Python 2 to Python 3,
>> can you please reply with your experience? Did you run into any
>> issues? Did 2to3 do its job well, or di
On 23/01/2019 21:51, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 1:36 PM Stefan Behnel wrote:
.
All right, but apart from absolute imports, the print function, and true
division, what has Python 3.x ever done for us?
*ducks*
headaches :)
--
Robin Becker
--
https://mail.python.org
On 22/01/2019 19:00, Schachner, Joseph wrote:
..
For anyone who has moved a substantial bunch of Python 2 to Python 3, can you
please reply with your experience? Did you run into any issues? Did 2to3 do
its job well, or did you have to review its output to eliminate some working
, the print function, and true
division, what has Python 3.x ever done for us?
*ducks*
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Cameron Simpson schrieb am 23.01.19 um 00:21:
> from __future__ import absolute_imports, print_function
>
> gets you a long way.
... and: division.
Stefan
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 23Jan2019 14:15, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2019-01-22, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 22Jan2019 19:20, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2019-01-22, Schachner, Joseph wrote:
For anyone who has moved a substantial bunch of Python 2 to Python
3, can you please reply with your experience?
If you used
On 2019-01-22, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 22Jan2019 19:20, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>On 2019-01-22, Schachner, Joseph wrote:
>>> For anyone who has moved a substantial bunch of Python 2 to Python
>>> 3, can you please reply with your experience?
>>
>>If yo
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 6:10 PM dieter wrote:
> > Did 2to3 do its job well
>
> I have not used "2to3" -- because I doubt, that it can handle
> important cases, i.e. when a Python 2 "str" must become a Python 3 bytes
> or when a "dict.{keys, values, ite
"Schachner, Joseph" writes:
> ...
> For anyone who has moved a substantial bunch of Python 2 to Python 3, can
> you please reply with your experience?
It can be simple and it can be difficult.
I have found "http://python-future.org/compatible_idioms.html";
espe
On 22Jan2019 19:20, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2019-01-22, Schachner, Joseph wrote:
For anyone who has moved a substantial bunch of Python 2 to Python
3, can you please reply with your experience?
If you used bytes (or raw binary strings) at all (e.g. for doing
things like network or serial
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:43 AM Akkana Peck wrote:
>
> Grant Edwards writes:
> > On 2019-01-22, Schachner, Joseph wrote:
> >
> > > For anyone who has moved a substantial bunch of Python 2 to Python
> > > 3, can you please reply with your experience?
>
Grant Edwards writes:
> On 2019-01-22, Schachner, Joseph wrote:
>
> > For anyone who has moved a substantial bunch of Python 2 to Python
> > 3, can you please reply with your experience?
>
> If you used bytes (or raw binary strings) at all (e.g. for doing
> th
On 2019-01-22, Schachner, Joseph wrote:
> For anyone who has moved a substantial bunch of Python 2 to Python
> 3, can you please reply with your experience?
If you used bytes (or raw binary strings) at all (e.g. for doing
things like network or serial protocols) you're in for a
... I've told my manager that we need to change
from Python 2.7.13 (the last version to which I updated it) to Python 3.x,
whatever the latest is, sometime this year and to get that on our roadmap. I
should mention that updating from earlier 2.x versions through 2.7.13 has not
caused any erro
roject/jpegtran-cffi/
> > >
> > > I can't find anything called just "jpegtran" for either Py2 or Py3,
> > > but that one claims to work on 3.3+ as well as 2.6 and 2.7.
> > >
> > I think that must be what I have already installed, it doesn&#x
On Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 10:48:16 AM UTC-7, Chris Green wrote:
> I think that must be what I have already installed, it doesn't make
> the module available in Python 3, it just says this when I try and
> install it:-
>
> root@t470:~# pip install jpegtran-cf
an" for either Py2 or Py3,
> > but that one claims to work on 3.3+ as well as 2.6 and 2.7.
> >
> I think that must be what I have already installed, it doesn't make
> the module available in Python 3, it just says this when I try and
> install it:-
>
> r
need to install in Python3?
> >
>
> Do you mean this?
>
> https://pypi.org/project/jpegtran-cffi/
>
> I can't find anything called just "jpegtran" for either Py2 or Py3,
> but that one claims to work on 3.3+ as well as 2.6 and 2.7.
>
I think that must be
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 2:51 AM Chris Green wrote:
>
> I'm converting an existing Python2 program to Python3, it uses
> jpegtran and I can't find what to install to get this in Python3.
>
> Can anyone advise what I need to install in Python3?
>
Do you mean this?
https://pypi.org/project/jpegtran
I'm converting an existing Python2 program to Python3, it uses
jpegtran and I can't find what to install to get this in Python3.
Can anyone advise what I need to install in Python3?
--
Chris Green
·
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Brian Oney via Python-list wrote:
> That's one thing that confused me. Generators are supposed to be one-off
> iterators. Iterators, *I understood* as reusable iterables.
The way I think about it, informally: iterables need and __iter__ method,
iterators need a __next__ method.
In practice all
On 22Sep2018 12:08, Brian Oney wrote:
That's one thing that confused me. Generators are supposed to be one-off
iterators. Iterators, *I understood* as reusable iterables.
You've misread the grammar (the semantics). Iterators are one off - they're
something that counts (for want of a better w
101 - 200 of 3842 matches
Mail list logo
