Robert Kern wrote:
> [david] wrote:
>> Steve Lamb wrote:
>>> On 2007-10-17, Byung-Hee HWANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just click "Ctrl-L", then you can reply to lists directly if you use
good mailer like mutt or thunderbird or evolution ;;
>>> Thunderbird only if it has the list-rep
Original Message
Subject: Re: why doesn't have this list
a "reply-to" ?
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:13:49 +0900
From: Byung-Hee HWANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organisation: InZealBomb
To: python-list@python.org
Newsgroups: gman
[david] wrote:
> Steve Lamb wrote:
>> On 2007-10-17, Byung-Hee HWANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Just click "Ctrl-L", then you can reply to lists directly if you use
>>> good mailer like mutt or thunderbird or evolution ;;
>> Thunderbird only if it has the list-reply patch, has either enigm
Steve Lamb wrote:
> On 2007-10-17, Byung-Hee HWANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just click "Ctrl-L", then you can reply to lists directly if you use
>> good mailer like mutt or thunderbird or evolution ;;
>
> Thunderbird only if it has the list-reply patch, has either enigmail or
> mhengy in
"Grant Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| On 2007-10-16, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| > It's not universal. Many people consider it harmful. Google "reply-to
considered
| > harmful" for a variety of opinions, for and against.
| >
| > I use GMane
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2007-10-16, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It's not universal. Many people consider it harmful. Google "reply-to
>> considered
>> harmful" for a variety of opinions, for and against.
>>
>> I use GMane to read and post to this list because I like my lists to
On Oct 16, 11:38 pm, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-10-16, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I use GMane to read and post to this list because I like my lists to act
> > like
> > USENET.
> > http://gmane.org
>
> Since "this list" is just mirroring a Usenet news group,
On 2007-10-16, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not universal. Many people consider it harmful. Google "reply-to
> considered
> harmful" for a variety of opinions, for and against.
>
> I use GMane to read and post to this list because I like my lists to act like
> USENET.
>
> http:
On 2007-10-17, Byung-Hee HWANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just click "Ctrl-L", then you can reply to lists directly if you use
> good mailer like mutt or thunderbird or evolution ;;
Thunderbird only if it has the list-reply patch, has either enigmail or
mhengy installed and has the reply-to
"J. Cliff Dyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With thunderbird, I do "reply all," which has the ugly side effect
> that the poster of the message I'm responding to gets 2 copies,
> unless I remember to delete one of them.
Though glacially slow (originally requested in 2000), the "reply to
list" f
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 23:45 +0200, stef mientki wrote:
> hello,
>
> I'm always have great difficulties, replying to this beautiful and
> helpful list.
>
> When I hit the reply button,
> the message is sent personally to the sender and not to the list.
> I've subscribed to dozen's of lists,
> and
Dick Crepeau wrote:
> It seems to me the original question was how can I reply to a posted
> message.
>
> I'm new here and see that while there are replies to several messages,
> many times, like with this note, the issue is brought up as if it is new.
>
> I don't know how to do a reply, can some
Dick Crepeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems to me the original question was how can I reply to a posted
> message.
By choosing whether you want to "reply to the author", or "reply to
the list". (Every message from the mailing list automatically provides
the correct infromation to make bot
It seems to me the original question was how can I reply to a posted
message.
I'm new here and see that while there are replies to several messages,
many times, like with this note, the issue is brought up as if it is new.
I don't know how to do a reply, can someone tell me how? This note was
On 10/16/07, stef mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm always have great difficulties, replying to this beautiful and
> helpful list.
>
> When I hit the reply button,
> the message is sent personally to the sender and not to the list.
> I've subscribed to dozen's of lists,
> and all have an "r
Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's not universal. Many people consider it harmful. Google
> "reply-to considered harmful" for a variety of opinions, for and
> against.
The arguments in support of munging have been defeated, since
2001. Munging the "Reply-To" field is in violation of s
stef mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm always have great difficulties, replying to this beautiful and
> helpful list.
>
> When I hit the reply button,
> the message is sent personally to the sender and not to the list.
Yes. That's what the "reply" function is for: sending a reply to the
stef mientki wrote:
> hello,
>
> I'm always have great difficulties, replying to this beautiful and
> helpful list.
>
> When I hit the reply button,
> the message is sent personally to the sender and not to the list.
> I've subscribed to dozen's of lists,
> and all have an "reply-to" address, th
hello,
I'm always have great difficulties, replying to this beautiful and
helpful list.
When I hit the reply button,
the message is sent personally to the sender and not to the list.
I've subscribed to dozen's of lists,
and all have an "reply-to" address, that points to list and not to the
indi
19 matches
Mail list logo
