Robert Kern wrote:
[david] wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
On 2007-10-17, Byung-Hee HWANG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just click Ctrl-L, then you can reply to lists directly if you use
good mailer like mutt or thunderbird or evolution ;;
Thunderbird only if it has the list-reply patch, has either
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2007-10-16, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not universal. Many people consider it harmful. Google reply-to
considered
harmful for a variety of opinions, for and against.
I use GMane to read and post to this list because I like my lists to act like
Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| On 2007-10-16, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| It's not universal. Many people consider it harmful. Google reply-to
considered
| harmful for a variety of opinions, for and against.
|
| I use GMane to read and
Steve Lamb wrote:
On 2007-10-17, Byung-Hee HWANG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just click Ctrl-L, then you can reply to lists directly if you use
good mailer like mutt or thunderbird or evolution ;;
Thunderbird only if it has the list-reply patch, has either enigmail or
mhengy installed and
[david] wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
On 2007-10-17, Byung-Hee HWANG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just click Ctrl-L, then you can reply to lists directly if you use
good mailer like mutt or thunderbird or evolution ;;
Thunderbird only if it has the list-reply patch, has either enigmail or
mhengy
Original Message
Subject: Re: why doesn't have this list
a reply-to ?
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:13:49 +0900
From: Byung-Hee HWANG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organisation: InZealBomb
To: python-list@python.org
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.python.general
References
hello,
I'm always have great difficulties, replying to this beautiful and
helpful list.
When I hit the reply button,
the message is sent personally to the sender and not to the list.
I've subscribed to dozen's of lists,
and all have an reply-to address, that points to list and not to the
stef mientki wrote:
hello,
I'm always have great difficulties, replying to this beautiful and
helpful list.
When I hit the reply button,
the message is sent personally to the sender and not to the list.
I've subscribed to dozen's of lists,
and all have an reply-to address, that points
stef mientki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm always have great difficulties, replying to this beautiful and
helpful list.
When I hit the reply button,
the message is sent personally to the sender and not to the list.
Yes. That's what the reply function is for: sending a reply to the
author
Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's not universal. Many people consider it harmful. Google
reply-to considered harmful for a variety of opinions, for and
against.
The arguments in support of munging have been defeated, since
2001. Munging the Reply-To field is in violation of
On 10/16/07, stef mientki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm always have great difficulties, replying to this beautiful and
helpful list.
When I hit the reply button,
the message is sent personally to the sender and not to the list.
I've subscribed to dozen's of lists,
and all have an reply-to
It seems to me the original question was how can I reply to a posted
message.
I'm new here and see that while there are replies to several messages,
many times, like with this note, the issue is brought up as if it is new.
I don't know how to do a reply, can someone tell me how? This note was
Dick Crepeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems to me the original question was how can I reply to a posted
message.
By choosing whether you want to reply to the author, or reply to
the list. (Every message from the mailing list automatically provides
the correct infromation to make both
Dick Crepeau wrote:
It seems to me the original question was how can I reply to a posted
message.
I'm new here and see that while there are replies to several messages,
many times, like with this note, the issue is brought up as if it is new.
I don't know how to do a reply, can someone
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 23:45 +0200, stef mientki wrote:
hello,
I'm always have great difficulties, replying to this beautiful and
helpful list.
When I hit the reply button,
the message is sent personally to the sender and not to the list.
I've subscribed to dozen's of lists,
and all
J. Cliff Dyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With thunderbird, I do reply all, which has the ugly side effect
that the poster of the message I'm responding to gets 2 copies,
unless I remember to delete one of them.
Though glacially slow (originally requested in 2000), the reply to
list function
On 2007-10-17, Byung-Hee HWANG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just click Ctrl-L, then you can reply to lists directly if you use
good mailer like mutt or thunderbird or evolution ;;
Thunderbird only if it has the list-reply patch, has either enigmail or
mhengy installed and has the reply-to-list
On 2007-10-16, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not universal. Many people consider it harmful. Google reply-to
considered
harmful for a variety of opinions, for and against.
I use GMane to read and post to this list because I like my lists to act like
USENET.
http://gmane.org
On Oct 16, 11:38 pm, Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-10-16, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use GMane to read and post to this list because I like my lists to act
like
USENET.
http://gmane.org
Since this list is just mirroring a Usenet news group,
wouldn't it be
19 matches
Mail list logo
