On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:26:03 -0500, Charles Hartman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The performance hit from X11 doesn't seem to be
> severe, and it plays well with Virtual Desktop Pro (which I'm also
> going to have to pay for because after five days I can't live without
> it).
Check out these proj
On Jan 7, 2005, at 3:55 PM, Brendan Simons wrote:
This is an old thread, (and an old topic) but my
question is about the state of the "new tools"
described in Bob's presentation at last year's pyCon.
Scanning the archives, I see Jack and Just have talked
about a PyObjC-based python ide since 2002.
On Jan 8, 2005, at 17:41, Jack Jansen wrote:
On 7-jan-05, at 22:55, Brendan Simons wrote:
This is an old thread, (and an old topic) but my
question is about the state of the "new tools"
described in Bob's presentation at last year's pyCon.
Scanning the archives, I see Jack and Just have talked
abou
On 7-jan-05, at 22:55, Brendan Simons wrote:
This is an old thread, (and an old topic) but my
question is about the state of the "new tools"
described in Bob's presentation at last year's pyCon.
Scanning the archives, I see Jack and Just have talked
about a PyObjC-based python ide since 2002. I've
FWIW: After going through everything I could find for OS X (PyOxide,
SPE, IDLE, etc) and giving up on all of it, I finally sprang for $35
for the Personal Edition of WingIDE. It's very good, and very well
supported. The Personal Edition is missing a bunch of stuff I don't
care about and one thi
This is an old thread, (and an old topic) but my
question is about the state of the "new tools"
described in Bob's presentation at last year's pyCon.
Scanning the archives, I see Jack and Just have talked
about a PyObjC-based python ide since 2002. I've
really anxious to see how they are coming
