Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] easy_install question

2007-04-23 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 23 Apr, 2007, at 21:31, Robert Kern wrote: Ronald Oussoren wrote: On Monday, April 23, 2007, at 02:46PM, "Ulysses Known" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Perhaps this is not possible, however I do see the following egg names through google so I wonder if it is possible: numpy-1.0.2.dev3507

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] easy_install question

2007-04-23 Thread Robert Kern
Ronald Oussoren wrote: > On Monday, April 23, 2007, at 02:46PM, "Ulysses Known" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Perhaps this is not possible, however I do see the following egg names >> through google so I wonder if it is possible: >> >> numpy-1.0.2.dev3507-py2.5-macosx-10.4-i386.egg >> >> Thanks

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] easy_install question

2007-04-23 Thread Ulysses Known
> On Monday, April 23, 2007, at 02:46PM, "Ulysses Known" > >I was wondering more along the lines of distutils.cfg so that I would > >set it once for this system and then have it affect all the installs > >thereafter. Ulysses Known wrote: > The answer (implied, but not explicitly stated) it that th

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] easy_install question

2007-04-23 Thread Christopher Barker
Ulysses Known wrote: > The answer (implied, but not explicitly stated) it that this is not > possible, and that on OSX python installs with easy_install are > targeted at OSX 10.3 and Universal binaries. not quite. easy_install uses distutils (or a modified version, anyway), which builds extensio

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] easy_install question

2007-04-23 Thread Ulysses Known
Thanks to Ronald and Kevin for their replies. > On Monday, April 23, 2007, at 02:46PM, "Ulysses Known" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >I was wondering more along the lines of distutils.cfg so that I would > >set it once for this system and then have it affect all the installs > >thereafter. The

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] easy_install question

2007-04-23 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On Monday, April 23, 2007, at 02:46PM, "Ulysses Known" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 4/23/07, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 23 Apr, 2007, at 3:44, Ulysses Known wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I just used easy_install to install a package on OSX 10.4.9 (MacBook >> > Pro) and noted

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] easy_install question

2007-04-23 Thread Kevin Walzer
Ulysses Known wrote: > > Well, since easy_install pulled down and built the package on this > machine (a very slick and easy install indeed!) I see no need to have > PPC binaries on it, since I would use that same install process on a > PPC box. > Is space at a premium on your machine? If not,

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] easy_install question

2007-04-23 Thread Ulysses Known
On 4/23/07, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 23 Apr, 2007, at 3:44, Ulysses Known wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just used easy_install to install a package on OSX 10.4.9 (MacBook > > Pro) and noted that the built egg has the following name: > > > > FOO-py2.5-macosx-10.3-fat.egg > > > > Ho

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] easy_install question

2007-04-22 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 23 Apr, 2007, at 3:44, Ulysses Known wrote: Hi, I just used easy_install to install a package on OSX 10.4.9 (MacBook Pro) and noted that the built egg has the following name: FOO-py2.5-macosx-10.3-fat.egg I looked inside the egg and yes, there are "fat" (PPC and Intel) shared objects. I

[Pythonmac-SIG] easy_install question

2007-04-22 Thread Ulysses Known
Hi, I just used easy_install to install a package on OSX 10.4.9 (MacBook Pro) and noted that the built egg has the following name: FOO-py2.5-macosx-10.3-fat.egg I looked inside the egg and yes, there are "fat" (PPC and Intel) shared objects. I tried looking through the PEAK website and the dist