Hi
Volunteering in quality assurance in the last year and a half was an
interesting experience for me.
I encounter arrogance and aggression which I despise, and therefore
decided to quit volunteering.
Thank you for the opportunity given to me and good luck in the future.
Edwin
Welcome Hitesh
4.1 post tests start soon in TestLink and your help will be appreciated.
Please don't hesitate to ask.
Good luck,
Edwin
On Tue, May 6, 2014, at 4:58, HITESH JAIN wrote:
> Hi
> This is Hitesh Jain from Surrey, BC, Canada.
> I am reading the instructions and moving ahead step by
Hi Yu Zhen
Please assign Linux Deb 64 bit and Win 7 manual cases, TestLink ID elish.
Thanks,
Edwin
On Mon, May 5, 2014, at 12:46, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have released AOO 4.1 successfully on Apr 29 with voting, but we still
> have some test cases not completed during 4.1 stage, in ord
OK, thank you
On Fri, May 2, 2014, at 15:37, Armin Le Grand wrote:
> Hi Edwin,
>
> for the moment please ignore [aw080] flagged tasks, I will take care
> when I get some time to continue working on it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On 01.05.2014 15:24, Edwin Sharp wrote:
>
No problem opening the file
AOO410m18(Build:9764) - Rev. 1589052
2014-04-22 11:43:54 (Di, 22 Apr 2014)
Win 7
On Thu, May 1, 2014, at 16:44, David Goldfield wrote:
> OK, I'm going to assume that there may be something flaky with my
> installation and that this isn't some sort of bug but I'd lik
Hello
I encounter unconfirmed bugs of AW080 branch.
Please explain how to evaluate those bugs (found
[1]https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Aw080_documentation but no
installation instructions there).
Thank you,
Edwin
References
1. https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Aw080_documentation
Hi Rainer
I agree - Bugzilla is not the place for philosophical debates. We should
concentrate in real life usage issues and not in theoretical scenarios like
issue 124683.
I also agree that keyword needmoreinfo has limited effectiveness. From my
personal experience, many times information was
+1
despite issue 124553.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014, at 18:11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
> (RC4) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.
>
> Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bugfixes and at least
> 2 major improvements
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014, at 17:45, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
> I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and
> the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very
> hot version ...
>
With a fourth release candidate on the way, I don't find it funny.
Please n
Another suggestion:
We should aim for smallest code base.
The smaller the code is, the better chances an update won't break anything.
This can be achieved by:
a. removal of non used features
b. making less used features available via extensions
c. one UI element per task (avoiding duplicates in UI)
Thanks Yuzhen!
Where to download?
IMHO we need
alpha feature freeze
beta feature freeze+fixing freeze
RC feature freeze+fixing freeze+testing freeze
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014, at 14:24, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
> Hi QAs and all volunteers,
>
> You are invited to test this RC3 if you have time and would like
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014, at 10:21, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/9/14 9:17 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > as reported on the dev list we had a build issue on Linux and rebuild
> > currently the Linux packages on the same revision.
I am not subscribed to the dev list, sorry.
> but maybe I should explai
-1
Issue 124607 Linux x86-64 DEB: 1585426 not OK, 1585624 OK.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014, at 12:00, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
> (RC2) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.
>
> Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bugfixe
Hello
Please report in Bugzilla.
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/HowToFileIssue
Thank you!
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014, at 10:38, Oukcha oukcha wrote:
> Hi developers,
>
> New volunteers on the QA list, we test on the fr-forum the last release
> candidate of AOO.
>
> When we extract the rpm files 4.
Dear Pedro
Please check existing issue:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124599
If not representing your observations, best you personally submit new issue
according:
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/HowToFileIssue
Regards,
Edwin
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014, at 0:01, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
+1
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014, at 10:56, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
> (RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0.
>
> Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bugfixes and at least
> 2 major improvements. It's the first version
Welcome and good luck!
Please read:
http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/intro-qa.html
Download and check 4.1 release candidate from:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets
Don't hesitate to ask.
On Thu, Ap
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014, at 11:12, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
> creating an issue make sense, maybe we should add a new category for
> this. And these issues should be addressed in the same way as other
> issues. Ok they probably no showstopper for a release but QA work is
> very important and we shoul
Hello Francisco
A Bugzilla issue has been opened for this:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124578
Thank you!
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014, at 23:13, Francisco Mancardi wrote:
> hi
> my name is Francisco Mnacardi, I'm the team leader and main developer of
> test link.
> I've seen that you are
I personally have no access to Mac.
Sorry.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014, at 12:18, Tal Daniel wrote:
> Hi, I've opened a bug about a year ago, and since then it hasn't been
> confirmed.
> How can I promote its confirmation, and even release-block flag?
>
> E.g. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?i
The oldest version where the bug occurs is more meaningful than the version the
bug reporter used.
The bug history shows the bug reporters version.
More fields - more confusion.
IMHO current Bugzilla is good.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014, at 12:33, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I suggest that bugzilla
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014, at 18:43, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have reported many bugs and some have already been solved in LibreOffice.
> I'm wondering if it makes sense to report them *again* to the Apache
> bugzilla...
Yes - these are different products.
>
> However, since the LibreOffice
I personally can not understand people using such ancient operating system from
a greedy corporation not respecting user privacy.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014, at 14:16, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm curious: does this mean Apache OpenOffice is dropping support for
> Windows XP?
>
> My PC runs Win
ID elish
platform Debian, Windows 7
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014, at 11:55, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have released AOO 4.1 Beta sucessfully on Mar 9 with voting, the next
> test stage is FPR(full regression test) targeting for release candidate of
> GA [1]. This is the call for volunteers on F
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014, at 20:00, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> Something to keep in mind: we have the ability, in BZ, to send
> reminder notes on issues. For example, we can send a note to all
> "needmoreinfo" issues untouched for X number of days, warning that the
> issue will be closed if there is no
Hi
Unconfirmed bugs which can not be evaluated (e.g. lack of knowledge or
lack of hardware) get keyword needhelp.
Currently, according
[1]https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Issue_lifecycle :
Unconfirmed bug with lacking description -> keyword=needmoreinfo -> 14
days with no answer -> Status=RESO
Dear Eva
Please open a bug report in:
[1]https://issues.apache.org/ooo/
see help in:
[2]https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/HowToFileIssue
Regards,
Edwin
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014, at 0:27, Eva Meñike wrote:
Hello,
I am writing to inform you about a problem I find with Open Office (v.
0) How did you hear about the beta?
10) What other versions are installed on your PC along with this beta?
11) What changes relative to beta do you expect to see in the release candidate?
12) What is the next appropriate release (4.1.1 / 4.2 / 5)?
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014, at 15:16, Rob Weir wrote:
>
+1
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014, at 10:55, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
> (RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 Beta. The Beta release is intended to
> reach more early adopters and to receive more valuable feedback to
> improve potenti
IMHO don't implement new icons. If beta is not general public then increase
RC-final duration.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014, at 17:50, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are still verifying some fixes to identify the Beta as real beta,
> means some branding elements, names etc. And we are working on som
I agree with Rainer.
Keywords or Tags should be preferred.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014, at 10:37, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we should decide whether we want to use a tracking bug [2] or a
> Key word (interop_OOXML) [2]. Using both in parallel only makes it more
> difficult to create re
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014, at 19:32, V Stuart Foote wrote:
>
> Not seeing an issue. Breathe!
>
+1
> >I will simply ignore all Bug reports where he is involved in future
>
> Your choice. However...think "inclusive" not "exclusive".
>
> Stuart
Ignoring our users is never a good idea.
---
Hejsan!
Please read about quality assurance at:
http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/intro-qa.html
There are currently 1446 bugs in unconfirmed status awaiting confirmation at:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/
Thank you,
Edwin
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014, at 21:59, Christoffer Freij wrote:
> Hello!
>
I'm against this recommendation.
Nothing more harmful to AOO reputation than an old unanswered problem because:
Lack of basic respect to the person who took the time to report it.
An indication for no control over the project.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014, at 11:52, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> curre
Hello Alberto
Please read about quality assurance in the following link:
http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/intro-qa.html
The beta version is not available yet but you can sign up in Bugzilla and check
new and unconfirmed bugs:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/
Thank you,
Edwin
On Thu, Jan 30,
See attached picture.
In the subsequent cases list click the green gear to execute test.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014, at 10:56, Andreas Säger wrote:
> > hi,Andreas
> >
> > Welcome to join 4.1 Feature Verification Test, yuzhen will assign test
> > executions to you in testlink and email to you
> >
> >
Maybe here:
[1]http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/#win
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014, at 16:06, akriti wrote:
I tried to install OO using
Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.1.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe downloaded from
'[2]https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Sn
apshot+Builds#D
Dear Shari
You don't have to be all that to help and make a difference.
Please sign up in Bugzilla - https://issues.apache.org/ooo/
Please sign up also in TestLink - http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/
Read about QA in http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/intro-qa.html
Don't hesitate to ask.
IMHO the word "volunteer" deters people and must be replaced with a more
enticing term.
Regarding point 2 - there's a volunteer hiding in every bug reporter...
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014, at 16:12, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Edwin Sharp wrote:
> > 85,08
85,083,221 downloads and only 5 volunteers???
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014, at 14:27, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
> Hi All,
> We started doing the AOO 4.1 Function Verification test(FVT), here is the
> weekly update (1/13 - 1/17):
>
> *Test execution:*
> 1. New feature testing on comments/Annotations on text rang
Hi Yuzhen
Please assign me test cases for Linux Ubuntu 64bit and Windows 7.
Thanks
Edwin
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014, at 11:39, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have made some progress on the 4.1 Feature Verification Test (FVT)
> execution with help from Edwin, Maryna and Liu Ping and will get even mo
bug 124005
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014, at 13:47, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 1/9/14 12:12 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote:
> > Hallo Gerhard
> > Have you reported this in Bugzilla?
> > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/
> > Edwin
>
> it seems to be not Mac specific, was able to r
Hello
How is this relevant to us?
>From the Wikipedia page on test effort it is for cost estimation - Apache
>OpenOffice is developed 100% by volunteers.
Edwin
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014, at 12:30, akriti wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Happy New Year to all..!!
>
> I am interested in learning and implementin
Reminder...
This poll closes at Jan 2nd 06:00 GMT.
- Original message -
From: Edwin Sharp <[1]el...@mail-page.com>
To: [2]qa@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Please reply on alternative for "Factory settings"
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:16:50 +0200
Hi
This is
Hi
This is related to:
[1]https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123887
Options are :
1. Initial settings
2. Original settings
3. Condition as received
Thank you,
Edwin
References
1. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123887
Best wishes and merry Christmas!
Warm regards,
Edwin
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013, at 8:58, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
> Merry X-Mas and Happy New Year to everyone!
>
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>
> > I also wish everybody Merry X-Mas & A Happy New Year. :-)
Hi
I suggest NOTABUG --> NOTANISSUE .
Sometimes enhancement or feature is requested without knowing that it already
exists.
Thanks.
On Tue, May 28, 2013, at 17:39, Rob Weir wrote:
> We received some feedback that the resolution status "INVALID" was
> seen as being too strong a term. We don't wan
What are you saying?
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013, at 9:52, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> waiting for Bugzilla becoming available again, I have some time for
> general meditations.
>
> Experience of life is that you should not confide your car to a garage
> where workers obviously are not intereste
igned you 44 testcases on Win7 in TestLink (under Test Plan: AOO
> 4.1 FVT) as first batch, please let me know when you are done. Thanks again.
>
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote:
>
> > elish - Debian and Win 7
> &g
elish - Debian and Win 7
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013, at 12:59, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The trunk build is ready, and we can start doing FVT(functional
> verification test) now. This is the call for volunteers on testing Writer
> product. Any one who can contribute to the testing, please provide
Welcome and good luck.
Some useful information: http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/intro-qa.html
Don't hesitate to ask.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013, at 8:46, phillip brown wrote:
> Hello my name is Phillip and I am a student at the University of Ballarat.
> I am currently undertaking a course that
In subsequent checks I installed the deb (not arc!) package using dpkg -i *.deb
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 12:05, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> On 29.09.2013 21:12, Edwin Sharp wrote:
> > [...]
> > Not sure what is meant by Crash bug, but here is relevant information:
> > Current dis
Dear Rainer
Not sure what is meant by Crash bug, but here is relevant information:
Current distribution I use: http://www.aptosid.com/
Original bug reports were generated via laptop using USB installation.
AOO was installed from arc file of the Buildbots.
Desktop environment was KDE.
Second check
Hallo Wolfgang
Bitte um Entschuldigung.
Die online-Übersetzung Ihrer Nachricht ist unverständlich.
Please describe your problem in English.
Regards,
Edwin
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013, at 18:12, Wolfgang Beiermann wrote:
>
> Guten Tag!
>
>
>
>
> Ob ich mit meinem Problem die richtigen Ansprech-Pa
Always had the impression testing with the latest build is best.
Thanks for correcting me.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013, at 18:15, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> Edwin Sharp schrieb:
> > Bugzilla updated.
> > Is it wrong to test on a newer build?
>
> Hi Edwin,
>
> yes, that
ease open them? Also, the latest RC build is
> RC3 AOO401m5(Build:9714) - Rev. 1524958, we are expected to test on it.
>
> Regards,
> Yu Zhen
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote:
>
> > **
> > Hi
> > Please find enclosed results for
Hi
Please find enclosed results for Impress Rev. 1525015.
Edwin
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013, at 15:08, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
Hi all,
This is the update for showstopper defect verification/impacted area
testing, general testing and PVT:
1. Bug(showstopper)verification and impacted area testing - Almo
Hi
elish - Debian
Thanks
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013, at 21:35, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Release Candidate build is announced, and we can start doing RC
> acceptance test now. This is the call for volunteers on the final tests.
> Any one who can contribute to the testing before this Wednesday
Are you using Opera browser?
I have encountered a problem in opera browser where no download link is
available.
Other browsers work OK.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013, at 16:49, David Dolata wrote:
> The download page does not have a clear download link.
> I should not need to be a computer expert to hunt
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013, at 22:58, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> Finally, I think we can all point to a similar open source project
> that has numerous betas, but still suffers from poor quality. So a
> public beta, by itself, is not sufficient. We need some upstream
> improvements as well, I think. But w
Dear Rob
The 4.0 release was too ambitious - we should advance in smaller steps.
Nothing compares to general public testing - betas and release candidates
should not be avoided.
TestLink cases should be less comprehesive (in terms of feature coverage) and
more stress testing oriented.
Regards,
Ed
There are three possiblities:
1- leave it unconfirmed - you and the next person trying to reproduce waste time
2- confirm when not a bug - a developer trying to fix wastes time
3- close when a bug - a future user reporting the already known bug wastes time
option 1 is the worst...
On Tue, Aug 13
Welcome and good luck.
Some useful information: http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/intro-qa.html
Don't hesitate to ask.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013, at 8:15, Camelia Brown wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> My name is Camelia (I usually just go by C.C. for short), and I am a recent
> graduate from Cal
eading.
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 10:47:29 AM Edwin Sharp wrote:
> > Thank you.
> > Same formats exist in both.
> > Only naming differs i.e NSO Writer UOF2 - Uniform Office Format 2 Text,
> > Writer8 - ODF Text Document etc.
> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013, at 23:26, Gerd Munck
122818 status can be set to unconfirmed, confirmed, accepted, resolved.
Let me know if I can help with these bugs.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013, at 12:21, Edoardo Panfili wrote:
> Il 07/08/13 10:47, Edwin Sharp ha scritto:
> > Bug number?
>
> for example 122818
>
> but all the bug
Bug number?
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013, at 11:22, Edoardo Panfili wrote:
> I need to confirm a bug but in bugzilla I can set the status only to
> "unconfirmed" or to "resolved"
>
> Edoardo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@ope
Thank you.
Same formats exist in both.
Only naming differs i.e NSO Writer UOF2 - Uniform Office Format 2 Text, Writer8
- ODF Text Document etc.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013, at 23:26, Gerd Muncke wrote:
>
> Tool/Options/Load/Save/General/Always save as
--
No list of formats in Tools - Options...
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013, at 18:24, Gerd Muncke wrote:
> Sorry, not Preferences but Options under Tools
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 08:52:09 AM Edwin Sharp wrote:
> > Where is preferences list located?
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013, at
Where is preferences list located?
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013, at 3:18, Gerd Muncke wrote:
> The list of available formats to store documents in Preferences does
> not contain as many options as the po-up list under Save As.
>
>
> -
>
Welcome and good luck.
Don't hesitate to ask...
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013, at 19:47, purva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My name is Purva and I would like to volunteer in QA. I am from Houston, TX.
> I am new to QA field. I took training in QA and I know Hp quality center,
> QTP, and Load runner. Also know how to r
IMHO the seven digit number (i.e. Rev. 1503704) is preferable for both report
and confirmation.
Item 5 - target milestones are meant to be broken...
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013, at 18:38, Rob Weir wrote:
> I'd like to update BZ to reflect the next release of AOO.
>
> Version are tracked in three differe
el...@mail-page.com
Debian, Win 7
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013, at 8:25, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Currently we have about 45 unconfirmed bugs in 4.0[1], if you have
> interest in joining the bug confirmation work, could you please let me
> know your Bugzilla ID and platforms you have, I will assign
IMHO just poorly written test case.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013, at 18:23, Prachi Jain wrote:
> Hi,
> In step no. 3 From context menu, select 'Bullets and numbering'. In bullet
> tab verify First Bullet Icon is None ,but first bullet icon is solid small
> circular bullet. Is it a bug? and at last it s
elish
Debian 64, Windows 7
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013, at 17:30, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Release Candidate build is just announced, and we can start doing RC
> acceptance test now. This is the call for volunteers on the final tests.
> Any one who can contribute to the testing, please send
Not entirely... :(
Numerical values are incorrect - data in bug 112829...
Sorry.
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013, at 22:00, Edwin Sharp wrote:
> Problem fixed in Rev. 1499775 Win 7.
>
> Thank you Raphael!
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013, at 22:34, Raphael Bircher wrote:
> > Hi at all
> &g
Problem fixed in Rev. 1499775 Win 7.
Thank you Raphael!
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013, at 22:34, Raphael Bircher wrote:
> Hi at all
>
> Can sameone confirm this bug
>
> 1) Open a Calc sheet
> 2) Make a Diagram
> 3) Select the diagram and copy it
> 4) Open a Draw document
> 5) paste
>
> Result: you have
Well, I guess working with bugs has a psychological side effect.
There are times I lose faith in the software.
In a few occasions even considered stop using it.
Bottom line, July 16th is just around the corner and I'm anxious.
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013, at 0:16, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> This is quit
Hello
Sorry for discussing on qa, I'm not subscribed to dev.
Please consider cancel date for official release.
Instead of final release, the conventional release cycle should be followed and
not skipped.
i.e. Beta, Release Candidate etc.
This will entice more volunteers for improving the final rel
Confirm also in Rev. 1491860 Debian
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013, at 22:34, Raphael Bircher wrote:
> Hi at all
>
> Can sameone confirm this bug
>
> 1) Open a Calc sheet
> 2) Make a Diagram
> 3) Select the diagram and copy it
> 4) Open a Draw document
> 5) paste
>
> Result: you have only the grid but no
Hello
I confirm in Rev. 1489073 Win 7.
Almost sure also in Debian.
Regards,
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013, at 22:34, Raphael Bircher wrote:
> Hi at all
>
> Can sameone confirm this bug
>
> 1) Open a Calc sheet
> 2) Make a Diagram
> 3) Select the diagram and copy it
> 4) Open a Draw document
> 5) paste
>
, Mechtilde wrote:
> Hello Edwin,
> hello at all,
>
> Bass is not as much used as e.g Writer. But I know many people included
> me who use Base and are glad that we have such a tool in a free office
> suite (free as in freedom)
>
> Kind regards
>
> Mechtilde
> Am 29.0
If no one use it, why not remove from suite?
Why waste time on Base instead of improving Writer or Calc?
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013, at 21:55, Rob Weir wrote:
> I think one of the challenges of testing OpenOffice Base is that not
> many people use it.
>
> And I see that almost no one says they know B
Dear Andre
This is exactly the problem!
When you grab a bug from the top and critical bugs continuously enter the list
-
The minor bugs at the bottom will never get attention.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013, at 14:24, Andre Fischer wrote:
>
>
> All good ideas.
>
> I would like to add another one. I a
My meaning is, respecting current users of OpenOffice who reported bugs and see
those bugs not resolved while new features (sidebar) are being introduced.
I think they deserve at least an explanation how introducing new features is
more important from fixing bugs that bothers them (after all, the
Thank you for this feedback.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013, at 9:57, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 6/20/13 8:01 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote:
> > Yes.
> > please allow to share the following objections:
> > 1. in general, bugs shouldn't be rated
>
> I disagree here and you
Yes.
please allow to share the following objections:
1. in general, bugs shouldn't be rated
2. most are crashes - "release blocker" can be other than crash - i.e. copy
chart from Calc into Writer results in chart area without curve. this is a huge
bug that doesn't involve a crash
3. with all the
Welcome and good luck.
See info at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+Defect+Verification+Guidance
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013, at 11:04, Emiliano Lucetti wrote:
> Hi
> This message to inform
Yes - Bugzilla is the tool to handle bugs.
TestLink is not for handling bugs.
Please use reference so it will be possible to connect between the two.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013, at 19:10, Edoardo Panfili wrote:
> Il 13/06/13 18:02, Edwin Sharp ha scritto:
> > Behavior = test description
Behavior = test description --> PASS
Else FAIL.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013, at 11:53, Edoardo Panfili wrote:
> I am executing some test cases regarding the sidebar.
>
> I am doing some tests on position an rotation.
> If the behaviour of the sidebar does not respect the test but is
> coherent with the
Welcome and good luck!
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013, at 12:39, Stefano Foscarini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my name's Stefano, I'm Italian and I've been an OpenOffice user since many
> years!
>
> I'd like to help you.
>
> Bye,
>
>
> Stefano
-
Please assigm me checklist.
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013, at 13:59, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have achieved the exeution target on full regression testing, as every
> QA assignee continues to do their assignments or retest for failed test
> cases when related defects have been resolved, We now have a
Yes.
As long as we don't waste time implementing kindergarten user interfaces and
worrying about compatibility to propriety file formats.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 18:45, Peter Junge wrote:
> That implies all bugs will get fixed if their priority is above low?
---
I think FAIL - better safe than sorry.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 18:38, Edoardo Panfili wrote:
> Il 06/06/13 17:29, Edwin Sharp ha scritto:
> > I think the sidebar is the subject, so everything should originate from it.
> > Having alternative ways is indeed awkward both in testing an
Please send the functional design specification and I will try to update the
test case.
Sorry if I offended you.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 15:59, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
> Edwin,
> Thanks very much for helping the testing!
> I wonder if you can try to update this test case also?
> You can click t
Don't be naive.
A bug with a low priority will never get fixed.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 16:20, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 6/6/13 2:13 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote:
>
>
> you are correct but I believe it is intended to get a priority list. We
> have long list of bugs and that ca
I think the sidebar is the subject, so everything should originate from it.
Having alternative ways is indeed awkward both in testing and in usage.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 16:35, Edoardo Panfili wrote:
> Il 06/06/13 11:59, Edwin Sharp ha scritto:
>
> Step 5 says "via sidebar"
I can understand voting for a new logo.
But voting for bugs?
A bug is a bug and needs to be fixed.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 14:54, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
Hi All,
Here is the list of identified candidates[1]/[2] which are proposed to
be 4.0.0 release blockers. Please indicate your selections for re
IMHO fail the test.
Rotation can not be found.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 18:38, Prachi Jain wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/lib/testcases/archiveData.php?edit=testcase&id=18967
>
> Step No. 3 Insert a drawing object, or a picture.
>
> After inserting drawing object
Found it...
More Options - Options - Protect - Size.
Maybe:
More Options - Type - Position -> to modify position?
For sure test is not written well.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 12:54, Edwin Sharp wrote:
> I think there is something wrong with the test description.
> Even before, in step 4:
I think there is something wrong with the test description.
Even before, in step 4:
"Check on 'Size' check box in 'Protect' section in 'Position and Size' dialog."
Where is that check box?
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 17:02, Edoardo Panfili wrote:
> I have a problem at step 5:
> "Modify position of obj
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
