CONFIG_PRODUCTVERSION 1,0,1,0
> >
> >
> >Patch:
> >--- VERSION.ORIG2012-02-18 18:56:16.62500 -0500
> >+++ VERSION 2012-02-18 18:56:31.609375000 -0500
> >@@ -1 +1 @@
> >-1.0,1
> >+1.0.1
>
> Acked-by: Stefan Weil
Ack, wow do I feel silly. Thanks for the catch.
--
Justin M. Forbes
buted
to make this release happen!
Regards,
Justin M. Forbes
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 10:40 +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Dong Xu Wang writes:
>
> > After applied this patch, while I was compiling on my lap, there will
> > be an error:
> >
> > ./configure --enable-kvm --target-list=x86_64-softmmu && make
> > CCx86_64-softmmu/translate.o
> > /qemu/tar
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 14:33 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Justin,
>
> Am 09.01.2012 19:00, schrieb Justin M. Forbes:
> > Due to the repository move, holidays and other bits, we are a bit late
> > getting out the door, but I want to get qemu 1.0.1 stable release done this
Due to the repository move, holidays and other bits, we are a bit late
getting out the door, but I want to get qemu 1.0.1 stable release done this
week. We have a number of patches, but if you are sitting on anything or
close to finishing up something, please get all patches to
qemu-sta...@nongnu.
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 13:55 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 05.12.2011 21:08, schrieb Justin M. Forbes:
> > Typically I get a flurry of patches shortly after
> > a release (and they have already started for 1.0). I have tried to get
> > a .1 release out in a timely mann
The stable tree for 1.0 has now been created and the mailing list
exists. I am curious as to people's thoughts on how we should proceed.
There was discussion of setting up a predictable time table for stable
releases, say monthly or bimonthly, though that seems a bit difficult
from past experience.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 08:09:31PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
> Thanks, Juan.
>
> PD. Tomorrow is a Spanish holiday, so I would not attend the call.
As there are no agenda items, todays call is cancelled.
Justin
e who contributed
to make this release happen!
Regards,
Justin M. Forbes
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 05:41 -0400, Brad wrote:
> On 26/09/11 9:16 AM, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
> > With the current patch queue I would like to start getting qemu-0.15.1
> > stable into shape. With this in mind, the plan is to tag the release on
> > Monday Oct 3rd. If you hav
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 02:33 -0400, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Onkar N Mahajan"
> > To: k...@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 6:03:26 AM
> > Subject: balloon drivers missing in virtio-win-1.1.16.vfd
> >
> > vir
With the current patch queue I would like to start getting qemu-0.15.1
stable into shape. With this in mind, the plan is to tag the release on
Monday Oct 3rd. If you have patches pending for stable, now would be the
time to send them. Please CC jmfor...@linuxtx.org if you can to ensure that
I see
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 13:30 -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> From: TeLeMan
>
> The breakage was introduced by the commit
> 13661089810d3e59931f3e80d7cb541b99af7071
This patch, as well as the next "monitor: fix build breakage for !
CONFIG_VNC" are already in stable, and have been for a few weeks.
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 10:14 +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 31.08.2011 09:40, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> > On 2011-08-31 02:03, Chris Friesen wrote:
> > c62f6d1d76aea587556c85b6b7b5c44167006264 and
> > 860341f60582959698d2e1d839a5b7a004a2d76f need to be applied to
> > stable-0.15 of upstream QEMU.
>
> S
On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 21:44 -0400, Brad wrote:
> Could this please be pulled back to the 0.15 branch?
>
>
> commit b49b710aae35add54321e4ba1b338cf6db25c2a2
> Author: Brad Smith
> Date: Sat Jul 30 19:08:51 2011 -0400
>
> Fix forcing multicast msgs to loopback on OpenBSD.
>
Pulled, thank
Fedora 15
- We have 65 open bugs 11 of which have fixes in awaiting updates.
- 12 bugs have been closed in the last week
Fedora 16
Fedora 16 Feature Freeze is just 1 week away. It is time to make sure
things are in shape for alpha. Important dates for the Fedora 16 Schedule:
2011-07-26 F
Fedora 14
- We have 101 open bugs, 5 of which have fixes in awaiting updates.
- 1 bug has been closed in the last week
Fedora 15
- Release tomorrow!
- We have 36 open bugs 2 of which have fixes in awaiting updates.
- 6 bugs have been closed in the last week
- GA images have been cleared for releas
e who contributed
to make this release happen!
Regards,
Justin M. Forbes
It has come time to do the 0.14.1 stable release. If there are any patches
which should make this release, please send them along. Remember, to be
included, they need to be in the development tree already, and bug fixes
only. I will cherry pick as appropriate.
Thanks,
Justin
Fedora 14
- We have 95 open bugs, 5 of which have fixes in awaiting updates.
- 17 bugs have been closed in the last week
Fedora 15
- We have 22 open bugs.
- 9 bugs have been closed in the last week
- Beta is released, go test!
- Upcoming Dates of importance:
2011-05-09 Final Change Deadline
2
This is just a reminder that Thursday, April 14 is Fedora Virtualization
test day. Test plans and more information for the event can be found on
the Fedora Project Wiki at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-04-14_Virtualization
IRC for the event on freenode in #fedora-test-day. Please
Fedora 14
- We have 103 open bugs, 16 of which have fixes in awaiting updates.
- 1 bugs have been closed in the last week
Fedora 15
- Upcoming Deadlines:
2011-04-05 Beta Change Deadline Features 100% Complete *today*
2011-04-19 Beta Release
2011-05-09 Final Change Deadline
2011-05-10 C
Fedora 14
- We have 91 open bugs, 10 of which have fixes in awaiting updates.
- 7 bugs have been closed in the last week
Fedora 15
- Upcoming Deadlines:
2011-03-29 Software Translation Deadline
2011-04-05 Beta Change Deadline Features 100% Complete
2011-04-19 Beta Release
2011-05-09 Fi
Fedora 14
- We have 90 open bugs, 9 of which have fixes in awaiting updates.
- 4 bugs have been closed in the last week
Fedora 15
- Upcoming Deadlines:
2011-03-15 Software Translation Deadline
2011-03-22 Beta Change Deadline Features 100% Complete
2011-04-05 Beta Release
2011-04-25 Fin
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:53:10AM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> The following changes since commit 343c1de916b1841cd5fd5f813add9c87590d72e8:
>
> x86: Fix MCA broadcast parameters for TCG case (2011-02-08 12:37:30 +0100)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://gitorious.org/qemu-mae
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 15:21 +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> The following changes since commit b03088c32f8a88e4674f6cdab47da79ef4188d88:
>
> linux-user: Fix possible realloc memory leak (2011-02-09 21:24:05 +0100)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://repo.or.cz/qemu/kevin.git for-st
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:52 +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Am 08.02.2011 15:12, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
> > Markus Armbruster (2):
> > blockdev: Plug memory leak in drive_uninit()
> > blockdev: Plug memory leak in drive_init() error paths
> >
> > blockdev.c | 12 ++--
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 20:26 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 06:25:26AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > To help make the stable branch more active than it has been in the
> > past, I'd like to split the stable branch into a separate tree to
> > allow the tree to develop a li
Fedora 14
- We have 79 open bugs, 9 of which have fixes in awaiting updates.
- 1 bug has been closed in the last week
- Virt-preview has been opened for Fedora 14, more details below
Fedora 15
- Upcoming Deadlines:
2011-01-25 Feature Submission Deadline (2 Weeks!)
2011-02-08 Feature Freeze--
Public bug reported:
Filed from Fedora bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589130
Guests can access USB Mass Storage Device, but fail to mark them as
removable.
** Affects: qemu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 14:14 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 11/29/2010 01:58 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > On 29.11.2010, at 20:29, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Is 2 just right?
> >>
> > I was thinking of a more sophisticated model. Maybe 1 maintainer + 1 user?
> > Or 1 person
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable
> > >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs
st add "good for stable" in uptream patch submission
> - looking for volunteers to manage stable tree
> - Anthony volunteers!! (ok, not really)
I will volunterr for this. I have a vested interest in the stable tree,
as I track to it with Fedora as well.
Justin M. Forbes
33 matches
Mail list logo
