Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-09-10 Thread Collin Walling
On 9/10/20 2:38 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 14:13:55 -0400 > Collin Walling wrote: > >> Has this been merged yet? There is one patch that I neglected to include >> in this series (I didn't realize it until now) that properly sets the >> SCCB size in QEMU based on the length

Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-09-10 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 14:13:55 -0400 Collin Walling wrote: > Has this been merged yet? There is one patch that I neglected to include > in this series (I didn't realize it until now) that properly sets the > SCCB size in QEMU based on the length provided by the kernel (right now, > these patches

Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-09-09 Thread Collin Walling
On 9/9/20 5:43 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:46:23 +0200 > Cornelia Huck wrote: > >> On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:54:40 +0200 >> Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> >>> On 16.07.20 14:02, Cornelia Huck wrote: On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:26:20 -0400 Collin Walling wrote:

Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-09-09 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:46:23 +0200 Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:54:40 +0200 > Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > On 16.07.20 14:02, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:26:20 -0400 > > > Collin Walling wrote: > > > > > >> On 7/15/20 12:04 PM, Cornelia Huck

Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-09-09 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:54:40 +0200 Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 16.07.20 14:02, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:26:20 -0400 > > Collin Walling wrote: > > > >> On 7/15/20 12:04 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > >>> On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:36:35 -0400 > >>> Collin Walling wrote:

Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-09-09 Thread Christian Borntraeger
On 16.07.20 14:02, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:26:20 -0400 > Collin Walling wrote: > >> On 7/15/20 12:04 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:36:35 -0400 >>> Collin Walling wrote: >>> Polite ping. Patches have been sitting on the list for a few weeks

Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-07-16 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:26:20 -0400 Collin Walling wrote: > On 7/15/20 12:04 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:36:35 -0400 > > Collin Walling wrote: > > > >> Polite ping. Patches have been sitting on the list for a few weeks now, > >> and it doesn't look like any further

Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-07-15 Thread Collin Walling
On 7/15/20 12:04 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:36:35 -0400 > Collin Walling wrote: > >> Polite ping. Patches have been sitting on the list for a few weeks now, >> and it doesn't look like any further changes are requested (hopefully I >> didn't miss something). > > The only

Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-07-15 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:36:35 -0400 Collin Walling wrote: > Polite ping. Patches have been sitting on the list for a few weeks now, > and it doesn't look like any further changes are requested (hopefully I > didn't miss something). The only thing I had was (I think) the logging of the length you

Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-07-15 Thread Collin Walling
Polite ping. Patches have been sitting on the list for a few weeks now, and it doesn't look like any further changes are requested (hopefully I didn't miss something). Thanks for everyone's time and patience. Stay safe out there. - Collin

[PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-06-24 Thread Collin Walling
Changelog: v4 • added r-b's and ack's (thanks, everyone!) • renamed boundary and length function • updated header sync to reflect a change discussed in the respective KVM patches • s/data_len/offset_cpu • added /* fallthrough */ comment in boundary check