Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 12:14:21AM +0900, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 4 March 2015 at 00:07, Marcel Apfelbaum mar...@redhat.com wrote:
In the mean time this series depends on Igor's ACPI dynamic series that
took
a lot of time to review and even
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 05:48:37PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 12:14:21AM +0900, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 4 March 2015 at 00:07, Marcel Apfelbaum mar...@redhat.com wrote:
In the mean time this series depends on Igor's
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 01:13:14PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On Mi, 2015-03-04 at 08:27 +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
On 4 March 2015 at 00:07, Marcel Apfelbaum mar...@redhat.com wrote:
In the mean time this series depends on Igor's
On Mi, 2015-03-04 at 08:27 +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
On 4 March 2015 at 00:07, Marcel Apfelbaum mar...@redhat.com wrote:
In the mean time this series depends on Igor's ACPI dynamic series that
took
a lot of time to review and even
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 12:14:21AM +0900, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 4 March 2015 at 00:07, Marcel Apfelbaum mar...@redhat.com wrote:
In the mean time this series depends on Igor's ACPI dynamic series that took
a lot of time to review and even Michael's PULL request with it is not yet
in
Hi,
Well, the support was ready in time, see:
[SeaBIOS] [PATCH V3 0/2] fw/pci: better support for multiple host bridges
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bios.coreboot.seabios/8681
but the SeaBIOS maintainers preferred to see first the QEMU submission
getting accepted.
Yep,
On 03/03/2015 03:57 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 03/03/2015 14:12, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 03/02/2015 03:11 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/03/2015 13:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 2 March 2015 at 21:33, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Looks like there are still a few pull
On 4 March 2015 at 00:07, Marcel Apfelbaum mar...@redhat.com wrote:
In the mean time this series depends on Igor's ACPI dynamic series that took
a lot of time to review and even Michael's PULL request with it is not yet
in master.
You can view this as an argument against enormous pull requests
Hi,
A possible alternative schedule could be:
2015-03-10 Tag v2.3.0-rc0
Hugely optimistic. I'm not likely to tag rc0 my first day
back at work :-)
Good!
I want the multi pci root buses feature to get in 2.3 and is depending
on Igor's dynamic ACPI series that is still
On 03/02/2015 03:11 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/03/2015 13:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 2 March 2015 at 21:33, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Looks like there are still a few pull requests pending, and Peter is on
vacation. Should we really enter hard feature freeze tomorrow?
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 01:33:23PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Looks like there are still a few pull requests pending, and Peter is on
vacation. Should we really enter hard feature freeze tomorrow? The 2.3
planning page in the end never got out the draft state.
I think at this point we
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 01:33:23PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Looks like there are still a few pull requests pending, and Peter is on
vacation. Should we really enter hard feature freeze tomorrow? The 2.3
planning page in the end never got out the
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
On 4 March 2015 at 00:07, Marcel Apfelbaum mar...@redhat.com wrote:
In the mean time this series depends on Igor's ACPI dynamic series that took
a lot of time to review and even Michael's PULL request with it is not yet
in master.
You can view
On 03/03/2015 14:12, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 03/02/2015 03:11 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/03/2015 13:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 2 March 2015 at 21:33, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Looks like there are still a few pull requests pending, and Peter is on
vacation. Should
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 01:33:23PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Looks like there are still a few pull requests pending, and Peter is on
vacation. Should we really enter hard feature freeze tomorrow? The 2.3
planning page in the end never got out the draft state.
A possible alternative
On 02/03/2015 13:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 2 March 2015 at 21:33, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Looks like there are still a few pull requests pending, and Peter is on
vacation. Should we really enter hard feature freeze tomorrow? The 2.3
planning page in the end never got out
On 2 March 2015 at 21:33, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Looks like there are still a few pull requests pending, and Peter is on
vacation. Should we really enter hard feature freeze tomorrow? The 2.3
planning page in the end never got out the draft state.
Well, I said you probably
Looks like there are still a few pull requests pending, and Peter is on
vacation. Should we really enter hard feature freeze tomorrow? The 2.3
planning page in the end never got out the draft state.
A possible alternative schedule could be:
2015-03-10 Tag v2.3.0-rc0
2015-03-17 Tag
18 matches
Mail list logo
