Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Notifiers are data-less callbacks and a notifier list is a list of registered
> notifiers that all are interested in a particular event.
>
> We'll use this in a few patches to implement mouse change notification.
We could use that for migration also.
spice just needs to
On 03/15/2010 10:34 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Notifiers are data-less callbacks and a notifier list is a list of registered
notifiers that all are interested in a particular event.
We'll use this in a few patches to implement mouse change notification.
Looks nicer & lighter!
--
error com
On 03/11/2010 08:42 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/11/2010 04:36 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 03/11/2010 02:42 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/11/2010 03:25 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I didn't understand the advantage of making QEMUNotifier a
struct. Instead of using container_of, reusing QEMUBHFunc (re
On 03/11/2010 04:36 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 03/11/2010 02:42 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/11/2010 03:25 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I didn't understand the advantage of making QEMUNotifier a
struct. Instead of using container_of, reusing QEMUBHFunc (renamed to
QEMUCallbackFunc maybe?) in QEMUNo
On 03/11/2010 02:42 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/11/2010 03:25 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I didn't understand the advantage of making QEMUNotifier a
struct. Instead of using container_of, reusing QEMUBHFunc (renamed to
QEMUCallbackFunc maybe?) in QEMUNotifierNode [...]
seems cleaner. You would plac
On 03/11/2010 02:58 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
On 03/11/2010 01:57 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
+struct QEMUNotifier
+{
+void (*notify)(QEMUNotifier *notifier);
+};
I suggest combining this with QEMUBH.
I didn't understand this suggestion exactly, but I think it's related
that I didn't under
On 03/11/2010 07:25 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 03/11/2010 01:57 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
+struct QEMUNotifier
> +{
> +void (*notify)(QEMUNotifier *notifier);
> +};
I suggest combining this with QEMUBH.
I didn't understand this suggestion exactly, but I think it's related
that I didn't u
> On 03/11/2010 01:57 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
> > +struct QEMUNotifier
> >
> > > +{
> > > +void (*notify)(QEMUNotifier *notifier);
> > > +};
> >
> > I suggest combining this with QEMUBH.
>
> I didn't understand this suggestion exactly, but I think it's related
> that I didn't understand the a
On 03/11/2010 03:25 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 03/11/2010 01:57 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
+struct QEMUNotifier
> +{
> +void (*notify)(QEMUNotifier *notifier);
> +};
I suggest combining this with QEMUBH.
I didn't understand this suggestion exactly, but I think it's related
that I didn't u
On 03/11/2010 01:57 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
+struct QEMUNotifier
> +{
> +void (*notify)(QEMUNotifier *notifier);
> +};
I suggest combining this with QEMUBH.
I didn't understand this suggestion exactly, but I think it's related
that I didn't understand the advantage of making QEMUNotifier
10 matches
Mail list logo
