I agree with Jorge and am personally not a fan of a simple "pay a
commercial partner" message, which is why I think a separate link like
Matthias suggested is a great idea, and any message which might be
interpreted as "It's open source, so fix it yourself" could be harmful.
I think a large part
Hi,
I have a different opinion on this. We should emphasis the community
component of our QGIS open source project. Just asking to pay if they
want the issue solved, is what any commercial software project does. It
does not help to create new contributors.
Reporting and working on issues is
I am not a fan of a bugtracker pushing people to sponsored development
by spamming each issue with it. It's perfectly reasonable to assign a
label that means basically "this issue appears legitimate but no one has
expressed interest in working on it", and make the pointer to either 1)
maybe you
github.io/>
-
The essential is invisible to the eye. Saint-Exupéry
From: QGIS-Developer On Behalf Of
Charles Dixon-Paver
Sent: 08 January 2021 07:44
To: Alexandre Neto
Cc: qgis-developer
Subject: Re: [QGIS-Developer] Stale bot and older requests/issue
How about something like:
Unfortunately this issue has not been addressed by the QGIS community for
some time. If you would like to expedite the resolution of this issue and
more like it, please refer to the https://qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/facilitation.html;>facilitating
development guide
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 11:44 PM Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
>
> What I'm trying to convey here is that there's a chance the ticket
> will be addressed without sponsorship, but if they DO sponsor it will
> get addressed immediately. So "fast track" here means something a
> little like "short cut". Is
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 09:25, Alexandre Neto wrote:
>
> As an user and member of a user group, the message does not offend at all.
> This is something we struggle to explain to users and it's a good opportunity
> to send the message.
>
> I prefer a long version instead of just a link (many
As an user and member of a user group, the message does not offend at all.
This is something we struggle to explain to users and it's a good
opportunity to send the message.
I prefer a long version instead of just a link (many won't click on it)
I am not a native english speaker, but I think
Hi Stefan,
On Thu, 07. Jan 2021 at 12:55:22 +, Stefan Steiger wrote:
> Also, if you use commercial software,
you probably meant to say proprietary software - as you correctly said free
software is not required to be free of charge and hence can be commercial too.
> As with plugins:
> As
.
>
> As long as you only use it internally (e.g. on a WebServer), you don’t
> have to abide by the terms of the GPL (the Affero
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affero_General_Public_License>/Application-Service-Provider
> loophole).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Q
> I've a small request to consider for stale bot and issues/feature
> requests. I think that if a ticket remains open for say > 90 days
> since the last comment, it would be nice if stale bot added a comment
> like:
>
> "Unfortunately this bug/feature request has not seen any solution in
> the
10:10
An: Matthias Kuhn
Cc: qgis-developer
Betreff: Re: [QGIS-Developer] Stale bot and older requests/issues - possible
enhancement
Hi
As a user and employee of a French administration, I think what is proposed
would be an excellent reminder. Open source is not free.
Le jeu. 7 janv. 2021 à 09
Hi
As a user and employee of a French administration, I think what is
proposed would be an excellent reminder. Open source is not free.
Le jeu. 7 janv. 2021 à 09:33, Matthias Kuhn a écrit :
> Hi Nyall,
>
> I would also appreciate a hint like this.
> Maybe it could be done even more subtle by
Hi Nyall,
I would also appreciate a hint like this.
Maybe it could be done even more subtle by shortening this text and adding
a link to a page "learn how to make things progress"?
I'd also very much appreciate the voices of users on this topic (that's a
classical "we don't only want to hear the
Hi list,
I've a small request to consider for stale bot and issues/feature
requests. I think that if a ticket remains open for say > 90 days
since the last comment, it would be nice if stale bot added a comment
like:
"Unfortunately this bug/feature request has not seen any solution in
the recent
15 matches
Mail list logo
