Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E Screen feature whilst CTRL C'ing

2006-09-21 Thread Neil Riley
Many Thanks for all of that. I shall check out the link and read up on it all. Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20 September 2006 19:01 >>> >>> Remember, I'm New ! >>> >It sounds like you are starting to find your way around pointer >environment. You might find Norman Dunbar's Pointer Environment >Id

Re: [ql-users] month number

2006-09-21 Thread P Witte
Dilwyn Jones writes: <> >> PS Still puzzled re; diff between O.S. and 'platform' in our recent >> context. >> :( > The operating system (QDOS or Windows) is that which is running your > programs and making sure all the hardware bits and pieces of your > computer work properly (or not as the case m

Re: [ql-users] month number

2006-09-21 Thread Dilwyn Jones
>>> PS Still puzzled re; diff between O.S. and 'platform' in our >>> recent >>> context. >>> :( >> The operating system (QDOS or Windows) is that which is running >> your >> programs and making sure all the hardware bits and pieces of your >> computer work properly (or not as the case may be). >>

Re: [ql-users] month number

2006-09-21 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Thank you, consider it added! -- Dilwyn Jones - Original Message - From: "Robert Newson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 8:33 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] month number > Dilwyn Jones wrote: > > ... >> In fact, as I was given permission to i

[ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ?

2006-09-21 Thread Norman
Afternoon all. I'm puzzled again. I'm writing an article on the use of the maths packags in QDOSMSQ for our esteemed QL Toady magazine and I've hit a small problem that, for the life of me, I can't figure out. I was explaining the SAVE and LOAD op codes for RI_EXEC and RI_EXECB where the top o

Re: [ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ?

2006-09-21 Thread Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I was explaining the SAVE and LOAD op codes for RI_EXEC and RI_EXECB > where the top of stack floating point value is saved to a variables > area at (A6,A1.L) or a new TOS is created by loading back from said > area. The op codes for save are even in the range $32 to $FF

[ql-users] QHelp

2006-09-21 Thread David McCann
Thanks Derek, for the menu_rext extensions. I've just installed them and I have progress: instead of the error "DIR_SELECT$ bad name" I now get "DIR_SELECT$ bad parameter"! Thanks Rich for your contribution. I have the help files and index in WIN1_basic_help_, because that's where I was told to p

Re: [ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ?

2006-09-21 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 21 Sep 2006 at 18:36, Marcel Kilgus wrote: >(...) > Well, you can store other things in the variable area too, so it makes > sense that you can address every individual word there. Just to add to that some small explanation: the load/save ops (and yes, there are negively indexed) are just t

Re: [ql-users] month number

2006-09-21 Thread Dilwyn Jones
In fact, as I was given permission to include those articles on the Documentation CD, may I ask you if I can also include these routines as well? Sure. Thanks for letting me use the routines, Robert. With coincidental timing, I was asked to come up with an article for QL Toady and Quanta (a

Re: [ql-users] QHelp

2006-09-21 Thread Dilwyn Jones
I'm guessing here, but it's possible that there may be a difference between menu_rext versions here. More recent menu_rext's allow slightly different parameters for some of the menus. I don't know if Rich Mellor includes menu_rext with QHelp - if he does it ought to be the right version for th

Re: [ql-users] QHelp

2006-09-21 Thread Ralf Reköndt
Maybe, QHelp belongs to an older version of QMenu? I remind, that Jochen has changed a few parameters during development. Cheers...Ralf R. - Original Message - From: "David McCann" Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 6:48 PM Subject: [ql-users] QHelp > Thanks Derek, for the menu_rext e

Re: [ql-users] month number

2006-09-21 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Aaargh, sorry this was meant to go direct to Robert! That's me blacklisted now I guess. Robert, I'll send it separately again, as the attachment may not have made it through to the list. -- Dilwyn Jones - Original Message - From: "Dilwyn Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECT

[ql-users] Gold Card Modifications

2006-09-21 Thread Rich Mellor
Malcolm Cadman has given me a Gold Card for sale - however it has the two outer pins on the 5V regulator shorted and a capacitor on the underside (underneath the 68000) - I presume it has been adapted for power through a backplane - can someone remind me of the modifications which would have

Re: [ql-users] Gold Card Modifications

2006-09-21 Thread Tony Firshman
Rich Mellor wrote: > Malcolm Cadman has given me a Gold Card for sale - however it has the two > outer pins on the 5V regulator shorted and a capacitor on the underside > (underneath the 68000) - I presume it has been adapted for power through a > backplane - can someone remind me of the modi

Re: [ql-users] month number

2006-09-21 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dilwyn Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >Aaargh, sorry this was meant to go direct to Robert! > >That's me blacklisted now I guess. > >Robert, I'll send it separately again, as the attachment may not have >made it through to the list. > >-- >Dilwyn Jones There w

Re: [ql-users] QHelp

2006-09-21 Thread Rich Mellor
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:12:47 +0100, Dilwyn Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm guessing here, but it's possible that there may be a difference > between menu_rext versions here. > > More recent menu_rext's allow slightly different parameters for some > of the menus. Possibly - the line in th

Re: [ql-users] month number

2006-09-21 Thread Dilwyn Jones
>>Aaargh, sorry this was meant to go direct to Robert! >> >>That's me blacklisted now I guess. >> >>Robert, I'll send it separately again, as the attachment may not >>have >>made it through to the list. >> >>-- >>Dilwyn Jones > > There was no attachment ... so saved by the error . :-) > > --