In message <4b42f14a.5020...@j-m-s.com>, Jochen Merz
writes
Hi,
glad to read more and more magazines arrive :-)
Yes, as I wrote - the pricing of QL Today would not work if I had to
mail all of them from here, Germany. Worse, Deutsche Post has increased
the price for exactly this kind of le
Dilwyn Jones wrote, On 5/01/10 19:14:
Tony Firshman wrote:
Dilwyn Jones wrote, On 5/01/10 17:00:
Clever, but better to use Thunderbird.
Although I've never installed Thunderbird, I think it's the program
my son's school suggested he install. He got so frustrated with it
(can't remember why) he
Tony Firshman wrote:
Dilwyn Jones wrote, On 5/01/10 17:00:
Clever, but better to use Thunderbird.
Although I've never installed Thunderbird, I think it's the
program
my son's school suggested he install. He got so frustrated with it
(can't remember why) he uninstalled it and started using Hotm
Dilwyn Jones wrote, On 5/01/10 17:00:
Clever, but better to use Thunderbird.
Although I've never installed Thunderbird, I think it's the program my
son's school suggested he install. He got so frustrated with it (can't
remember why) he uninstalled it and started using Hotmail of all
things ins
Clever, but better to use Thunderbird.
Although I've never installed Thunderbird, I think it's the program my
son's school suggested he install. He got so frustrated with it (can't
remember why) he uninstalled it and started using Hotmail of all
things instead.
That sort of kludge reminds me
Tony Firshman wrote:
Clever, but better to use Thunderbird.
Yes, you may be right, but I always want to use it all genuine ;-)). Even
QPLQ (now) is perfect with QPCprint. So, why use anything else...?
Cheers...Ralf
___
QL-Users Mailing List
htt
Tony Firshman wrote, On 5/01/10 16:51:
Andreas Berger wrote, On 5/01/10 16:23:
Am 05.01.2010 17:14 schrieb Ralf Reköndt:
From: "gdgqler"
I put my reply at the end unless, as now, I am replying to specific
points inside the original message.
I have all set in OE, as Tony F. suggested, but som
Ralf Reköndt wrote, On 5/01/10 16:38:
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
I put my reply at the end unless, as now, I am replying to specific
points
inside the original message.
I have all set in OE, as Tony F. suggested, but sometimes the quote
chars
appears, sometimes not. As I have said, OE puts the chars
Andreas Berger wrote, On 5/01/10 16:23:
Am 05.01.2010 17:14 schrieb Ralf Reköndt:
From: "gdgqler"
I put my reply at the end unless, as now, I am replying to specific
points inside the original message.
I have all set in OE, as Tony F. suggested, but sometimes the quote
chars appears, sometime
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
I put my reply at the end unless, as now, I am replying to
specific points
inside the original message.
I have all set in OE, as Tony F. suggested, but sometimes the
quote
chars
appears, sometimes not. As I have said, OE puts the chars in
front
of t
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
I put my reply at the end unless, as now, I am replying to specific
points
inside the original message.
I have all set in OE, as Tony F. suggested, but sometimes the quote
chars
appears, sometimes not. As I have said, OE puts the chars in front
of the
original messages, the
Andreas Berger wrote:
Am 05.01.2010 17:14 schrieb Ralf Reköndt:
From: "gdgqler"
I put my reply at the end unless, as now, I am replying to specific
points inside the original message.
I have all set in OE, as Tony F. suggested, but sometimes the quote
chars appears, sometimes not. As I have s
I put my reply at the end unless, as now, I am replying to specific
points
inside the original message.
I have all set in OE, as Tony F. suggested, but sometimes the quote
chars
appears, sometimes not. As I have said, OE puts the chars in front
of the
original messages, then(!) format the te
Am 05.01.2010 17:14 schrieb Ralf Reköndt:
From: "gdgqler"
I put my reply at the end unless, as now, I am replying to specific
points inside the original message.
I have all set in OE, as Tony F. suggested, but sometimes the quote
chars appears, sometimes not. As I have said, OE puts the chars
Ralf Reköndt wrote, On 5/01/10 16:14:
From: "gdgqler"
I put my reply at the end unless, as now, I am replying to specific
points inside the original message.
I have all set in OE, as Tony F. suggested, but sometimes the quote
chars appears, sometimes not. As I have said, OE puts the chars in
gdgqler wrote, On 5/01/10 16:07:
On 4 Jan 2010, at 14:08, Tony Firshman wrote:
I think mailing lists like this need in-line quoting. The vast majority do use
this, and good mailers like Thunderbird do this by default.
I would probably agree if I knew what "in-line quoting" means.
From: "gdgqler"
I put my reply at the end unless, as now, I am replying to specific points
inside the original message.
I have all set in OE, as Tony F. suggested, but sometimes the quote chars
appears, sometimes not. As I have said, OE puts the chars in front of the
original messages, then(
On 4 Jan 2010, at 14:08, Tony Firshman wrote:
> I think mailing lists like this need in-line quoting. The vast majority do
> use this, and good mailers like Thunderbird do this by default.
>
I would probably agree if I knew what "in-line quoting" means.
> However some users append the "Origi
On 4 Jan 2010, at 12:40, John Gilpin wrote:
> QLToday has arrived in Manchester despite our -9.5 degrees of frost
> overnight. Thanks Jochen - Another good read once tucked up in the warm!!
>
> John Gilpin.
>
>
>
> Tony Firshman wrote:
>> SMSQ - Jochen Merz wrote, On 1/01/10 13:36:
>>> Thank
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Tony Firshman wrote:
Usnet use inline so why not here?
My 2 cents: I'm fully with Tony on this one but also think that it's a
battle against windmills and thus cannot be won.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.
Tony Firshman wrote:
> Usnet use inline so why not here?
My 2 cents: I'm fully with Tony on this one but also think that it's a
battle against windmills and thus cannot be won.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Ian Pine wrote, On 5/01/10 12:05:
See below.
- Original Message - From: "Ian Pine"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Message formatting
In my opinion, generally, I think that as a thread builds up, old
stuff should be 'pushed down' with the latest c
Ian Pine wrote, On 5/01/10 11:58:
In my opinion, generally, I think that as a thread builds up, old
stuff should be 'pushed down' with the latest comment going in at the
top (like this message); this means that I don't have to scroll
through a lengthening chunk of everything I've previously rea
See below.
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Pine"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Message formatting
In my opinion, generally, I think that as a thread builds up, old stuff
should be 'pushed down' with the latest comment going in at the top (like
In my opinion, generally, I think that as a thread builds up, old stuff
should be 'pushed down' with the latest comment going in at the top (like
this message); this means that I don't have to scroll through a lengthening
chunk of everything I've previously read to get to the latest reply - BUT
Hi Jochen,
Still no sign of QL Today here in Leuven (Belgium).
Kind regards,
François Van Emelen
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Hello Adrian,
I am sorry to say that what YOU write about Royal mail is true for
Deutsche Post too.
They save on everything you can imagine: they took thousands of
postboxes away, so that millions of customers have to go/drive
longer routes to put their letters into boxes (and then they tell
27 matches
Mail list logo