George Gwilt wrote:
> For various reasons only a subset of 68020+ instructions have been
> coded so far for QPC2.
That was some days ago, I have done much in the meantime ;-)
> Instructions not emulated include MOVE16 (68040) and TRAPcc.
I didn't implement MOVE16 because it's in the LINE-F segme
Fabrizio Diversi wrote:
> I am wondering if these QPC emulation changes implement the full set
> of the M68020 new instructions
Pretty much the full thing except MMU and FPU.
> or just a subset of these, as an example MOVE16 instruction will be
> implemented ?
MOVE16 is 68040 only.
Marcel
On 13 Apr 2006, at 09:17, Fabrizio Diversi wrote:
> Marcel Kilgus ha scritto:
>> George Gwilt wrote:
>>
Next QPC2 version will probably be able to run it.
>>> The test version of QPC2 demonstrated at the recent Quanta
>>> meeting in
>>> Manchester certainly does run GWASS.
>>>
> At th
Marcel Kilgus ha scritto:
> George Gwilt wrote:
>
>>> Next QPC2 version will probably be able to run it.
>>>
>> The test version of QPC2 demonstrated at the recent Quanta meeting in
>> Manchester certainly does run GWASS.
>>
At this point, does exist the possibility that TURBO compil
George Gwilt wrote:
>> Next QPC2 version will probably be able to run it.
> The test version of QPC2 demonstrated at the recent Quanta meeting in
> Manchester certainly does run GWASS.
True, that worked fine from the get go. But still I've spend the last
few days almost full-time getting everythin
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Firshman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Roy wood wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Firshman
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>
>>> It has been that way for many years I think. I am totally QL hardware
>>> based, and I have been doing pretty well no bu
On 11 Apr 2006, at 21:19, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
> Derek Stewart wrote:
>> If emulators are the way forward how do I run GWASS.
>
> Next QPC2 version will probably be able to run it.
>
> Marcel
The test version of QPC2 demonstrated at the recent Quanta meeting in
Manchester certainly does run GW
Roy wood wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Firshman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>> It has been that way for many years I think. I am totally QL hardware
>> based, and I have been doing pretty well no business for years now.
> But then again you have no new products so ..
Yes
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dilwyn Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Rather sad really, although I'm an emulator man myself as my main
>system is a PC with QPC2, but I still have and still use an Aurora SGC
>system and a QL+Gold Card. It would be really sad if this sort of
>viewpoint caused n
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Firshman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>It has been that way for many years I think. I am totally QL hardware
>based, and I have been doing pretty well no business for years now.
But then again you have no new products so ..
--
Roy Wood
Q Branch. 20 Locks H
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
>> If emulators are the way forward how do I run GWASS.
>>
>> On QPC2, it says that it is not a 6020+ and exits.
>>
>> I would say UQLX is the same based on a QL Rom
>>
>> Derek
> First, the "future is emulators" is not really my own opinion, but the
> prevalent view at the wor
e said to him they
wanted a particular item.
--
Dilwyn Jones
>
> Derek
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dilwyn Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [ql-users] GWASS on QPC2
&g
turn at a workshop and
show this running.
Also could have some cheap laptops as well.
Derek
- Original Message -
From: "Dilwyn Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] GWASS on QPC2
>
&g
Does sound interesting.
Derek
- Original Message -
From: "Marcel Kilgus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] GWASS on QPC2
> Derek Stewart wrote:
>> If emulators are the way forward how
> If emulators are the way forward how do I run GWASS.
>
> On QPC2, it says that it is not a 6020+ and exits.
>
> I would say UQLX is the same based on a QL Rom
>
> Derek
First, the "future is emulators" is not really my own opinion, but the
prevalent view at the workshop.
Rather sad really, alt
Derek Stewart wrote:
> If emulators are the way forward how do I run GWASS.
Next QPC2 version will probably be able to run it.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
If emulators are the way forward how do I run GWASS.
On QPC2, it says that it is not a 6020+ and exits.
I would say UQLX is the same based on a QL Rom
Derek
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
17 matches
Mail list logo
