Re: [ql-users] Linux on the SGC?

2002-01-27 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 25 Jan 2002, at 21:24, Timothy Swenson wrote: > BTW, Phoebus... the baby. The first one is difficult. After that you get > good at ignoring them and the wife. (Un)fortunately, the reverse isn't true... Wolfgang - www.wlenerz.com

Re: [ql-users] Linux on the SGC?

2002-01-25 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
At 09:24 ìì 25/1/2002 -0800, you wrote: >At 12:09 AM 1/26/2002 -0500, you wrote: >>At 07:58 ìì 25/1/2002 -0800, you wrote: >> >>Yep but still very relevant... >>I wonder who did that and if it's available from its author (well I want >>tell PH if you don't ;-) >> >> >>Phoebus >> >>Oh and Tim, so

Re: [ql-users] Linux on the SGC?

2002-01-25 Thread Timothy Swenson
At 12:09 AM 1/26/2002 -0500, you wrote: >At 07:58 ìì 25/1/2002 -0800, you wrote: > >Yep but still very relevant... >I wonder who did that and if it's available from its author (well I want >tell PH if you don't ;-) > > >Phoebus > >Oh and Tim, sorry for the delay on sending you the file I promised

Re: [ql-users] Linux on the SGC?

2002-01-25 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
At 12:09 ðì 26/1/2002 -0500, you wrote: >At 07:58 ìì 25/1/2002 -0800, you wrote: > >>Some of you might remember, some years back, when one QLer was able to >>port Minix to the standard QL, but could not distribute the diffs due to >>Prentice-Hall saying "No". Andrew Tannenbaum saw no problem wi

Re: [ql-users] Linux on the SGC?

2002-01-25 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
At 07:58 ìì 25/1/2002 -0800, you wrote: >Some of you might remember, some years back, when one QLer was able to >port Minix to the standard QL, but could not distribute the diffs due to >Prentice-Hall saying "No". Andrew Tannenbaum saw no problem with it, but >PH did. Now Minix is pretty muc

Re: [ql-users] Linux on the SGC?

2002-01-25 Thread Timothy Swenson
Some of you might remember, some years back, when one QLer was able to port Minix to the standard QL, but could not distribute the diffs due to Prentice-Hall saying "No". Andrew Tannenbaum saw no problem with it, but PH did. Now Minix is pretty much forgotten. Tim Swenson

Re: [ql-users] Linux on the SGC?

2002-01-25 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
At 01:11 ìì 25/1/2002 -0500, you wrote: >At 09:43 ðì 25/1/2002 +0100, you wrote: > >>Hi Phoebus, >> >> >Check this out... interesting... >> >>uClinux could indeed be ported to SGC, if the details needed for low-level >>programming weren't Miracles secrets. >> >>But remember: uClinux is NOT Linux!

Re: [ql-users] Linux on the SGC?

2002-01-25 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
At 09:43 ðì 25/1/2002 +0100, you wrote: >Hi Phoebus, > > >Check this out... interesting... > >uClinux could indeed be ported to SGC, if the details needed for low-level >programming weren't Miracles secrets. > >But remember: uClinux is NOT Linux! True but I was thinking more along the lines of T

Re: [ql-users] Linux on the SGC?

2002-01-25 Thread Peter Graf
Hi Phoebus, >Check this out... interesting... uClinux could indeed be ported to SGC, if the details needed for low-level programming weren't Miracles secrets. But remember: uClinux is NOT Linux! Usually Linux applications in C/C++ are portable between different Linux platforms (like x86, Power

[ql-users] Linux on the SGC?

2002-01-24 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
Check this out... interesting... http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~pcoene/atari.html Phoebus