The following defense against the public accusations by Roy Wood
necessarily has to reveal some of his business methods. I never planned to
publish this, it is absolutely depressing to deal with this issue. But Roy
Wood has violently dragged this issue into the public and seeks to involve
other p
Just one comment - we have all heard the comments on both sides and can see there is no love lost between Peter and Roy. Beyond that, the legal aspects and everything else should now be kept out of this list completely - users do not want to hear further personal accusations.
Rich Mellor
RWAP S
--
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] [OT] Making
business with Roy Wood
Just one comment - we
have all heard the comments on both sides and can see there is no love lost
between Peter and Roy. Beyond that,
Well that was an interesting tirade. I have no intention of going into a
lengthy discussion of this in deference to those of you who have become
as heartily sick of the whole thing now as I was in trying to deal with
Peter in the first place. I do feel, and I apologise in advance here
that th
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 at 23:19:06, Roy Wood wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>Well that was an interesting tirade. I have no intention of going into
>a lengthy discussion of this in deference to those of you who have
>become as heartily sick of the whole thing now as I was in trying to
>deal w
> Well that was an interesting tirade. I have no intention of going
into a
> lengthy discussion of this in deference to those of you who have
become
> as heartily sick of the whole thing now as I was in trying to deal
with
> Peter in the first place. I do feel, and I apologise in advance here
> t
>The Q60 is a success, no two ways about that. The entire first batch
>is almost sold out from what Dennis and Derek told me, so we are
>probably better off getting all of this off our chests then forgetting
>about it and see the positives to come out of it, namely that Peter
>and D & D Systems h
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Firshman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>That is about all I am going to say on the subject you will all be
>>pleased to hear. I am sure Peter has a whole different view on the
>>subject and, after all, this is all very subjective. My main concern
>>was always
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:37:04AM +0100, Tony Firshman wrote:
> QUOTE (23 Aug 98 email from PG to me)
are you quoting private mails here or what? Interesting methods.
I wonder how many MB of such mails exist but I very seriously doubt
anyone here is willing to dig deep enough into this shit
ROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] [OT] Making business with Roy Wood
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:37:04AM +0100, Tony Firshman wrote:
> QUOTE (23 Aug 98 email from PG to me)
are you quoting private mails here or what? Interesting meth
- Original Message -
From: "Roy Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 11:19 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] [OT] Making business with Roy Wood
> time ago) to sell the finished working boards. I would never have
> offered
On Tuesday 02 July 2002 6:33 pm, you wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Roy Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 11:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [ql-users] [OT] Making business with Roy Wood
>
>
&
>> Slight correction here.
>> D&D did not go to the Indian restaurant and therefore know nothing of
>> this conversation whatsoever, we were in a pub 3 miles away drinking
>> beer :-)
Hmm sorry I thought that you were there. I know D&D didn't exist as
such.
--
Roy Wood
Q Branch, 20 Locks Hill P
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 at 20:23:59, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
(ref: <003101c22136$9baaae40$e2065cc3@default>)
>
>> Well that was an interesting tirade. I have no intention of going
>into a
>> lengthy discussion of this in deference to those of you who have
>become
>> as heartily sick of the whole thing n
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 03:07:48PM +0100, Norman Dunbar wrote:
> PS. Got UQLX working on Mandrake 8.2 - yippee !
> The colour scheme seems to be a bit wonky, might be Mandrake or KDE, maybe
> not - all I get is yellow, magenta, cyan, red and black - regardless of mode
> 4 or 8. :o(
interesting.
S.com
-
-Original Message-
From: Richard Zidlicky
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] [OT] Making business with Roy Wood
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 03:07:48PM +0100, Norman Dunbar wrote:
> PS.
16 matches
Mail list logo
