Tony Firshman writes:
...I wonder when Tony Firshman is going to
get his first helpdesk call from some frustrated troglodyte wondering
why
his 200 cowry microdrive doesnt fit in the slot without the aid of a
club!
That was meant as a tease rather than a criticism.
If I had taken it as a
After that it gets difficult: Some people may
not want to move on from microdrives. They wont want PE or anything
newfangled like that, otherwise Id suggest that the following products were
also considered a fundamental part of the system for ALL platforms:
Microdrives! I'd actually forgotten
Malcolm Lear writes:
After that it gets difficult: Some people may
not want to move on from microdrives. They wont want PE or anything
newfangled like that, otherwise Id suggest that the following products
were
also considered a fundamental part of the system for ALL platforms:
I wrote:
...I wonder when Tony Firshman is going to
get his first helpdesk call from some frustrated troglodyte wondering why
his 200 cowry microdrive doesnt fit in the slot without the aid of a club!
That was meant as a tease rather than a criticism.
Per
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 at 01:40:33, P Witte wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I wrote:
...I wonder when Tony Firshman is going to
get his first helpdesk call from some frustrated troglodyte wondering why
his 200 cowry microdrive doesnt fit in the slot without the aid of a club!
That was meant as
So, essentially, throwing muck at Quanta is part of the problem.
It's an information and opinion overload that prevents any
concensus. half the people are for something. Half the people are
against something. There's lots of overlap. Paralysis!
In a business there is only one who takes
Dave Park writes:
My own personal opinion about futures of platforms isn't based on their
strengths, but their weaknesses. As such, I don't feel the urge to create
fixes for problems that don't really exist any more. However, I do feel
there are two or three key areas that are costing the
- Original Message -
From: Duncan Neithercut
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 10:33 PM
Subject: RE: [ql-users] Fw: ENOUGH is ENOUGH and MORE THAN ENOUGH
Before I answer your comments a personal opinion.
During the time I have been in Quanta I have not seen a chairman make such a
serious
The question actually is which one of these schemes do QL users want :
I think the democratic version
Duncan Neithercut
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of - Aucun
-
Sent: 23 November 2004 09:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Fw
PROTECTED] Behalf Of gwicks
Sent: 23 November 2004 20:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Fw: ENOUGH is ENOUGH and MORE THAN ENOUGH
- Original Message -
From: Duncan Neithercut
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 10:33 PM
Subject: RE: [ql-users] Fw: ENOUGH is ENOUGH and MORE THAN ENOUGH
I have decided to forward this message as I think all Quanta members should
read it. Derogatory comments about a third person have been removed.
- Original Message -
From: john mason
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: John Mason ; Geoff Wicks ; John Gregory ; Roy Brereton ; John Gilpin
Bruce Nicholls wrote:
I would just like to stipulate this is NOT a Quanta List.
The welcome instructions setup a long, long time ago. :-
Welcome
---
Welcome to the QL/SMS mailing list!
This list is for any discussion related to QL/SMS be it news, help,
queries, for sale
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Fw: ENOUGH is ENOUGH and MORE THAN ENOUGH
Despite what got said in and about this letter, I don't consider it
offensive in the form which was forwarded. There are issues of
'netiquette' (shouting etc) which someone fairly new
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, gwicks wrote:
As one of the persons named in the letter (or rather not named, but
everyone knew whom John meant) I agree fully with the above sentiment. We
have slagged Quanta off and thus they have a right to reply. Equally John
must accept there will be robust
Dexter P wrote:
i. The availability of new, performance hardware at a reasonable price.
ii. The connectivity issue.
iii. The huge variety and assortment of toolkits and add-ons required
to do even simple things - such features belong in the OS package
(not necessarily
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dave P [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
SNIP
The heart of the problem is that the userbase is not attracting new
members, and is losing older and experienced members by attrition (some of
us were old when the QL was released) and by need for more applicable
platforms in
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 at 19:37:07, gwicks wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message - From:
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Fw: ENOUGH is ENOUGH and MORE THAN ENOUGH
Despite what got said in and about this letter, I don't consider it
offensive in the form which was forwarded
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Roy wood wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Dave Park wrote:
The availability of new, performance hardware at a reasonable price.
A vital point and one that I have urged Nasta towards.
The real problem for Nasta is such a simple one. He has a complete design
ready to go - he
I have decided to forward this message as I think all Quanta members should
read it. Derogatory comments about a third person have been removed.
- Original Message -
From: john mason
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: John Mason ; Geoff Wicks ; John Gregory ; Roy Brereton ; John Gilpin ; John
Hello All,
I would just like to stipulate this is NOT a Quanta List.
The welcome instructions setup a long, long time ago. :-
Welcome
---
Welcome to the QL/SMS mailing list!
This list is for any discussion related to QL/SMS be it news, help, queries,
for sale etc.
Off topic
On 21 Nov 2004 at 15:24, Bruce N wrote:
I would just like to stipulate this is NOT a Quanta List.
Thanks for making this clear, Bruce!
Wolfgang
www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com
___
QL-Users Mailing List
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 15:24:37, Bruce N wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hello All,
I would just like to stipulate this is NOT a Quanta List.
The welcome instructions setup a long, long time ago. :-
Welcome
---
Welcome to the QL/SMS mailing list!
This list is for any discussion
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 19:08:53, john mason wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Dear Bruce,
Further to our telephone conversation this afternoon re above
I am as intrigued as you are as to why the email I forward below has
not appeared in ql-users Inbox. I have not received any unable to
deliver
, November 21, 2004 4:24 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [ql-users] Fw: ENOUGH is ENOUGH and MORE THAN ENOUGH
Hello All,
I would just like to stipulate this is NOT a Quanta List.
The welcome instructions setup a long, long time ago. :-
Welcome
---
Welcome to the QL/SMS mailing list
health?
Best wishes
Duncan Neithercut
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeremy
Taffel
Sent: 21 November 2004 18:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Fw: ENOUGH is ENOUGH and MORE THAN ENOUGH
What an extraordinary outburst!! I'd
OK, now I'm confused. What IS the history of this list? The reason I
ask, is that going back through my inbox I found that that a couple of
years ago, the address for the list was [EMAIL PROTECTED], and that
the welcome email suggests that Bruce's email address was
[EMAIL PROTECTED] So was the
26 matches
Mail list logo
