From: Cris Daniluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:Isn't there a *real* way to do this? I swear there is...
By "real way", do you mean a way that's not already built into your operating
system?
--Adam
Eric Dahnke wrote:
> Cris Daniluk escribió:
>
> > Eric Dahnke wrote:
> >
> > > Hello List,
> > >
> > > We have a server moving about 9000 msgs per day and want to have a
> > > second qmail server waiting on our network to take over in the event of
> > > a failure.
> > >
> > > Our current thinking
"Adam D. McKenna" wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply, but this isn't a qmail problem, it's a unix file
> permissions problem.
>
> # groupadd shellusr
> # vi /etc/group
> # chown root.shellusr /bin/csh
> # chmod 750 /bin/csh
> # chown root.shellusr /bin/sh
> # chmod 750 /bin/sh
> # chown root.shell
On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 11:53:16PM +, Robin Bowes wrote:
> Peter van Dijk wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 11:03:23PM +, Robin Bowes wrote:
> > > A test.
> >
> > Depending on what you're trying, I think it did :)
>
>
>
> I'm testing my mailing list <--> newsgroup gateway.
>
> I
Peter van Dijk wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 11:03:23PM +, Robin Bowes wrote:
> > A test.
>
> Depending on what you're trying, I think it did :)
I'm testing my mailing list <--> newsgroup gateway.
I *think* I've just about got to the bottom of it, except the program I
use to re-writ
On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 11:03:23PM +, Robin Bowes wrote:
> A test.
Depending on what you're trying, I think it did :)
Greetz, Peter.
--
.| Peter van Dijk | stoned worden of coden
.| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | dat is de levensvraag
| coden of stoned worden
A test.
--
Two rules to success in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
-- Sassan Tat
Joel Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Dave Sill wrote:
>
>> Brad Shelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >All you have to do is create it as root and make it readable by the mail
>> >process for the user. They can read it, but they can't replace it.
>>
>> Not true. I
On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 09:27:24AM -0500, Mark E Drummond wrote:
> The problem is that mail to a non-existant or mispelled address within
> our domain gets sent to the internal hub, which checks it and does not
> find a valid RCPT, and so it sends the email back to the MX. Now the MX,
> instead of
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Eric Dahnke wrote:
> What do you mean by hold all the messages?
>
> Our mailserver does both smtp and pop, so therein lies the problem. Great, so
> the MX rolls and the backup server accepts smtp for our domains. But what
> about pop? When the primary server comes back up,
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Dave Sill wrote:
> Brad Shelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >All you have to do is create it as root and make it readable by the mail
> >process for the user. They can read it, but they can't replace it.
>
> Not true. If the user can write the directory, they can replac
> I'm looking for a way to have qmail 1.03 deliver mail to Maildir's which all
> have the same uid/gid. I'm have vchkpw-3.1.3 running, and I know I can
> accomplish the task via this method, however I do not want to require 7.5k users
> to change their mail settings to include the domain name
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It is very easy to make users ftp in only to their ~home/public_html,
> thus they will not be able to alter the .qmail files.
chroot() is broken on Solaris 2.5.1, which is running on the server. But
it doesn't matter anyway, since I made a patch for
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On 15-Mar-99 Mate Wierdl wrote:
> > But if the users do not have shell access, how do they create .qmail files?
>
> ftp it from their local machine. They'll be able to at least forward mail
> and maybe do some simple lists, but I doubt they'd be abl
At 09:14 AM 3/16/99 +, Yusuf Goolamabbas wrote:
>Hi, I am currently using tcpserver on a Linux 2.0.36 box/RH 5.2 box
>I have setup tcpserver with a limit of 5 connections via -c5 and
>backlog of 1 with -b1
>
>However, when I start up the 7th and subsequent connection, I
>basically get held up
Juan Carlos Castro y Castro wrote:
> > But it would fix in no way the problems in this thread.
>
> Maybe it would be too much for the person who originally brought the
> question, because users would be unable to do anything with their .qmail
> while what the guy wanted was only to prevent them f
Mark E Drummond writes:
> The problem is that mail to a non-existant or mispelled address within
> our domain gets sent to the internal hub, which checks it and does not
Your "internal hub" is broken. Contact your software vendor for a fix. If
your software vendor is unable to produce a proper
Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
>
> - Mark E Drummond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> | My setup is an external gateway machine running qmail (our MX),
> | forwarding mail for our domain to our internal mailhub running
> | Netscape Messaging Server (NMS) which all our users access using
> | IMAP.
> |
> | Th
- Mark E Drummond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| My setup is an external gateway machine running qmail (our MX),
| forwarding mail for our domain to our internal mailhub running
| Netscape Messaging Server (NMS) which all our users access using
| IMAP.
|
| The problem is that mail to a non-existant or m
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 06:13:15PM -0500,
Scott Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | But yes, it would consider these warnings as bounces.
>
> It also considers vacation messages to be bounces. :-(
Vacation programs shouldn't be replying to lists
Sorry for the late reply, but this isn't a qmail problem, it's a unix file
permissions problem.
# groupadd shellusr
# vi /etc/group
# chown root.shellusr /bin/csh
# chmod 750 /bin/csh
# chown root.shellusr /bin/sh
# chmod 750 /bin/sh
# chown root.shellusr /bin/ksh
# chmod 750 /bin/ksh
etc.. Of
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999 18:22:50 -0500, Justin Bell wrote:
>but vacation messages shouldnt be replying to list email, right?
1. ezmlm lists can be set up via DIR/headeradd to contain "Precedence:
Bulk". Vacation programs should not respond to these. ezmlm-idx since
quite a while does this by default
Hi folks. I put my new qmail based MX into production yesterday and it
is working great. However, I have one problem and I am not sure which
end I should look to for the answer.
My setup is an external gateway machine running qmail (our MX),
forwarding mail for our domain to our internal mailhub
elite, thats exactly what i need. i was gonna take the code someone else
had posted and write my own ticketing system, but this is much cooler.
thanks to everyone.
-xs
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Guy Antony Halse wrote:
>> hey all,
>> i was wondering if anyone knew of a package that did this, or pe
Cris Daniluk escribió:
> Eric Dahnke wrote:
>
> > Hello List,
> >
> > We have a server moving about 9000 msgs per day and want to have a
> > second qmail server waiting on our network to take over in the event of
> > a failure.
> >
> > Our current thinking is:
> >
> > - an identical qmail install
Andy Walden escribió:
> >
> > - an identical qmail installation on a backup machine
> > - daily copy of /home /control and /alias to backup machine
> > - in the event of a massive failure unplug the ethernet from the main
> > server and plug into the backup machine.
> >
> > (I realize we will los
Eric Dahnke wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> We have a server moving about 9000 msgs per day and want to have a
> second qmail server waiting on our network to take over in the event of
> a failure.
>
> Our current thinking is:
>
> - an identical qmail installation on a backup machine
> - daily copy of /
>My question is, will there be any implications "Out_There" of suddenly
>having a new IP and hostname for our mailserver, assuming we make the
>appro DNS changes?
Maybe you could arrange it on your router via port forwarding? You set it
up to forward all conenction for ports 25 i 110 to first mac
On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 02:48:09PM +0100, torben fjerdingstad wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 11:19:30PM +0100, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
> > - torben fjerdingstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > | At the same time I think it should be modified to be able to take
> > | multiple -r flags.
> >
> >
>> This is an extract from proftpd menual:
>
>Has anyone managed to get proftpd to actually chroot?
Yes :-)
- RJP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
|
| G'Day.
| I have been sporadically trying to set up Qmail-1.03 for about 3 weeks
| now and keep running into:
|
| Mar 16 09:07:53 SedricWorks qmail: 921575273.166915 status: local 0/10
| remote 2/20
| Mar 16 09:07:53 SedricWorks qmail: 921575273.276501 delivery 4:
qmail Digest 16 Mar 1999 11:00:00 - Issue 581
Topics (messages 22971 through 23016):
dot-qmail security
22971 by: Matthias Pigulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
22972 by: Markus Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
22978 by: Juan Carlos Castro y Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
22981
G'Day.
I have been sporadically trying to set up Qmail-1.03 for about 3 weeks
now and keep running into:
Mar 16 09:07:53 SedricWorks qmail: 921575273.166915 status: local 0/10
remote 2/20
Mar 16 09:07:53 SedricWorks qmail: 921575273.276501 delivery 4:
deferral: CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._
On 03/16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> maybe smd. has written already a script which will create the proper
> ~/Maildir/ for every user in /etc/passwd ?
> I would really be happy to get this one (:
My modified checkpassword does that... just rip off main() from
maildirmake.c and insert it i
Hi, I am currently using tcpserver on a Linux 2.0.36 box/RH 5.2 box
I have setup tcpserver with a limit of 5 connections via -c5 and
backlog of 1 with -b1
However, when I start up the 7th and subsequent connection, I
basically get held up waiting for the smtpgreeting string which will
occur as so
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 02:02:12PM -0800, Kai MacTane wrote:
> >so for each message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it is delivered to those three
> >people, what i would like to do is have every other message goto
> >every other person, so msg1 goes to tech1, msg2 goes to tech2, msg3 goes
> >to tech3, msg
This message was cancelled from within Mozilla.
> hey all,
> i was wondering if anyone knew of a package that did this, or perhaps
> something qmail might allready have that will round robin messages to
> different rcpt's, for example:
Hiya ...
I have written a program that does just this, we use it for our help@rucus
address. It round robins
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 06:20:46PM -0700, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
> The issue is: Fine, users should be able to modify their .qmail files --
> but they should not be able to pipe to a shell or other command.
Did I miss anything? Why noy just have qmail-local chroot, and
hand-craft a ~/bin directo
39 matches
Mail list logo
