qmail Digest 20 Aug 1999 10:00:00 - Issue 734
Topics (messages 29199 through 29260):
Setting maximum attachment sizes
29199 by: "Bongo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
29201 by: Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IMAP, PAM... and the home directory?
29200 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Samar Vijay wrote:
> I am thinking of writing a Mail Filter of my own. Can I use the CDB file that Qmail
>uses for user authentication?
> Is there any API dicumented ot something?
What and Why do you want to authenticate in a mail filter?
Is it an outgoing and/or incoming m
I am running qmail with David Summers qmail-imap Linux
RPM.
Although pop-3 connections work fine, users connecting with
IMAP sends the imapd process anywhere between 40 and 100% for around 30 seconds,
before they get delivery of their Inbox (or any other folder)
The server is a PII 400 w
I had this idea...
> in my free time (in a month? :-) I want to start working on a log
> reviewing tool for cyclog. right now it's very inconveniant to run less on
> a random logfile, since the filename changes once in a while, plus the
> time stamps are not human readable. an interface to read
I just extend the fairly clearly described qmail license to the other
djb products: a binary distribution which installs the same as if it
was compiled (unpatched) from the tarball, and it behaves the same can be
distributed w/o getting djb's personal permission.
I do not see any problem Kevin
Using redhat-5.2/linux and qmail-1.03-2, I have added some
rblsmtpd's to the startup script /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail which now says:
echo -n "Starting qmail: "
/var/qmail/start-qmail &
/usr/sbin/tcpserver -u 72 -g 201 0 smtp \
/usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -rrelays.radparker.co
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 11:22:51AM +, Alain Cocconi wrote:
See FAQ #5.5 from the qmail docs. It talk about a broken client, but it
works for any client, and you can do whatever you like with the message,
including keep a copy.
> Hello,
>
> I'm searching a .qmail-default configuration for ke
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 03:20:49PM +0200, torben fjerdingstad wrote:
> Using redhat-5.2/linux and qmail-1.03-2, I have added some
> rblsmtpd's to the startup script /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail which now says:
>
>echo -n "Starting qmail: "
> /var/qmail/start-qmail &
> /usr/sbin/tcp
(I used qmail for my tiny site within Kodak 3 years ago, and have
just converted my new employer (~200 accounts) to it...)
We have an automated environment where an LDAP server is the key data
repository. Users manage aliases and forwarding through a web page.
With sendmail, a backend took the d
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Samar Vijay wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Magnus Bodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Samar Vijay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: QMAIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, August 20, 1999 11:12 AM
> Subject: Re: Mail Filter of my own
>
>
> > On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Samar V
Hi,
I need to implement user
based Email forwarding. This essentially means that i can have multiple users
on one particular domain. There might be [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Both these users
physically sit at different places say one is in London and one in New York. Now
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 08:38:42PM +0530, Amit Vadehra wrote:
> I need to implement user based Email forwarding. This essentially means that
> i can have multiple users on one particular domain. There might be
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Both these users physically sit at
> differe
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 10:21:42AM -0400, Steve Tylock wrote:
> (I used qmail for my tiny site within Kodak 3 years ago, and have
> just converted my new employer (~200 accounts) to it...)
>
> We have an automated environment where an LDAP server is the key data
> repository. Users manage aliase
> the daemontools binaries are included, they are, like all DJB
> software other than Qmail itself, under PD (not GPL).
Public domain would mean you can do anything you want with it. You
can't; in particular, you are not allowed to distribute derivative
works other than precompiled var-qmail pac
Steve Tylock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
[[snip]]
> I have fastforward, and have modified most of the backend to work
> with ~user/.qmail, and still run the rest out of /etc/aliases.
>
> I'd like this backend to work as a user other than root, but
> newaliases requires the file /etc/aliases
If you want, I can extract the patches from the src rpm for you.
What you wrote about patches and nonprogrammers was exactly my point;
for nonprogrammers (and I assume many mail administrators may not be),
it is hard to figure out which patches they need to get for what they
want. www.qmail.org
Kevin Waterson writes:
> Ira Abramov wrote:
>
> > readme files in the packages or on DJB's site. Russ? could there be a
> > little note about licensing on qmail.org? it's very confusing to a lot of
> > people, especially now that GPL is in the news, it should be strictly
> > mentioned on th
At 03:54 PM 8/19/99 -0500, you wrote:
>> When connecting to my pop server, it takes between 20-30 seconds to
>> connect. After connecting, everything is fast. I have tested my client
>> with pop servers on other machines and I don't experience this delay (i.e.
>> it is a server problem).
>
>run
Actually the mail administrator MAY be a non-programmer. (in fact where
I work, our postmaster is a tech / system maint person).
And I bet that this is more the norm, than an exception.
Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: Mate Wierdl [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 20, 1
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 11:25:57AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
: If you want, I can extract the patches from the src rpm for you.
I didn't see an SRPM anywhere...if I had I would have extracted it on my
Linux box, but I sure appreciate it :)
: What you wrote about patches and nonprogrammers was ex
Greg Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ira Abramov wrote:
>>
>> the daemontools binaries are included, they are, like all DJB
>> software other than Qmail itself, under PD (not GPL).
>
>Public domain would mean you can do anything you want with it. You
>can't; in particular, you are not allowed
James Smallacombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>For sure. In the past 3+ years I've been running qmail, Sendmail's gotten
>a whole lot better, both from a security standpoint, and an ease of
>configuration standpoint.
1) Lack of reported vulnerabilities <> more secure.
2) Sendmail's performance
Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 20 August 1999 at 15:51:59 -0400
> James Smallacombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >For sure. In the past 3+ years I've been running qmail, Sendmail's gotten
> >a whole lot better, both from a security standpoint, and an ease of
> >configuration sta
> For *qmail*. See the Subject of this message.
Yeah, sorry about that.
Some of the reasoning in my message remains valid (lack of a license
is not an indication of public domain status), but of course the
specific facts were irrelevant.
> From: Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:51:59 -0400 (EDT)
>
> 2) Sendmail's performance still lags far behind current-generation
>MTA's.
...and will continue to as long as it runs that stupid rule based system to
rewrite addresses that don't need to be rewritten.
Sorry to ask this but I've lost the subscription mail and can't find
instructions on the web page.
I just don't have time to read all this mail.
Thanks
James Smallacombe writes:
> For sure. In the past 3+ years I've been running qmail, Sendmail's gotten
> a whole lot better, both from a security standpoint, and an ease of
> configuration standpoint. If qmail is going to remain a desirable
> alternative, it has to move forward as well. DJB'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there a recommended platform for running QMail - hardware and
software? I'm looking at needing to push out up to 3mm emails a day,
and -so far- I'm not seeing the performance that I think I should be.
Thanks in advance,
<:) Lyndon Griffin
Syste
Lyndon Griffin writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is there a recommended platform for running QMail - hardware and
> software? I'm looking at needing to push out up to 3mm emails a day,
> and -so far- I'm not seeing the performance that I think I should be.
I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
That's what I've heard, as well... My problem is getting past 100k /
day / host. I seem to be at that roadblock. No matter what I try:
fd limits, patches, different injection methods, one big-ass-pipe to
the internet... BTW, I have several of the
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Diego Puertas wrote:
> Sorry to ask this but I've lost the subscription mail and can't find
> instructions on the web page.
Every message sent from the list has a header called 'Mailing-List' which
tells you to contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the un
It's called the "run away from IDE" code. The disk system in a U10 is
pathetic as an email server.
-Peter
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 04:24:38PM -0700, Lyndon Griffin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> That's what I've heard, as well... My problem is getting past 100k /
I have the following setup. Currently my mail is spooled on my mail hub
and I access it using IMAP. I am running qmail locally with delivery to
my ~/Maildir/. If I turn on mail fowarding on my mailhub to send mail to
my local machine (which is the goal here) all my mail gets stuck in
~/Maildir/. N
"Mark E. Drummond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>So everything is set up except for the mail filter and I am wondering
>which I should use. I have some experience with procmail but have not
>managed to get it to work with qmail. Is there a filter that I can stick
>in the pipe that will deliver to
Completely off topic, but I find it interesting that Outlook 98 decided that
this particular thread was of an obscene nature and marked it as an "Adult",
filtering it into my trash folder...
Perhaps Redmond doesn't like any competition for the dreaded Exchange
server...
--
The phrasing,
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 07:38:27PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
: Completely off topic, but I find it interesting that Outlook 98 decided that
: this particular thread was of an obscene nature and marked it as an "Adult",
: filtering it into my trash folder...
:
: Perhaps Redmond doesn't like any c
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Lyndon Griffin wrote:
> Ultra 10, single CPU @ 333mHz, 512mb RAM, running Solaris 7
Qmail is a very parallel system. To push the envelope you should throw a
bunch of CPUs in there. Also, I'd bump up to as much RAM is you can,
which you can use for caching the disk, and,
> http://www.mollymail.com
This just uses emumail, which is available free (with advertising).
Tim
Dear Tim,
> > http://www.mollymail.com
> This just uses emumail, which is available free (with advertising).
Oh...gottcha...anyway I'm looking a hotmail kind of webmail...any
suggestion???
Best regards,
Martin Paulucci
http://www.ServiRED.COM
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell Phone: 15-4935-4246
Telepho
I'm presently working on a project to place concurrency limits on mails sent
by qmail, and I have a few questions
1) Does there exist a method within qmail right now (or a patch to qmail)
that will enable me to limit the number of sockets qmail-send and associates
will open to a given IP during a
Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the daemontools binaries are included, they are, like all DJB software
> other than Qmail itself, under PD (not GPL).
I'm fairly sure that Dan's software is not in the public domain. It
requires a specific and explicit statement by the author to place
s
Lyndon Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ultra 10, single CPU @ 333mHz, 512mb RAM, running Solaris 7
An Ultra 10 is a pathetically low-performance low-end server in my
experience, particularly for disk-intensive applications distributed
across multiple disks. Go to an Ultra 2 with SCSI disk
42 matches
Mail list logo
