qmail *is* instant messaging ;)
On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Eric Dahnke wrote:
I understand the pros and cons of each, but am interested in knowing if
there is anyone on this list who thinks instant messaging has a chance
of upseating smtp.
This is
qmail Digest 25 Oct 1999 10:00:00 - Issue 800
Topics (messages 32066 through 32078):
Re: Qmail won't send mail
32066 by: Subba Rao
32073 by: Carrott
Re: [OT] Any thoughts on instant messaging vs. smtp
32067 by: Stan Horwitz
32078 by: Lyndon Griffin
Re:
Jon Rust writes:
The Net:POP3 login method expects to get a message count back after a
successful login.
It's broken, then. Somebody confused an implementation for a
specification.
--
-russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok |
On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 08:54:50AM +0300, dd wrote:
i have just installed qmail on my linux machine. it has no running dns,
though but instead using an upstream dns server to resolve domain names.
i do not have a registered domain name for my server so my email address
shld be:
Hi!
I run an email server here for a domain smartrafficenter.net (it will be
smartrafficenter.org when we get our T3 set up). I have another domain
for a field office as phase2.smartrafficenter.org and a 56K connection
between our offices.
You should be able to simply add this to your
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 06:13:19PM -0400, Peter Green wrote:
We would like to set up a subdomain on our system, say, 'fwd.example.com'.
When mail gets sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it gets rewritten to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (along with some other headers) and resent.
The
Carrott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
defaulthost is set to my node provided by my ISP. This was tested as per
the FAQ on my qmail machine and workes perfectly. ie mail sent is rewritten
as [EMAIL PROTECTED] when sent as " echo to: me | qmail-inject".
That's not rewriting; qmail-inject is merely
On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 01:27:21PM -0400, Russell P. Sutherland wrote:
I've looked through the qmail archives and saw similar problems but no
real definitive answer:
I am using fastforward-0.50 with ~alias-default as:
% cat ~alias/.qmail-default
| fastforward /etc/aliases.cdb
That's
On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 03:38:20PM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 06:13:19PM -0400, Peter Green wrote:
We would like to set up a subdomain on our system, say, 'fwd.example.com'.
When mail gets sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it gets rewritten to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (along with
* Anand Buddhdev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [25 Oct 1999 10:16]:
I am using fastforward-0.50 with ~alias-default as:
% cat ~alias/.qmail-default
| fastforward /etc/aliases.cdb
That's wrong. You need to invoke fastforward with a -d option:
|fastforward -d /etc/aliases.cdb
I figured out that
On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 10:17:47AM -0400, Peter Green wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 03:38:20PM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 06:13:19PM -0400, Peter Green wrote:
We would like to set up a subdomain on our system, say, 'fwd.example.com'.
When mail gets sent to [EMAIL
Hello there,
Is it possible to use use a combination of virtual users using
the users/assign file and also specifiying sub-domains as well
as domains? For example my users/assign file looks like this:
=subdomain-domain-com-nige:vuser:888:888:/vusers/nige:::
---
control/vitualdomains
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25 Oct 99, at 8:10, Nescot Account wrote:
[snip]
My DNS Configuration:
I have loads of subdomains in the domain file with each subdomain
being a CNAME that point to a single A record. there is also
one MX entry which has the same domain as
Hi.
I inherited a linux box running qmail.
I more or less understand the structure of qmail, it's aliases, control
files etc. and have the docs laid out in front of me, but I need a
little guidance.
I need emails coming from one of say three predefined addresses have
these changes:
1. a "reply
Hi Charles,
I think this is on the right track for me, but I still don't understand.
I can get virtual domains to work just fine, where all mail for a domain
will go into a certain user account, or a certain user .qmail-default
file. That's works well.
The problem is that for some domains, I
This guy seems to be originating from flash.net. While
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was working a month ago, it seems to be /dev/null now.
Is flash.net already in rbl? How does one check?
Mate
Here is a header I received (and many more in the past month)
Forwarded: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 01:12:26 -0500
Hi,
I have just setup qmail for my ISP server, I have got my DNS and MX
everything setup properly. But most of my clients are getting bounced
message when they send to other addresses around the world.
This is the content of the bounced message,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Connected to 206.31.56.7 but
Wow, like this problem has been driving me MAD for the past few
hours. Thanks
|--- Original Message ---
|From: "Petr Novotny" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Date: 10/25/99 4:15:57 PM
|
|-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|Hash: SHA1
|
|On 25 Oct 99, at 8:10, Nescot Account
On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 09:52:00AM -0400, Curtis Generous wrote:
Are you using MAILDIR format on the mailboxes? or are you using standard
Maidir of course.
Rani
Some of our clients use ETRN to get their mail. I'm wondering what are my
choices of solutions to implement this feature into qmail. The only thing I
have found is at http://defiant.cqc.com/~pacman/projects/qmail-etrn/. Is
anyone using this? If so, how's it working for you?
Any and all solutions
Some of our clients use ETRN to get their mail. I'm wondering what are my
choices of solutions to implement this feature into qmail. The only thing I
have found is at http://defiant.cqc.com/~pacman/projects/qmail-etrn/. Is
anyone using this? If so, how's it working for you?
Any and all solutions
look at faq 5.4, about allow relay messages
marco leeflang
Ranjan Koirala wrote:
Hi,
I have just setup qmail for my ISP server, I have got my DNS and MX
everything setup properly. But most of my clients are getting bounced
message when they send to other addresses around the world.
This
Hello All,
Since I didn't get a reply back with this msg, I thought I would try again :)
With the help of Ken Jones at inter7.com, I have qmail running on a
slightly faster pent-133 (as opposed to a pent-100), and things are working
well, however, how fast should an SMTP connection take
You need to clarify the problem here. When you say it takes 20 seconds to
send a message, do you mean that it takes 20 seconds from the time you send
a message to the time it arrives somewhere else? Do you mean that you're
watching the logs and it takes qmail 20 seconds to process the message?
Is anyone doing Qmail authentication for POP over SSL to
an LDAP server?
If so, do you mind sharing your thoughts?
Thanks.
Eric
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some of our clients use ETRN to get their mail. I'm wondering what are my
choices of solutions to implement this feature into qmail. The only thing I
have found is at http://defiant.cqc.com/~pacman/projects/qmail-etrn/. Is
anyone using this? If so, how's it working
Eric Dahnke wrote:
I understand the pros and cons of each, but am interested in knowing if
there is anyone on this list who thinks instant messaging has a chance
of upseating smtp.
- cheers Eric
"talk" is as least as old as SMTP. Did the appearance of
the telephone eliminate the postal
Recommend, please, protocol instead SMTP in such case.
Sam wrote:
The final long-term solution is to get your clients to use an alternative
mail arrangement. ETRN is a solution in search of a problem. Even though
someone is maintaining ETRN workaround and hacks right now does not mean
that
Hi,
Try sending emial to user@[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is your IP.
Pay attention about the bracket.
hope this help.
Akai
dd wrote:
i have just installed qmail on my linux machine. it has no running dns,
though but instead using an upstream dns server to resolve domain names.
i
I think he is referring to a solution such as POP3, or IMAP accounting.
Which would be the most viable option in the absence of a stable, always-on
internet connection.
Mike Ventimiglia
Ultracom Internet Technologies
-Original Message-
From: Pashinin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Hi all:
Has anyone performanced a webmail powered by qmail?
Now I want to programme a webmail system with qmail,
which supports virtuldoamins.
anyone have some ready-mode examples for me?
or give some advice about the interface of web to Maildir.
thanks
Akai
--
Song Kaicheng
We are currently migrating a Windows NT based webmail system, to use with
software.com's WebEdge product to interact with qmail-pop3d under a Solaris
enviroment. Only draw back WebEdge was built with an IMAP accounting
structure, so with POP3 you lose some functionality.
Mike Ventimiglia
As I think, POP3 or IMAP accounts is the best way for users,
but not for organizations.
Besides, why POP3 better SMTP for feeding large mail stream over
unstable, slow connection ?
Mike Ventimiglia wrote:
I think he is referring to a solution such as POP3, or IMAP accounting.
Which would
Organizations that incur a large mail stream, shouldn't be relying on a
slow, unstable connection. If they are trapped with this kind of
connectivity, POP3 and IMAP accounts on a remote mail server was the option
I was referring to- for the simple fact that mail server administration
would be
I recall at least a couple of people who were having trouble with the
getting the Maildir-patched pine-4.10 to work, so I thought I'd forward
this insight from Larry.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 20:22:43 -0400
From: Larry Morley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: James
Pashinin writes:
Recommend, please, protocol instead SMTP in such case.
UUCP.
--
Sam
Pashinin writes:
As I think, POP3 or IMAP accounts is the best way for users,
but not for organizations.
Besides, why POP3 better SMTP for feeding large mail stream over
unstable, slow connection ?
No kind of mail stream should be fed over an unstable, slow connection.
If you want
bin/mail on osf5 / DU5.0 / Compaq trucluster64.
tru64 binmail cannot take the -f switch, as -f means something
different here than it means to the system 7 syntax as given
in all the /var/qmail/boot examples.
I have determined that I can get a successful qmail delivery
using OS-proved
Hi all!,
I'm getting this message in the syslog. It seems that that file is
missing, because I've checked in the queue/local/16/ and didn't find
it. Any idea how to stop qmail to try sending this message?.
I've checked with qmail-sanity and worked just fine (nothing wrong
in the queue?).
look at faq 5.4, about allow relay messages
Remote host said: 501 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Sender domain must exist
Another possibility could be a reverse look up failure. Some SMTP clients
insist on a valid sender domain.
--pgm
P G Mohanan
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Mate Wierdl wrote:
This guy seems to be originating from flash.net. While
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was working a month ago, it seems to be /dev/null now.
Is flash.net already in rbl?
Wouldn't matter, this came directly from a dialup there, not their mail
servers. The RBL
Does the file exist?
Have the permissions changed on it?
Has the queue been moved?
Has qmail been recompiled/installed with different uids?
Has the path to the queue changed permissions in some way?
Do other local mails get delivered correctly, or is it all local mails?
At 01:09 AM
42 matches
Mail list logo
