"Chris, the Young One" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ! Have you come across particular problems
> ! with tcpserver that lead you to the 'Need inetd' conclusion?
>
> I didn't say you ``need'' inetd. My conclusion was that with inetd,
> there is effectively _no_ concurrency lim
Hey,
Your startup could also be happening in the rc2.d scripts, check them
/etc/rc*.d/ as well as the start up of the sendmail in
/etc/rc2.d/S**sendmail.
Is there a /var/run/'filename' for that process and is it dead (svstat
/var/run/'filename')
Good luck!
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 03:31:07PM
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I have talked to the original dns admins.
> to clear up the old dns records so that the MX and A records point to our new
> dns. but still seem to get bounced email when it goes thru the gcs.gateway(who
> owns it? i don't know).
I've attached the bounce message fr
>From: "asantos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>A ldd qmail-remote on my machine gives me:
>
>libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x40019000)
>libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40027000)
>/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000)
>
>I bet you a eider feather against a authentic Sakenussem scr
qmail Digest 1 Aug 2000 10:00:01 - Issue 1080
Topics (messages 45873 through 45932):
many processes open
45873 by: Marco Benetton
45881 by: Chris, the Young One
45912 by: andrew.tic.ch
45921 by: Chris, the Young One
45929 by: Toens Bueker
qmail ident
Hi guys,
I had just set up qmail for testing and I keep
receiving this email send to the root user :
---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon)To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Cron /sbin/rmmod
-asX-Cron-Env: X-Cron-Env:
X-Cron-Env: X-Cron-
FCP Wong wrote:
> Hi guys, I had just set up qmail for testing and I keep receiving this
> email send to the root user
> : --- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Cron Daemon)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Cron /sbin/rmmod -as
> X-Cron-Env:
> X-Cron-Env:
> X-
Hi Guys,
I'm a qmail newbie and just installed qmail 1.03 in RED HAT 6.2. Followed installation
instructions from Life w/ qmail.
Including all the packages like daemontools and ucspi. I think I followed it all,
double checking on the scripts and
the directories to make, link files, ownerships,
Hi Guys,
I'm a qmail newbie and just installed qmail 1.03 in RED HAT 6.2. Followed installation
instructions from Life w/ qmail.
Including all the packages like daemontools and ucspi. I think I followed it all,
double checking on the scripts and
the directories to make, link files, ownerships,
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 06:04:12PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
>> Use any version of PGP or "PGP for Windows" and use the clipboard encryption
>> features:
>> 1) select all text (Ctrl-A)
>> 2) "copy" (Ctrl-C)
>> 3) click on PGP tray icon
>> 4) click "
Toens Bueker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From inetd(8):
>
>The optional `max'' suffix (separated from `wait'' or `nowait'' by a dot)
>specifies the maximum number of server instances that may be spawned from
>inetd within an interval of 60 seconds. When omitted, `max'' defaults to 40.
That's a r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Then I tried the test.receive using the
>smtp. I was able to follow the instructions given on the
>test.receive. But when I checked the mailbox, mail was not received,
>instead there was a mailer-daemon message...
No, that's not really a mailer daemon message. As the S
I am running qmail w/ tcpserver, dnscache, and daemontools. Latest
versions of each, despite the annoying tai64n timestamps on multilog.
;-)
Two to three times a day, tcpserver seems to slow way down. While it is
acting up like this, it will accept a connection but will not actually
start qma
Hi...
i have the Problem that we are serving domains for foo.de
our Mailserver is in 194.97.15.0
The customers Mailserver is in 62.108.55.224 for example.
The customers cant send mail over our mailserver. The domain
foo.de is in rctphosts of qmail.
Is there a way to fix this problem so that they
Sten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't see anything in the FAQ that seemed to be relevant to
>this, and the ORNL search engine wants to split 'message-id' into
>'message' and 'id'.
"message id" does the trick.
> I just received a pair of messages from PayPal, which appears
>to
True -- but that would require the countries the software manufacturers do business
in to relax their export regs. and allow for open encryption hooks in their tools.
Dave Sill wrote:
> >It's not even this complicated with 6.5. You click on the window whose text
> >you want to encrypt, click on
Hi...
Another way is to add the ip range or individual addresses into you
/etc/tcp.smtp file and recreate the smtp.cdb file. Also double check the
spelling in rcpthosts (although I think that is not poss but you never know)
:o)
Slider
Hi...
i have the Problem that we are serving domains for
In addition be sure that the qmail processes have been restarted, in order
to take up the new settings!!
;o)
Slider
Hi...
i have the Problem that we are serving domains for foo.de
our Mailserver is in 194.97.15.0
The customers Mailserver is in 62.108.55.224 for example.
The customers cant se
Are you asking more for something like:
2000/07/31 06:02:10.42 (GMT+05)
This has always been the date format I've prefered ... its sortable (as the year
comes first -- although its quite narrow-minded of me to not allow for 5 digit
dates), its human-readable, and quite parsable. The decimal por
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1 Aug 00, at 9:58, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> Are you asking more for something like:
>
> 2000/07/31 06:02:10.42 (GMT+05)
>
> This has always been the date format I've prefered ... its sortable
> (as the year comes first -- although its quite n
POR FAVOR RETIREM MEU EMAIL DESTA LISTA
MUITO OBRIGADA
MONICA
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 08:03:23AM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> despite the annoying tai64n timestamps on multilog. ;-)
Let's just pass over that :)
> 2000-08-01 07:42:33.785679500 tcpserver: ok 61983 :216.243.128.140:25
> :205.188.1
> 2000-08-01 07:42:34.432984500 tcpserver: ok 61985
> mail.bit
Which part of "more like" did you miss?
Fixing seconds precision to anything is unnecessary ... with a decimal to
separate the fractional portion and a space to end it, it can be as short or
long as you wish -- a parser does not need that number to have 0 padding at
the end ... comment irrelevant
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 03:27:44PM +0100, James Raftery wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 08:03:23AM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> > despite the annoying tai64n timestamps on multilog. ;-)
>
> Let's just pass over that :)
>
> > 2000-08-01 07:42:33.785679500 tcpserver: ok 61983 :216.243.128.140:25
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 10:34:51AM -0400, Bennett Todd wrote:
> 2000-07-28-16:04:47 Ben Beuchler:
> > Any major gotchas with djbdns, besides the problems nslookup has
> > talking to it?
>
> nslookup only has a problem if it's not serving its own address
> properly for reverse lookups, other than
2000-08-01-10:50:58 Ben Beuchler:
> Sometime in the near future we will be a djbdns shop. It will
> take some arm twisting of the other admins, but it will happen.
That's good. You'll be glad.
I'll tell you how I made the transition, not that this is the only
way or anything, but it worked real
> Dave Sill writes:
DS> Sten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I didn't see anything in the FAQ that seemed to be relevant to
>> this, and the ORNL search engine wants to split 'message-id' into
>> 'message' and 'id'.
DS> "message id" does the trick.
Not any better than 'message-id'. I
Please help me !!
I can't figure what I shall do to configure and run Mrtg for QMAIL
I'm using multilog Is it possible to use it with MRTG ??
I have the following logs :
Died at /usr/local/bin/qmail-mrtg-concurrency line 14.
Could not get any data from external command
'/usr/local/bin/qm
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 11:03:59AM -0400, Bennett Todd wrote:
> 2000-08-01-10:50:58 Ben Beuchler:
> > Sometime in the near future we will be a djbdns shop. It will
> > take some arm twisting of the other admins, but it will happen.
>
> That's good. You'll be glad.
>
> I'll tell you how I made
Albert Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The new location is on another (non-qmail) server. Basically this
> user is wanting her currently delivered email to be send to the
> other email address (the one I put in her .qmail). I'm not sure if
> it's called requeuing or what but basically I w
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 09:43:50AM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> Hmmm... What flag tells it not to look for that?
-l localname
See http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html for the full raft of
options.
> It appears to be. If you or anyone else can find a problem with it, I
> would be greatful.
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 05:52:57PM +0100, James Raftery wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 09:43:50AM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> > Hmmm... What flag tells it not to look for that?
>
> -l localname
> See http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html for the full raft of
> options.
I will try that, t
I would like to bounce all mail incoming to my qmail machine (which is
qmail.domain.com) for domain.com to mail.domain.com while i set up my
server. What would this look like in smtproutes? I don't see this file in my
control files, and I didnt see it in the install docs. Can anyone point me
towar
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 11:05:18AM -0700, Jacob Scott wrote:
> I would like to bounce all mail incoming to my qmail machine (which is
> qmail.domain.com) for domain.com to mail.domain.com while i set up my
> server. What would this look like in smtproutes? I don't see this file in my
> control f
That's more of what the RBL is for -- if you want to take that step. The RBL
is supposed to be a good list of sites that are producing spam, not that are
necessarily open relays at all.
"Hubbard, David" wrote:
> Thanks for responding Chris. I am currently using the MAPS
> relays.mail-abuse.org
* Chad Cranston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. (*) text/plain ( ) text/html
^
Turn this off. It only makes your mail 5x as big without adding anything.
> I'm having problems w/ vpasswd the binary file for vpasswd (to change
> the password of a vpopmail user) is located in /home/vpopmail
Actually, no. The problem is that his E-mail client (Outlook Express) has
the option of sending BOTH plain and html versions of the message and is
sending them encoded as seperate MIME segments. Netscape Messenger also
supports this, but IMHO, its an incorrect reading of how MIME should be used.
Hi,
I have been using Qmail on Linux for a while. All the mail I send from
Linux seem to get delivered to the destination SMTP server. On my local LAN
I do have non-Linux systems. When I point the email clients the Linux system
as the SMTP server, I am getting the following message:
"An error o
hi,
try a telnet to port 25 of your linuxbox from a m$-client. if you get a connection
type HELO DUDE and CR. you should see an answer
from your qmail server. if not, it may be possible, that your tcp-server is not
listening at the local device.
IMHO tcp.smtp is responsible for relaying and ther
When the mail goes out from any of my systems on the LAN, I would like to
hide the IP addresses and possibly the host names(don't know if the later is
possible).
What Qmail files do I need to look at to hide IP address information in the
headers?
--
Subba Rao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pws.prser
On 01-Aug-2000, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> "Robin S. Socha" wrote:
> > * Chad Cranston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > 1. (*) text/plain ( ) text/html
> >^
> > Turn this off. It only makes your mail 5x as big without adding anything.
>
> Actually, no. The problem is that his E-mail c
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 05:34:36PM +1200, Chris, the Young One wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 11:12:54PM -0400, Vincent Danen wrote:
> ! In /etc/passwd I have this:
> !
> ! alias:x:400:401::/var/qmail/alias:/bin/true
>
> Can you please run qmail-showctl and list the output of the line
> ``use
Ok, I fixed it. It now just rotates the serverindex.pos[] by a random
amount, and then loops through until it finds a good server. rand() is still
seeded with milliseconds from the system clock. I used memcpy() to move the
array around instead of loops to make it more efficient.
Would it be pos
Im setting a mailing list system that will require
a VERY good
performance. After search for a lot of options, Ive decided to use
qmail
because I think it is the most quick and configurable MTA.
Im wondering what can I change to improve the performance
of my
mailing list, I already read
Sorry about the subject of my last mesg, this was a copy and
paste
:-)
--
_
Fernando Costa de Almeida
ICQ - 72293951
Jay,
If I understand this correctly, then I think there is a flaw in this type
of random round robin. I think I can best describe it with an example.
Assume you have 4 servers A, B, C, D, and that server C is down. When your
random seed hits server A, B or D (with probability 1/4, respectively)
I setup qmail on a small dialup machine. All local mail is delivered normally and mail
to the internet is relayed to smtp.my.provider.com.
My smtproutes contains the line
:smtp.my.provider.com
The problem is, that the smtp server of my provider checks the From address (or the
domain part of it
Is there a RFC 2645 server and client that is compatible with qmail?
Thanks,
John
--
John ConoverTel. 408.370.2688 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
631 Lamont Ct. Cel. 408.772.7733
Campbell, CA 95008 Fax. 408.379.9602 http://www.johncon.com
Is there an easy way to just send to all users in a linux group, instead of
having to use an alias file?
I installed ezmlm-0.53 + ezmlm-idx-0.40 on my newly installed
RedHat Linux 6.1, as instructed in INSTALL and INSTALL.idx
files. But it wouldn't work.
I run "qmail-inject joe-testlist < mail.file" and the post did not reach
the subscribers in the list.
I run "ezmlm-send ~/testlist < mail.file
You are correct. However, since qmail-qmqpc does not continually run, it is
not possible to do a non-random round robin (as far as I know). If qmqpc
could be turned into a process that ran continuously, it would be possible
to do regular round-robin and there would be no need for the random stuf
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, &6*B06 wrote:
> I run "ezmlm-send ~/testlist < mail.file" and it will cause
> segmentation fault and core dump.
ezmlm-send, I've found, will dump core if you don't set the SENDER
environment varible.
ezmlm-send does not distribute bounce messages: if the
e
Cedric Fontaine writes:
> Please help me !!
> I can't figure what I shall do to configure and run Mrtg for QMAIL
> I'm using multilog Is it possible to use it with MRTG ??
Yes, however there's a bug which I'm going to rewrite around. Going to
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am trying to get qmail-smtpd-auth working but I do not think tcpserver is
passing the parameters to qmail-smtpd
The example given in the instructions is for inetd and im not sure if you
can just pass parameters at the end of the tcpserver line...
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u10
* Moritz Jodeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a way, how I could change the From-address from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? The From-address should
> only be changed for mail to the internet. Local mail should still be
> delivered as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,[ /var/qmail/doc/FA
* Barry Smoke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. (*) text/plain ( ) text/html
^ turn this off
> Is there an easy way to just send to all users in a linux group,
> instead of having to use an alias file?
,[ /var/qmail/doc/FAQ ]
| 4.2. How do I set up a mailing list? I'd like [EMAIL
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 08:26:59PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
Hi Peter,
> > a script to move the larger mail into a seperate IP and then login
> > to that IP and get the bigger mail at night ?
> > or have you something else in mind.
> When you run 'maildirsmtp', that in turn runs maildirseri
57 matches
Mail list logo