Amar writes:
Here is the output
[of qmail-showctl]
qmails7389 0.0 0.3 1096 384 pts/3S02:17 0:00 qmail-send
qmaill7390 0.0 0.3 1068 412 pts/3S02:17 0:00 splogger
qmail
root 7391 0.0 0.2 1056 328 pts/3S02:17 0:00 qmail-lspawn
|pre
qmail Digest 1 Dec 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 1200
Topics (messages 53148 through 53253):
Re: ezmlm warning
53148 by: Neil Grant
Re: Problems with dnscache in Linux
53149 by: Andrew Richards
53152 by: Andrew Richards
53168 by: clemensF
53187 by: Andrew
Charles Cazabon writes:
Ari Arantes Filho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to limit only outgoing messages? I so databytes, but I only
want to limit the messages that my users send, not receive.
[...]
Use tcpserver to set the DATABYTES variable on a per-IP basis. Set it to
Hi,
I'm running rblsmtpd, according to the response of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] my RBL is working.
Problem: if any machine in the local sub-network (subnetwork: 10.1.7.*
with differents MAC, DNS) bombarding me all messages are delivred to my
mail server (my sub-network is 10.1.6.* differente MAC, DNS,
Am Don, 30 Nov 2000 schrieb Dave Sill:
Louis Mushandu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...cerebrally...sphincter...petulant...commensurate...intelligentsia...
Wow, Louis, you sure do use some purdy fancy words for a newbie.
-Dave
they really are fancy ones, i only knew one of them ;)
Anton
Just a recommendation..
Book Title: "Pragmatics of Human Communication"
Author: Paul Watzlawik a.o.
ISBN: 0393010090
and now back to work..
Anton Pirnat
you didn´ t tell what services you need besides qmail, but i guess a minimal
install (that includes the compilers) should be enough. I am not used with RH
distribution, but at FBSD, SuSE and others it did work this way for me ..
regards
Anton Pirnat
--
is there any life before breakfast?
Hi all,
I have some doubts about qmail-popup. I read the man of qmail-popup
and
I saw that exist some descriptors used by qmail-popup. My doubts are
about it.
Let me see if I figured out what man page says.
Qmail-popup expects descriptor 0 from the network, sent by a client
like a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I admin quite a large mail server that is currently running
sendmail/qpopper, it has about 6 accounts on it currently. I know
that UNIX has a limit on the UID's of 65534, any file that has a UID
higher than that number defaults back to UID0..
That has been
* Andrew Buenaventura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001130 22:59]:
I am going to setup a dedicated linux box that will run qmail only. What is
the most minimum package that I need to install from Red Hat 7.0 to be able
to run Qmail? I do not want unnecessary services/daemons running on that
box. I
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 07:15:27AM +0100, Cyril Bitterich wrote:
I second that.
We are now at 114 messages about that one subject on this little list
What is so funny is that one of the people who was at the heart of this gave a
reason of haveing to pay for each message download. Well at
What is so funny is that one of the people who was at the heart of this gave a
reason of haveing to pay for each message download. Well at least now I have
my $0.02 worth in :)
rofl, you pay for Traffic? You must have been from Yesterday! ;-))
* Peter Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andrew Buenaventura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001130 22:59]:
I am going to setup a dedicated linux box that will run qmail only.
What is the most minimum package that I need to install from Red Hat
7.0
Why DeadRat? For a server, I'd go for a leaner
When I do that, Qmail can't send and log::
Failure: I_(qmail-remote)_was_invoked_improperly._(#5.3.5)/
On 1 Dec 2000, at 0:15, Butch Evans wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. create a file named "qmail-remote" with:
/var/bin/qmail/adbait.pl |
Robin S. Socha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Why DeadRat? For a server, I'd go for a leaner distribution like
Slackware or Debian (i.e. one that won't install GNOME, 27 X-Servers and
4 RDBMs if you click "Server install"). Also, apply the following
liberally: LIDS: http://www.lids.org/.
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, montgomery f. tidwell wrote:
Howdy,
is it possible to have qmail just remove the offending "Sender:"
field from all outgoing emails??
Yes. No. Maybe.
It all depends on how the message is getting to qmail. As you're using
netscape, you are sending mail from netscape to
Scott D. Yelich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was the issue about an MX pointing to a CNAME ever resolved?
Yes; it's verboten. If you do it, don't expect to receive 100% of the mail
people try to send to you.
Also; please start a new thread when posting a new question; your message
showed up in
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, montgomery f. tidwell wrote:
Howdy,
ok, i found the answer.
it is indeed Netscape that is being bad, not qmail.
the solution is to add the following line to the
preferences.js file:
user_pref("mail.suppress_sender_header", true);
Excellent. Thanks for that.
I built a qmail/web-based email server here using debian.
The system is as follows:
P5 133
128M RAM
9 Gig SCSI HD
To get everything running I used the following packages to
get everything running:
qmail-src
courier-imap
apache-php3
horde
ÄãºÃ£º
ÎÒÔÚfreebsd+qmail+vpopmail»·¾³ÔËÐÐÕý³££¬php+mysqlÒ²ÔËÐÐÕý³££¬ÏÖÔÚÏëqmail+vpopmail¼ÓÈëmysql¹ÜÀíÓû§£¬Òò´ËÖØбàÒëvpopmailÈçÏÂ:
./configure --enable-roaming-users --enable-hardquota=5242880
--enable-mysql=y --enable-sqlincdir=/usr/local/include/mysql
Hi everybody...
I have qmail vpopmail running on Linux machine and I was thinking on
installing an antivirus on my mailserver, does anyone have any suggestions
about this issue?!
Thanks for your time
V.
Is this Arabic language? How should we read
this?
- Original Message -
From:
emailsys
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 5:45
PM
Subject:
freebsd+qmail+vpopmail+mysql»·¾³
ÄãºÃ£º
Visar Emini wrote:
Hi everybody...
I have qmail vpopmail running on Linux machine and I was thinking on
installing an antivirus on my mailserver, does anyone have any suggestions
about this issue?!
Thanks for your time
V.
Before you get flamed by everyone for asking a "obvious"
I'm asking the following several time the following
questionNO RESPONSE NO RESPONSE.
Is there is really somebody already using rblsmtpd?
I'm running rblsmtpd, according to the response of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] my RBL is working.
Problem: if any machine in my sub-network (10.1.7.*
having it's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 1 December 2000 at
18:13:03 +0100
I'm asking the following several time the following
questionNO RESPONSE NO RESPONSE.
Is there is really somebody already using rblsmtpd?
Sure, lots of us are. I've always found it installs easily and
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I'm asking the following several time the following
questionNO RESPONSE NO RESPONSE.
Is there is really somebody already using rblsmtpd?
Allright, I'm _not_ going to touch that.. but tempting.
I'm running rblsmtpd, according to the response
Am Freitag, 1. Dezember 2000 18:13 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm asking the following several time the following
questionNO RESPONSE NO RESPONSE.
You may wan't to check http://www.qmail.org/top.html#paidsup . There you can
whine if nobody helps you, there you can be rude if nobody
* Visar Emini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have qmail vpopmail running on Linux machine and I was thinking
on installing an antivirus on my mailserver, does anyone have any
suggestions about this issue?!
http://qmail.org/ - how many seconds did you search the archives?
--
Robin S. Socha
I'd like to know how you used the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
test address anyway? The IP addresses you gave are non-routable
private addresses so there is no way the crynwr.com test machine
could have connected to your server in the first place. The
rblsmtpd only blocks spam based on the connecting mail
I just read
http://cr.yp.to/im2000.html
The ideas there seem extremely demoralizing for somebody trying to
write an MTA for the traditional mail infrastructure.
In particular, it seems understandable why qmail-1.04 (not to mention
qmail-2.00) has not come out. Maybe it never will---and I bet
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 11:52:37AM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
I just read
http://cr.yp.to/im2000.html
The ideas there seem extremely demoralizing for somebody trying to
write an MTA for the traditional mail infrastructure.
I guess that depends on whether you think that im2000 is something
Thus spake Jamin Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I write good software.
Others help me.
The software gets better.
This is a very selfish view. Based on these statements, you only care about
software in so much as you can gain from it. This is a key difference
between you and I.
When I do that, Qmail can't send and log::
Failure: I_(qmail-remote)_was_invoked_improperly._(#5.3.5)/
1. learn how to quote
2. if you change stuff without understanding it, and that results in
problems for you, tough luck.
Read the fucking man page for qmail-remote. It clearly states
I am going to setup a dedicated linux box that will run qmail only. What is
the most minimum package that I need to install from Red Hat 7.0 to be able
to run Qmail? I do not want unnecessary services/daemons running on that
box. I will also be installing the web based email package that
Thus spake Wesley Wannemacher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
To get everything running I used the following packages to
get everything running:
qmail-src
courier-imap
apache-php3
horde
imp
mysql-server
horde is completely superfluous.
If you run a web based
Thus spake Visar Emini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I have qmail vpopmail running on Linux machine and I was thinking on
installing an antivirus on my mailserver, does anyone have any suggestions
about this issue?!
Forget it.
Anti virii don't work.
They also introduce new security problems.
Felix
Thus spake Mate Wierdl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I just read
http://cr.yp.to/im2000.html
The ideas there seem extremely demoralizing for somebody trying to
write an MTA for the traditional mail infrastructure.
Why do you say that?
This does not look demoralizing at all to me.
In particular,
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 18:34:59 -0800
From: Greg White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't see any circumstances where any of Dan's sofware can be deemed
closed source.
It is not the case that all software is either open source or closed
source. There is a
I'm taking a vacation from this list until the level of newbie
tolerance improves dramatically.
Sorry, I just can't take it any longer.
-Dave
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:00:32PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
`ps aux | grep qmail`, if you see qmail-smtpd it is running, otherwise not.
(note: if you run qmail.smtp from inetd use Jamin's method).
Using inetd at all, but especially for qmail, is no good idea IMHO, your
mileage may
Felix von Leitner wrote:
At least: has anybody thought about implementing MXPS:
http://cr.yp.to/proto/mxps.txt
Several people have.
But it is not worth the bother until a noticable part of the Internet
uses it.
Felix
What is the advantage of MXPS over SMTP options? It seems like
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 07:50:13PM +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote:
http://cr.yp.to/proto/mxps.txt
Several people have.
But it is not worth the bother until a noticable part of the Internet
uses it.
Shades of the question I used to get when installing a web server:
"Why would you bother
From: Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you run mysqsl, stability and reliability are obviously not important
to you. You should be running sendmail, Postfix or Exim.
Felix
I find MySQL to be reliable and stable. I only keep logs for 6 months, so in
the last 6 months I've had MySQL
Like Felix I'm skeptical about the value of general anti-virii programs
running as gatekeepers on Linux servers.
However, I have found AMaViS (A Mail Virus Scanner;
http://amavis.org ) very useful for filtering out e-mail viruses, a very
annoying and prominant subgroup of viruses.
AMaVis
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 03:46:23PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
How can I check if I have qmail-smtpd enabled on my host?
$ telnet 0 25
Trying 0.0.0.0...
Connected to 0.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 sws5.ctd.ornl.gov ORNL/WS ESMTP
help
214 qmail home page: http://pobox.com/~djb/qmail.html
I guess that depends on whether you think that im2000 is something
likely to be achieve in that year or that century... There are a
number of hurdles to surmount - in particular the issue of
notification. It strikes me that notification has the same issues that
email currently does - one
sorry to hear that, and i complete do understand and agree with you. It is a
childish behaviour and should stop asap. We are no kids, and should respect
others as they are. All of us started as a newbie this way or another.
I hope the wave is gone soon and we all can go back helping others.
2. How can I enable qmail-smtpd? What is the best way to do it?
There are several ways to start qmail-smtpd. One is to use inetd.
The other way, which is recommended by the author, is to use tcpserver.
See http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/servers.html#tcpserver-smtpd
Mads
I'm taking a vacation from this list until the level of newbie
tolerance improves dramatically.
Sorry, I just can't take it any longer.
-Dave
I am sorry to see you go, Dave, you have been a great help to myself
and countless others.
Even though some of the newbie questions make me cringe,
Thus spake Mark Delany ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
http://cr.yp.to/proto/mxps.txt
Several people have.
But it is not worth the bother until a noticable part of the Internet
uses it.
Shades of the question I used to get when installing a web server:
"Why would you bother until a noticable part
Thus spake asantos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I find MySQL to be reliable and stable.
Good luck to you, then.
You will need it.
I only keep logs for 6 months, so in
the last 6 months I've had MySQL 3.22.23 running for vpopmail-3.4.11-2 over
qmail-1.03+ezmlm-0.53, managing more than 260 virtual
on 12/1/00 13:18, QBA at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did 'ps -aux | grep qmail-smtpd' and got no message so I don't have it
running. And that's why I have two more questions:
1. What means this line (about qmail) in my /etc/inetd.conf ? (I wrote it
in my earlier message)
Include the line
Thus spake Jerry Keene ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Like Felix I'm skeptical about the value of general anti-virii programs
running as gatekeepers on Linux servers.
Please email yourself an email with http://www.fefe.de/antivirus/42.zip
as attachment. Either your antivirus is thorough and DoSses your
Like Felix I'm skeptical about the value of general
anti-virii programs
running as gatekeepers on Linux servers.
Check out http://www.vmyths.com
A lot of the most "deadly" attacks could have been stopped dead with simple
processes that looked for methods and not specific "signatures".
A
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 12:52:33 -0600
From: "David L. Nicol" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 18:34:59 -0800
From: Greg White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't see any circumstances where any of Dan's sofware can be deemed
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 02:24:03PM -0500, Jerry Keene wrote:
very useful for filtering out e-mail viruses
Don't know if this is a urban legend or if it really exists, but a
friend told me about a ZIP file called 42.ZIP (maybe because it is
42 KB in size) which - as I heard - is currently
No mean to start a Flame but!
A) Web based being a security threat! You have to be kidding right?
Ever hear of SSL.
B) mysql being unreliable and unstable for use. WRONG again. There are
several! Have a look for yourself.
http://www.mysql.com/information/users.html. I will mention
Date: 1 Dec 2000 18:28:12 +
From: "Mark Delany" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another issue for my money is that of the lost of instantaneousness
that would result in having to (effectively) retrieve a web page for
each email you read. It sounds silly, but adding a mere second to the
on 12/1/00 13:29, QBA at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I also typed 'telnet 0 25' and here is what I got:
Trying 0.0.0.0...
Connected to 0.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 qbaroot.dyndns.org ESMTP
'help'
214 qmail home page: http://pobox.com/~djb/qmail.html
'quit'
221 qbaroot.dyndns.org
In case you do not like certain people's postings to this list because
they are offensive to you (too trivial questions, too abusive
language), you can do the following steps
1) Look at the From: field of the person. In my case, it is usually
(not now) is
From: Mate Wierdl [EMAIL
Don't know if this is a urban legend or if it really exists, but a
friend told me about a ZIP file called 42.ZIP (maybe because it is
42 KB in size) which - as I heard - is currently floating around. This
is not a virus but a DoS attack against virus scanners.
If you unzip this ZIP
Mate Wierdl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
This has the added benefit that if the person not only sends his
message to the list but to you as well, both messages will be ignored.
It doesn't however do anything about their messages getting quoted by other
users.
Jamin W. Collins
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 02:29:04PM -0500, Lipscomb, Al wrote:
I would think that it would work something like this:
1) A dial in user (for example) would transfer a message to a well connected
server at their ISP. The ISP would provide the disk space used to store the
message.
...
5)
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:00:32PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
`ps aux | grep qmail`, if you see qmail-smtpd it is running, otherwise not.
(note: if you run qmail.smtp from inetd use Jamin's method).
Using inetd at all, but especially for qmail, is no good idea IMHO, your
mileage may
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:58:54PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
I'm taking a vacation from this list until the level of newbie
tolerance improves dramatically.
Sorry, I just can't take it any longer.
-Dave
Arg, that sucks. Sorry to see you go, Dave. REALLY sorry to see a few
pricks ruin it
I am not sure there is a need to send further receipes for getting the
offending addresses from the From: field.
The point is that there are simple ways to avoid flames and friends,
and those who do not use them are obviously are there to---flame.
Mate
Dear All,
How do I forward all mail recieved by a user to a user on a different host.
I have looked at the forward command but this does not seem to do the trick.
Could someone point me in the direction of some documentation on the forward
command if this is the correct one.
Thanks
I had
How do I forward all mail recieved by a user to a user on a
different host.
I have looked at the forward command but this does not seem
to do the trick.
Could someone point me in the direction of some documentation
on the forward command if this is the correct one.
Read 'man
hi,
I need your help:
I had success make freebsd+qmail+vpopmail, but once I want to
use mysql to do user authentication, the user that created by ./vadduser
can not login on swebmail,why?
It seems that sqwebmail has MySQL
authenticationmodules, how to set up and install it?
thank
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 11:01:47AM -0600, Trey Nolen wrote:
I'm running a Debian system with Qmail 1.03. Everything has been working
using the init scripts, and tried restarting. On restart, I get this error:
Starting mail-transfer agent: qmail./qmail: xrealloc: cannot reallocate 512
bytes
* emailsys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I need your help:
,[ vpopmail FAQ ]
| 14. Is there a mailing list available for vpopmail package?
| Yes. Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`
I had success make freebsd+qmail+vpopmail, but once I want to use
mysql to do user
"Aaron L. Meehan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've said enough. Pretty close to adding a rule for *Outlook* and
*Inernet Mail Service* (heh, "Service!") into my .procmailrc, though,
for mails to this list, with the SNR getting so bad among you all.
The only problem with doing that is the
Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Signature based detection can never catch current virii.
Either
s/current/new/
or
s/catch/reliably catch/
There can be no argument that a signature based virus scanner can
catch SOME viruses. The question is how reliably.
The two issues are:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 10:59:27PM +0100, QBA wrote:
And one more thing - Henning Brauer wrote that using inetd is not to good idea.
Can anyone tell me why?
http://www-archive.ornl.gov:8000/
has a searchable archive of this list.
Thus spake Matt Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Therefore, signature based scanners CANNOT be a 100% reliable method
for preventing viruses.
Plus, they are a security risk in themselves.
And, they normally even cost money.
Felix, you seem to be of the opinion that anything less than 100%
Felix,
Thank you very much for your very polite reply. I have been a Windows user
for the past 6 years and an Exchange admin for 3 years. The reason why I am
planning to migrate to linux is because it is free, very stable, and most
importantly, lists/communities (i.e. gurus like you) like this
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 01:47:53AM +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote:
If running a virus scanner would be free (i.e. does not reduce security,
does not eat up CPU time on the email server, does not use memory, does
not cost time and money to maintain) then I would not be against it.
Antivirus,
Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If running a virus scanner would be free (i.e. does not reduce security,
does not eat up CPU time on the email server, does not use memory, does
not cost time and money to maintain) then I would not be against it.
Nothing is free. All that is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robin S. Socha) writes:
[1] Quick maildrop recipe for that, anyone?
No. But I've got some code to help you stop sending vacuous messages.
Add it to your .gnus and restart emacs.
(defadvice message-send (before suppress-noise
activate
I'm copying this back to both the qmail list, and the ezmlm list, because it
is not that simple, although I really appreciate the reply...it has been the
only one I've gotten.
After all the research, and digging through, FAQ's and documentation, I am
really surprised I am having this much
2) The actual virus code may be hidden inside a wide number of
packaging schemes; different mime encodings, compression formats,
encryption formats, etc. It is impossible for a virus scanner to be
able to read them all. Thus some known viruses can slip by because
they're inside an
On 1 Dec 2000, Matt Brown wrote:
The only problem with doing that is the clueful admins with clueless
management who force everyone to use the Corporate Email Solution, ie
Outlook. Not me right now, but it was me in my last job.
Agreed. At my last consulting job... it took over 3 weeks to
From: Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good luck to you, then.
You will need it.
No luck involved.
If your servers never crash and you never have unexpected hardware
failures, mysql may be for you.
I've had hardware failures on the servers, and power failures. No problem
with MySQL. But
2000-12-01 20:40:08.460829500 starting delivery 16: msg 38650 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2000-12-01 20:40:08.460845500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
2000-12-01 20:40:08.467900500 delivery 16: deferral: Unable_to_find_alias_user!/
The above log snippit illustrates a problem I am running into
Hi,
vpopmail[58140]: vchkpw login [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
how to logging the remote IP
" [EMAIL PROTECTED]: IP "
thx
_
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 10:12:12PM -0600, Matthew Hunter wrote:
I'm in the process of trying to determine if the alias uid was
different when qmail was compiled vs the current alias
uid. Other than that, which I don't think is the problem,
nothing immediately springs to mind.
This is
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 06:42:04AM +0100, Markus Stumpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 10:12:12PM -0600, Matthew Hunter wrote:
I'm in the process of trying to determine if the alias uid was
different when qmail was compiled vs the current alias
uid. Other than that,
From: Matthew Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any ideas where to look?
Check the /var/qmail/users/{assign,cdb} stuff. Maybe someone played with the
alias.
Armando
90 matches
Mail list logo
