Hi,
Thank you. I patched qmail, although I am still having troubles. I guess
I am doing something wrong...
I was running qmail-pop3d with something like:
exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin" \
tcpserver -H -R 0 pop3 \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup smashweb.com \
/usr/home/vpopmail/b
Hi I hope you can point me in the right direction with this one.
I have setup qmail, qmail-scanner and courier imap on a test server, what we
need to be able to do is only allow certain users access to external e-mail
i.e. they can only send internally by default unless we let them do
otherwis
qmail Digest 16 Apr 2001 10:00:01 - Issue 1336
Topics (messages 60738 through 60763):
QMail and PHP
60738 by: Christian Maier
60739 by: Lukasz Felsztukier
60740 by: Alex Kramarov
60742 by: Uwe Ohse
Re: Maildir (dir) to file for /var/mail/$USR (Inbox) [imapd]
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
> I am doing something wrong...
>
> run:
> #!/bin/sh
> exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin" \
> tcpserver -H -R 0 pop3 \
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup smashweb.com \
> /usr/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir
>
> log/run:
> #!/bin/s
From: "Rick Updegrove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oops I always do that ...
> p.s.
>
> This guy even uses softlimit in his log/run script, I think I shall update mine asap.
> http://www.flounder.net/qmail/qmail-howto.html
Actually that is NOT softlimit, see http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/multilog.html
how do i configure qmail to deliver mail to
/var/spool/mail/. Thats where kmail looks for the mail box.
Currently i have a symlink from $HOME/Mailbox to /var/spool/mail/userbox..
It works but still
Rizwan
--
In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick,
On Monday, April 16, 2001 12:24, Rick Updegrove
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I am no expert but I think you need the "2>&1" at the end of your
> qmail-pop3d/run. I know mine has that. I also think you "sh
Why not use tcpserver?
My experience with xinetd has been terrible.
By the way, try to set RELAYCLIENT="".
> -Original Message-
> From: John Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: jueves, 12 de abril de 2001 20:28
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: xinetd, tcpwrappers and qmail
>
>
>
P.S.
also please remember that users/assign method is not suitable
for us since - for many reasons (our auto-hosting software) -
we have to use system accounts
at: http://www.pgregg.com/projects/qmail/single-uid-howto.php
>>
"If you want to use system accounts do not read this document -
Rizwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> how do i configure qmail to deliver mail to /var/spool/mail/.
Read the qmail documentation. Dan has instructions for /var/spool/mail
delivery.
> Thats where kmail looks for the mail box.
So configure kmail to look somewhere else (like $HOME/Maildir/) for
From: Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Rizwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> how do i configure qmail to deliver mail to /var/spool/mail/.
>
> Read the qmail documentation. Dan has instructions for /var/spool/mail
> delivery.
Specifically, in the source, look at the file INSTALL.vsm.
Is it possible to get scan4virus to scan email that does not pass through
qmail-smtpd?
I am trying to get email sent through IMP (www.horde.org) Webmail to be
scanned.
I have tried setting the Environment Variable in Apache but that didn't
work. I am now trying to get it to work through simple she
Hi,
Maillog says:
Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.474503 starting delivery 57: msg
218656 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.474811 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.498477 delivery 57: deferral:
Unable_to_chdir_to_mai
Patric de Waha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok I see that mails can not be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (yy.xxx.lu
> is the server name), because there is no Maildir..
Or for another reason.
> pop:*:68:6:Post Office Owner:/nonexistent:/sbin/nologin
>From the manpage for qmail-getpw:
q
Hi,
Can i run 2 Qmail server on the same server with different port ?
If yes how ?
Thanks
=> How i can add X-Complaint-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in headers of all
output message ?
Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
France: Tel +33 671887502
---
Note: All HTML e
My server failed in Relay Test 6 in www.abuse.net.
The result is:
Relay test 6
>>> RSET
<<< 250 flushed
>>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<< 250 ok
>>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<< 250 ok
Relay test result
Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay.
THIS MAY OR MAY N
Jairo Marciano Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My server failed in Relay Test 6 in www.abuse.net.
No, it didn't. This comes up all the time; read the bloody mailing list
archives.
Charles
--
---
Charles Cazabon
Was the message relayed? My guess, NO. If it wasn't delivered its not a
problem.
What part of "THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY." doesn't
make sense?
-Original Message-
From: Jairo Marciano Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 12:37 PM
To: [EMA
> Relay test 6
> >>> RSET
> <<< 250 flushed
> >>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <<< 250 ok
> >>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <<< 250 ok
>
> Relay test result
> Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay.
> THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY.
Jairo,
No, y
Thanks very much !!!
Jairo
- Original Message -
From: "John P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jairo Marciano Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: Relay test on abuse.net
> > Relay test 6
> > >>> RSET
> > <<< 250 flushed
> > >>> MAI
Take a look at this -- be sure to look at the two "Follow-Ups" to the
mesage:
http://lists.omnipotent.net/qmail/200010/msg00817.html
> From: "Jairo Marciano Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 13:37:11 -0300
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Relay test on abuse.net
>
> My ser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patric,
On Saturday, April 16, 2005 18:10, Patric de Waha
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Maillog says:
>
> Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.474503 starting delivery 57:
> msg 218656 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Apr 16 17:58:13
Hi,
I checked on the web and the archives of this list, but no luck. Can you
confirm that qmail is unable to add a disclaimer to any outgoing e-mail?
Thx
FF.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, April 16, 2001 19:18, Frederic Faure
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I checked on the web and the archives of this list, but no luck.
> Can you confirm that qmail is unable to add a disclaimer to any
> outgoing e-mail?
>
I know of a feature in SGI's File System that launches an event when something
including data changes happen to a file. This might be a generic Journalling FS
feature. In which case installing a JFS might be one way. However I am not sure
of the current state of JFS on Linux. I know there has been
NDSoftware :
> Hi,
> Can i run 2 Qmail server on the same server with different port ?
> If yes how ?
> Thanks
You have to distinguish between the various components of qmail, for
our purposes the programs like qmail-send. qmail-inject etc. that
maintain the queue and the part that listens for
Adam Andrzej Jaworski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>also please remember that users/assign method is not suitable
>for us since - for many reasons (our auto-hosting software) -
>we have to use system accounts
qmail-users doesn't preclude the use of system accounts, it just
provides a more general
OK Thanks you very much.
I try this now.
Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
France: Tel +33 671887502
---
Note: All HTML email sent to me can be deleted for security reasons.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
A question about qmail-popup.
Here is a part of the qmail-popup manual.
qmail-popup expects descriptor 0 to read from the network
and descriptor 1 to write to the network. It reads a
username and password from descriptor 0 in POP's USER-PASS
st
Iain Morrison wrote:
>
> I was thinking that by assigning sub domains to the e.g. office1.domain.com
> etc... This would enable this to happen via DNS MX records. I would propose
> to have one system as the server that sends & receives all mail from the
> internet acting as a gateway for our inte
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Tim Hunter wrote:
> Was the message relayed? My guess, NO. If it wasn't delivered its not a
> problem.
>
> What part of "THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY." doesn't
> make sense?
Ok, so I'm gonna take a ride in the subject and ask about my relay test on
mail
No, unless you have enabled the percenthack '%' (see
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#percenthack for details) you are not a
relay.
Please stop with the questions unless you actually check for answers first.
Daniel Duclos writes:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Tim Hunter wrote:
>
>> Was the
Hola!
A new version of oMail-webmail is now available! This is
version 0.96.1, with lots of fixes and major improvements :
Major changes since last pre-release:
* integrated search engine in each mail folder
* automatic email-addresses grabbing by reading
existing mes
hello, sorry for the off topic post.
real quick; had a server x.x.x.110 running sendmail.
getting complaints of spam originating from that box.
removed IP, still getting complaints.
turned system off, still getting complaints.
Can an IP be spoofed so totally in mail headers?
headers:
Received:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:00:32PM -0500, mick wrote:
> hello, sorry for the off topic post.
> real quick; had a server x.x.x.110 running sendmail.
> getting complaints of spam originating from that box.
> removed IP, still getting complaints.
> turned system off, still getting complaints.
>
> C
The system is off, and has had that ip removed. It no longer belongs to a
functioning system. 207.179.205.110 if it helps.
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Alex Pennace wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:00:32PM -0500, mick wrote:
> > hello, sorry for the off topic post.
> > real quick; had a server x.x.x
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Alex Pennace wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:00:32PM -0500, mick wrote:
> > hello, sorry for the off topic post.
> > real quick; had a server x.x.x.110 running sendmail.
> > getting complaints of spam originating from that box.
> > removed IP, still getting complaints.
>
mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can an IP be spoofed so totally in mail headers?
Short answer: yes. Spammers are getting better at spoofing mail headers, as
misguided "spam protection" features in MTAs force them to.
Long answer: can't analyze the situation properly when you munge header
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Can an IP be spoofed so totally in mail headers?
>
> Short answer: yes. Spammers are getting better at spoofing mail headers, as
> misguided "spam protection" features in MTAs force them to.
>
> Long answer
> From: mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:00:54 -0500 (CDT)
>
> hello, sorry for the off topic post.
> real quick; had a server x.x.x.110 running sendmail.
> getting complaints of spam originating from that box.
> removed IP, still getting complaints.
> turned system off, sti
Medi Montaseri wrote:
>
> I know of a feature in SGI's File System that launches an event when something
> including data changes happen to a file. This might be a generic Journalling FS
> feature. In which case installing a JFS might be one way. However I am not sure
> of the current state of JF
Thanks Dave,
of course, I just realized that Keith talked about just qmail-users,
not in context "Single-UID based POP3 box By Paul Gregg"
- I'm sorry Keith -
anyway, it seems that I should start hacking around the qmail :-)
I will let you know, folks, if it will be a success, since
I'm not a pro
Hi, I recently switched our Communigate (which was carshing a lotand required
exoensive update) to qmail + ezmlm-idx.
Qmail is working great so far.
Ezmlm is pretty good do, even if it's a little harder to get the kind of
mailing list we want here.
We need announcement only list, this is one po
Is it possible to ONLY use virtual domains? I'd like to do this for
oganizational sake more than anything else (I am using vmailmgr and like to
have each domain controlled under on home dir). For example, let's say I
have a machine named mail.mydomain.com. The MX record for mydomain.com
poi
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 11:35:28PM -0400, Sean Brown wrote:
> Is it possible to ONLY use virtual domains? I'd like to do this for
> oganizational sake more than anything else (I am using vmailmgr and like to
> have each domain controlled under on home dir).
Yes. I have an organization with abo
Hello:
I have followed www.lifewithqmail.org instructions. The server is OpenBSD
2.8. This was my first qmail installation. At the office I installed OpenBSD
and Qmail and followed instructions and have had no problem. I installed
pop/smtp stuff.
At home I have another obsd bo
Hi,all:
I have built a qmail on my firewall.when I connect qmail from my client MUA,I found
the
speed is very slow.The welcome information will not been seen in a minutes. Why
this things happened ?
and because I use firewall ,there are tow NICs. When I see the orignal information of
the
lett
Hi,
Check your Reverse DNS records. Your client IP's should have Reverse DNS
records or at least the subnet of your clients should be recorded in IP
Reverse Mappings on your name server.
Or maybe, you can disable Reverse DNS Lookups of your Mail Server.
Take it easy.
qmail
Simply The Best
Hi All Great
I am new this list pls excuse for any
kidding
How can i subscribe to ezmlm mailing list so
that when
I suscribe to the mailing list i should
be directly subscribe to it
Without i had to send any reply
confirmation
Regards
49 matches
Mail list logo
