On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, James Stevens wrote:
You are correct ;) Sendmail can only sustain one exsistance of it's
delivery object meaning it can't multithread like the newer MTA's soo
when sendmail runs a large q say 10k messages all those messages go into
q and get piped out through one
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 05:54:20AM +0200, Marco Calistri wrote:
On 25-Apr-2001 Tim Legant wrote:
1. Do you want your email address to be [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Yes that's my official INTERNET address
2. Can you receive mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Yes I can if I avoid to touch my
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 03:59:04PM -0700, Brett wrote:
Does anybody know the maximum concurrency for sendmail? From what I
understand, with the big concurrency patch, it's 500 for qmail but I can't
find any data on sendmail. Thanks in advance.
sendmail doesn't have concurrency-limiting. With
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 06:01:15PM -0700, Brett wrote:
Below, you say that you think the big concurrency patch is useless but in
your testing:
http://www.lamer.de/maex/creative/software/qmail/deliveries/,
your lowest evaluation was for 150 remote connections and qmail's default
maximum
Hi guys,
if there is someone who ever tried ezmlm.
I tried to compile it, but failed. It said:
root@omega:/usr/local/ezmlm-0.53# make
./compile ezmlm-make.c
ezmlm-make.c: In function `main':
ezmlm-make.c:135: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'
./compile auto-str.c
auto-str.c: In
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:18:28AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
root@omega:/usr/local/ezmlm-0.53# make
./compile ezmlm-make.c
ezmlm-make.c: In function `main':
ezmlm-make.c:135: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'
./compile auto-str.c
auto-str.c: In function `main':
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:18:28AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if there is someone who ever tried ezmlm.
I tried to compile it, but failed. It said:
Correct, YOU failed not the compiler :-))
auto-str.c: In function `main':
auto-str.c:15: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'
qmail Digest 26 Apr 2001 10:00:00 - Issue 1346
Topics (messages 61388 through 61490):
per-recipient VERP with other MTAs
61388 by: Balazs Nagy
Return-Path is root - why ?
61389 by: Lukasz Felsztukier
61401 by: Karsten W. Rohrbach
ezmlm questions
61390 by:
Hi!
Does anyone know, if there would be any promblems
installing qmail+vpopmail using Maildir's on a RedHat 7.1 installation? I'm
hosting a few domains...
I already have it installed on an earlier version
of RedHat, but I'm planning to reinstall the server. My only concern is about
Hallo qmailer ;)
i tried to install the autoresponder from Bruce Guenter and it's
working, inspite of the fact that the responded message doesn't have
anysenderaddress.the sender alway look like this
@ieb.net.
Does any have a hint for me.
ciao Lars
On 0, Mark Delany [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:32:12PM +, Subba Rao wrote:
I have followed the instructions on DJB's site to install and start svscan.
On Linux and other SVR4-based systems with /etc/inittab, add SV:123456:respawn
:env -
Hi all!
I'm new to this list and haven't found a solutions in the archives.
Rather, I found a solution which should have worked, but didn't.
My setup is qmail 1.03, vpopmail, SuSE Linux.
I need all incoming mails for a certain user to be copied to 2 POP
accounts, i.e. all incoming mails to
Has anyone seen a memory leak problem with qmail using any or all of the
following patches:
- Outgoing IP Patch
- 0.0.0.0 patch
- badrcptto patch
- tarpit patch
after making and installing the memory would go to almost nothing (with
minimal swapping, however) and qmail would constantly report
Barry Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anyone help me here?
I'm sure there are many competent people on the vpopmail list.
Regards, Frank
Webmail www.netwinsite.com.
KF
- Original Message -
From:
Thomas Rokamp
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 7:27
PM
Subject: RedHat 7.1 and
qmail+vpopmail
Hi!
Does anyone know, if there would be any promblems
installing
* K. F. YIm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010426 09:09]:
Thomas Rokamp
Does anyone know, if there would be any promblems installing
qmail+vpopmail using Maildir's on a RedHat 7.1 installation? I'm
hosting a few domains... I already have it installed on an earlier
version of RedHat, but I'm
Hi,
Thursday, April 26, 2001, 1:54:44 PM, you wrote:
Can anyone help me here?
FT I'm sure there are many competent people on the vpopmail list.
Aha? I assumed it was a qmail issue, because .qmail files are
evaluated by qmail itself, regardless of where they are ... But thanks
for the
I am looking to HOWTO Mail Administrator:
- 6.1.5. Testing qmail
Now it is configured, try:
sh -cf '/var/qmail/rc '
to launch qmail (it won't interfere with your
localMTA), then:
echo to: mylogin | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
You should receive this mail in the
Barry Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Aha? I assumed it was a qmail issue, because .qmail files are
evaluated by qmail itself, regardless of where they are ...
That's the case for your successful try. Inside a user directory
the delivery is done by a vpopmail program.
Look at .qmail-default in
Hy all,
I need to redirect all unrecognized messages for a virtual domain to a
directory where another program(maildirsmtp) will catch it and send it to
another mailserver.
To let the unrecognized messages into the specified directory, i'm using
the following .qmail-default command line:
|
I need all incoming mails for a certain user to be copied to 2 POP
accounts, i.e. all incoming mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should go to:
/home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.com/test/Maildir/
/home/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.com/test1/Maildir/
The archives said that I should simply set up a
Okidoki, so more precise instructions: show us the output of all the
commands below.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 08:17:27AM +, Subba Rao wrote:
1. Is the inittab entry all on one line? Show us.
Do
grep ^SV /etc/inittab
3. Does /service exist? Show us with ls.
Do
ls -ld /service
[tail between my legs]
burned by my fat fingers again! fixed the type-o in my SOA
record and it worked great.
Thanks everyone for your responses. Very helpfull as usual.
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Willy De la Court wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, April 25,
qmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to redirect all unrecognized messages for a virtual domain to a
directory where another program(maildirsmtp) will catch it and send it to
another mailserver.
To let the unrecognized messages into the specified directory, i'm using
the following
I backed up the contents of a few Maildirs and now I'd like to put
these messages into the new Maildirs. What's the best way to do this?
Is it safe to simply copy them in?
Thanks,
Steven
Steven Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I backed up the contents of a few Maildirs and now I'd like to put
these messages into the new Maildirs. What's the best way to do this?
Is it safe to simply copy them in?
Yes. The Maildir naming convention Dan uses prevents filename collisions.
Just
(I searched the mail archives briefly but did not see any discussion
of this. My apologies if I missed it.)
This is the new RFC which supersedes RFC821 as the SMTP specification:
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html
The grammar in sections 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 appears not to permit [] as
the
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:53:50PM -0500, John Hogan wrote:
yep, popper's running...
qmail is configured to ~/Mailbox, tests, performs local delivery and receipt
What popper? qmail-pop3d only does Maildir.
Greetz, Peter.
i was running just regular, old, linux distribution flavored popper... must i switch?
- hogan
At 09:17 PM 4/26/2001 +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:53:50PM -0500, John Hogan wrote:
yep, popper's running...
qmail is configured to ~/Mailbox, tests, performs local
I know it is a off topic.
what can it be ?
##compiling qmail
make: warning: Clock skew detected. Your build may be incomplete.
#
THX.
date of yoru computer is either in way long in future or somethin like 1979
or somethin:) use ntpdate to update your clock
- Original Message -
From: Linux!audimed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 3:48 PM
Subject: off topic qmail compiling error
* Linux!audimed [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010426 16:05]:
I know it is a off topic.
Then why don't you choose an appropriate forum? /join #lusers
make: warning: Clock skew detected. Your build may be incomplete.
man date - and remember, kids: reboots are for hardware changes.
--
Robin S. Socha
thanks for the off-list advice...
i thought i'd let everyone know - building a sym-link from /var/spool/mail/username to
~(username)/Mailbox did the trick... popper must have been looking at the old
/var/spool i'll have to figure out a way to change popper and release those nasty
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 06:04:36PM +, qmail wrote:
OH, do you know the variable name wich refers to the qmail-local messages
names? If I use the same name that qmail-local uses I wouldn't have name
collisions, right?
Is it possible?
As Charles mentioned there is no variable.
But you
what it probably means is that you're building across an NFS mount, and that the
machine you're compiling on is reading a modification time for the source file
as being in the future.
biggest possible problem is make not properly determining which source files
have been altered, and not
About your question below,
I had that problem too, however I fixed it opening
the original code of qmail (qmail-1.03.tar.gz)
and sharing a common folder wrote a shared temporary file
to comunicate between qmail to my program.
In add you must not use my entire solution that was
originate some
Hi,
Preferred permissions are 700.
By my last qmail-installation I've given the maildirs the right 703.
I think that is also a good setting for that.
Some time ago I've asked about the rights for the maildirs, with 703 I
think there is a good security for the maildirs.
Regards,
Ruprecht
Thank you, it's working fine!
Markus Stumpf escritas:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 06:04:36PM +, qmail wrote:
OH, do you know the variable name wich refers to the qmail-local messages
names? If I use the same name that qmail-local uses I wouldn't have name
collisions, right?
Is
Ruprecht Helms wrote:
By my last qmail-installation I've given the maildirs the right 703.
I think that is also a good setting for that.
Uh, sure, if you don't mind any fool process or user writing stuff in your
mail directories. Remember, qmail assumes the rights and permissions of
the user
Hi everyone:
I can't make qmail-queue patch work: I always get 451 unable to exec qq
(#4.3.0) when finishing DATA with a . on a line by itself (telnet to port
25). The interesting part is, whenever QMAILQUEUE environment variable is
set, no matter its value, the mail doesn't end in qmail-queue.
On 26-Apr-2001 Tim Legant wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 05:54:20AM +0200, Marco Calistri wrote:
[..cut]
5. Do you actually have the following, individual machines on your
network?
a. ik5bcu.ampr.org
b. linux.ik5bcu.ampr.org
Yes,on b I have qmail and fetchmail and this is
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:10:01PM +0200, Ruprecht Helms wrote:
Some time ago I've asked about the rights for the maildirs, with 703 I
think there is a good security for the maildirs.
Well, if you have a good reason to let every user on the system write
anything they want into your maildirs,
I've convinced management (at my current employer) to give me a
chance to replace our Netscape (and, hopefully soon, MS Exchange)
server(s) with qmail. I installed, configured, and managed a qmail
(+vpopmail+sqwebmail) server at my previous employer, after dumping
the Netscape server I had
When I did install the ucspi-tcp package I receive the following
error-message (var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd):
tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: adress already use
I did install ucspi-tcp as described (http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp.html)
There must be some problems with inetd...
How can I solve this
you already have a service listening on port 25. a likely culprit is
sendmail. make sure that it's shut off, and make sure that you check
/etc/inetd.conf. if there's something in there listening on the smtp
port, comment it out, and kill -HUP inetd's pid.
dan
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, jx001
At 27.04.2001 02:20, you wrote:
When I did install the ucspi-tcp package I receive the following
error-message (var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd):
tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: adress already use
I did install ucspi-tcp as described (http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp.html)
There must be some problems
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 08:20:24AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Chris Hellberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As in the life with qmail document, I'm told that qmail doesn't give
deffered delievery messages like Sendmail does, but I've heard from the
archives that there's a patch to turn it on.
I'm going through all of the qmail/djbdns/etc. archives, but it is slow
going.
I've used sendmail/DNS/BIND on various unix boxes for years and am
absolutely sick of them.
I would like to use qmail and Cyrus IMAP and djbdns, etc. on a single Redhat
7.0 server that has 8 IP addresses for 8
There are sources for a database that is compatible with procmail(1)
scripts, qmail, etc., and audits the IP addresses in Received:
headers at:
http://www.johncon.com/john/receivedIP/
in case anyone wants to construct a personal BL for offline/uucp
systems.
John
BTW, would
Actually, I submitted my prior email too quickly.
I have also found the info about Courier IMAP/VMailMgr, and the omail info
as well.
It seems to me that MailDirs still require a login account/home directory
for each webmail user. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Please advise.
I've been seeing a lot of the following ever since I started accepting mail
for a particular domain.
988341350.667080 tcpserver: pid 10036 from 138.220.29.7
988341350.668046 tcpserver: ok 10036 matrixit.net:216.58.86.3:25
:138.220.29.7::2037
988341350.672839 10036 220 matrixit.net ESMTP
I guess qmail-LDAP will eliminate the need to have user accounts/home
directories for the webmail users.
I don't see any documentation in the Life with Qmail/Ldap about virtual
domains, although I do see info about virtual users.
I guess VMailMgr (with Qmail/LDAP) will allow me to set up
Hi:
I have a Linux platform Red Hut 7.0 working on qmail, vopmail, qmailadmin
and sqlwebmail. My virtual domains work great. I have the following inquiry
as follow:
- I have an NT with an application with domain xxx.com name of with the
following IP address.xxx.xxx.xxx.38
- I created a
Chris Hellberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As in the life with qmail document, I'm told that qmail doesn't give
deffered delievery messages like Sendmail does, but I've heard from the
archives that there's a patch to turn it on.
Well, I think it's actually an add-on (a Perl script run from
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:42:53AM -0700, Steven Katz wrote:
I backed up the contents of a few Maildirs and now I'd like to put
these messages into the new Maildirs. What's the best way to do this?
Is it safe to simply copy them in?
yes
--
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster
I´m using the qmail server under linux enviroment but my costumers are
using my software under the Windows platform.
My Win software was created in C language and it is a very rush program,thus
it overloads the qmail recipient pile.
So, I had been wondering about a way to retrieve how many
On 0, Subba Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:32:12PM +, Subba Rao wrote:
I have followed the instructions on DJB's site to install and start svscan.
On Linux and other SVR4-based systems with /etc/inittab, add SV:123456:respawn
:env -
Adren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I had been wondering about a way to retrieve how many messages are
waiting for delivery (from qmail server).
qmail-qstat (or mailq) will give you this information, among other bits.
You just need a way to get it to whoever cares; that could be as simple as a
At 26.04.2001 18:36, you wrote:
I´m using the qmail server under linux enviroment but my costumers are
using my software under the Windows platform.
My Win software was created in C language and it is a very rush program,thus
it overloads the qmail recipient pile.
So, I had been wondering about a
I'd like to ask you: is this procedure dangerous? There is the
possibility
of loosing messages, receive attacks, or something I can't imagine now?
Yes. You said $$ was the PID; that can wrap (especially if you're on a
system
with 15- or 16--bit PIDs), and you get a filename
OH, do you know the variable name wich refers to the qmail-local messages
names? If I use the same name that qmail-local uses I wouldn't have name
collisions, right?
Is it possible?
Charles Cazabon escritas:
qmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to redirect all
i have qmail all configured, tested and working in a local environment... when i send
a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the message is not downloaded by a third-party UA and is
only available at the command line (pine)
any ideas?
- hogan
Hi John,
Thursday, April 26, 2001, 7:16:38 PM, you wrote:
JH i have qmail all configured, tested and working in a local
JH environment... when i send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the
JH message is not downloaded by a third-party UA and is only
JH available at the command line (pine)
JH any
qmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to ask you: is this procedure dangerous? There is the
possibility of loosing messages, receive attacks, or something I can't
imagine now?
Yes. You said $$ was the PID; that can wrap (especially if you're on a
system with 15- or 16--bit
qmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OH, do you know the variable name wich refers to the qmail-local messages
names? If I use the same name that qmail-local uses I wouldn't have name
collisions, right?
Is it possible?
Yes, it's possible -- but there's no environment variable holding the
John Hogan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have qmail all configured, tested and working in a local environment...
when i send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the message is not downloaded by a
third-party UA and is only available at the command line (pine)
If NFS is involved, make sure that the
yep, popper's running...
qmail is configured to ~/Mailbox, tests, performs local delivery and receipt
new messages are received in Pine just fine, but not by a remote UA
- hogan
At 07:42 PM 4/26/2001 +0100, Barry Hill wrote:
Hi John,
Thursday, April 26, 2001, 7:16:38 PM, you wrote:
JH i
67 matches
Mail list logo
