Re: mailserver, can traceroute, cannot make SMTP connection

2001-04-30 Thread postmaster
When I telnet to the host, the connection just hang. For example, I telnet to mta.excite.com 25, it just hang, no response but I can receive mail from their site. I hope I could get more idea on analyzing why the problem occured. Yes, I know that the problem seemed to be on my side, but what

POP3 Login

2001-04-30 Thread Aaron Goldblatt
I'm experiencing a curious issue with qmail-popup/pop3d. qmail-popup is being called by tcpserver. It even works. POP3 server: wndrgrl.goldblatt.net 208.190.130.82/27 Other interface: 10.1.1.10 The 208.190.130.82 works quickly, efficiently, as expected, but in public. This interface is a 1

Return messages from postmaster

2001-04-30 Thread Angel Durán
Hello,  I'm using vpopmail, and I have multiple domains in the same host.   When sending a message to a non existent user in that domains, the sender never gets a return message indicating the problem, but the postmaster receives a copy of the original message.   Here is the log generated:  

RE: Return messages from postmaster

2001-04-30 Thread davidu
postmaster has been set as a catch-all account.   If [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't exist, postmaster will get it.(postmaster gets *@domain.com, minus existing users)  If you want it to bounce, simply turn off the catch-all for postmaster and only [EMAIL PROTECTED] email will be delivered.   -dav

qmail Digest 30 Apr 2001 10:00:01 -0000 Issue 1350

2001-04-30 Thread qmail-digest-help
qmail Digest 30 Apr 2001 10:00:01 - Issue 1350 Topics (messages 61636 through 61668): qmail-inject 61636 by: C P 61637 by: Frank Tegtmeyer Which IMAP do you prefer with qmail? 61638 by: q question 61639 by: Robin S. Socha trouble with qmail 61640 by

Re: POP3 Login

2001-04-30 Thread Chris Johnson
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 03:15:41AM -0500, Aaron Goldblatt wrote: > When I try to retrieve mail via POP3 on the PRIVATE interface, it works, > but where the public side takes about two seconds to complete an empty > transaction, the private one takes as much as 60 seconds to authenticate > (Eudo

Re: POP3 Login

2001-04-30 Thread qmail mailing list
- Original Message - From: "Chris Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Aaron Goldblatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 12:17 PM Subject: Re: POP3 Login Maybe it would be a good idea to discuss the options of tcpserver more thoroughly in LWQ and othe

Re: POP3 Login

2001-04-30 Thread QML Killer
> "qmail" == qmail mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - Original Message - Typical OE luser. -- "Windows isn't a virus, viruses do something."

RE: POP3 Login

2001-04-30 Thread Wagner Teixeira
> > I'm experiencing a curious issue with qmail-popup/pop3d. > [snip] > > When I try to retrieve mail via POP3 on the PUBLIC interface, all > goes well. > > When I try to retrieve mail via POP3 on the PRIVATE interface, it works, > but where the public side takes about two seconds to complete an e

Re: How can qmail scale?

2001-04-30 Thread Henning Brauer
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 09:30:07AM +0800, Foo Ji-Haw wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to set up qmail to support a 200,000 user domain. Can someone pls > recommend a feasible way to do this? I don't think adding 200,000 records in > /etc/passwd is such a good idea. It's even not possible on 32bit

Re: POP3 Login

2001-04-30 Thread Henning Brauer
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:21:32PM +0200, qmail mailing list wrote: > Maybe it would be a good idea to discuss the options of tcpserver more > thoroughly in LWQ and other qmail howto's. Dave already has this issue on his list for lwq. -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS|

Maildrop : Good info/examples ?

2001-04-30 Thread Tom Vandeplas
Hi all, I am experimenting with dropmail in a combination with qmail... Problem is it doesn't seem to work properly. Does anybody know where I can find some good information / examples. What I tried: in ~/.qmail |/usr/local/bin/maildrop in ~/.mailfilter if(/^From: *[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

Re: Maildrop : Good info/examples ?

2001-04-30 Thread Robert Sander
On 30 Apr 2001 14:50:31 +0200, Tom Vandeplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > in ~/.qmail >|/usr/local/bin/maildrop > > in ~/.mailfilter >if(/^From: *[EMAIL PROTECTED]/) >{ > to INBOX.qMail List >} > > in /etc/maildroprc >DEFAULT="./Maildir" You really want to subscrib

[Announce] oMail-webmail 0.98.2

2001-04-30 Thread Olivier M.
Bonjour! A new version of oMail-webmail is now available: this is version 0.98.2, with some news: Major changes since 0.97: * Security fix: remote IP is checked again * new configuration variables (fixed/variable font) * FreeBSD fixes * new translation for Czech

queue problems

2001-04-30 Thread Neil Grant
hi how can I completely purge queue of messages and fix the annoying bounce message? ... unforunately half asleep I noticed a problems with a message and deleted without stopping qmail 2001-04-29 01:47:12.220485500 delivery 4: deferral: Connected_to_139.222.230.4_but_sender_was_rejected./Remote

Re: queue problems

2001-04-30 Thread Charles Cazabon
Neil Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... unforunately half asleep I noticed a problems with a message and deleted > without stopping qmail Download queue-fix from the link at www.qmail.org and compile it -- if you're using the big-todo patch for qmail, you'll also need to patch queue-fix.

username@domain@domain relay hole !

2001-04-30 Thread Nissim Penias
Hello all ,   I have recently installed a new qmail server an i am interested in working with soon but i figured out that qmail doesn't solve the  situation of relaying this address type:   username@domain@domain while username@domain is the person to which i am intersted in sending mail and

Re: Where does the mail goes?

2001-04-30 Thread Marco Calistri
On 30-Apr-2001 Tim Legant wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 01:40:15AM +0200, Marco Calistri wrote: >> If my $HOME doesn't contains any dot qmail or even it is empty, >> where the incoming mail is stored? > > Does the file exist, or not? If it doesn't exist, qmail follows the > default delivery i

Re: username@domain@domain relay hole !

2001-04-30 Thread Charles Cazabon
Nissim Penias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have recently installed a new qmail server an i am interested in working > with soon but i figured out that qmail doesn't solve the situation of > relaying this address type: > > username@domain@domain [...] > I am sure that you all concerned about

username@domain@domain relay hole !!!

2001-04-30 Thread Nissim Penias
Hello all ,   I have recently installed a new qmail server an i am interested in working with soon but i figured out that qmail doesn't solve the  situation of relaying this address type:   username@domain@domain while username@domain is the person to which i am intersted in sending mail and

Fw: username@domain@domain relay hole !

2001-04-30 Thread Nissim Penias
- Original Message - From: Nissim Penias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 4:40 PM Subject: Re: username@domain@domain relay hole ! > > - Original Message - > From: Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: POP3 Login

2001-04-30 Thread |nix ZixinG
Hi. I also have the same problem 2 days ago. And I solved it after some kind soul helped me out. Anyway, just add -R and the -H switch to tcpserver. -R disables IDENT -H disables reverse DNS lookups Your new line should look like this /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R -H 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-p

Re: Fw: username@domain@domain relay hole !

2001-04-30 Thread Charles Cazabon
Nissim Penias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > username@domain@domain > > > [...] > > > > I am sure that you all concerned about this as I do because it makes > > > > your server an open relay to this trick . > > > No, it doesn't. What makes you think it does? To qmail, there's > > > nothi

Re: queue problems

2001-04-30 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Charles Cazabon wrote: >Neil Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> ... unforunately half asleep I noticed a problems with a message and deleted >> without stopping qmail > >Download queue-fix from the link at www.qmail.org and compile it -- Doesn't seem to be

Re: username@domain@domain relay hole !

2001-04-30 Thread Robert Geller
At 08:20 AM 4/30/01 -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: >Nissim Penias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have recently installed a new qmail server an i am interested in working > > with soon but i figured out that qmail doesn't solve the situation of > > relaying this address type: > > > > username

wildmat patch ???

2001-04-30 Thread Nissim Penias
Hello all ,   I opened qmail-1.03.tar.gz and patched it with the wildmat patch and ren : make qmail-smtpd  in order to activate the badmailpatterns .   During compilation of the qmail-smtpd i get the folowing error : qmail-smtpd.c : In function `main': qmail-smtpd.c:417:return type of `main

Re: username@domain@domain relay hole !

2001-04-30 Thread Markus Stumpf
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:27:57AM -0400, Robert Geller wrote: > I think Nissim is correct. I have tested several qmail servers and this > does happen. I am sure he is not: $ telnet mail.space.net smtp Trying 195.30.0.8... Connected to mail.space.net. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mail.space.ne

Re: username@domain@domain relay hole !

2001-04-30 Thread Charles Cazabon
Robert Geller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > username@domain@domain > >[...] > > > I am sure that you all concerned about this as I do because it makes your > > > server an open relay to this trick . > > > >No, it doesn't. [...] > >In no circumstances will the message be relayed to the ser

Postmaster : "sorry, no mailbox here with that name" - fastforward problem ?

2001-04-30 Thread jcarreiro
hello,   i have a qmail virtual domain "test.com" with vpopmail. all virtual users works fine. i have created /etc/aliases and put some aliases like "postmaster: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"   launched /var/qmail/bin/newaliases to create /etc/aliases.cdb (this is ok)   i have puted this line "/var/qmai

Re: username@domain@domain relay hole !

2001-04-30 Thread Markus Stumpf
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 10:37:20AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > If baz.net is in rcpthosts, but not in locals or virtuals, qmail will then > forward the whole thing on to the primary MX for baz.net. If this is what is > happening, it's not (unauthorized) relaying at all, and doesn't involve >

Postmaster - fastforward problem

2001-04-30 Thread jcarreiro
hello,   i have a qmail virtual domain "test.com" with vpopmail. all virtual users works fine. i have created /etc/aliases and put some aliases like "postmaster: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"   launched /var/qmail/bin/newaliases to create /etc/aliases.cdb (this is ok)   i have puted this line "/var/qma

Re: POP3 Login

2001-04-30 Thread Rick Updegrove
From: "|nix ZixinG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -R disables IDENT > -H disables reverse DNS lookups Actually thats not always enough. I had -H and -R and still had the dreaded slow response times. http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html says (and LWQ should also) -l localname: Do not look up the l

¾Ç©f³Q....XXX...

2001-04-30 Thread ªü±l
Às­ô, ¤µ¦~¯uªº¤£¦n¹L,§Ú¤w¸g´«¤FN­Ó¤u§@.. §@«á¤½¥q¤S­Ë³¬¤F...³o¤@®a¤½¥qÆZ¦nª±ªº.. §Ú¦b¬ü°ê¦³¸òElena¤@°_ª±¹L¥xÆW¤]¯u¥ý¶i.. §A¦n¦n¬Ý¬Ý..§Ú­Ì¤]¥i¥H¶}¤@¶¡.. «ö¤U­±ªº³s µ²- ©P¬ü¶³... p.s. ¬P´Á¤» Friday's ¨£­±!!

[ANNOUNCE] TMDA 0.10 - python-based anti-spam system for qmail

2001-04-30 Thread Jason R. Mastaler
I'm pleased to announce a new "major" release of my Tagged Message Delivery Agent (TMDA). New in release 0.10: * The amkCrypto package is no longer necessary. With this release, only the core Python language distribution version 1.5.2 or higher is required to run TMDA. See the `UPGRADE' fi

Problem with virtualdomains and VERPs (with patch)

2001-04-30 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
qmail-send handles virtual domains (by prepending the virtual domain prefix) before it creates a Variable Envelope Return Path. This creates problems for me on my master mail server. For example, if I am the user "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", and I address a message to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", and I request

masquerading and autoeresponders

2001-04-30 Thread David Chait
Greetings, Forgive my newbieness, this is the first Unix based mail project that I have had to bring up to production standards.. Currently I have Qmail functioning in all respects but 2, #1 being Qmail must be able to rewrite the headers of outgoing mail so that it all looks to be coming

release qmailinstallmachime0.01

2001-04-30 Thread Linux!audimed
Hello list. I've made this script to get qmail1.03 working on a redhat machine in one step. I've installed so and it works, any way it must be no complete. Give me your comments the steps are: 1##put the sig 4 .gz in /usr/src/qmail and qmailinstallmachine.txt there too ##qmail-1.03.tar.gz ##ucs

Stopping Message to msglog@domain.com

2001-04-30 Thread Ted Mead
Folks, Everytime an email is sent to my qmail server, I receive a message to the postmasters account indicating that msglog is an unknown user on my domain. "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1)" My .qmail-mslog file contains nothing but comments. Is ther

Re: "A news.newusers.questions's Guide to Qmail"

2001-04-30 Thread Frank Tegtmeyer
"Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bet they'll never publish my comments... I'm afraid the same will be true for mine.

Re: Help abot qmail and vpomail

2001-04-30 Thread Keary Suska
> Huh? You are thinking of locals or virtualdomains here. The domain must be > in locals if qmail should accept and queue mail fro that domain. Yes, but *only* if the domain should not be treated as a virtual domain, or if the domain used the standard /etc/passwd for user verification. -K "Do n

Re: Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes only"?

2001-04-30 Thread John R. Levine
>One last note on this thread. While rereading the FAQ, I came across this >which indicates qmail has brakes to keep from generating denial of service >attacks. > >http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/efficiency.html > >Does qmail back off from dead hosts? >Answer: Yes. qmail has three backoff features: ..

adding custom bounce headers (was Re: How do you handle the double bounces?)

2001-04-30 Thread Jason R. Mastaler
Frank Tegtmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If the TMDA-bounces would be marked somehow (inserted header or > something like that) they could be sorted out from the double > bounces. For that tmda-filter would have to inject a self made > bounce message and use a result code of 99 instead of 10

Relay for domains in rcpthosts

2001-04-30 Thread ross
I want to allow relaying of all domains in my rcpthosts file. While I know this is a very bad thing to do this is only a very temporary measure. I have searched high and low for this...and I cant find the answer! Thanks, ross

Re: Relay for domains in rcpthosts

2001-04-30 Thread Daniel Kelley
i think you're essentially referring to how to maintain a secondary MX. qmail will not attempt local delivery to any host that is in rcpthosts, but is not in locals/me. if you are running under tcpserver, make sure that you're not preventing any connections you want, and you should be fine. O

Re: Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes only"?

2001-04-30 Thread Oleg Polyakov
--- "John R. Levine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Qmail backs off very well, but doesn't work all that well with > sendmail under heavy load. The problem is that sendmail keeps > accepting connections even when it doesn't have enough system > resources to accept mail, and tends to thrash to dea

Re: Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes only"?

2001-04-30 Thread David L. Nicol
Russ Allbery wrote: > Rather, it tries to bounce them and the bounce bounces as undeliverable. > The solution is for ORBS to stop probing systems from which no spam has > ever been sent and for which there is no reason to suspect a lack of > security. they were a lot easier to igore when they

Re: Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes only"?

2001-04-30 Thread David L. Nicol
Oleg Polyakov wrote: > > I'm not sure how qmail works if you are sending 100 messages > from server to another one. > Does it open 100 connections concurrently? it opens "maxconcurrency" connections. It doesn't have per-site concurrency limit, unles you patch it. It is reccommended, if you ar

qmail on OSF/Unix (Digital) and C2security

2001-04-30 Thread Wiroon Ruangsang
Hi all, How I can use qmail on OSF/Unix (Digital) and C2security ? I cann't authen password by checkpassword program. Can you help me ? How to? Thank you SOC

¶W§C»ù15¦TTFT LCD ¿Ã¹õ

2001-04-30 Thread ªü±l
ªü²», ÁÙ¦b¥Î¬M¹³ºÞªº¿Ã¹õ¶Ü? ¨ì®É«á¤Ó¦h¿ç®g½u¨S¦³¿ìªk"¼"°_¨Ó!!! ¨Ó¬Ý¬Ý³o¤@­Óºô¯¸...¦³ LCD TFT ªº¿Ã¹õ³á!! http://www.megarats.com ¤p«}

removing a particular *recipient* from the queue

2001-04-30 Thread Omar Thameen
How do I stop qmail from attempting to deliver a message to a particular recipient? I don't want to remove the entire message from the queue; I just want it to stop trying to deliver to a broken mail server. I already know about qmHandle, and that won't work here. I'm running qmail 1.03 and ezm

Re: removing a particular *recipient* from the queue

2001-04-30 Thread Adam McKenna
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:23:21PM -0400, Omar Thameen wrote: > How do I stop qmail from attempting to deliver a message to a particular > recipient? I don't want to remove the entire message from the queue; > I just want it to stop trying to deliver to a broken mail server. > I already know abo

Re: POP3 Login

2001-04-30 Thread Tim Legant
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 10:02:24AM -0700, Rick Updegrove wrote: > P.S. Should we all just just add the response to this FAQ our signatures? What a great idea! Tim -- * * * | 1) It's SLOW!--> "man tcpserver" - especially -R,-H,-l qmail | 2) Roaming users --> http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq

Re: masquerading and autoeresponders

2001-04-30 Thread Tim Legant
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:38:04PM -0700, David Chait wrote: >#1 being Qmail must be able to rewrite > the headers of outgoing mail so that it all looks to be coming from > bonair.stanford.edu instead of fops-monitor.stanford.edu. qmail doesn't rewrite any head

Re: release qmailinstallmachime0.01

2001-04-30 Thread Tim Legant
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 05:57:21PM -0300, Linux!audimed wrote: > Hello list. > I've made this script to get qmail1.03 working on a redhat machine in one > step. We thank you for posting this. Twice. This is much clearer than Life With Qmail, and shorter, too. Only one step! (although it appears

Re: Stopping Message to msglog@domain.com

2001-04-30 Thread Tim Legant
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 05:03:10PM -0400, Ted Mead wrote: > Everytime an email is sent to my qmail server, I receive a message to the > postmasters account indicating that msglog is an unknown user on my domain. > > "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1)" >

Re: Relay for domains in rcpthosts

2001-04-30 Thread Tim Legant
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 07:33:17PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I want to allow relaying of all domains in my rcpthosts file. While I > know this is a very bad thing to do this is only a very temporary measure. Perhaps solution 2 or 3, below? Tim -- * * * | 1) It's SLOW!--> "man tcpser

¥_¤@¤k.......¶W¯Å»¶©f§Ú!

2001-04-30 Thread ¤ý¥Ð§Q
Às­ô, ¤µ¦~¯uªº¤£¦n¹L,§Ú¤w¸g´«¤FN­Ó¤u§@.. §@«á¤½¥q¤S­Ë³¬¤F...³o¤@®a¤½¥qÆZ¦nª±ªº.. §A¦n¦n¬Ý¬Ý..§Ú­Ì¤]¥i¥H¶}¤@¶¡.. «ö¤U­±ªº³s µ²- ©P¬ü¶³... p.s. ¬P´Á¤» Friday's ¨£­±!!

Re: removing a particular *recipient* from the queue

2001-04-30 Thread Omar Thameen
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 08:38:54PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:23:21PM -0400, Omar Thameen wrote: > > How do I stop qmail from attempting to deliver a message to a particular > > recipient? I don't want to remove the entire message from the queue; > > I just want it t