On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 08:38:54PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:23:21PM -0400, Omar Thameen wrote:
> > How do I stop qmail from attempting to deliver a message to a particular
> > recipient? I don't want to remove the entire message from the queue;
> > I just want it t
Àsô,
¤µ¦~¯uªº¤£¦n¹L,§Ú¤w¸g´«¤FNÓ¤u§@..
§@«á¤½¥q¤S˳¬¤F...³o¤@®a¤½¥qÆZ¦nª±ªº..
§A¦n¦n¬Ý¬Ý..§Ṳ́]¥i¥H¶}¤@¶¡..
«ö¤U±ªº³s
µ²-
©P¬ü¶³...
p.s. ¬P´Á¤» Friday's ¨£±!!
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 07:33:17PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I want to allow relaying of all domains in my rcpthosts file. While I
> know this is a very bad thing to do this is only a very temporary measure.
Perhaps solution 2 or 3, below?
Tim
--
* * * | 1) It's SLOW!--> "man tcpser
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 05:03:10PM -0400, Ted Mead wrote:
> Everytime an email is sent to my qmail server, I receive a message to the
> postmasters account indicating that msglog is an unknown user on my domain.
>
> "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1)"
>
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 05:57:21PM -0300, Linux!audimed wrote:
> Hello list.
> I've made this script to get qmail1.03 working on a redhat machine in one
> step.
We thank you for posting this. Twice.
This is much clearer than Life With Qmail, and shorter, too. Only one
step! (although it appears
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:38:04PM -0700, David Chait wrote:
>#1 being Qmail must be able to rewrite
> the headers of outgoing mail so that it all looks to be coming from
> bonair.stanford.edu instead of fops-monitor.stanford.edu.
qmail doesn't rewrite any head
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 10:02:24AM -0700, Rick Updegrove wrote:
> P.S. Should we all just just add the response to this FAQ our signatures?
What a great idea!
Tim
--
* * * | 1) It's SLOW!--> "man tcpserver" - especially -R,-H,-l
qmail | 2) Roaming users --> http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:23:21PM -0400, Omar Thameen wrote:
> How do I stop qmail from attempting to deliver a message to a particular
> recipient? I don't want to remove the entire message from the queue;
> I just want it to stop trying to deliver to a broken mail server.
> I already know abo
How do I stop qmail from attempting to deliver a message to a particular
recipient? I don't want to remove the entire message from the queue;
I just want it to stop trying to deliver to a broken mail server.
I already know about qmHandle, and that won't work here.
I'm running qmail 1.03 and ezm
ªü²»,
ÁÙ¦b¥Î¬M¹³ºÞªº¿Ã¹õ¶Ü? ¨ì®É«á¤Ó¦h¿ç®g½u¨S¦³¿ìªk"¼"°_¨Ó!!!
¨Ó¬Ý¬Ý³o¤@Óºô¯¸...¦³ LCD TFT ªº¿Ã¹õ³á!!
http://www.megarats.com
¤p«}
Hi all,
How I can use qmail on OSF/Unix (Digital) and C2security ?
I cann't authen password by checkpassword program.
Can you help me ? How to?
Thank you
SOC
Oleg Polyakov wrote:
>
> I'm not sure how qmail works if you are sending 100 messages
> from server to another one.
> Does it open 100 connections concurrently?
it opens "maxconcurrency" connections. It doesn't have per-site
concurrency limit, unles you patch it. It is reccommended, if
you ar
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Rather, it tries to bounce them and the bounce bounces as undeliverable.
> The solution is for ORBS to stop probing systems from which no spam has
> ever been sent and for which there is no reason to suspect a lack of
> security.
they were a lot easier to igore when they
--- "John R. Levine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Qmail backs off very well, but doesn't work all that well with
> sendmail under heavy load. The problem is that sendmail keeps
> accepting connections even when it doesn't have enough system
> resources to accept mail, and tends to thrash to dea
i think you're essentially referring to how to maintain a secondary MX.
qmail will not attempt local delivery to any host that is in rcpthosts,
but is not in locals/me.
if you are running under tcpserver, make sure that you're not preventing
any connections you want, and you should be fine.
O
I want to allow relaying of all domains in my rcpthosts file. While I
know this is a very bad thing to do this is only a very temporary measure.
I have searched high and low for this...and I cant find the answer!
Thanks,
ross
Frank Tegtmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If the TMDA-bounces would be marked somehow (inserted header or
> something like that) they could be sorted out from the double
> bounces. For that tmda-filter would have to inject a self made
> bounce message and use a result code of 99 instead of 10
>One last note on this thread. While rereading the FAQ, I came across this
>which indicates qmail has brakes to keep from generating denial of service
>attacks.
>
>http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/efficiency.html
>
>Does qmail back off from dead hosts?
>Answer: Yes. qmail has three backoff features: ..
> Huh? You are thinking of locals or virtualdomains here. The domain must be
> in locals if qmail should accept and queue mail fro that domain.
Yes, but *only* if the domain should not be treated as a virtual domain, or
if the domain used the standard /etc/passwd for user verification.
-K
"Do n
"Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bet they'll never publish my comments...
I'm afraid the same will be true for mine.
Folks,
Everytime an email is sent to my qmail server, I receive a message to the
postmasters account indicating that msglog is an unknown user on my domain.
"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1)"
My .qmail-mslog file contains nothing but comments.
Is ther
Hello list.
I've made this script to get qmail1.03 working on a redhat machine in one
step.
I've installed so and it works, any way it must be no complete.
Give me your comments
the steps are:
1##put the sig 4 .gz in /usr/src/qmail and qmailinstallmachine.txt there too
##qmail-1.03.tar.gz
##ucs
Greetings,
Forgive my newbieness, this is the first Unix based mail project that I
have had to bring up to production standards.. Currently I have Qmail
functioning in all respects but 2, #1 being Qmail must be able to rewrite
the headers of outgoing mail so that it all looks to be coming
qmail-send handles virtual domains (by prepending the virtual domain
prefix) before it creates a Variable Envelope Return Path.
This creates problems for me on my master mail server. For example,
if I am the user "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", and I address a message to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]", and I request
I'm pleased to announce a new "major" release of my Tagged Message
Delivery Agent (TMDA).
New in release 0.10:
* The amkCrypto package is no longer necessary. With this release,
only the core Python language distribution version 1.5.2 or higher
is required to run TMDA. See the `UPGRADE' fi
Àsô,
¤µ¦~¯uªº¤£¦n¹L,§Ú¤w¸g´«¤FNÓ¤u§@..
§@«á¤½¥q¤S˳¬¤F...³o¤@®a¤½¥qÆZ¦nª±ªº..
§Ú¦b¬ü°ê¦³¸òElena¤@°_ª±¹L¥xÆW¤]¯u¥ý¶i..
§A¦n¦n¬Ý¬Ý..§Ṳ́]¥i¥H¶}¤@¶¡..
«ö¤U±ªº³s
µ²-
©P¬ü¶³...
p.s. ¬P´Á¤» Friday's ¨£±!!
From: "|nix ZixinG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -R disables IDENT
> -H disables reverse DNS lookups
Actually thats not always enough. I had -H and -R and still had the dreaded
slow response times. http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html says (and LWQ
should also)
-l localname: Do not look up the l
hello,
i have a qmail virtual domain "test.com" with
vpopmail. all virtual users works fine.
i have created /etc/aliases and put some aliases
like "postmaster: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
launched /var/qmail/bin/newaliases to create
/etc/aliases.cdb (this is ok)
i have puted this line "/var/qma
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 10:37:20AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> If baz.net is in rcpthosts, but not in locals or virtuals, qmail will then
> forward the whole thing on to the primary MX for baz.net. If this is what is
> happening, it's not (unauthorized) relaying at all, and doesn't involve
>
hello,
i have a qmail virtual domain "test.com" with
vpopmail. all virtual users works fine.
i have created /etc/aliases and put some aliases
like "postmaster: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
launched /var/qmail/bin/newaliases to create
/etc/aliases.cdb (this is ok)
i have puted this line "/var/qmai
Robert Geller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > username@domain@domain
> >[...]
> > > I am sure that you all concerned about this as I do because it makes your
> > > server an open relay to this trick .
> >
> >No, it doesn't.
[...]
> >In no circumstances will the message be relayed to the ser
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:27:57AM -0400, Robert Geller wrote:
> I think Nissim is correct. I have tested several qmail servers and this
> does happen.
I am sure he is not:
$ telnet mail.space.net smtp
Trying 195.30.0.8...
Connected to mail.space.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mail.space.ne
Hello all ,
I opened qmail-1.03.tar.gz and patched it with the
wildmat patch and ren : make qmail-smtpd in
order to activate the badmailpatterns
.
During compilation of the qmail-smtpd i get the
folowing error :
qmail-smtpd.c : In function `main':
qmail-smtpd.c:417:return type of `main
At 08:20 AM 4/30/01 -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
>Nissim Penias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I have recently installed a new qmail server an i am interested in working
> > with soon but i figured out that qmail doesn't solve the situation of
> > relaying this address type:
> >
> > username
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Charles Cazabon wrote:
>Neil Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> ... unforunately half asleep I noticed a problems with a message and deleted
>> without stopping qmail
>
>Download queue-fix from the link at www.qmail.org and compile it --
Doesn't seem to be
Nissim Penias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > username@domain@domain
> > > [...]
> > > > I am sure that you all concerned about this as I do because it makes
> > > > your server an open relay to this trick .
> > > No, it doesn't. What makes you think it does? To qmail, there's
> > > nothi
Hi. I also have the same problem 2 days ago. And I solved it after some kind
soul helped me out.
Anyway, just add -R and the -H switch to tcpserver.
-R disables IDENT
-H disables reverse DNS lookups
Your new line should look like this
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R -H 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-p
- Original Message -
From: Nissim Penias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: username@domain@domain relay hole !
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello all ,
I have recently installed a new qmail server an i
am interested in working with soon but i figured out that
qmail doesn't solve the situation of relaying
this address type:
username@domain@domain while username@domain is the
person to which i am intersted in sending mail and
Nissim Penias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have recently installed a new qmail server an i am interested in working
> with soon but i figured out that qmail doesn't solve the situation of
> relaying this address type:
>
> username@domain@domain
[...]
> I am sure that you all concerned about
On 30-Apr-2001 Tim Legant wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 01:40:15AM +0200, Marco Calistri wrote:
>> If my $HOME doesn't contains any dot qmail or even it is empty,
>> where the incoming mail is stored?
>
> Does the file exist, or not? If it doesn't exist, qmail follows the
> default delivery i
Hello all ,
I have recently installed a new qmail server an i
am interested in working with soon but i figured out that
qmail doesn't solve the situation of relaying
this address type:
username@domain@domain while username@domain is the
person to which i am intersted in sending mail and
Neil Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ... unforunately half asleep I noticed a problems with a message and deleted
> without stopping qmail
Download queue-fix from the link at www.qmail.org and compile it -- if you're
using the big-todo patch for qmail, you'll also need to patch queue-fix.
hi
how can I completely purge queue of messages and fix the annoying bounce
message?
... unforunately half asleep I noticed a problems with a message and deleted
without stopping qmail
2001-04-29 01:47:12.220485500 delivery 4: deferral:
Connected_to_139.222.230.4_but_sender_was_rejected./Remote
Bonjour!
A new version of oMail-webmail is now available: this is version 0.98.2,
with some news:
Major changes since 0.97:
* Security fix: remote IP is checked again
* new configuration variables (fixed/variable font)
* FreeBSD fixes
* new translation for Czech
On 30 Apr 2001 14:50:31 +0200,
Tom Vandeplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in ~/.qmail
>|/usr/local/bin/maildrop
>
> in ~/.mailfilter
>if(/^From: *[EMAIL PROTECTED]/)
>{
> to INBOX.qMail List
>}
>
> in /etc/maildroprc
>DEFAULT="./Maildir"
You really want to subscrib
Hi all,
I am experimenting with dropmail in a combination with qmail...
Problem is it doesn't seem to work properly. Does anybody know where I
can find some good information / examples.
What I tried:
in ~/.qmail
|/usr/local/bin/maildrop
in ~/.mailfilter
if(/^From: *[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:21:32PM +0200, qmail mailing list wrote:
> Maybe it would be a good idea to discuss the options of tcpserver more
> thoroughly in LWQ and other qmail howto's.
Dave already has this issue on his list for lwq.
--
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster BSWS|
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 09:30:07AM +0800, Foo Ji-Haw wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to set up qmail to support a 200,000 user domain. Can someone pls
> recommend a feasible way to do this? I don't think adding 200,000 records in
> /etc/passwd is such a good idea.
It's even not possible on 32bit
>
> I'm experiencing a curious issue with qmail-popup/pop3d.
>
[snip]
>
> When I try to retrieve mail via POP3 on the PUBLIC interface, all
> goes well.
>
> When I try to retrieve mail via POP3 on the PRIVATE interface, it works,
> but where the public side takes about two seconds to complete an e
> "qmail" == qmail mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - Original Message -
Typical OE luser.
--
"Windows isn't a virus, viruses do something."
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Aaron Goldblatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: POP3 Login
Maybe it would be a good idea to discuss the options of tcpserver more
thoroughly in LWQ and othe
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 03:15:41AM -0500, Aaron Goldblatt wrote:
> When I try to retrieve mail via POP3 on the PRIVATE interface, it works,
> but where the public side takes about two seconds to complete an empty
> transaction, the private one takes as much as 60 seconds to authenticate
> (Eudo
qmail Digest 30 Apr 2001 10:00:01 - Issue 1350
Topics (messages 61636 through 61668):
qmail-inject
61636 by: C P
61637 by: Frank Tegtmeyer
Which IMAP do you prefer with qmail?
61638 by: q question
61639 by: Robin S. Socha
trouble with qmail
61640 by
postmaster has been set as a catch-all account.
If [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't exist, postmaster will
get it.(postmaster gets *@domain.com, minus
existing users) If you want it to bounce, simply turn off the catch-all
for postmaster and only [EMAIL PROTECTED]
email will be delivered.
-dav
Hello, I'm using vpopmail, and I have
multiple domains in the same host.
When sending a message to a non existent user in
that domains, the sender never gets
a return message indicating the problem, but the
postmaster receives a copy of the original
message.
Here is the log generated:
I'm experiencing a curious issue with qmail-popup/pop3d.
qmail-popup is being called by tcpserver. It even works.
POP3 server: wndrgrl.goldblatt.net 208.190.130.82/27
Other interface: 10.1.1.10
The 208.190.130.82 works quickly, efficiently, as expected, but in
public. This interface is a 1
When I telnet to the host, the connection just hang. For example, I telnet
to mta.excite.com 25, it just hang, no response but I can receive mail from
their site.
I hope I could get more idea on analyzing why the problem occured. Yes, I
know that the problem seemed to be on my side, but what
58 matches
Mail list logo