Re: qmailr processes

2001-07-10 Thread Daniel Kelley
> and restarted qmail, but I still get these processes sending me mail: > > qmailr 1071 0.0 0.5 888 568 ?? S12:27PM 0:00.01 qmail-remote > graycastle.com query-return-28234- > qmailr 1080 0.0 0.5 888 568 ?? S12:27PM 0:00.00 qmail-remote > graycastle.com query-return-2

Re: Problem with received from

2001-07-10 Thread Daniel Kelley
> > Uh, looking back over my data, the tcpserver line has a "0" in the > location the tcpserver --help says should be a hostname. Is this my > problem? If so, I'd feel like a complete dumbass except for I just > checked and its like that in the LWQ text. uh-oh: from http://cr.yp.to/ucspi

Re: Problem with received from

2001-07-10 Thread Daniel Kelley
> >>/var/qmail/control/me is "starnie.harrison.org" > >> > > > >something else that's interesting: why is the mail received from > >127.0.0.1? are you sedning a message via smtp from the box to the same > >box? > > > >how are you starting qmail-smtpd? > > > uh, did you read my original messa

Re: Problem with received from

2001-07-10 Thread Daniel Kelley
> The "Received: from" header has "by 0" instead of "by > starnie.harrison.org". Looking in qmail-smtpd.c, I can see where it > gets assigned: what do you have in /var/qmail/control/me? that's one place to look.

Re: Unable_to_open_./Maildir:_is_a_directory._(#4.2.1)/

2001-07-05 Thread Daniel Kelley
you're probably starting qmail with and argument that looks like this: qmail-start ./Maildir instead of this: qmail-start ./Maildir/ the trailing slash tells qmail that it should to a Maildir, and not a file. > But when I try to send myself an email, it show line like this at my > /var/lo

Re: Problem with VAR directory during install

2001-06-26 Thread Daniel Kelley
> I'm attempting to set up qmail on Mandrake 8.0. I do create > the /var/qmail directory, but when qmail compiles nothing goes > into this directory. Of course then when you run ./config it > barfs because it can't find certain things in /var/qmail. Yes, > I'm logged on as root. config doe

Re: qmail-injecting a message with 50K Bcc:

2001-06-25 Thread Daniel Kelley
> Wrong. Ezmlm is what you need. It's a high speed mailing list manager, > and with the qmail-verh patch you can have individual addressing. You > can also take input from a text file of one address per line when > subscribing the list members. does this hold true for one-time mailings? i'm sen

reasearch: qmail-qfilter freebsd segfault

2001-06-08 Thread Daniel Kelley
hi all- with some pointers from charles cazabon, i've stared to trace the occurance of qmail-qfilter segfaults on freebsd. here's what i've done: i set QMAILQUEUE to /var/qmail/bin/qmail-runfilters via tcpserver for all incoming mail: /etc/tcp.smtp: :allow,QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-run

qmail-qfilter signal 11

2001-06-04 Thread Daniel Kelley
hi- i think that someone posted earlier today regarding sporadic sig 11's on freebsd 4.2-RELEASE while running qmail-qfilter. interestingly, i just installed qmail-qfilter earlier today on the same release of freebsd, and i'm getting the same thing: Jun 4 19:46:03 mx1 /kernel: pid 64541 (qmai

Re: qmail ONLY selectively receiving mail from outside

2001-06-04 Thread Daniel Kelley
what you want to do is allow all incoming connections (i.e. don't have your /etc/hosts.allow & /etc/hosts.deny setup to drop all miscellaneous smtp connections) on port 25. if you only set RELAYCLIENT for the ip's you want, qmail will handle rejecing the emails. make sense? On Mon, 4 Jun 2001,

Re: Re[2]: Oops,I guess Sendmail wasn't secure after all...

2001-06-02 Thread Daniel Kelley
> Why no one makes a package with "all you need" to download and > install, here is a suggestion: > > - qmail > - the tcpserver > - something good for pop before smtp > - vpopmail > - good tools for blocking spam, blocking mails from open relays, and > so on > - and other additions from other pe

Re: Relay for domains in rcpthosts

2001-04-30 Thread Daniel Kelley
i think you're essentially referring to how to maintain a secondary MX. qmail will not attempt local delivery to any host that is in rcpthosts, but is not in locals/me. if you are running under tcpserver, make sure that you're not preventing any connections you want, and you should be fine. O

Re: TCPserver; ucspi-tcp; inetd

2001-04-26 Thread Daniel Kelley
you already have a service listening on port 25. a likely culprit is sendmail. make sure that it's shut off, and make sure that you check /etc/inetd.conf. if there's something in there listening on the smtp port, comment it out, and kill -HUP inetd's pid. dan On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, jx001 wrote

Re: Problem with occational duplicate e-mails

2001-04-11 Thread Daniel Kelley
some cisco firewalls (pix 520 and 515; not sure if others as well) provide facilities for rewriting connections through certain ports (smtp, sqlnet, ftp, http). the smtp rewrite is turned on by default. it only allows rfc 822 smtp commands to be passed. any other text that appears in a smtp co

Re: Problem with occational duplicate e-mails

2001-04-11 Thread Daniel Kelley
for us, it was a cisco problem (smtp fixup), but i don't think that there's been enough info given here to determine if that's the problem. if you're seeing dups on a smtp level, the firewall may be the issue. the same behavior can be caused by pop/mailbox problems; that's easier to investigate.

Re: Should I worry about these compile warnings?

2001-03-29 Thread Daniel Kelley
no. On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Sid Wilroy wrote: > maildirwatch.c:62: warning: return type of `main' is not `int' > ./load maildirwatch hfield.o headerbody.o maildir.o \ > prioq.o now.o getln.a env.a open.a strerr.a stralloc.a \ > alloc.a substdio.a error.a str.a > > idedit.c:124: warning: return ty

Re: Repeated Identical Messages

2001-03-17 Thread Daniel Kelley
i think the latter is correct. this is my fault; i'm responsible for setting up our secondary, and the admin who set up our primary told me that it was qmail-1.03. it's definitely qmail, but must be an older version. thanks- dan On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16,

451 timeout

2001-03-11 Thread Daniel Kelley
Hi all- I've been expereincing a lot of ugly errors lately: many copies of the smae emial arriving, some remte hosts can't email us at all (yes, MX records are ok). I've begun to watch everytihng that happens w/ recordio. In my log files, I'm beginning to see a distressing number of errors

recordio / logging problem

2001-03-11 Thread Daniel Kelley
hi- i'm trying to record all incoming smtp sessions using recordio, but i'm stymied by the following: /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c 100 -u -g 0 smtp \ /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd /usr/local/bin/recordio /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \ | /var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd 3 & this s

Re: Still having mutiple delivery problems.

2001-03-07 Thread Daniel Kelley
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 04:00:29PM -0500, Daniel Kelley wrote: > > > > aha! we use cucipop as well. there's only one 'error locking' message in > > the logs, but there are plenty of these: > >

Re: Still having mutiple delivery problems.

2001-03-07 Thread Daniel Kelley
bout? if outlook clients are sending messages that cause this, what steps can be taken to prevent it? thanks- dan On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 03:03:20PM -0500, Daniel Kelley wrote: > > > > i am having the *exact* same problem. it

Re: Still having mutiple delivery problems.

2001-03-07 Thread Daniel Kelley
i am having the *exact* same problem. it only happens with mails originating outside our domain, and tehre's no rhyme or reason to it. our logs do show seems to happen more often with hotmail and yahoo. it's also happend with this list! the only constant i can see between the three is that

QMTP/mail distribution

2001-03-04 Thread Daniel Kelley
hi all- i currently have a setup where one central mail server receives all mail for a primary domain, then redistributes it to subdomains (eg satellite offices) as necessary. this is currently done with fastforward and SMTP. i'd like to try out QMTP, and use this to forward mai