Anyway-for the brief question. Has anyone ever seen the problem of
emails being delivered with without the body of the message?
I would try to check that the mail actaully arrives at your system in
the format the users sending it believe it should.
I have had users of one PC mailer (Eudora)
"home qmail: 962410407.609427 delivery 33:
deferral:unable_to_open_./Maildir:_is_a_directory._(#4.2.1)/"
Presumably your delivery instruction says "./Maildir". For maildir
delivery you need a trailing slash: "./Maildir/".
Regards,
Giles
is there any body know how to install on HP UX 11.0
if any body here please send some docs
What's the problem? Where do the standard installation instructions
fail to work?
Regards,
Giles
Someone who can't be replied to "net admin admin" wrote:
I am seeing a bunch of message delivery failed bounces that says:
Too many hops 27 (MAX 25) ...
What mailer is creating this bounce? I'll bet it is sendmail, and
there is nothing you can do about it; the site(s) involved have to
I have been unable to find out why I cannot get past the error:
* ERR this user has no $HOME/Maildir
Does the user have a Maildir directory? Are the permissions correct
on it and on the home directory? What output is logged from
qmail-pop3d?
Regards,
Giles
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 11:25:30 +0200 TAG wrote:
Hi ALL
I have an urgent problem - why does the stock standard installation of
qmail-1.03 take long (30 sec)when answering an pop3 request
Are you using tcpserver? Assuming that you are, look at the -R
option to suppress ident lookups, and if
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 13:19:38 +0200 TAG wrote:
OK - thanks for the reply - but it still is not working even with the -R
option - the -M gives an error - what version of the tcpserver is that -
I am using ucspi-tcp-0.84??
Who said anything about -M? I mentioned -R and -H.
Also you
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 10:02:47 -0800 "Mike Denka" wrote:
Turns out that the solution to this problem was to make sure that the
ampersand, '', is in front of each line followed by each additional
recipient address. ...
... However the documentation makes it sound as
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 20:24:27 - "Petr Novotny" wrote:
I have recently spoken to a guy who said me something along
these lines:
"I have considered qmail once. I found it easy to install and
configure. But I had to write all the top-level domains to some file,
can't remember which
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 06:47:07 +1100 Giles Lean wrote:
It sounds like the person you were talking to had some sort of DNS
problem he or she failed to solve.
Or maybe I misunderstood. If your correspondant was concerned about
rcpthosts and locals like Russell Nelson's reply suggests
On 24 Jan 2000 05:38:20 -0800 Russ Allbery wrote:
That's just for starters. To be fair, current syslog on *most* Unix
systems is now pretty solid except for occasionally losing messages. But
among the problems I've seen or heard of in different
implementations:
Also, depending on the
[I'm sure this has been discussed before. If someone is better than I
am at nagivating the archives and can find a discussion, please point
me at it. Thanks.]
One regular sticking point for user (rather than administrator)
acceptance of qmail is that all the .qmail-* files a user creates go
I find some of the error messages from qmail to be quite terse. This
one perplexed me this morning:
Jan 9 11:19:14 nemeton qmail: 947377154.120073 delivery 9: deferral:
Unable_to_chdir_to_maildir._(#4.2.1)/
In this case I'd left a domain listed in 'locals' when I added it to
virtualdomains
On Thu, 06 Jan 2000 14:17:12 PST Bill Ataras wrote:
Is there a good faq somewhere that talks about how to handle the various
envelope and header fields from a MUA point of view?
I like:
http://cr.yp.to/immhf.html
Giles
On Tue, 28 Dec 1999 00:37:59 -0700 Andy Bradford wrote:
So, any hints as to what this new software is??? :)
http://cr.yp.to/dnscache.html
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999 17:05:24 -0600 "Chris Garrigues" wrote:
I'm using Peter Samuel's qmail vacation program and a user
complained because she got a bounce when it tried to tell a spammer
that she was on vacation.
Would it be a bad thing for vacation to set the envelope sender to
On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 15:59:27 + "John P . Looney" wrote:
Nice one. I also had a look at:
http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#procmail
Smeg, but this is going to be an evil one to get working. Seems I have to
install the qmail-procmail error number, translation software,
On Tue, 9 Nov 1999 18:06:03 -0600 (CST) "Phil Howard" wrote:
There will be hundreds of virtual domains and hundreds of userids in each.
No, make that thousands. Maybe more. What's more, the user names will
be created on the fly, so creating .qmail files in advance for every user
name
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999 17:10:49 + Emmanuel PIERRE wrote:
How can I set-up fetchmail to put downloaded mails in Maildirs ?
Either deliver it to the local mail system via SMTP, or specify a mail
delivery agent (mda line in .fetchmailrc) that writes mail to a
maildir.
Such a MDA is
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 15:39:28 -0400 (EDT) Dave Sill wrote:
However, should you chose to attempt a band-aid for a key remote site,
the approach would be to install a second qmail with a lower
concurrencyremote and redirect messages for the swamped site from the
primary qmail to the
On Sat, 9 Oct 1999 08:41:32 +0100 Peter Gradwell wrote:
My best idea so far is to deliver all the mail for all the domains
and deliver it to ~forwarder/.qmail-default. Then, that
.qmail-default file would have two lines
| rules.pl
| forward $END_ADDRESS
- now, the idea is that
On Thu, 07 Oct 1999 00:35:51 +0200 Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
Now, one or more of these patches "upgraded" /usr/lib/sendmail
I make my startup scripts remove /usr/lib/sendmail and re-create the
symlink that I want, just in case.
The introduction of a new startup file is harder to deal with,
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999 14:01:16 -0500 (EST) Chris Hardie wrote:
Hi. We're having some problems with qmail and majordomo. I've read the
FAQs on using the two together, the docs on majordomo-inject, the man
pages for qmail-inject and qmail-header, and I still don't quite know what
to do.
Hmm
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 17:51:43 +0200 "Stephan Hadan (E-Mail)" wrote:
is there anybody who has Qmail working together with HP Openmail 6.0 for
Linux ? Please tell me if it works and how it works.
qmai interacts with Openmail just like it does with any other SMTP
mail transport: it speaks SMTP.
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:10:48 +0100 (BST) Simon Woodward wrote:
We have many customers who have an ISDN lan connection, where every now and
then their ISDN machine will connect and grab its mail from a mail spool.
Basically we have sendmail configured so *anything*@blah.com is accepted by
On Mon, 14 Jun 1999 10:48:47 -0400 Dave Kitabjian wrote:
I developed a script to support holiday messages. It appears to work very
nicely with one important exception (that I expected): if a person on
holiday sends a message to another person on holiday, they get an infinite
loop of
On Sat, 12 Jun 1999 03:45:53 +0200 "Mark Weinem" wrote:
D. J. Bernstein:
This sort of idiocy happens much more often than most subscribers know,
thanks to a broken piece of software by Eric Raymond called fetchmail.
Is there a good fetchmail alternative?
Fetchmail to pick up mail
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999 09:31:50 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote:
It is very important that autoresponders not reply to certain addresses,
such as . Also for most applications they should be rate limited to
something like one message a day.
...
It would be nice if there was an rfc for
On Thu, 08 Apr 1999 16:15:41 -0500 Jerry Rose wrote:
.qmail-360
In theory, mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be delivered. Qmail spits
it back out and moans about it.
1.03 likse a ~alias/.qmail-360 file here just fine. No idea what
your problem is, sorry.
Giles
On 21 Mar 1999 19:23:54 -0800 Russ Allbery wrote:
The only major difference between qmail's sendmail and regular sendmail
that I've seen, from the perspective of the typical Unix program (and
discounting things like daemon mode), is that qmail when given a message
missing a From header
30 matches
Mail list logo
