> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 6:26 PM
> Despite the smiley, that first paragraph sounds supiciously insulting.
> And why are you trying to turn this into a dicksize war?
Oh, Charles...I'm feeling impetuous. Pleas
Gadzooks In my previous reply to Charles Cazabon
I was IMPRECISE. My rcpthosts file is NOT blank,
it has localhost in it.
Just wanted to clear that up before Charles could retort :)
Scott Zielsdorf
Senior Technical Support Consultant
Computer Instruments
9901 W. 87th St.
Overland Park, KS
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 1:52 PM
> First of all, I'm on the list, and I set Mail-Followup-To:
> appropriately. Please don't cc: me on your list messages; I hate
> duplicates and get 500-1000 messages a day al
right direction.
I'm not enough of a linux wizard yet (going on 5 days now, woohoo!) to know
how to delete xinetd. Hell, I didn't even know what xinetd was.
Scott Zielsdorf
Senior Technical Support Consultant
Computer Instruments IVR Solutions Support Group
Voice: 913.492.1888 x8862 Fax: 913.492.1483
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Subject: Re: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?
>
> Possibly the reason you were "blasted" is that this is incorrect.
LOL...You think?
> You_cannot_ make inetd or xinetd use tcpserver. Your xinetd
omorrow but tomorrow's a whole 'nother day.
Thanks again.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robin S. Socha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 4:05 PM
> To: Qmail List
> Subject: Re: Selective Relaying/tcprules check SOLVED!
>
>
> On Wed
now selective relaying is working like a champ.
Thanks for all the responses and suggestions to my stupid problem, it has
been quite a learning experience.
Scott Zielsdorf
Senior Technical Support Consultant
Computer Instruments IVR Solutions Support Group
Voice: 913.492.1888 x8862 Fax
At 11:37 01.08.2001 -0500, Lukas Beeler wrote:
> At 11:14 01.08.2001 -0500, Scott Zielsdorf wrote:
> >Once I set the TCPREMOTEIP variable I did see the rule which now
> leads me to
> >the discovery that my Windows workstations - which are DHCP
> clients - do not
> >hav
Thanks Philipp and Charles for the help on this.
Once I set the TCPREMOTEIP variable I did see the rule which now leads me to
the discovery that my Windows workstations - which are DHCP clients - do not
have entries in my DNS. So when qmail does the reverse look up, it can't
resolve the IP.
Short
or do I have a
problem there? And if it's a problem - what do I do to fix it?
Thanks,
Scott Zielsdorf
Senior Technical Support Consultant
Computer Instruments IVR Solutions Support Group
Voice: 913.492.1888 x8862 Fax: 913.492.1483
I'm having the same problem and am getting ready to reinstall Qmail to make
sure it conforms to LWQ but I can't help
but wonder if qmail is not seeing the IP coming at it. All my workstations,
the only ones I want to have relay capability,
sit on a Windows network with DHCP and NAT.
When I look a
tall qmail before reinstalling or
can I simply overwrite it?
And another newbie type question: I checked out GNUS's homepage. I am a
slave to Outlook. I
would like to break the bonds but, uh, I didn't see anything about a release
for NT Server.
Is there one? How do I get it?
Thanks,
Scott Zielsdorf
Senior Technical Support Consultant
Computer Instruments IVR Solutions Support Group
r futzing with tcp.smtp and I have ran
qmailctl restart extensively as I tinker with the settings.
Anybody? I am getting a little desperate.
Thanks.
Scott Zielsdorf
Senior Technical Support Consultant
Computer Instruments IVR Solutions Support Group
Voice: 913.492.1888 x402 Fax: 913.492.1483
13 matches
Mail list logo
