>I did have a problem with patching qmail-smtpd (I got a warning about a
>return type, see earlier e-mail on list) but I'm not sure if that's the
>problem.
>/etc/shadow is owned by user/group root.
the roots of your (and 90% of other people's problems) are 2
a) either your qmail-smtpd is not ab
>The 3.x series has been having *tons* of security problems, including
>stuff that was previously fixed in 2.x. I really don't trust it.
There is realy no point in using qpopper. I have used it in isp enviroment
and i can say that it sucks.
It doesn't do any mailbox locking, it just copies the
At 21:12 2000-05-16, you wrote:
Has anyone tried installing the
smtp-auth qmail patch after installing the amavis ant-virus
wrapper? I tried and was no longer able to send or receive
mail. I had to re-install the qmail binaries and then re-install
amavis. Any help or knowledge would be
apprecia
At 20:06 2000-05-03, Russell Nelson wrote:
>Is anyone using Krzysztof Dabrowski's cmd5checkpw with qmail-pop3d?
>Yes, I know that he didn't write it for that, he wrote it for
>smtp-auth. But it looks to me like he's reversed the password and the
>timestamp parameters to checkpassword.
;)
Isn't i
>Thanx.
>To solve this problem we are going to run two queues and only share the
>users directories.
>This sound good for you ??
>
>Thomas
Would you be so kind and share with us your experience with qmail + coda?
I'm investigating this possibility too and i would like to know how good it
is (c
>I applied the TLS patch, then the auth patch, which required some
>handwork. If you can't figure it out, I can send you some diffs.
>
>-Dave
Dave.. if you can, then send this patch to me so i can add it to my
webpage. Maybe it'll be helpfull for others too.
Kris
>Anyone know how to manually generate the proper response?
Take my cram md5 checkpassword and modify it a bit. Keyed md5 routines are
there.
http://www.elysium.pl/members/brush/cmd5checkpw
Kris
Hello,
Please, please forgive me, but yesterday's version of my SMTP AUTH patch
does not work. It was my mistake during "securing" it a bit and it went out
unchecked. Grab the latest version from:
http://www.elysium.pl/members/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
I have checked it with Eudora 4.2.2 few mi
Hello.
I have finished my smtp-auth patch for qmail. First betatesters has got it
2 days ago.
I hope that i didn't screw up anything this weekend (i have modified it a
bit without testing in real world) ,
but hey! - release early, release often!
I've updated mr. Brisby's patch to work with 2 m
Hello..
I've took mr. Brisby's patch and i'm enhancing it now.
At the moment i have implemented the PLAIN AUTH type and i'm in the middle
of CRAM-MD5.
When we'll have these 3, i can assume that most client will be able to use
this feature.
I need some beta testers so if you are interested then
> Mrs. Brisby has written a user/password based authentication
> mechanism for qmail-smtpd. This lets your microsoft's outlook
> express supports (outgoing mail server user name) and netscape
> 4.5 (and above-betas) users securely roam. Users can use a
> slightly modified
At 20:29 2000-01-22 , Sam wrote:
>On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, listy-dyskusyjne Krzysztof Dabrowski wrote:
>
> > Actualy i'll be paid to enhance the SMTP AUTH patch to support more
> > authentication types so you can expect it next month if time permits.
>
>I'm curio
At 19:09 2000-01-22 , Guan Yang wrote:
>listy-dyskusyjne Krzysztof Dabrowski wrote:
> > Actualy i'll be paid to enhance the SMTP AUTH patch to support more
> > authentication types so you can expect it next month if time permits.
>
>I thought the SMTP AUTH patch used c
>relaying. What control mechanism are you using? SMTP after POP is pretty
>easy, and I think there's stuff already on the qmail web site implementing
>it.
There is atleast one smtp client from redmond that never does POP before
SMTP if there is something to send prefering to do POP after SMTP
>Right, and if someone changes the software, that person takes on the
>support nightmare. Dan could quite reasonably say "I will only help
>you if you are using an unpatched qmail."
>
> > Dan doesn't want to be ``faced with a support nightmare---forever'', and
> > I can't say I blame him.
>
>T
>Spam would either be removed from the queue, or (and I like this better)
>sent back to the spammer (his e-mail is in the To: header). He seems to be
>connected through dial-up, so there's a chance of annoying him with sending
>everything back to him.
You can set up a .qmail-default in ~/alias/ b
At 20:25 99-05-05 , Russell Steffen wrote:
>
>
>You can choose sendmail during a fresh install. However, when you do the
>updgrade from a previous version, sendmail is forcibly installed and there
>is no obvious way to turn that off.
>
>Russ
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you haven't done "rpm -e sendmail
>stuff like 'Red Hat doing fine with qmail, 16MB 486/66, 7 messages a
keep in mind that 7 messages/day is less than 1 message/second. and
this is nothing special at all. On out peak hours we've few messages/second
and out processor usage is someting like 0.7 on p2 266.
K.
Hello..
As i can see my post provoked few interesting answers. At the moment
everything looks like that hypotetical 500.000+ mailserver could be
implemented. There are just few remaining questions. If someone knows the
answers then please share them :)
a) how one can organize an independent quot
If you like some suggetsions then you can make a switch that will prevent
your script from checking in a local or virtualdomain is in rcpthosts. We
are using RELAYCLIENT in tcpserver so rcpthosts are not neede and your
script is making too much noise.
Not that i can't grep it out but you can make
At 22:05 98-12-22 , Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
>On 22-Dec-98 Sam wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 Dec 1998, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> > Unless you knew in advance that things have been relocated, you'd find
>>> > everything where you normally expect them to be.
>>>
>>> Yep. Nothin better than an ins
>This conversation is making me yearn for reposts of FAQ 5.4. I don't
>use Linux. I don't use Redhat - these conversations have made it even
>more clear to me that I never want to use Linux or Redhat.
What EXACTLY prevent you from installing qmail on Linux? Nothing i guess.
> Why would
>anyone w
22 matches
Mail list logo
