On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 08:36:43AM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
I agree with you in general, Russ. The only benefit I can see to
comp.mail.qmail is that there is also a comp.mail.sendmail.
The impression I gain is that reception amidst vocal
qmail advocates is at best lukewarm. How
Magnus Bodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Isn't the general shift nowadays (since 1994 and forward) from news to
mailinglists just because of the big problem with
spam-address-collectors on usenet?
If that's the case, you're all already doomed; this mailing list has been
gated to two or three
Russ Allbery writes:
Darren Wyn Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Below, I've quoted a DRAFT RFD proposal for comp.mail.qmail.
I'm not sure this is a good idea, mostly because I don't see the
distinction between the newsgroup and this mailing list and I also don't
expect the people
On Wed, 31 May 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
Russ Allbery writes:
Darren Wyn Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Below, I've quoted a DRAFT RFD proposal for comp.mail.qmail.
I'm not sure this is a good idea, mostly because I don't see the
distinction between the newsgroup and this
I agree with you in general, Russ. The only benefit I can see to
comp.mail.qmail is that there is also a comp.mail.sendmail.
I suppose it might work with a two-way gateway between the newsgroup and
this list, and registration to post as it is now. I've been doing that
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
I know this is not a qmail question... but I've been trying to get my
hands on an news server address as I have none from where to see any
newsgroups. Would someone please ... give me one :) if it is not much
trouble
Thanks a lot
Guillermo
"John R. Levine" wrote:
I agree with you in
Guillermo Villasana Cardoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know this is not a qmail question... but I've been trying to get my
hands on an news server address as I have none from where to see any
newsgroups. Would someone please ... give me one :) if it is not much
trouble
Darren Wyn Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:18:39PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
I'm not sure this is a good idea, mostly because I don't see the
distinction between the newsgroup and this mailing list
^^^
Funnily enough, I don't see much of a distinction
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:55:28PM +, Darren Wyn Rees wrote:
[snip]
-=-=-=-=-=-= THIS IS A DRAFT -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
NOTES : I prefer using lowercase 'q' in qmail. But for the sake
of grammatical correctness, in the RFD I've used 'Q'.
Even grammatical correctness would dictate a lowercase
Darren Wyn Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Below, I've quoted a DRAFT RFD proposal for comp.mail.qmail.
I'm not sure this is a good idea, mostly because I don't see the
distinction between the newsgroup and this mailing list and I also don't
expect the people using the mailing list to really
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:18:39PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Darren Wyn Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Below, I've quoted a DRAFT RFD proposal for comp.mail.qmail.
I'm not sure this is a good idea, mostly because I don't see the
distinction between the newsgroup and this mailing list
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 07:33:32AM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
That is true. I currently do not read news, and also do not know when I
will be reading news again. What value will it add besides the mailinglist?
You can get a lot of nice mail from people selling things to you ;-)
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
