On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:44:06AM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
[snip]
Can anyone tell me which of the many sendmail files on my OpenBSD 2.9 system
I should remove and which I should symlink to qmail/bin/sendmail?
My system contains the following sendmail files:
From: Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
This one can stay. chmod u-s it for security.
/usr/bin/sendmail
This one needs to become a symlink.
Ok.
Are you sure there is nothing in /usr/sbin/sendmail?
There is. Missed it. Should it be a symlink too?
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:02:47PM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
[snip]
Are you sure there is nothing in /usr/sbin/sendmail?
There is. Missed it. Should it be a symlink too?
Yes.
/usr/share/sendmail
This one can stay just fine.
Oops, it's a directory. Should have noticed
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:02:47PM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
From: Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you sure there is nothing in /usr/sbin/sendmail?
There is. Missed it. Should it be a symlink too?
yes.
So what is /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail?
The actual sendmail binary.
On 9, Aug, 2001 at 02:06:28PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:02:47PM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
[snip]
Are you sure there is nothing in /usr/sbin/sendmail?
There is. Missed it. Should it be a symlink too?
On my OpenBSD CURRENT machine there's no
Hello.
Going through the qmail installation instruction is lwq. Section 2.8.3
describes how to remove sendmail. At the end of the section it says I
must
create some symlinks for the old sendmail to /var/qmail/bin/sendmail.
However the instructions give locations for sendmail that don't
Follow-up.
My system contains the following sendmail files:
/usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
/usr/bin/sendmail
/usr/share/sendmail
You sure about /usr/bin/sendmail ? On my OpenBSD v2.8 it
was /usr/sbin/sendmail
Which results in :-
mv /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 02:33:47PM +0200, Morten Liebach wrote:
[snip]
This is news to me, I've been using mailwrapper (e.g. /etc/mailer.conf)
instead.
What's so bad about mailwrapper?
It invokes the real sendmail when it gets in any kind of trouble. A
fix for this is in a FreeBSD PR that
