Hi,
I've successfully installed the qmail-smtpd-auth-0.30, but I would like
to
log the username and IP address in /var/qmail/log/smtpd/current. Is it
possible?? Currently it only logs the IP address.
My /var/qmail/supervise/smtpd/run
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
NOFILESGID=`
I'm having trouble getting this patch to work with $M outlook express or the
2000 client. When I turn on smtp auth on in these clients - it just prompts
me for a user name and password over and over again - same thing with
Netscape.
smtp startup file
[bucknum@mail1 qmail-smtpd]$ less run
#!/bin
I'm considering patching qmail with the qmail-smtpd-auth patch. The reason
is that the roaming user pop before smtp function in vpopmail doesn't work
very well with my clients mail clients. In particular if Outlook has mail in
the Outbox it will always send that first no matter what. I
Hi,
I've installed the patch of qmail-smtpd-auth-0.26 and it not working.
I'm running smtp with tcpserver:
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
MAXSMTPD=20
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -x /etc/tcp.s
Hi there,
I want to enable authenticated smtp between server and mua.
Therefor I installed either mrs.brisbys qmail-smtp patch or
the advanced version from http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
As I use vpopmail I applied all modifications mentioned in
http://members.elysium.pl
At 10:33 2000-03-21 -0600, you wrote:
>I'm having trouble getting this patch to work with $M outlook express or the
>2000 client. When I turn on smtp auth on in these clients - it just prompts
>me for a user name and password over and over again - same thing with
>Netscape.
The problem is that b
Hello..
New version of qmail-stmpd-auth patch is available at:
http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
It fixes a nasty problem with cram-md5 auth. It worked perfectly for me for
2 months and i've found the bug only recently.
Brush
Has anyone tried patching qmail with qmail-smtpd-auth and Iain Patterson's
MySQL+QMAIL patch?
I plan on doing this and would like to know in advance whether I can expect
trouble... :-)
Thanks in advance, Goran
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Bjorn Nilsen wrote:
> I'm considering patching qmail with the qmail-smtpd-auth patch. The reason
> is that the roaming user pop before smtp function in vpopmail doesn't work
> very well with my clients mail clients. In particular if Outlook has mail in
&
on 12/1/01 12:15 AM, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Bjorn Nilsen wrote:
>
>> I'm considering patching qmail with the qmail-smtpd-auth patch. The reason
>> is that the roaming user pop before smtp function in vpopmail doesn't work
>> very wel
Bjorn Nilsen wrote:
> I'm considering patching qmail with the qmail-smtpd-auth patch...
> I am rather nervous about patching rock solid qmail with a 3rd party
patch...
You're not going to find any ESMTP AUTH solutions for qmail that don't
involve patching qmail'
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Kris Kelley wrote:
> You're not going to find any ESMTP AUTH solutions for qmail that don't
> involve patching qmail's source.
This is completely false. smtp-poplock doesn't require patching the
qmail source. You can find a link to it on www.qmail.org.
Vince.
--
===
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > You're not going to find any ESMTP AUTH solutions for qmail that don't
> > involve patching qmail's source.
>
> This is completely false. smtp-poplock doesn't require patching the
> qmail source. You can find a link to it on www.qmail.org.
If I'm wrong, my apologies
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > You're not going to find any ESMTP AUTH solutions for qmail that don't
> > involve patching qmail's source.
>
> This is completely false. smtp-poplock doesn't require patching the
> qmail source. You can find a link to it on www.qmail.org.
If I'm wrong, my apologies
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Bjorn Nilsen wrote:
> on 12/1/01 12:15 AM, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Bjorn Nilsen wrote:
> >
> >> I'm considering patching qmail with the qmail-smtpd-auth patch. The reason
> >> is that the roaming user pop
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Kris Kelley wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> > > You're not going to find any ESMTP AUTH solutions for qmail that don't
> > > involve patching qmail's source.
> >
> > This is completely false. smtp-poplock doesn't require patching the
> > qmail source. You can find a li
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > If I'm wrong, my apologies. I'm not familiar with smtp-poplock, and I
was
> > basing what I said on Bjorn Nilsen's last reply, which said,
"smtp-poplock
> > is just another implementation of 'pop before smtp.'"
>
> It does the same thing - allow any client to send mail
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Kris Kelley wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > > If I'm wrong, my apologies. I'm not familiar with smtp-poplock, and I
> was
> > > basing what I said on Bjorn Nilsen's last reply, which said,
> "smtp-poplock
> > > is just another implementation of 'pop before smtp.'"
> >
>
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:44:09AM +1300, Bjorn Nilsen wrote:
> smtp-poplock is just another implementation of "pop before smtp" which I
> already have with vpopmail. I will explain in more detail why this solution
> doesn't work for me. Many mail clients the default or only action is to send
> ma
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 06:09:48PM -0500, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Kris Kelley wrote:
>
> > You're not going to find any ESMTP AUTH solutions for qmail that don't
> > involve patching qmail's source.
>
> This is completely false. smtp-poplock doesn't require patching the
>
Thus spake Henning Brauer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > This is completely false. smtp-poplock doesn't require patching the
> > qmail source. You can find a link to it on www.qmail.org.
> This is a smtp after pop solution, no SMTP AUTH. SMTP AUTH is an SMTP
> protocol extension allowing clients to a
"Manuel Gisbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Now when I connect to the server using outlook or outlook express (both are
>mentioned on the above website as working) qmail-smtpd exits with "421 out
>of memory (#4.3.0)".
>
>
>#!/bin/sh
>QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
>NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
>exec /u
At 08:22 2000-06-19 +0200, Goran Blazic wrote:
>Has anyone tried patching qmail with qmail-smtpd-auth and Iain Patterson's
>MySQL+QMAIL patch?
>I plan on doing this and would like to know in advance whether I can expect
>trouble... :-)
>
>Thanks in advance, Goran
Send me
Hello,
A new version of qmail-smtpd-auth patch has been released.
Changes:
- security fix - if your checkpassword crashed, attacker would get the relay
permission. Now it should work.
You can download it from the usual place:
http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
NOTICE: this
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 11:44:39AM +0200, Krzysztof Dabrowski wrote:
> Hello,
> A new version of qmail-smtpd-auth patch has been released.
> http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
looks nice. Do you know if it works with qmail+vmailmgr ?
(your doc only talk about vpopmail)
At 18:41 2000-10-17 +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 11:44:39AM +0200, Krzysztof Dabrowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> > A new version of qmail-smtpd-auth patch has been released.
> > http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
>
>looks nice. Do you
I have get qmail-smtpd-auth-0.26.tar.gz.
"tar xvfz qmail-smtpd-auth-0.26.tar.gz"
Then I get qmail-smtpd.patch
Now I do not know how to use is.
Please tell me how to do it. Thanks.
--
»¶ÓʹÓà 21CN µç×ÓÓʼþϵͳ http://www.21cn.com
Thank you
Hello.
I'm proud to announce a new version of qmail-smtpd-auth patch. We have
merged our effors with
Eric M. Johnston so now there is again only one qmail-smtpd-auth patch.
We have also set up a mailing list, which is available on
http://list.elysium.pl/mailman/listinfo/smtpauth .
Subs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have get qmail-smtpd-auth-0.26.tar.gz.
> "tar xvfz qmail-smtpd-auth-0.26.tar.gz"
> Then I get qmail-smtpd.patch
> Now I do not know how to use is.
> Please tell me how to do it. Thanks.
Read `man patch` (and proba
I have installed the smtpd-auth-patch to my qmail
server, Now I have two problems. One is the server does not
require me to log in to send mail, and seems to be sending mail(as far as I can
tell). The MAJOR problem I am having is that it does not seem to receive
any mail. I tried to send
30 matches
Mail list logo
