Since it is difficult to see whether you'd like us to flood them or not, I
would suggest if you need an outside test, to use hotmail or some other free
email service and send a message.
Hank Wethington
Information Logi
Roger Arnold wrote:
Hello All,
I am having difficulty checking a domain to see if it is receiving email
from outside on the Internet.
Could someone please send a test email to the following 2 addresses, so
I can check that they are receiving mail properly:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and
[EMAIL
test
Jaros³aw Bad¼mierowski
RC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >What's in the file ~alias/.qmail-root ?
>
> it says 'root'
There's your problem. `man dot-qmail` will tell you why this can't work.
The qmail install directions tell you what you should have done with
~alias/.qmail-root.
Charles
--
* RC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010517 01:27]:
> logs are showing a bunch of bounced msgs, i think because it's having
> trouble delivering to root. i played with some stuff earlier, and
> now it looks like just a bunch of error messages are getting
> delivered to alias, and not the regularly daily
At 8:19 AM -0600 5/16/01, Charles Cazabon wrote:
>RC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It's been awhile since I've been able to try this again, but the last
>> time I tried the test as per the ezmlm install instructions, I ended
>> up with this message in
In this case, how about comparing $HOST with control/locals? Someone
suggested this in a private message since when qmail rewrites a
virtualdomain address into a local one, it changes $USER, but not
$HOST. If $HOST is in locals, then it's not a virtualdomain address.
Any exceptions to this?
&g
"Jason R. Mastaler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Does anyone know of a reliable way to programatically test whether an
>incoming message is part of a qmail "virtualdomain" or not?
I think you'll have to parse control/virtualdomains.
>I've been lookin
I would say the most reliable way would be to just parse
/var/qmail/virtualdomains and compare the LHS with $HOST (although this
is a problem while somebody has updated virtualdomains but haven't sent
-HUP to qmail-send yet). Do you just need to test for these three packages
or does it ne
Does anyone know of a reliable way to programatically test whether an
incoming message is part of a qmail "virtualdomain" or not?
I've been looking at qmail-send's environment variables under
both a regular setup and a virtualdomain, and can't find a surefire
way to di
RC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's been awhile since I've been able to try this again, but the last
> time I tried the test as per the ezmlm install instructions, I ended
> up with this message in __TSTDIR__err:
> ezmlm-send: fatal: temporary qmail-queue erro
n able to try this again, but the last
> time I tried the test as per the ezmlm install instructions, I ended
> up with this message in __TSTDIR__err:
> ezmlm-send: fatal: temporary qmail-queue error: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0)
>
> as far as I know, qmail is working correctly [e
It's been awhile since I've been able to try this again, but the last
time I tried the test as per the ezmlm install instructions, I ended
up with this message in __TSTDIR__err:
ezmlm-send: fatal: temporary qmail-queue error: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0)
as far as I know, qmail
Test post to list
>
>> Was the message relayed? My guess, NO. If it wasn't delivered its not a
>> problem.
>>
>> What part of "THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY." doesn't
>> make sense?
>
> Ok, so I'm gonna take a ride in the s
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Tim Hunter wrote:
> Was the message relayed? My guess, NO. If it wasn't delivered its not a
> problem.
>
> What part of "THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY." doesn't
> make sense?
Ok, so I'm gonna take a ride
Take a look at this -- be sure to look at the two "Follow-Ups" to the
mesage:
http://lists.omnipotent.net/qmail/200010/msg00817.html
> From: "Jairo Marciano Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 13:37:11 -0300
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&
Thanks very much !!!
Jairo
- Original Message -
From: "John P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jairo Marciano Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: Relay test on abuse.net
> > R
> Relay test 6
> >>> RSET
> <<< 250 flushed
> >>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <<< 250 ok
> >>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <<< 250 ok
>
> Relay test result
> Hmmn, at first glance, host appeare
pril 16, 2001 12:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Relay test on abuse.net
My server failed in Relay Test 6 in www.abuse.net.
The result is:
Relay test 6
>>> RSET
<<< 250 flushed
>>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<< 250 ok
>>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL
Jairo Marciano Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My server failed in Relay Test 6 in www.abuse.net.
No, it didn't. This comes up all the time; read the bloody mailing list
archives.
Charles
--
---
C
My server failed in Relay Test 6 in www.abuse.net.
The result is:
Relay test 6
>>> RSET
<<< 250 flushed
>>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<< 250 ok
>>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<< 250 ok
Relay test result
Hmmn, at first gl
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 07:49:02PM +0200, Willy De la Court wrote:
> On Monday, April 09, 2001 11:11, Franco Vecchiato
> [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> >
> > - cd ~alias
> > - touch .qmail-postmaster
> > - touch .qmail-mailer-daemon
> > - touch .qmail-root
> > - chmod 644 ~alias/.qmail*
> > -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
You forgot these
# redirect postmaster and mailder-daemon mail to root
echo root > /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-postmaster
echo root > /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-mailer-daemon
# after this you have 2 choices you can create a Maildir
maildirmake /var/qma
Hi,
I'm trying to install qmail on a PC with a Suse Linux distribution (I
installed sendmail but I never configured it), and there are problems
with aliases (postmaster).
I downloaded the tar.gz packages from
www.flounder.net/qmail/qmail-howto.html
(qmail, qmail patch, daemontools, dot-forward,
test, disregard
Hi.
qmail compiled like a charm and installatioin was pretty easy.
..but..when i try to run the first test (local-to-local)
it fails :>
all qmail-daemons are running (4 + splogger) [startet via /var/qmail/rc &]
echo "to: skyper" | ltrace -f /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
...
Paco Martinez writes:
> Relay test result
> Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay.
> THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY.
>
>
> As you see "Test 9" shows that my PC has a security hole
Hello, Paco. Could
hello,everyone
I have build the qmail-ldap server.And it works well.
But how can I test the capability of my qmail server,both
send and receive?
How can I know how many letters/second it sends and receive?
root
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ "Paco Martinez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| Relay test 9
| >>> RSET
| <<< 250 flushed
| >>> MAIL FROM:
| <<< 250 ok
| >>> RCPT TO:<"relaytest%abuse.net">
| <<< 250 ok
|
| Relay test result
| Hmmn, at first glan
Hi all
I have put Qmail in my PC and I'd like to know how
to avoid my PC from spammers.
Imagine that IP address is 192.168.1.1
I have checked PC using URL: http://www.abuse.net/cgi-bin/relaytest?ADDR=192.168.1.1&ALIAS=YES
and I have obtained this message:
Relay test
"Sumith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>perl qmail-qsanity-0_52
>
>did not display anything does that mean..that my Qmail Queue system
>is set right. or what does it really mean.
What does the qmail-qsanity documentation say?
>perl qmail-lint-0_55
>Warning: users/assign checking not implemented.
Hello
I've tested my qmail system with the following two
perl scripts, downloaded from www.qmail.org
perl qmail-qsanity-0_52
did not display anything does that mean..that my
Qmail Queue system is set right. or what does it really mean.
perl qmail-lint-0_55Warning: users/assign
checki
This might be a weird request, but I am wondering if anyone would
be willing to send me virus infected emails to test my setup... all I have
here is the Anna, and my AV stops that... but if a few of you would
send me different ones, maybe ones that would get by the AV scan
>At 10:15 PM 2/7/2001, dick wrote:
>
>sigh.i think we all know the awnser
>
>read LWQ at http://www.lifewithqmail.org
>
>dave - you should charge $1.00 for every person that reads LWQ,
>you'd be a very wealthy man. :-)
If he charged $1 for everyone who _didn't_ read it before posting,
At 10:15 PM 2/7/2001, dick wrote:
sigh.i think we all know the awnser
read LWQ at http://www.lifewithqmail.org
dave - you should charge $1.00 for every person that reads LWQ, you'd be a
very wealthy man. :-)
~kurth
>any suggestion is welcome.
any suggestion is welcome.
Hi,
after setting up a qmail server I would like to stress test it a little bit
to see how many mails the server could handle and to fine tune the
parameters.
At the moment everything is set to default values as on initial setup.
Any ideas/suggestions?
Are there some testing skripts available
forget this
On Friday 05 January 2001 15:23, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Michael Maier writes:
> > > >No, it hasn't a Mail Header in it.
> > >
> > > Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner.
> > >
> > > Sean
> >
> > But why it works for 100 Mails then ?
>
> Who knows??? It shouldn't have worked.
Much as I h
Michael Maier writes:
> > >No, it hasn't a Mail Header in it.
> >
> > Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner.
> >
> > Sean
>
> But why it works for 100 Mails then ?
Who knows??? It shouldn't have worked.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com |
Crynwr sells support
> >No, it hasn't a Mail Header in it.
>
> Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner.
>
> Sean
But why it works for 100 Mails then ?
Michael..
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 09:45:20AM +0100, Michael Maier wrote:
>No, it hasn't a Mail Header in it.
Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner.
Sean
--
Q: What kind of dog goes "BOFH! BOFH!"?
A: A rootweiler
Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tummy.com - Linux Consult
> I'm confused. You say, 'it worked fine', then you say 'email has
> not been sent'. Which is it?
Sorry! I forgot to right down it worked fine when sending about 100 Messages.
> If you are sending a an identical message to 500,000 people, consider
> one message with a half-million recipients,
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:11:37AM +0100, Michael Maier wrote:
> >system 'qmail-inject $addr < 50k.data';
>
> Does 50k.data have a Mail header on it? Just a guess...
No, it hasn't a Mail Header in it.
I think maybe it will be solved by putting some additional random Cha
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:11:37AM +0100, Michael Maier wrote:
>system 'qmail-inject $addr < 50k.data';
Does 50k.data have a Mail header on it? Just a guess...
>I really need to know where the Bottleneck is because I need to sendout
>500.000 Mails in 36 hrs.
Good luck..
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:11:37AM +0100, Michael Maier wrote:
> Hi People!
> I was running the following Perl Script for Stress Test qmail:
>
> [...]
>
> But when I run it worked fine. 50k.data is a File with 50 KB Random
> Data.
> The e-Mails have not been send out.
Hi People!
I was running the following Perl Script for Stress Test qmail:
#!/usr/local/bin/perl
use Thread;
my $addr = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; # change to desired mail address!!
my $var1 = 100;
my $count = 0;
for(my $a=0; $a<10; $a++)
{
my $ref = new Thread \&sen
> Maybe we ought to ask John Levine (being a qmail guy himself) if he
> can add blinking text when it fails on the user%foo.com@[] test,
> where the test always stops with vanilla qmail:
>
After read the Qmail Spam Howto I discovered that the spam that I
was receiving was
gt;
> > We have the technology, but ... do you really think it would help?
>
> Of course not. I've found that the more obvious the item is, the less
> likely most folks will find it.
Maybe we ought to ask John Levine (being a qmail guy himself) if he
can add blinking text wh
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Michael Boyiazis writes:
> > Perhaps Russ can make "SEARCH THE ARCHIVES" appear in large
> > blinking text on www.qmail.org so people will see it.
>
> We have the technology, but ... do you really think it would help?
Of course not. I've found that
Michael Boyiazis writes:
> Perhaps Russ can make "SEARCH THE ARCHIVES" appear in large
> blinking text on www.qmail.org so people will see it.
We have the technology, but ... do you really think it would help?
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com | If I knew the
Crynwr s
Roberto Samarone Araujo \(RSA\) writes:
> I saw that message but, I was worried ... The default installation of qmail
> block spam ?? I set up rblsmtp but, I don't know how to use it right ..
> I'd like to block some emails using rblsmtp. I created tcp.smtp and put
> some rules there but, I don
I saw that message but, I was worried ... The default installation of qmail
block spam ?? I set up rblsmtp but, I don't know how to use it right ..
I'd like to block some emails using rblsmtp. I created tcp.smtp and put
some rules there but, I don't know how to put a specific rule to rblstmp ...
gt; Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 9:37 AM
> To: Qmail-List
> Subject: www.abuse.net test and mail Qmail server - Help
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I was testing my qmail server against relay ... I went to
> www.abuse.net/relay.html and asked to test. The te
you cannot tell at this point
whether the message will be relayed or not.
You cannot tell if it is really an open relay without sending a test
message; this anonymous user test DID NOT send a test message."
> -Original Message-
> From: Roberto Samarone Araujo (RSA) [mailto
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 02:37:09PM -0300, Roberto Samarone Araujo (RSA) wrote:
> I was testing my qmail server against relay ... I went to
> www.abuse.net/relay.html and asked to test. The test returned me that my
> email server is accepting relay :( . Look at the last resu
Roberto Samarone Araujo (RSA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was testing my qmail server against relay ... I went to
> www.abuse.net/relay.html and asked to test. The test returned me that my
> email server is accepting relay :
No, it didn't say you are
Hi,
I was testing my qmail server against relay ... I went to
www.abuse.net/relay.html and asked to test. The test returned me that my
email server is accepting relay :( . Look at the last result of the test :
Relay test 6
>>> RSET
<<< 250 flushed
>
I found a solution to my problem in the Archives.
At 03:58 PM 11/21/00 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I cam just to install rblsmtpd all tests mentionned in INSTALL file
>works fine.
good.
>But my problem Is about haw to include:
>"tcpserver -p -v -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u1007 -g1007 0 25 \
> rblsmtpd qmail-smtpd 2>&1 | setuser qmaill accustamp | \
At 03:58 PM 11/21/00 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
I cam just to install rblsmtpd all tests mentionned in INSTALL file
works fine.
good.
But my problem Is about haw to include:
"tcpserver -p -v -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u1007 -g1007 0 25 \
rblsmtpd qmail-smtpd 2>&1 | setuser qmaill accustamp | \
setu
At 03:58 PM 11/21/00 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
I cam just to install rblsmtpd all tests mentionned in INSTALL file
works fine.
good.
But my problem Is about haw to include:
"tcpserver -p -v -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u1007 -g1007 0 25 \
rblsmtpd qmail-smtpd 2>&1 | setuser qmaill accustamp | \
setu
Ould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I cam just to install rblsmtpd all tests mentionned in INSTALL file
>works fine.
>But my problem Is about haw to include:
>"tcpserver -p -v -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u1007 -g1007 0 25 \
>rblsmtpd qmail-smtpd 2>&1 | setuser qmaill accustamp | \
>setuser qmaill c
Hi,
I cam just to install rblsmtpd all tests mentionned in INSTALL file
works fine.
But my problem Is about haw to include:
"tcpserver -p -v -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u1007 -g1007 0 25 \
rblsmtpd qmail-smtpd 2>&1 | setuser qmaill accustamp | \
setuser qmaill cyclog \
-s100 -n5 /var/log
At 03:53 PM 11/17/2000, you wrote:
>test
you get an A for being to the point, and an F for being obscure...which
averages to a C.. you pass... but next time you should give it more effort
test
At 10:13 10.11.00 -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I tested SMTP on my qmail installation (installed with "life with Qmail")
> >with TEST.receive
> >
> >...
> >
> >Everything worked fine at the shell but I couldn't f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I tested SMTP on my qmail installation (installed with "life with Qmail")
>with TEST.receive
>
>...
>
>Everything worked fine at the shell but I couldn't find the test email in
>the gast Mailbox ? Why could be the reason ?
Most
Hi,
what does your log say?
Petr
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> I tested SMTP on my qmail installation (installed with "life with Qmail")
> with TEST.receive
>
>
> 1. SMTP server test: Forge some mail locally via SMTP. Replace ``m
I tested SMTP on my qmail installation (installed with "life with Qmail")
with TEST.receive
1. SMTP server test: Forge some mail locally via SMTP. Replace ``me''
with your username and ``domain'' with your host's name.
% telnet 1
I tested SMTP on my qmail installation (installed with "life with Qmail")
with TEST.receive
1. SMTP server test: Forge some mail locally via SMTP. Replace ``me''
with your username and ``domain'' with your host's name.
% telnet 1
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 01:45:56PM +, Ricardo Cerqueira wrote:
> > > How about giving them numbers?
> > See? :) This is the kind of unexpected response which is good to
> > gather up before we talk to Yahoo... By the way, I'm not against
> > Yahoo, I just think their sysadmins need a good kick
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 11:28:53PM +1100, Brett Randall wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Nov 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Count me in. I'm seeing the same problem.
>
> Well, I'm not really after an army of followers, but I would more like
> to see people taking some degree of initiative, giving the
Say sorry to everyone: I send this mail just test that dose
my
mail can send out. If I can read this mail from qmail
list.
It mean my act is right!
Say SORRY again.
ljwsy
also sprach aaron:
> The inet-access list has a regular contributor from Yahoo, by the name
> of Derek Balling. I can't find his official yahoo address, but he
> posts to Usenet as dredd megacity.org (he has some posts in
> alt.sysadmin.recovery, perhaps he will be able to empathize with us
> :)
Quoting Peter van Dijk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 06:47:43PM +1100, Brett Randall wrote:
> [snip]
> > I am putting forward a proposal that, to help ourselves, our staff,
> > and the hundreds of thousands of Yahoo Mail patrons, we should contact
> > Yahoo and pester them to get
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 12:34:24AM +1100, Brett Randall wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > How about giving them numbers?
>
> See? :) This is the kind of unexpected response which is good to
> gather up before we talk to Yahoo... By the way, I'm not against
> Yahoo, I ju
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How about giving them numbers?
See? :) This is the kind of unexpected response which is good to
gather up before we talk to Yahoo... By the way, I'm not against
Yahoo, I just think their sysadmins need a good kick up the rear and
maybe even a good k
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 11:28:53PM +1100, Brett Randall wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Nov 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Count me in. I'm seeing the same problem.
>
> Well, I'm not really after an army of followers, but I would more like
> to see people taking some degree of initiative, giving the
On Thu, 02 Nov 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Count me in. I'm seeing the same problem.
Well, I'm not really after an army of followers, but I would more like
to see people taking some degree of initiative, giving the list
information on what the problem would be, e-mail addresses of people
w
Count me in. I'm seeing the same problem.
Peter van Dijk wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 06:47:43PM +1100, Brett Randall wrote:
> [snip]
> > I am putting forward a proposal that, to help ourselves, our staff,
> > and the hundreds of thousands of Yahoo Mail patrons, we should contact
> > Yahoo
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 06:47:43PM +1100, Brett Randall wrote:
[snip]
> I am putting forward a proposal that, to help ourselves, our staff,
> and the hundreds of thousands of Yahoo Mail patrons, we should contact
> Yahoo and pester them to get their system working. These failures are
> all too com
Dear fellow list members,
I just attempted 14 SMTP connections to seperate Yahoo.com MX
machines. 5 failed to allow me to connect, 1 had a "Temporary failure,
try again later", and only 8 succeeded (actually, this figure is
better than my queue would tend to suggest). This is only 14 of the
many
http://www.abuse.net/relay.html is a good way.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 7:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: open relay test
How do I check for open relay?
I saw something once with a simple test
How do I check for open relay?
I saw something once with a simple test.
could someone please point me to something
similar
--
Kind regards
Kevin Waterson
CEO OceaniaTLA
Quoting Leonard Tulipan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Now the thing ist, that relay test number six still goes thru. Is this some
> issue? Did I do something wrong?
Yes, you did. You failed to read the web page, especially the bold
blinking text.
Aaron
-
THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEA
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Fritz-Data: 06201 - 90 20 4-26
=
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Leonard Tulipan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 13. Oktober 2000 12:47
An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Betreff: Relayi
don't worry about test nr. 6, it is testing a known weakness in old
sendmail versions that qmail is not subject to (sendmail would treat %
as a special sign).
The reason why it appears to fail is that qmail interprets the RCPT
address correctly and thus the mail is for a localy controled d
So, after my hassle with RELAYCLIENT, and us beeing used as a spam relay, I
tested the new setup with
http://www.abuse.net/relay.html
Now the thing ist, that relay test number six still goes thru. Is this some
issue? Did I do something wrong?
citing abuse.net:
Relay test 6
>>> RSE
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
also sprach subb3:
> On 0, Subba Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you receive this note, please ignore.
> >
> > Thank you for you patience.
>
> I have sent this earlier note to test duplicate subscription. It looks like
> qmail list server accepts
On 0, Subba Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you receive this note, please ignore.
>
> Thank you for you patience.
I have sent this earlier note to test duplicate subscription. It looks like
qmail list server accepts subscriptions from the same address without checking
t
If you receive this note, please ignore.
Thank you for you patience.
--
Subba Rao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ping
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
