Hi!
I have noticed that vpopmail has a limit off 100 domains for a directory,
after that limit it creates folders like 0 and put the new domains in that.
Is there a possibility to control the names off these folders so it can be
better organized?I get 100 domains a month so it is best if
let me boil all this down, since this is becoming a pointless
thrash.
you made the following statement:
And if it weren't for DJB's stubbornness, its usage might actually
be growing instead of steadily declining.
you've provided no evidence to support that statement.
either support the statemen
little long winded, but if you read to the end, there's a nice
surprise! A solution to your problem!
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 19:51, Paul L. Allen wrote:
> > > I think everyone does, once they find out what qmail CANNOT be made to
> > > do for no other reason than DJB disapproves of people being abl
Ok - can this crap come to an end please? It's gone from stupid
question to borderline flame to ignorant political comments.
I think the various points have been made. This is a support list - not
a place to bitch about things. Thanks.
Thanks;
Michael R. Bagnall
Powertools Productions, LLC.
[E
Jeremy Kitchen writes:
Damn it's 2:30 am here and I really do need to go to bed. Jeremy, rest
assured that I have skimmed through your response and I will tear it to
shreds when I have the time tomorrow. And believe, me Jeremy, I will
kick the crap out of you (I'm drunk now, and in far too good
Hi Paul
Paul Theodoropoulos writes:
> that's an inherent weakness simply of using dynamic addresses to host an
> MTA, you do realize? with a reasonably well crafted timing attack, one
> could present themselves as the IP the mail is to go to, and grab it all.
Ummm, please read my original pos
I elided the wrong section of text at the top of my response. my last
message should have started:
At 04:49 PM 10/29/2003, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
At 04:12 PM 10/29/2003, Paul L. Allen wrote:
Yep. But the problem here is not that they could be without mail for
24 hours but that for 24 hours s
Jeremy Kitchen writes:
> On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 12:50, Paul L. Allen wrote:
> Interesting? yes. Entertaining? no.
That is a subjective judgement. I entertain myself. I entertain
some others. If you do not find me entertaining the killfile is your
friend...
> Ignorant? very.
We will explore
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 18:12, Paul L. Allen wrote:
> > no, you tell them "we cannot promise reliable delivery of email if you
> > host it on an unreliable backbone line. we would recommend that you host
> > your email elsewhere".
>
> Which is what we may have to tell them. And they may well then
At 04:12 PM 10/29/2003, Paul L. Allen wrote:
> Secondly, ADSL service guarantees are generally along the lines of 'if
> it goes down, we'll get someone out to check it within 24 hours, and
> we'll see if we can fix it'.
that's an inherent weakness simply of using dynamic addresses to host an
MTA,
Paul Theodoropoulos writes:
> At 03:09 PM 10/29/2003, Paul L. Allen wrote:
> ADSL is not a reliable backbone medium.
But they're not backbones. They're end users who want something faster
than dial-up or ISDN. I work from home and I'm out in the sticks and I
can't even get ADSL (don't even as
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 12:50, Paul L. Allen wrote:
> Justin Hopper writes:
>
> > Wow. Of all the rants I've read on mailing lists, this is probably one
> > of the most interesting.
>
> Thanks. I try to be entertaining even when ranting.
Interesting? yes. Entertaining? no. Ignorant? very.
> >
At 03:09 PM 10/29/2003, Paul L. Allen wrote:
The fact is the medium-sized enterprises need their own mail server and
ADSL to handle the volume of mail. And the fact is that static IP with
ADSL if freaking expensive here. These are the realities. You may not
consider this a serious usage of MTA b
Paul Theodoropoulos writes:
> i don't think djb makes any bones about the fact that qmail is meant for
> serious MTA usage. sites on non-static IP addresses are not serious MTA
> sites. that's my opinion, but i think it's borne out in practice as well.
I would NOT run a mail server handling ma
I'm actually running 1.0.27 currently. From my previous email:
The other 4 options seem to work no problem. Can someone tell me what
is going on? Is this a bug? I am running QmailAdmin 1.0.27 and vpopmail
5.3.20
Thanks;
Michael R. Bagnall
Powertools Productions, LLC.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
615.453
At 10:50 AM 10/29/2003, Paul L. Allen wrote:
So how to fix this problem? ETRN? Nope, qmail doesn't support it
without patching, and it's not particularly safe anyway. Serialsmtp
and autoturn? Apparently not, from what I've read since it expects
static IP. Mailrdirsmtp and some custom "I'm aliv
I am having issues creating moderated mailing lists with the new
version of QmailAdmin.
When I configure it via the "Only subscribers can post, all others go
to moderators for approval" and then send a message to the list, I get
the following bounce back error:
Hi. This is the qmail-send progr
Justin Hopper writes:
> Wow. Of all the rants I've read on mailing lists, this is probably one
> of the most interesting.
Thanks. I try to be entertaining even when ranting.
> My colleagues and I went from dreams of lush green MTA lands to hating
> DJB as well when we first started working wi
Paul,
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 15:47, Paul L. Allen wrote:
> Justin Hopper writes:
>
> > Ah yes, I had forgotten that qmail will dump email if it sees a # sign
> > in a dotqmail file. I was never sure if this was a desired effect or
> > not, so I've never used it.
>
> According to the man page for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
A new version of the installing's script for qmail are released.
All feedback are welcome for this final 1.3.6 :)
http://www.linuxpourtous.com/download/qmail/install_qmail-1.3.6.tar.gz
http://www.linuxpourtous.com/download/qmail/README
http:/
20 matches
Mail list logo
