On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 11:28, Charlie Brady wrote:
I use dnscache on my home network and would like to know why anybody
decide to move from dnscache.
Performance,
Could you supply some details, please?
Off the top of my head the
On Jul 27, 2011, at 16:41, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
I use dnscache on my home network and would like to know why anybody
decide to move from dnscache.
Performance, IPv6 support, ease of maintenance (when using dnscache I often end
with subtly differently patched versions; frustrating).
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote:
On Jul 27, 2011, at 16:41, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
I use dnscache on my home network and would like to know why anybody
decide to move from dnscache.
Performance,
Could you supply some details, please?
IPv6 support, ease of maintenance
On Jul 28, 2011, at 11:28, Charlie Brady wrote:
I use dnscache on my home network and would like to know why anybody
decide to move from dnscache.
Performance,
Could you supply some details, please?
Off the top of my head the two things I'd run into are the outstanding requests
limit
On 7/28/2011 12:09 PM, Chris Lewis wrote:
I'd not use dnscache in corporate/enterprise/high reliability
environments. Unbound is nice and hiccup-free. Bind9 is reasonable
enough. I hear good things about PowerDNS too.
As a FYI, on a machine running qpsmtpd, handling up to 10M emails per
day,
On 7/26/2011 10:41 PM, Jared Johnson wrote:
We discussed doing this once at my organization and someone astutely
pointed out that considering that this is DNS, the better solution would
really be to run a local caching DNS server, e.g. bind9 and point
resolv.conf to 127.0.0.1 with forwarders to
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Jared Johnson wrote:
That sounds like a pretty sweet configuration!
[Note if you are running qpsmtpd-async, as we do, it's not really
possible to route DNS queries differently for DNSBLs versus other DNS
queries qpsmtpd does. ParaDNS doesn't handle paralleled DNS queries
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Matt Sergeant m...@sergeant.org wrote:
However I'm unlikely to maintain much on Qpsmtpd now that Haraka has taken
off.
Matt.
how about a plugin adapter, so Haraka can use Qpsmtpd plugins or v/v?
That probably implies
either a node.js -- perl integration layer,
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, David Nicol wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Matt Sergeant m...@sergeant.org wrote:
However I'm unlikely to maintain much on Qpsmtpd now that Haraka has taken
off.
Matt.
how about a plugin adapter, so Haraka can use Qpsmtpd plugins or v/v?
That probably implies
Dear Chris,
On Mit 27.07.2011 10:59, Chris Lewis wrote:
On 7/26/2011 10:41 PM, Jared Johnson wrote:
[snipp]
Now each of our qpsmtpd instances has their own rbldnsd (serving ~700Mb
zone consisting of almost all the DNSBLs we use as one merged zone)
plus the Unbound DNS server package. This
Dear list members,
I thought about a module which learns from the plugin dnsbl.
Maybe we call it check_known_dnsbl_spammer ;-) and use the module
http://search.cpan.org/~robm/Cache-FastMmap-1.39/lib/Cache/FastMmap.pm
Thoughts:
When the dnsbl returns a IP as Spammer
add the ip into
I thought about a module which learns from the plugin dnsbl.
Maybe we call it check_known_dnsbl_spammer ;-) and use the module
http://search.cpan.org/~robm/Cache-FastMmap-1.39/lib/Cache/FastMmap.pm
Hi Aleks,
We discussed doing this once at my organization and someone astutely
pointed out
12 matches
Mail list logo
