There you go, in what you found, agencies were not communicating.
In fact is was against Federal law for the FBI CIA to work
together/share information on anything stateside. I may have seen the
report (or one like it) on the history channel. But it was easy to
build a case after the fact.
Hi Stuntman,
I understand what you're saying about military protocol, and I agree we have been fighting a war on ''Terrorism," as it is called today, for at least 25 years. I'm just saying if a watcher, like myself,of these Geo-political protocols beingplayed outcould see how something like
---Original Message---
From: David K. Kelmer
Date: Monday, November 01, 2004 21:37:18
To: Stuntman; QuadPirate; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the Enemy- StockPile
Hi Stuntman,
I considered that it was a possible threat before 9/11! If you are saying that no one
I'm saying that the military protocol was not in place prior to 9/11 to
fight aircraft launched from within our borders.
While Intelligence was mulling over information regarding a possible
threat, the strategic nature of our military was not. This was one of
the problems addressed by the 9/11
Do you know WHEN our government saw this tape?
Who in our government saw it?
Who made the accusation?
If you say meathead moore you lose 1000 credibility points.
Stuntman
[I think it's crazy to think our government didn't consider it
especially when they have known terrorist on video explaining
: Saturday, October 30, 2004 14:54:03
To: QuadPirate; Stuntman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the Enemy- StockPile
Hi QP,
I was watching the History Channel yesterday and they had the story
of the Professional golfer Payne Stewart and the five other
0;I sure wish nobody was running David I'd vote for him. Mark ---Original Message--- From: David K. Kelmer Date: Saturday, October 30, 2004 14:54:03 To: QuadPirate; Stuntman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: !
Re:
[QUAD-L] Who's the Enemy- StockPile Hi QP,
I sure wish nobody was running David I'd vote for him.
Mark
---Original Message---
From: David K. Kelmer
Date: Saturday, October 30, 2004 14:54:03
To: QuadPirate; Stuntman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the Enemy- StockPile
Hi QP,
I
-
From: Stuntman
Date: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 18:48:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the Enemy- StockPile
The sats capable of high resolution photography are not very high up.SAC shared the same sats with the CIA, NSA, Navy, DOD, etc.To maneuver them
14:30:24
To: QuadPirate; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stuntman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the Enemy- StockPile
I think our dif on this particular piece of news is that you seem to think it wasn't a deliberate timed attack.The fact that it was released
ECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Stuntman ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 4:25
PM
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the Enemy-
StockPile
I watched Guilliani say it wasn't the presidents fault it's
the troops fault, talking about casting a shadow.
You guys would have been great handlers. The voter would also be better
informed before voting. How come you two guys have figured out something so
simple?
W
In a message dated 10/29/04 12:25:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stuntman me and you are like a couple pit bulls for what we
Title: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the Enemy- StockPile
Just to be specific, the following are all subsets of DOD:
Navy---(ONI)
Army---(CIC)
Air Force--(OSI).
Boyd
--
On 10/27/04 6:48 PM, Stuntman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The sats capable of high
Direct tv.
Mark
---Original Message---
From: Stuntman
Date: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 18:48:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the Enemy- StockPile
The sats capable of high resolution photography are not very high up.SAC shared the same sats
In a message dated 10/28/04 11:08:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to think our military was smarter than Direct tv.
Isn't Direct TV owned by a Russian Commo Company?
W
Hey W,
Thought you might like this
washingtontimes.com/national/20041028-122637-6257r.htm
Russian special forces troops moved many of Saddam Hussein's weapons
and related goods out of Iraq and into Syria in the weeks before the
March 2003 U.S. military operation, The Washington Times has
14:18:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the Enemy- StockPile-Russian Sats
Hey W,Thought you might like thiswashingtontimes.com/national/20041028-122637-6257r.htm"Russian special forces troops moved many of Saddam Hussein's weapons and related goods out of Iraq an
I always thought that we were on relations with the commies these days. Why
did it take all these years for them to decide to tell us they are in
possession of all that tonnage. Now that we know who removed it all... what did they
do with it?
On a side note,
I recently saw a tour picture of a
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the Enemy- StockPile
The sats capable of high resolution photography are not very high up.
SAC shared the same sats with the CIA, NSA, Navy, DOD, etc.
To maneuver them into a precise spot sometimes takes several orbits
---
From: Stuntman
Date: Thursday, October 28, 2004 15:41:09
To: QuadPirate; Stuntman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the Enemy- StockPile
You DO realize the quantum difference between bouncing a transmitted signal and the limited range of optics? A great OPTICAL sp
Don't pee on my leg... and tell me its raining. We live in a country with
the best spy system... bar none, period. Once that stockpile was located it was
entered into our system and cataloged. If our spy system can determine the
brand of cigarettes that the enemy is smoking at any given
The Soviets were giving Sadamned timelines when our birds would be
absent overhead. Our spy sats are NOT in geo-synchronis orbit. We had a
convoy moving up and down that hwy with drones watching overhead, it is
highly unlikely anybody moved 380 TONS of explosives AFTER we got in.
Stuntman
You, my friend, are way ahead of your government. The information that you
provided is not available to our national spy network. I was always assure by
the company who supplies our sat service that THEIR tiny network of
communication sats are geo-synchronis orbited for 24 hrs service, 365
In a message dated 10/27/04 6:49:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The sats capable of high resolution photography are not very high up.
SAC shared the same sats with the CIA, NSA, Navy, DOD, etc.
To maneuver them into a precise spot sometimes takes several orbits and
consumes a portion of
24 matches
Mail list logo
