Danny Mayer wrote:
Jan Ceuleers wrote:
This means that there is no need to allocate memory for constructing the
reply packet, no need to copy data from received to transmitted packet, etc.
This is also false. That's not what the code does. The recvbuf structure
is not even the same size as
Jan Ceuleers wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just look at the NTP/SNTP request format and for ***every*** field
explain why would a client send it to a server. Do not pick just one
field like MODE, explain for ***all*** fields.
I believe that the principal reason for having the same
(sender?),
As for symmetry in request/response being uncommon, you may consder ICMP
Echo/Echo Reply and even TCP as uncommon, and that is curious.
The RFC describes formulas for computing the offset and delay. You
consider this ***alone*** is the slowest way. You imply there are
other ways to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 3, 3:34 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David
Woolley) wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
QueryPerformanceCounter() directly off the hardware. Windows
scheduling has no impact here, the drawbacks of tick counts do not
Windows scheduling
Martin Burnicki wrote:
AFAIK the code in the SNTP subdirectory has not yet been ported to
Windows ...
Martin
We probably wron't try since that code is supposed to be rewritten. The
effort doesn't justify the cost.
Danny
___
questions mailing
On Dec 3, 3:34 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David
Woolley) wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
QueryPerformanceCounter() directly off the hardware. Windows
scheduling has no impact here, the drawbacks of tick counts do not
Windows scheduling will cause uncertainty in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just look at the NTP/SNTP request format and for ***every*** field
explain why would a client send it to a server. Do not pick just one
field like MODE, explain for ***all*** fields.
I believe that the principal reason for having the same format for the
received
On Dec 3, 2:18 pm, Jan Ceuleers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just look at the NTP/SNTP request format and for ***every*** field
explain why would a client send it to a server. Do not pick just one
field like MODE, explain for ***all*** fields.
I believe that the
On Dec 2, 7:03 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David
Woolley) wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anybody know of any *practical* samples on how to
implement NTP/SNTP client?. The goal is to provide
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know of any *practical* samples on how to
implement NTP/SNTP client?. The goal is to provide accurate
time for a program/client running on Windows Vista.
Specifically, what values to include in the the request message,
how to process the reply message,
On 2007-12-02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 2, 7:03 am, (David Woolley) wrote:
WinZip, which most power users of Windows seem to have, can handle
this. Also, to the best of my recollection, gzip compiles easily on
Windows and there ought to be Windows builds of it around
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with any free utilities for Windows is that I have to
spend the time to
decide which one of them is safe enough to install on my PC.
Nowadays, most of them
are infested with viruses and crapware. I plan to use my very old PC,
now packed in a box.
WinRAR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 1, 3:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hal
Murray) wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anybody know of any *practical* samples on how to
implement NTP/SNTP client?. The goal is to provide accurate
time for a program/client running on
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know of any *practical* samples on how to
implement NTP/SNTP client?. The goal is to provide accurate
time for a program/client running on Windows Vista.
Specifically, what values to include in the the request message,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know of any *practical* samples on how to
implement NTP/SNTP client?. The goal is to provide accurate
time for a program/client running on Windows Vista.
Have you seen the sntp directory in the reference implementation tarball?
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anybody know of any *practical* samples on how to
implement NTP/SNTP client?. The goal is to provide accurate
time for a program/client running on Windows Vista.
Just curious. Why do you want to roll your own as compared
to run one of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know of any *practical* samples on how to
implement NTP/SNTP client?. The goal is to provide accurate
time for a program/client running on Windows Vista.
[]
Why not just run NTP?
http://www.meinberg.de/english/sw/ntp.htm
Cheers,
David
On Dec 1, 3:07 pm, Joseph Gwinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know of any *practical* samples on how to
implement NTP/SNTP client?. The goal is to provide accurate
time for a program/client running on Windows Vista.
On Dec 1, 3:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hal
Murray) wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anybody know of any *practical* samples on how to
implement NTP/SNTP client?. The goal is to provide accurate
time for a program/client running on Windows Vista.
Just
19 matches
Mail list logo
